Review on degradation behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer bars in marine environments
Source abstract
Abstract
Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are expected to serve as reinforcement materials for coastal and island infrastructure due to their high strength, lightweight, and good corrosion resistance. However, the performance of FRP bars as reinforcement materials in long-term service in the marine environment is also subject to deterioration. Therefore, for improving the durability performance of FRP bars, it seems necessary to understand their degradation behavior. This paper first analyzes the deterioration mechanisms of the fibers, resins, and fiber–resin interfaces that make up the FRP bars under the action of seawater/salt solution, seawater sea-sand concrete pore solution/alkali solution, and stress-marine corrosive environment coupling, respectively, and further investigated the mechanical property degradation of FRP bars under the action of various factors, including interlaminar shear strength, tensile strength, and bond strength with concrete. The degree of degradation of FRP bars exposed to the offshore environment was found to be more sensitive to the magnitude of alkalinity and stress levels; GFRP bars were more resistant to seawater corrosion than BFRP bars. Moreover, the long-term mechanical properties of FRP bars were predicted, and the predicted result is more conservative than the field data. Based on the summarized and analyzed results of this review, recommendations for future work are presented, also for a comprehensive and better understanding of the degradation behavior of FRP bars.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Li YL, Zhao XL, Singh RKR (2016) Experimental study on seawater and sea sand concrete filled GFRP and stainless steel tubular stub columns. Thin-Walled Struct 106:390–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.01410.1016/j.tws.2016.05.014 ↗
2. Li YL, Zhao XL, Singh RKR (2016) Tests on seawater and sea sand concrete-filled CFRP, BFRP and stainless steel tubular stub columns. Thin-Walled Struct 108:163–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.08.01610.1016/j.tws.2016.08.016 ↗
3. Kaushik SK, Islam S (1995) Suitability of sea water for mixing structural concrete exposed to a marine environment. Cem Concr Compos 17(3):177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)00015-510.1016/0958-9465(95)00015-5 ↗
4. Huang Y, Zhang Y, Xiao J (2020) Study on bond between seawater sea sand recycle concrete and epoxy-coated steel bars. J Build Struct 41(S1):390–398. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S1.044. (in Chinese)10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S1.044 ↗
5. Mariam Z, Amira T, Ahmed S (2021) Potential advantages of basalt FRP bars compared to carbon FRP bars & conventional steel. Aust J Civ Eng 19(1):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2020.181663810.1080/14488353.2020.1816638 ↗
6. Subramanian N, Solaiyan E (2020) Study on bond strength of geopolymer and control concrete between fiber-reinforced polymer and steel bars. Struct Concr 22(1):146–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.20190050610.1002/suco.201900506 ↗
7. Penghui W, Hongxia Q, Yunsheng Z (2020) Meso-damage evolution analysis of magnesium oxychloride cement concrete based on X-CT and grey-level co-occurrence matrix. Constr Build Mater 255:1193731–11937316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11937310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119373 ↗
8. Dong Z, Wu G, Xu Y (2016) Experimental study on the bond durability between steel-FRP composite bars (SFCBs) and sea sand concrete in ocean environment. Constr Build Mater 115(15):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.052 ↗
9. Younis A, Ebead U, Judd S (2018) Life cycle cost analysis of structural concrete using seawater, recycled concrete aggregate, and GFRP reinforcement. Constr Build Mater 175:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.18310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.183 ↗
10. Wang Z, Zhao X, Xian G (2017) Durability study on interlaminar shear behaviour of basalt-, glass- and carbon-fibre reinforced polymer (B/G/CFRP) bars in seawater sea sand concrete environment. Constr Build Mater 156:985–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.045 ↗
11. ACI440.1R-15 (2015) Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. ACI Committee 440, Farmington Hills Farmington Hills. https://www.doc88.com/p-9724553641548.html
12. Gu Y, Li M, Wang J (2010) Characterization of the interphase in carbon fiber/polymer composites using a nanoscale dynamic mechanical imaging technique. Carbon 48(11):3229–3235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.00810.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.008 ↗
13. Dai Z, Zhang B, Shi F (2011) Effect of heat treatment on carbon fiber surface properties and fibers/epoxy interfacial adhesion. Appl Surf Sci 257(20):8457–8461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.12910.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.129 ↗
14. Liu J, Ge H, Chen J (2012) The preparation of emulsion type sizing agent for carbon fiber and the properties of carbon fiber/vinyl ester resin composites. J Appl Polym Sci 124(1):864–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3512610.1002/app.35126 ↗
15. Ahmed A, Guo S, Zhang Z (2020) A review on durability of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars reinforced seawater sea sand concrete. Constr Build Mater 256:119484.1-119484.18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11948410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119484 ↗
16. Bakis CE, Bank LC, Brown VL (2002) Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction state-of-the-art review. J Compos Constr 6(2):73–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
17. Grace NF, Sayed GA, Soliman AK (1999) Strengthening reinforced concrete beams using fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates. Struct J 96(5):865–874. https://doi.org/10.14359/74110.14359/741 ↗
18. Schué F (2004) FRP: strengthened RC structures. JG Teng, JF Chen, ST Smith and L Lam. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. pp 245, ISBN 0‐471‐48706‐6. Polym Int 53(2): 232–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.131210.1002/pi.1312 ↗
19. Liu T, Liu X, Feng P (2020) A comprehensive review on mechanical properties of pultruded FRP composites subjected to long-term environmental effects. Compos B 191:107958–107958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10795810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107958 ↗
20. Nkurunziza G, Debaiky A, Cousin P (2005) Durability of GFRP bars: a critical review of the literature. Prog Stuct Eng Mater 7(4):194–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.20510.1002/pse.205 ↗
21. GB 50608—2010 Technical code for infrastructure application of FRP composites. Beijing; 2010. (in Chinese). https://www.doc88.com/p-88561506213080.html
22. ISIS Canada Reinforcing concrete structures with fiber reinforced polymers (2001) Winnipeg, Canada: University of Winnipeg. https://www.doc88.com/p-3814863910945.html
23. Zhejiang GBF Basalt Fiber Co., Ltd. Basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP). http://www.chinagbf.com/product/cpflsdab/.
24. Feng GY, Zhu DJ, Guo SC, Rahman MZ, Jin ZQ, Shi CJ (2022) A review on mechanical properties and deterioration mechanisms of FRP bars under severe environmental and loading conditions. Cem Concr Compos 134:104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2022.10475810.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2022.104758 ↗
25. Emparanza AR, Kampmann R, De Caso F, Morales C, Nanni A (2022) Durability assessment of GFRP rebars in marine environments. Constr Build Mater 329:127028. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.12702810.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.127028 ↗
26. Karbhari VM (2002) Effect of concrete based alkali solutions on short-term durability of E-glass/vinylester composites. J Compos Mater 36(17):2101–2121. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830203601797710.1177/0021998302036017977 ↗
27. Yan F, Lin Z, Zhang D (2016) Experimental study on bond durability of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in concrete exposed to harsh environmental agents: freeze-thaw cycles and alkaline-saline solution. Compos B 116:406–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.08310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.083 ↗
28. Benmokrane B, Ali AH, Mohamed HM (2017) Laboratory assessment and durability performance of vinyl-ester, polyester, and epoxy glass-FRP bars for concrete structures. Compos B 114:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.002 ↗
29. Sherif ESM (2011) Corrosion and corrosion inhibition of aluminum in Arabian Gulf seawater and sodium chloride solutions by 3-amino-5-mercapto-1, 2, 4-triazole. Int J Electrochem Sci 6(5):1479–149210.1016/S1452-3981(23)15087-5 ↗
30. Sheng L, Deju Z, Shuaicheng G (2022) Static and dynamic tensile behaviors of BFRP bars embedded in seawater sea sand concrete under marine environment. Compos Part B 242:110051. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.11005110.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.110051 ↗
31. Elgabbas F, Ahmed EA, Benmokrane B (2015) Physical and mechanical characteristics of new basalt-FRP bars for reinforcing concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 95:623–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.036 ↗
32. Benmokrane B, Elgabbas F, Ahmed EA (2015) Characterization and comparative durability study of glass/vinylester, basalt/vinylester, and basalt/epoxy FRP bars. J Compos Constr 19(6):4015008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.036 ↗
33. Rocha IBCM, Raijmaekers S, Nijssen RPL (2017) Hygrothermal ageing behaviour of a glass/epoxy composite used in wind turbine blades. Compos Struct 174:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.028 ↗
34. Mikols WJSJAA (1982) Evaluation of structural changes in epoxy systems by moisture sorption-desorption and dynamic mechanical studies. Polym Compos 3(3):118–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.75003030410.1002/pc.750030304 ↗
35. Tam L, Zhou A, Wu C (2019) Nanomechanical behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy interface in hygrothermal conditioning: A molecular dynamics study. Materials Today Communications, 19(C): 495–505. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.04.00210.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.04.002 ↗
36. Lu Z, Xian G, Li H (2015) Effects of exposure to elevated temperatures and subsequent immersion in water or alkaline solution on the mechanical properties of pultruded BFRP plates. Compos Part B Eng 77B:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.06610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.066 ↗
37. Kumar KR, Achutha KP (2012) Investigation of the long term effects of moisture on carbon fibre and epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 72(6):656–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020745039016229010.1080/00207450390162290 ↗
38. Hong B, Xian G, Wang Z (2018) Durability study of pultruded carbon fiber reinforced polymer plates subjected to water immersion. Adv Struct Eng 21(4):571–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/136943321773266410.1177/1369433217732664 ↗
39. Boukhoulda BF, Adda-Bedia E, Madani K (2005) The effect of fiber orientation angle in composite materials on moisture absorption and material degradation after hygrothermal ageing. Compos Struct 74(4):406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.032 ↗
40. Du R, Wu K, Xu D (2016) A modified Arrhenius equation to predict the reaction rate constant of Anyuan pulverized-coal pyrolysis at different heating rates. Fuel Process Technol 148:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.01110.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.011 ↗
41. Foster SK, Bisby LA (2008) Fire survivability of externally bonded FRP strengthening systems. J Compos Constr 12(5):553–561. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:5(553)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:5(553) ↗
42. Leone M, Matthys S, Aiello MA (2009) Effect of elevated service temperature on bond between FRP EBR systems and concrete. Compos Part B Eng 40B(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.06.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2008.06.004 ↗
43. Bonniau P (1981) A comparative study of water absorption theories applied to glass epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 15(3):272–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983810150030610.1177/002199838101500306 ↗
44. Huang G, Sun H (2007) Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of glass/polyester composites. Mater Des 28(5):1647–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.01410.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.014 ↗
45. Robert M, Benmokrane B (2013) Combined effects of saline solution and moist concrete on long-term durability of GFRP reinforcing bars. Constr Build Mater 38:274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.021 ↗
46. Guigon M, Klinklin E (1994) The interface and interphase in carbon fibre-reinforced composites. Composites 25(7):534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(94)90181-310.1016/0010-4361(94)90181-3 ↗
47. Cech V, Palesch E, Lukes J (2013) The glass fiber-polymer matrix interface/interphase characterized by nanoscale imaging techniques. Compos Sci Technol 83:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.014 ↗
48. Sethi S, Ray BC (2015) Environmental effects on fibre reinforced polymeric composites: evolving reasons and remarks on interfacial strength and stability. Adv Coll Interface Sci 217:43–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.12.00510.1016/j.cis.2014.12.005 ↗
49. Wang Z, Huang X, Xian G (2016) Effects of surface treatment of carbon fiber: tensile property, surface characteristics, and bonding to epoxy. Polym Compos 37(10):2921–2932. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2348910.1002/pc.23489 ↗
50. Tsenoglou CJ, Sylvia P, Papaspyrides Constantine D (2006) Evaluation of interfacial relaxation due to water absorption in fiber–polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 66(15):2855–2864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.022 ↗
51. Sanghamitra S, Bankim CR (2015) Environmental effects on fibre reinforced polymeric composites: evolving reasons and remarks on interfacial strength and stability. Adv Coll Interface Sci 217:43–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.12.00510.1016/j.cis.2014.12.005 ↗
52. Shulan Y, Weiqing L, Yuan F (2019) Influence of hygrothermal aging on the durability and interfacial performance of pultruded glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites. J Mater Sci 54(3):2102–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2944-610.1007/s10853-018-2944-6 ↗
53. Tanaka K, Hosoo N, Katayama T (2016) Effect of temperature on the fiber/matrix interfacial strength of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide model composites. Mec Eng J 3(6):16–00158. https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.16-0015810.1299/mej.16-00158 ↗
54. Dickson AG, Goyet C (1994) Handbook of methods for the analysis of the various parameters of the carbon dioxide system in sea water. Version 2. Seawater. https://doi.org/10.2172/1010777310.2172/10107773 ↗
55. Teng J, Xiang Y, Yu T (2019) Development and mechanical behaviour of ultra-high-performance seawater sea-sand concrete. Adv Struct Eng 22(14):3100–3120. https://doi.org/10.1177/136943321985829110.1177/1369433219858291 ↗
56. Christian K, Andreas H, Holger S (2013) Influence of the polymeric interphase design on the interfacial properties of (fiber-reinforced) composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(7):2469–2478. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302694h10.1021/am302694h ↗
57. Bazli M, Li Y, Zhao X (2020) Durability of seawater and sea sand concrete filled filament wound FRP tubes under seawater environments. Compos Part B Eng 202:108401–108409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10840910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108409 ↗
58. Ray BC (2020) Effects of changing environment and loading speed on mechanical behavior of FRP composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 202:108409.1-108409.23. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440605978310.1177/0731684406059783 ↗
59. Wang Y, Zhu W, Zhang X, Cai G, Wan B (2020) Influence of thickness on water absorption and tensile strength of BFRP Laminates in water or alkaline solution and a thickness-dependent accelerated ageing method for BFRP laminates. Appl Sci 10(10):3618. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1010361810.3390/app10103618 ↗
60. Wang Z, Zhao X, Xian G (2017) Long-term durability of basalt- and glass-fibre reinforced polymer (BFRP/GFRP) bars in seawater and sea sand concrete environment. Constr Build Mater 139:467–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.038 ↗
61. Fan XJ, Lee SWR, Han Q (2009) Experimental investigations and model study of moisture behaviors in polymeric materials. Microelectron Reliab 49(8):861–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2009.03.00610.1016/j.microrel.2009.03.006 ↗
62. Ali AH, Mohamed HM, Benmokrane B (2020) Bar size effect on long-term durability of sand-coated basalt-FRP composite bars. Compos Part B Eng 195:108051–108059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10805910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108059 ↗
63. Earl JS, Shenoi RA (2004) Hygrothermal ageing effects on FRP laminate and structural foam materials. Compos A 35(11):1237–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.007 ↗
64. Miyano Y, Nakada M (2020) Accelerated testing methodology for durability of CFRP. Compos Part B Eng 191:107971–107977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10797710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107977 ↗
65. Younis A, Ebead U, Suraneni P (2018) Fresh and hardened properties of seawater-mixed concrete. Constr Build Mater 190:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.12610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.126 ↗
66. Cheng S, Shui Z, Sun T (2018) Effects of seawater and supplementary cementitious materials on the durability and microstructure of lightweight aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 190:1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.17810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.178 ↗
67. Xiangke G, Zuquan J, Chuansheng X (2022) Deterioration of mechanical properties of basalt/carbon hybrid FRP bars in SWSC under seawater corrosive environment. Constr Build Mater 317:125979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12597910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125979 ↗
68. Song Y, Xiang H, Yifan Z (2022) Research on durability of glass fiber textile reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete exposed to simulated marine environment. Mater Rep 36(09):93–101 (in Chinese)
69. Kamal ASM, Boulfiza M (2011) Durability of GFRP rebars in simulated concrete solutions under accelerated aging conditions. J Compos Constr 15(4):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000016810.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000168 ↗
70. Yong Y, Deju Z, Guo S (2011) Mitigating the deterioration of BFRP bars in seawater sea sand mortar by reducing alkalinity. Constr Build Mater 15(4):473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12588510.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125885 ↗
71. Zike W (2018) Study on the durability performances of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars exposed to simulated seawater and sea sand concrete pore solution. Harbin Institute of Technology, (degree thesis, China)
72. Ali AH, Mohamed HM, Benmokrane B (2018) Durability performance and long-term prediction models of sand-coated basalt FRP bars. Compos B 157:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.06510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.065 ↗
73. Dehui W, Qingnan G, Qiang Y (2021) Review of the properties of fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced seawater-sea sand concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000389410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003894 ↗
74. Scheffler C, Förster T, Mäder E (2009) Aging of alkali-resistant glass and basalt fibers in alkaline solutions: evaluation of the failure stress by Weibull distribution function. J Non-Cryst Solids 355(52):2588–2595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.01810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.09.018 ↗
75. Tjaronge MW, Irmawaty R, Adisasmita SA (2014) Compressive strength and hydration process of self compacting concrete (SCC) mixed with sea water, marine sand and Portland composite cement. Adv Mater Res 3144(935–935):242–246. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.935.24210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.935.242 ↗
76. Erniati TMW, Sampebulu V (2015) Porosity and microstructure phase of self compacting concrete using sea water as mixing water and curing. Adv Mater Res 4080(1119–1119):647–651. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1119.64710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1119.647 ↗
77. Cui M, Mao JZ, Jia DG (2014) Experimental study on mechanical properties of marine sand and seawater concrete. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICMCE-14.2014.1910.2991/ICMCE-14.2014.19 ↗
78. Zhang ZH, Sang ZQ, Zhang LY (2013) Experimental research on durability of concrete made by seawater and sea-sand. Adv Mater Res 2216(641–642):385–388. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.641-642.38510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.641-642.385 ↗
79. Etxeberria M, Gonzalez-Corominas A, Pardo P (2016) Influence of seawater and blast furnace cement employment on recycled aggregate concretes’ properties. Constr Build Mater 115:496–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.064 ↗
80. Etxeberria M, Fernandez JM, Limeira J (2016) Secondary aggregates and seawater employment for sustainable concrete dyke blocks production: case study. Constr Build Mater 113:586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.097 ↗
81. Etxeberria M, Corominas AG (2018) Properties of plain concrete produced employing recycled aggregates and sea water. Int J Civ Eng 16(9):993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0229-010.1007/s40999-017-0229-0 ↗
82. Katano K, Takeda N, Ishizeki Y (2013) Properties and application of concrete made with sea water and un-washed sea sand. http://www.claisse.info/2013%20papers/data/e172.pdf
83. Li P, Li W, Yu T (2020) Investigation on early-age hydration, mechanical properties and microstructure of seawater sea sand cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 249:118776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11877610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118776 ↗
84. Yifan Z, Xiang H, Caijun S (2021) A review on seawater sea-sand concrete: mixture proportion, hydration, microstructure and properties. Constr Build Mater 295:123602.1-123602.19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12360210.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123602 ↗
85. Li G, Zhang A, Song Z (2017) Study on the resistance to seawater corrosion of the cementitious systems containing ordinary Portland cement or/and calcium aluminate cement. Constr Build Mater 157:852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.17510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.175 ↗
86. Li H, Farzadnia N, Shi C (2018) The role of seawater in interaction of slag and silica fume with cement in low water-to-binder ratio pastes at the early age of hydration. Constr Build Mater 185:508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.091 ↗
87. Shicai L, Zuquan J, Yong Y (2021) Chloride binding by calcined layered double hydroxides and alumina-rich cementitious materials in mortar mixed with seawater and sea sand. Constr Build Mater 293:123493.1-123493.11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12349310.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123493 ↗
88. Li Q, Geng H, Shui Z (2015) Effect of metakaolin addition and seawater mixing on the properties and hydration of concrete. Appl Clay Sci 115:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.04310.1016/j.clay.2015.06.043 ↗
89. Song L (2021) Experimental study on sea sand and basalt fiber ultra high strength concrete. Liaoning University of Science and Technology, (Degree thesis, China)
90. Juan L (2013) Study on high belite–sulphoaluminate cement. Wuhan University of Technology, (Degree thesis, China)
91. Singh NB, Kumar M, Rai S (2020) Geopolymer cement and concrete: properties. Mater Today Proc 29(Pt 3):743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.51310.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.513 ↗
92. Singh A, Kumar R, Goel P (2021) Factors influencing strength of magnesium oxychloride cement. Constr Build Mater 303:124571. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12457110.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124571 ↗
93. Yufei C, Yanlei W, Mifeng W (2021) Bond durability and degradation mechanism of GFRP bars in seawater sea-sand concrete under the coupling effect of seawater immersion and sustained load. Constr Build Mater 307:124878. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12487810.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124878 ↗
94. Felice R, Antonio N, Fausto T (2020) Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: a review. J Mar Sci Eng 8(1):26–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse801002610.3390/jmse8010026 ↗
95. Nkurunziza G, Benmokrane B, Debaiky AS (2005) Effect of sustained load and environment on long-term tensile properties of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars. Struct J 102(4):615–621. https://doi.org/10.14359/1456610.14359/14566 ↗
96. Wang Z, Zhao X, Xian G (2018) Effect of sustained load and seawater and sea sand concrete environment on durability of basalt- and glass-fibre reinforced polymer (B/GFRP) bars. Corros Sci 138:200–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.00210.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.002 ↗
97. Deng ZC, Gao WN, Shen F (2017) Experimental and theoretical study on compressive strength of FRP rebars under different stress levels in alkaline and salt solution. Acta Mater Compos Sin 34(10):2220–2231. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20170106.001. (in Chinese)10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20170106.001 ↗
98. Zhang X, Deng Z (2019) Durability of GFRP bars in the simulated marine environment and concrete environment under sustained compressive stress. Constr Build Mater 223:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.21210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.212 ↗
99. Wan YZ, Wang YL, Huang Y (2005) Moisture absorption in a three-dimensional braided carbon/Kevlar/epoxy hybrid composite for orthopaedic usage and its influence on mechanical performance. Compos A 37(9):1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.009 ↗
100. Tsai YI, Bosze EJ, Barjasteh E (2013) Influence of hygrothermal environment on thermal and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/fiberglass hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(3):432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.012 ↗