Multiphase field simulation of dynamic recrystallization during friction stir welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
During friction stir welding (FSW) of AZ31 magnesium alloy, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) takes place and enables fine equiaxed grains to be formed in the weld nugget zone (WNZ), which significantly affects the microstructure and properties of the weld joints. In this study, the multiphase field method was employed to analyze the DRX process in AZ31 FSW. The coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian model was first established to obtain the transient variation of temperature and strain rate at a checking point located in the WNZ center, which was then used as the input variables of DRX simulation. The multiphase field model including dislocation density was used to simulate the DRX behavior driven by both thermal and mechanical factors. It was found that the whole DRX process in AZ31 FSW consists of four stages, at each of which the dislocation density, grain boundary mobility and nucleation rate are varied at each stage, so that the DRX features are different. The calculated results of the final grain structure are in good agreement with the experimentally measured ones.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Joost WJ, Krajewski PE (2017) Towards magnesium alloys for high-volume automotive applications. Scripta Mater 128:107–11210.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.035 ↗
2. Song JF, She J, Chen DL, Pan FS (2017) Latest research advances on magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide. J Magnes Alloys 8:1–4110.1016/j.jma.2020.02.003 ↗
3. Ma ZY, Qiao S, Ni DR, Xiao BL (2018) Friction stir welding of magnesium alloys: a review. Acta Metall Sin 54(11):1597–1617
4. Mironov S, Onuma T, Sato YS, Kokawa H (2015) Microstructure evolution during friction-stir welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Acta Mater 100:301–31210.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.066 ↗
5. Mishra RS, Ma ZY (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R 50(1–2):1–7810.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
6. Nandan R, DebRoy T, Bhadeshia H (2008) Recent advances in friction-stir welding–process, weldment structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci 53(6):980–102310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.05.001 ↗
7. Fonda RW, Bingert JF, Colligan KJ (2004) Development of grain structure during friction stir welding. Scripta Mater 51(3):243–24810.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.017 ↗
8. Prangnell PB, Heason CP (2005) Grain structure formation during friction stir welding observed by the ‘stop action technique.’ Acta Mater 53(11):3179–319210.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.044 ↗
9. Yu PF, Wu CS, Shi L (2021) Analysis and characterization of dynamic recrystallization and grain structure evolution in friction stir welding of aluminum plates. Acta Mater 207:11669210.1016/j.actamat.2021.116692 ↗
10. Prosgolitis CG, Lambrakos SG, Zervaki AD (2018) Phase-field modeling of nugget zone for a AZ31-Mg-alloy friction stir weld. J Mater Eng Perform 27(10):5102–511310.1007/s11665-018-3471-y ↗
11. Song KJ, Dong ZB, Fang K, Zhan XH, Wei YH (2014) Cellular automaton modelling of dynamic recrystallisation microstructure evolution during friction stir welding of titanium alloy. Mater Sci Technol Lond 30(6):700–71110.1179/1743284713Y.0000000389 ↗
12. Shojaeefard MH, Akbari M, Khalkhali A, Asadi P, Parivar AH (2014) Optimization of microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welding using the cellular automaton and Taguchi method. Mater Des 64:660–66610.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.014 ↗
13. Morhac M, Morhacova E (2000) Monte Carlo simulation algorithms of grain growth in polycrystalline materials. Cryst Res Technol 35(1):117–12810.1002/(SICI)1521-4079(200001)35:1<117::AID-CRAT117>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
14. Grujicic M, Ramaswami S, Snipes JS, Avuthu V, Galgalikar R, Zhang Z (2015) Prediction of the grain-microstructure evolution within a friction stir welding (FSW) joint via the use of the Monte Carlo simulation method. J Mater Eng Perform 24(9):3471–348610.1007/s11665-015-1635-6 ↗
15. Fan D, Chen LQ (1997) Computer simulation of grain growth using a continuum field model. Acta Mater 45(2):611–62210.1016/S1359-6454(96)00200-5 ↗
16. Steinbach I, Pezzolla F, Nestler B, Seeßelberg M, Prieler R, Schmitz GJ, Rezende JLL (1996) A phase field concept for multiphase systems. Physica D 94(3):135–14710.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
17. Steinbach I, Pezzolla F (1999) A generalized field method for multiphase transformations using interface fields. Physica D 134(4):385–39310.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
18. Takaki T, Hirouchi T, Hisakuni Y, Yamanaka A, Tomita Y (2008) Multi-phase-field model to simulate microstructure evolutions during dynamic recrystallization. Mater Trans 49(11):2559–256510.2320/matertrans.MB200805 ↗
19. Takaki T, Hisakuni Y, Hirouchi T, Yamanaka A, Tomita Y (2009) Multi-phase-field simulations for dynamic recrystallization. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):881–88810.1016/j.commatsci.2008.12.009 ↗
20. Mecking H, Kocks UF (1981) Kinetics of flow and strain-hardening. Acta Metall 29(11):1865–187510.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7 ↗
21. Yang CL, Wu CS, Shi L (2020) Phase-field modelling of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir welding of aluminium alloys. Sci Technol Weld Join 25(4):345–35810.1080/13621718.2019.1706261 ↗
22. Yoshimoto C, Takaki T (2014) Multiscale hot-working simulations using multi-phase-field and finite element dynamic recrystallization model. ISIJ Int 54(2):452–45910.2355/isijinternational.54.452 ↗
23. Shokri V, Sadeghi A, Sadeghi MH (2018) Thermomechanical modeling of friction stir welding in a Cu-DSS dissimilar joint. J Manuf Process 31:46–5510.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.004 ↗
24. Geng P, Ma Y, Ma N, Ma H, Aoki Y, Liu H, Fujii H, Chen C (2022) Effects of rotation tool-induced heat and material flow behaviour on friction stir lapped Al/steel joint formation and resultant microstructure. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 174:10385810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2022.103858 ↗
25. Hammelmüller F, Zehetner C (2015) Increasing numerical efficiency in coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian metal forming simulations. In: COMPLAS XIII: proceedings of the XIII international conference on computational plasticity: fundamentals and applications, CIMNE, pp 727–733
26. Li XB, Zhang ZM (2011) Study on metal flowing law for isothermal extrusion deformation of AZ31 magnesium alloy. In: Advanced materials research, vol 314. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, pp 448–45110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.314-316.448 ↗
27. Abbassi F, Srinivasan M, Loganathan C, Narayanasamy R, Gupta M (2016) Experimental and numerical analyses of magnesium alloy hot workability. J Magnes Alloys 4(4):295–30110.1016/j.jma.2016.10.004 ↗
28. Feng F, Huang S, Meng Z, Hu JH, Lei Y, Zhou MC, Yang ZZ (2014) A constitutive and fracture model for AZ31B magnesium alloy in the tensile state. Mater Sci Eng A Struct 594:334–34310.1016/j.msea.2013.11.008 ↗
29. Laasraoui A, Jonas JJ (1991) Prediction of steel flow stresses at high temperatures and strain rates. Mech Res Commun 22:1545–1558
30. Liu X, Li L, He F, Zhou J, Zhu B, Zhang L (2013) Simulation on dynamic recrystallization behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy using cellular automaton method coupling Laasraoui–Jonas model. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc 23(9):2692–269910.1016/S1003-6326(13)62786-7 ↗
31. Krill Iii CE, Chen LQ (2002) Computer simulation of 3-D grain growth using a phase-field model. Acta Mater 50(12):3059–307510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-8 ↗
32. Vedantam S, Patnaik BSV (2006) Efficient numerical algorithm for multiphase field simulations. Phys Rev E 73(1):01670310.1103/PhysRevE.73.016703 ↗
33. Gruber J, Ma N, Wang Y, Rollett AD, Rohrer GS (2006) Sparse data structure and algorithm for the phase field method. Model Simul Mater Sci 14(7):118910.1088/0965-0393/14/7/007 ↗
34. Kim SG, Kim DI, Kim WT, Park YB (2006) Computer simulations of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ideal grain growth. Phys Rev E 74(6):06160510.1103/PhysRevE.74.061605 ↗
35. Wang M, Zong BY, Wang G (2009) Grain growth in AZ31 Mg alloy during recrystallization at different temperatures by phase field simulation. Comput Mater Sci 45(2):217–22210.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.010 ↗
36. Yoo MH, Morris JR, Ho KM, Agnew SR (2002) Nonbasal deformation modes of HCP metals and alloys: role of dislocation source and mobility. Metall Mater Trans A 33(3):813–82210.1007/s11661-002-0150-1 ↗
37. Heidarzadeh A, Mohammadzadeh R, Jafarian HR, Pruncu CI, Simar A (2022) Role of geometrically necessary dislocations on mechanical properties of friction stir welded single-phase copper with medium stacking fault energy. J Mater Res Technol 16:194–20010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.162 ↗
38. Ma X, Huang C, Moering J, Ruppert M, Höppel HW, Göken M, Narayan J, Zhu Y (2016) Mechanical properties of copper/bronze laminates: role of interfaces. Acta Mater 116:43–5210.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.023 ↗
39. Kubin LP, Mortensen A (2003) Geometrically necessary dislocations and strain-gradient plasticity: a few critical issues. Scr Mater 48(2):119–12510.1016/S1359-6462(02)00335-4 ↗
40. Zhao YQ, You J, Qin J, Qin JC, Dong CL, Liu L, Liu Z, Miao S (2022) Stationary shoulder friction stir welding of Al–Cu dissimilar materials and its mechanism for improving the microstructures and mechanical properties of joint. Mater Sci Eng A Struct 837:14275410.1016/j.msea.2022.142754 ↗