journal article·2023-04

A gradient four-layered gelatin methacrylate/agarose construct as an injectable scaffold for mimicking osteochondral tissue

Ali Mokhtarzade, Rana Imani, Parvin Shokrollahi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Connective tissue disorders research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Johnston SA (1997) Osteoarthritis: joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology. Veterinary Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 4:699–72310.1016/S0195-5616(97)50076-3 ↗
2. Jiménez G, Cobo-Molinos J, Antich C, López-Ruiz E (2018) Osteoarthritis: trauma vs disease. Osteochondral Tissue Eng Chall Curr Strateg Technol Adv. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76735-2_310.1007/978-3-319-76735-2_3 ↗
3. Li G, Yin J, Gao J, Cheng TS, Pavlos NJ, Zhang C, Zheng MH (2013) Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: insight into risk factors and microstructural changes. Arthritis Res Ther 15:1–1210.1186/ar4405 ↗
4. Di Luca A, Van Blitterswijk C, Moroni L (2015) The osteochondral interface as a gradient tissue: from development to the fabrication of gradient scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 105(1):34–5210.1002/bdrc.21092 ↗
5. Khorshidi S, Karkhaneh A (2018) A review on gradient hydrogel/fiber scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12(4):e1974–e199010.1002/term.2628 ↗
6. Nooeaid P, Salih V, Beier JP, Boccaccini AR (2012) Osteochondral tissue engineering: scaffolds, stem cells and applications. J Cell Mol Med 16(10):2247–227010.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01571.x ↗
7. Geckil H, Xu F, Zhang X, Moon S, Demirci U (2010) Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine (Lond) 5(3):469–48410.2217/nnm.10.12 ↗
8. Nukavarapu SP, Dorcemus DL (2013) Osteochondral tissue engineering: current strategies and challenges. Biotechnol Adv 31(5):706–72110.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.004 ↗
9. O’Keefe RJ, Mao J (2011) Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic—an overview. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(6):389–39210.1089/ten.teb.2011.0475 ↗
10. Hoffman AS (2012) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:18–2310.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010 ↗
11. Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, Schacht E (2011) Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. Biomacromol 12(5):1387–140810.1021/bm200083n ↗
12. Hoare TR, Kohane DS (2008) Hydrogels in drug delivery: progress and challenges. Polymer 49(8):1993–200710.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 ↗
13. Nguyen KT, West JL (2002) Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23(22):4307–431410.1016/S0142-9612(02)00175-8 ↗
14. Li Z, Jia S, Xiong Z, Long Q, Yan S, Hao F, Liu J, Yuan Z (2018) 3D-printed scaffolds with calcified layer for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng 126(3):389–39610.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.03.014 ↗
15. Kang H, Zeng Y, Varghese S (2018) Functionally graded multilayer scaffolds for in vivo osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 78:365–37710.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.039 ↗
16. Nooeaid P, Roether JA, Weber E, Schubert DW, Boccaccini AR (2014) Technologies for multilayered scaffolds suitable for interface tissue engineering. J Adv Eng Mater 16(3):319–32710.1002/adem.201300072 ↗
17. Liu M, Zeng X, Ma C, Yi H, Ali Z, Mou X, He N (2017) Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res 5(1):1–2010.1038/boneres.2017.14 ↗
18. Singh YP, Moses JC, Bhardwaj N, Mandal BB (2018) Injectable hydrogels: a new paradigm for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 6(35):5499–552910.1039/C8TB01430B ↗
19. Shirahama H, Lee BH, Tan LP, Cho N-J (2016) Precise tuning of facile one-pot Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) synthesis. Sci Rep 6(1):1–1110.1038/srep31036 ↗
20. Wang H, Zhou L, Liao J, Tan Y, Ouyang K, Ning C, Ni G, Tan G (2014) Cell-laden photocrosslinked GelMA-DexMA copolymer hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25(9):2173–218310.1007/s10856-014-5261-x ↗
21. Ji X, Lei Z, Yuan M, Zhu H, Yuan X, Liu W, Pu H, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Xiao J (2020) Cartilage repair mediated by thermosensitive photocrosslinkable TGFβ1-loaded GM-HPCH via immunomodulating macrophages, recruiting MSCs and promoting chondrogenesis. Theranostics 10(6):2872–288710.7150/thno.41622 ↗
22. Yan W, Xu X, Xu Q, Sun Z, Jiang Q, Shi D (2019) Platelet-rich plasma combined with injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for porcine cartilage regeneration: a 6-month follow-up. Regen Biomater 7(1):77–9010.1093/rb/rbz039 ↗
23. Qi C, Liu J, Jin Y, Xu L, Wang G, Wang Z, Wang L (2018) Photo-crosslinkable, injectable sericin hydrogel as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix for minimally invasive repairing cartilage. Biomaterials 163:89–10410.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.016 ↗
24. Sun AX, Lin H, Fritch MR, Shen H, Alexander PG, DeHart M, Tuan RS (2017) Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional, photocrosslinked hydrogel constructs: effect of cell seeding density and material stiffness. Acta Biomater 58:302–31110.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.016 ↗
25. Steinmetz NJ, Aisenbrey EA, Westbrook KK, Qi HJ, Bryant SJ (2015) Mechanical loading regulates human MSC differentiation in a multi-layer hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 21:142–15310.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.015 ↗
26. Han F, Yang X, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Yuan X (2015) Photocrosslinked layered gelatin-chitosan hydrogel with graded compositions for osteochondral defect repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:1–1310.1007/s10856-015-5489-0 ↗
27. Yang J, Zhang YS, Yue K, Khademhosseini A (2017) Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 57:1–2510.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036 ↗
28. Kurian AG, Singh RK, Patel KD, Lee J-H, Kim H-W (2022) Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics. Bioactive Mater 8:267–29510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.027 ↗
29. Cao Y, Yang S, Zhao D, Li Y, Cheong SS, Han D, Li Q (2020) Three-dimensional printed multiphasic scaffolds with stratified cell-laden Gelatin Methacrylate hydrogels for biomimetic tendon-to-bone interface engineering. J Orthop Trans 23:89–100
30. Lee D, Choi EJ, Lee SE, Kang KL, Moon H-J, Kim HJ, Youn YH, Heo DN, Lee SJ, Nah H, Hwang Y-S, Lee Y-H, Seong J, Do SH, Kwon IK (2019) Injectable biodegradable Gelatin-Methacrylate/β-tricalcium phosphate composite for the repair of bone defects. Chem Eng J 365:30–3910.1016/j.cej.2019.02.020 ↗
31. Salati MA, Khazai J, Tahmuri AM, Samadi A, Taghizadeh A, Taghizadeh M, Mozafari M (2020) Agarose-based biomaterials: opportunities and challenges in cartilage tissue engineering. Polymers 12(5):115010.3390/polym12051150 ↗
32. Zarrintaj P, Manouchehri S, Ahmadi Z, Saeb MR, Urbanska AM, Kaplan DL, Mozafari M (2018) Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 187:66–8410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060 ↗
33. Cigan AD, Roach BL, Nims RJ, Tan AR, Albro MB, Stoker AM, Cook JL, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Hung CT, Ateshian GA (2016) High seeding density of human chondrocytes in agarose produces tissue-engineered cartilage approaching native mechanical and biochemical properties. J Biomech 49(9):1909–191710.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.039 ↗
34. Xu XL, Lou J, Tang T, Ng KW, Zhang J, Yu C, Dai K (2005) Evaluation of different scaffolds for BMP-2 genetic orthopedic tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 75B(2):289–30310.1002/jbm.b.30299 ↗
35. Loessner D, Meinert C, Kaemmerer E, Martine LC, Yue K, Levett PA, Klein TJ, Melchels FPW, Khademhosseini A, Hutmacher DW (2016) Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl–based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms. Nat Protoc 11(4):727–74610.1038/nprot.2016.037 ↗
36. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
37. Olad A, Hagh HBK (2019) Graphene oxide and amin-modified graphene oxide incorporated chitosan-gelatin scaffolds as promising materials for tissue engineering. Compos Part B Eng 162:692–70210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.040 ↗
38. Raveendran N, Vaquette C, Meinert C, Ipe DS, Ivanovski S (2019) Optimization of 3D bioprinting of periodontal ligament cells. Dent Mater 35(12):1683–169410.1016/j.dental.2019.08.114 ↗
39. Rahali K, Ben Messaoud G, Kahn CJ, Sanchez-Gonzalez L, Kaci M, Cleymand F, Arab-Tehrany E (2017) Synthesis and characterization of nanofunctionalized Gelatin Methacrylate hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci 18(12):267510.3390/ijms18122675 ↗
40. Basu B (2017) Biomaterials science and tissue engineering: principles and methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41. Hadagalli K, Panda AK, Mandal S, Basu B (2019) Faster biomineralization and tailored mechanical properties of marine-resource-derived hydroxyapatite scaffolds with tunable interconnected porous architecture. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2(5):2171–218410.1021/acsabm.9b00151 ↗
42. Koshy ST, Ferrante TC, Lewin SA, Mooney DJ (2014) Injectable, porous, and cell-responsive Gelatin cryogels. Biomaterials 35(8):2477–248710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.044 ↗
43. Celikkin N, Mastrogiacomo S, Jaroszewicz J, Walboomers XF, Swieszkowski W (2018) Gelatin methacrylate scaffold for bone tissue engineering: the influence of polymer concentration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 106(1):201–20910.1002/jbm.a.36226 ↗
44. Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, Bernotienė E (2016) Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology 68(3):355–36910.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
45. Apte G, Lindenbauer A, Schemberg J, Rothe H, Nguyen T-H (2021) Controlling surface-induced platelet activation by agarose and Gelatin-based hydrogel films. ACS Omega Am Chem Soc 6(16):10963–1097410.1021/acsomega.1c00764 ↗
46. Singh YP, Bhardwaj N, Mandal BB (2016) Potential of agarose/silk fibroin blended hydrogel for in vitro cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(33):21236–2124910.1021/acsami.6b08285 ↗
47. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A (2015) Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73:254–27110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 ↗
48. Kilic Bektas C, Hasirci V (2018) Mimicking corneal stroma using keratocyte-loaded photopolymerizable methacrylated gelatin hydrogels. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 12(4):e1899–e191010.1002/term.2621 ↗
49. Zhao R, Xu Z, Li B, Chen T, Mei N, Wang C, Tang S (2019) A comparative study on agarose acetate and PDLLA scaffold for rabbit femur defect regeneration. Biomed Mater 14(6):06500710.1088/1748-605X/ab3c1b ↗
50. Zhu Y, Zhang Q, Shi X, Han D (2019) Hierarchical hydrogel composite interfaces with robust mechanical properties for biomedical applications. Adv Mater 31(45):180495010.1002/adma.201804950 ↗
51. Ma J, Huang C (2020) Composition and mechanism of three-dimensional hydrogel system in regulating stem cell fate. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 26(6):498–51810.1089/ten.teb.2020.0021 ↗
52. Lin H, Yin C, Mo A, Hong G (2021) Applications of hydrogel with special physical properties in bone and cartilage regeneration. Materials 14(1):23510.3390/ma14010235 ↗
53. Callister WD, Rethwisch DG (2018) Materials science and engineering: an introduction. Wiley, New York
54. Oyen M (2014) Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials. Int Mater Rev 59(1):44–5910.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 ↗
55. Jaspers M, Dennison M, Mabesoone MF, MacKintosh FC, Rowan AE, Kouwer PH (2014) Ultra-responsive soft matter from strain-stiffening hydrogels. Nat Commun 5(1):580810.1038/ncomms6808 ↗
56. Kamkar M, Janmaleki M, Erfanian E, Sanati-Nezhad A, Sundararaj U (2022) Covalently cross-linked hydrogels: mechanisms of nonlinear viscoelasticity. Can J Chem Eng 100(11):3227–323910.1002/cjce.24388 ↗
57. Masoumi N, Copper D, Chen P, Cubberley A, Guo K, Lin RZ, Mayer J (2017) Elastomeric fibrous hybrid scaffold supports in vitro and in vivo tissue formation. Adv Funct Mater 27(27):160661410.1002/adfm.201606614 ↗
58. Ibañez RIR, Do Amaral RJFC, Reis RL, Marques AP, Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2021) 3D-printed Gelatin Methacrylate Scaffolds with controlled architecture and stiffness modulate the fibroblast phenotype towards dermal regeneration. Polymers 13(15):251010.3390/polym13152510 ↗
59. Sakai S, Hashimoto I, Kawakami K (2007) Synthesis of an agarose-gelatin conjugate for use as a tissue engineering scaffold. J Biosci Bioeng 103(1):22–2610.1263/jbb.103.22 ↗
60. Marklein RA, Soranno DE, Burdick JA (2012) Magnitude and presentation of mechanical signals influence adult stem cell behavior in 3-dimensional macroporous hydrogels. Soft Matter 8(31):8113–812010.1039/c2sm25501d ↗
61. Chatterjee K, Lin-Gibson S, Wallace WE, Parekh SH, Lee YJ, Cicerone MT, Young MF, Simon CG Jr (2010) The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening. Biomaterials 31(19):5051–506210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.024 ↗
62. Aldana AA, Houben S, Moroni L, Baker MB, Pitet LM (2021) Trends in double networks as bioprintable and injectable hydrogel scaffolds for tissue regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7(9):4077–410110.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01749 ↗
63. Alonso JM, Andrade del Olmo J, Perez Gonzalez R, Saez-Martinez V (2021) Injectable hydrogels: from laboratory to industrialization. Polymers 13(4):65010.3390/polym13040650 ↗
64. Chakraborty P, Roy B, Bairi P, Nandi AK (2012) Improved mechanical and photophysical properties of chitosan incorporated folic acid gel possessing the characteristics of dye and metal ion absorption. J Mater Chem 22(38):20291–2029810.1039/c2jm33995a ↗
65. Ghosh M, Halperin-Sternfeld M, Grinberg I, Adler-Abramovich L (2019) Injectable alginate-peptide composite hydrogel as a scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Nanomaterials 9(4):49710.3390/nano9040497 ↗
66. Ichinose N, Ura H (2020) Concentration dependence of the sol-gel phase behavior of agarose-water system observed by the optical bubble pressure tensiometry. Sci Rep 10(1):262010.1038/s41598-020-58905-8 ↗
67. Khadija L, Safouane A, Peyrellasse J (2005) Sol state formation and melting of agar gels rheological study. Phys A 358:205–21110.1016/j.physa.2005.06.022 ↗
68. Eddhahak A, Zidi M (2015) Influence of viscoelastic properties of an hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel on viability of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater Eng 26(3–4):103–114
69. Lee K, Chen Y, Yoshitomi T, Kawazoe N, Yang Y, Chen G (2020) Osteogenic and Adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in Gelatin solutions of different viscosities. Adv Healthcare Mater 9(23):200061710.1002/adhm.202000617 ↗
70. Ingavle GC, Gehrke SH, Detamore MS (2014) The bioactivity of agarose–PEGDA interpenetrating network hydrogels with covalently immobilized RGD peptides and physically entrapped aggrecan. Biomaterials 35(11):3558–357010.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.002 ↗
71. Antonova LV, Silnikov VN, Sevostyanova VV, Yuzhalin AE, Koroleva LS, Velikanova EA, Barbarash LS (2019) Biocompatibility of small-diameter vascular grafts in different modes of RGD modification. Polymers 11(1):17410.3390/polym11010174 ↗
72. Levingstone TJ, Ramesh A, Brady RT, Brama PA, Kearney C, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ (2016) Cell-free multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds demonstrate layer specific regeneration of functional osteochondral tissue in caprine joints. Biomaterials 87:69–8110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.006 ↗
73. Bahcecioglu G, Buyuksungur A, Kiziltay A, Hasirci N, Hasirci V (2014) Construction and in vitro testing of a multilayered, tissue-engineered meniscus. J Bioact Compat Polym 29(3):235–25310.1177/0883911514529688 ↗
74. Yan LP, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira MB, Vilela C, Pereira H, Sousa RA, Mano JF, Oliveira AL, Oliveira JM, Reis RL (2015) Bilayered silk/silk-nanoCaP scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: in vitro and in vivo assessment of biological performance. Acta Biomater 12:227–24110.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.021 ↗
75. Cipriani F, Ariño Palao B, Gonzalez de Torre I, Vega Castrillo A, Aguado Hernández HJ, Alonso Rodrigo M, Rodriguez-Cabello JC (2019) An elastin-like recombinamer-based bioactive hydrogel embedded with mesenchymal stromal cells as an injectable scaffold for osteochondral repair. Regen Biomater 6(6):335–34710.1093/rb/rbz023 ↗
76. Yu H, Feng M, Mao G, Li Q, Zhang Z, Bian W, Qiu Y (2022) Implementation of photosensitive, injectable, interpenetrating, and Kartogenin-modified GELMA/PEDGA biomimetic scaffolds to restore cartilage integrity in a full-thickness osteochondral defect model. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 8(10):4474–448510.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00445 ↗
77. Kim H, Woo Y, Patel M, Jeong B (2020) Thermogelling inclusion complex system for fine-tuned osteochondral differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromol 21(8):3176–318510.1021/acs.biomac.0c00623 ↗
78. Tahlawi A, Klontzas ME, Allenby MC, Morais JCF, Panoskaltsis N, Mantalaris A (2019) RGD-functionalized polyurethane scaffolds promote umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cell expansion and osteogenic differentiation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(2):232–243
79. Zhu Y, Kong L, Farhadi F, Xia W, Chang J, He Y, Li H (2019) An injectable continuous stratified structurally and functionally biomimetic construct for enhancing osteochondral regeneration. Biomaterials 192:149–15810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.017 ↗
80. Tamaddon M, Wang L, Liu Z, Liu C (2018) Osteochondral tissue repair in osteoarthritic joints: clinical challenges and opportunities in tissue engineering. Bio-Des Manuf 1(2):101–11410.1007/s42242-018-0015-0 ↗
81. Amini AR, Nukavarapu SP (2014) Oxygen-tension controlled matrices for enhanced osteogenic cell survival and performance. Ann Biomed Eng 42:1261–127010.1007/s10439-014-0990-z ↗
82. Lin T-H, Wang H-C, Cheng W-H, Hsu H-C, Yeh M-L (2019) Osteochondral tissue regeneration using a tyramine-modified Bilayered PLGA scaffold combined with articular chondrocytes in a porcine model. Int J Mol Sci 20(2):32610.3390/ijms20020326 ↗
83. Matsiko A, Gleeson JP, O’Brien FJ (2015) Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng Part A 21(3–4):486–49710.1089/ten.tea.2013.0545 ↗
84. Shah SS, Liang H, Pandit S, Parikh Z, Schwartz JA, Goldstein T, Lavelle LP, Datta A, Grande DA (2018) Optimization of degradation profile for new scaffold in cartilage repair. Cartilage 9(4):438–44910.1177/1947603517700954 ↗
85. Liu J, Li L, Suo H, Yan M, Yin J, Fu J (2019) 3D printing of biomimetic multi-layered GelMA/nHA scaffold for osteochondral defect repair. Mater Des 171:10770810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107708 ↗
86. Chen P, Zheng L, Wang Y, Tao M, Xie Z, Xia C, Gu C, Chen J, Qiu P, Mei S, Ning L, Shi Y, Fang C, Fan S, Lin X (2019) Desktop-stereolithography 3D printing of a radially oriented extracellular matrix/mesenchymal stem cell exosome bioink for osteochondral defect regeneration. Theranostics 9(9):2439–245910.7150/thno.31017 ↗
87. Liao J, Tian T, Shi S, Xie X, Ma Q, Li G, Lin Y (2017) The fabrication of biomimetic biphasic CAN-PAC hydrogel with a seamless interfacial layer applied in osteochondral defect repair. Bone Res 5(1):1701810.1038/boneres.2017.18 ↗
88. Nishimori M, Deie M, Kanaya A, Exham H, Adachi N, Ochi M (2006) A bone marrow-stimulating procedure enhanced by cultured allogenic bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1236–124410.1302/0301-620X.88B9.17810 ↗
89. Pelham RJ, Wang Y-L (1997) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94(25):13661–1366510.1073/pnas.94.25.13661 ↗
90. Chen J, Chin A, Almarza AJ, Taboas JM (2020) Hydrogel to guide chondrogenesis versus osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells for fabrication of cartilaginous tissues. Biomed Mater 15(4):04500610.1088/1748-605X/ab401f ↗
91. Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW (2009) Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324(5935):1673–167710.1126/science.1171643 ↗
92. Erickson AE, Sun J, Lan Levengood SK, Swanson S, Chang FC, Tsao CT, Zhang M (2019) Chitosan-based composite bilayer scaffold as an in vitro osteochondral defect regeneration model. Biomed Microdev 21:1–1610.1007/s10544-019-0373-1 ↗
93. Han SB, Kim JK, Lee G, Kim DH (2020) Mechanical properties of materials for stem cell differentiation. Adv Biosyst 4(11):200024710.1002/adbi.202000247 ↗
94. Alipour M, Baneshi M, Hosseinkhani S, Mahmoudi R, Jabari Arabzadeh A, Akrami M, Bardania H (2020) Recent progress in biomedical applications of RGD-based ligand: from precise cancer theranostics to biomaterial engineering: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 108(4):839–85010.1002/jbm.a.36862 ↗
95. Verstappen JFM, Jin J, Koçer G, Haroon M, Jonkheijm P, Bakker AD, Klein-Nulend J, Jaspers RT (2020) RGD-functionalized supported lipid bilayers modulate pre-osteoblast adherence and promote osteogenic differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 108(4):923–93710.1002/jbm.a.36870 ↗
96. Li J, Chen G, Xu X, Abdou P, Jiang Q, Shi D, Gu Z (2019) Advances of injectable hydrogel-based scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Regen Biomater 6(3):129–14010.1093/rb/rbz022 ↗
97. Raucci MG, D’Amora U, Ronca A, Ambrosio L (2020) Injectable Functional Biomaterials for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Adv Healthcare Mater 9(13):200034910.1002/adhm.202000349 ↗
98. Soltan N, Ning L, Mohabatpour F, Papagerakis P, Chen X (2019) Printability and cell viability in Bioprinting alginate Dialdehyde-Gelatin scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5(6):2976–298710.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00167 ↗
99. Temirel M, Dabbagh SR, Tasoglu S (2022) Shape fidelity evaluation of alginate-based hydrogels through extrusion-based bioprinting. J Funct Biomater 13(4):22510.3390/jfb13040225 ↗
100. Foster AA, Dewi RE, Cai L, Hou L, Strassberg Z, Alcazar CA, Heilshorn SC, Huang NF (2018) Protein-engineered hydrogels enhance the survival of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Biomater Sci 6(3):614–62210.1039/C7BM00883J ↗