Drug repurposing for SARS-CoV-2: a high-throughput molecular docking, molecular dynamics, machine learning, and DFT study
Source abstract
Abstract
A micro-molecule of dimension 125 nm has caused around 479 million human infections (80 M for the USA) and 6.1 million human deaths (977,000 for the USA) worldwide and slashed the global economy by US$ 8.5 Trillion over two years period. The only other events in recent history that caused comparative human life loss through direct usage (either by human or nature, respectively) of structure-property relations of 'nano-structures' (either human-made or nature, respectively) were nuclear bomb attacks during World War II and 1918 Flu Pandemic. This molecule is called SARS-CoV-2, which causes a disease known as COVID-19. The high liability cost of the pandemic had incentivized various private, government, and academic entities to work towards finding a cure for this and emerging diseases. As an outcome, multiple vaccine candidates are discovered to avoid the infection in the first place. But so far, there has been no success in finding fully effective therapeutic candidates. In this paper, we attempted to provide multiple therapy candidates based upon a sophisticated multi-scale in-silico framework, which increases the probability of the candidates surviving an in-vivo trial. We have selected a group of ligands from the ZINC database based upon previously partially successful candidates, i.e., Hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir, Remdesivir, Ritonavir. We have used the following robust framework to screen the ligands; Step-I: high throughput molecular docking, Step-II: molecular dynamics analysis, Step-III: density functional theory analysis. In total, we have analyzed 242,000(ligands)*9(proteins) = 2.178 million unique protein binding site/ligand combinations. The proteins were selected based on recent experimental studies evaluating potential inhibitor binding sites. Step-I had filtered that number down to 10 ligands/protein based on molecular docking binding energy, further screening down to 2 ligands/protein based on drug-likeness analysis. Additionally, these two ligands per protein were analyzed in Step-II with a molecular dynamic modeling-based RMSD filter of less than 1Å. It finally suggested three ligands (ZINC001176619532, ZINC000517580540, ZINC000952855827) attacking different binding sites of the same protein(7BV2), which were further analyzed in Step-III to find the rationale behind comparatively higher ligand efficacy. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10853-022-07195-8.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Diverse Scientific Research Studies · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Lai C-C, Shih T-P, Ko W-C, Tang H-J, Hsueh P-R (2020) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 55(3):10592410.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924 ↗
2. “WHO Chief Media Conference for Pandemic Declaration”
3. Cui J, Li F, Shi Z-L (2019) Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17(3):181–19210.1038/s41579-018-0118-9 ↗
4. Rabi FA, Al Zoubi MS, Kasasbeh GA, Salameh DM, Al-Nasser AD (2019) “SARS-CoV-2 and coronavirus disease what we know so far.” Pathogens 9(3):2020
5. Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS (2020) coronavirus infections: more than just the common cold. JAMA 323(8):707–70810.1001/jama.2020.0757 ↗
6. Astuti I, Ysrafil (2020) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): an overview of viral structure and host response. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 14(4):407–41210.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.020 ↗
7. Yang J et al (2020) Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat Commun 11(1):454110.1038/s41467-020-18319-6 ↗
8. J Kashyap, S Nagesh, K Narayan, and P K Pattnaik (2016) “Design and simulation of a novel 3D MEMS fabrication/micro cutting facility by thermally actuated MEMS device,”. In: IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, Proceedings/TENCON, 201610.1109/TENCON.2015.7373004 ↗
9. Siemieniuk RAC et al (2020) Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 370:m298010.1136/bmj.m2980 ↗
10. Maciorowski D et al (2020) A review of the preclinical and clinical efficacy of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir-ritonavir treatments against COVID-19. SLAS Discov Adv Sci Drug Discov 25(10):1108–112210.1177/2472555220958385 ↗
11. Terstappen GC, Reggiani A (2001) In silico research in drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 22(1):23–2610.1016/S0165-6147(00)01584-4 ↗
12. Ton AT, Gentile F, Hsing M, Ban F, Cherkasov A (2020) “Rapid identification of potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by deep docking of 1.3 billion compounds.” Mol Inform 39(8):200002810.1002/minf.202000028 ↗
13. Irwin JJ, Sterling T, Mysinger MM, Bolstad ES, Coleman RG (2012) ZINC: a free tool to discover chemistry for biology. J Chem Inf Model 52(7):1757–176810.1021/ci3001277 ↗
14. Krieger E, Vriend G (2015) New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 36(13):996–100710.1002/jcc.23899 ↗
15. Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G (2002) Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA: a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 47(3):393–40210.1002/prot.10104 ↗
16. Krieger E, Vriend G (2014) YASARA view: molecular graphics for all devices—from smartphones to workstations. Bioinformatics 30(20):2981–298210.1093/bioinformatics/btu426 ↗
17. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31(2):455–46110.1002/jcc.21334 ↗
18. Case DA et al (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26(16):1668–168810.1002/jcc.20290 ↗
19. Roe DR, Cheatham TE (2013) PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J Chem Theory Comput 9(7):3084–309510.1021/ct400341p ↗
20. Hafner J (2008) Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: density-functional theory and beyond. J Comput Chem 29(13):2044–207810.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
21. Henkelman G, Jónsson H (1999) A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives. J Chem Phys 111(15):7010–702210.1063/1.480097 ↗
22. Rose PW et al (2017) The RCSB protein data bank: integrative view of protein, gene and 3D structural information. Nucleic Acids Res 45(D1):D271–D281
23. Pettersen EF et al (2004) UCSF Chimera: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–161210.1002/jcc.20084 ↗
24. Towns J et al (2014) XSEDE: accelerating scientific discovery. Comput Sci Eng 16(5):62–7410.1109/MCSE.2014.80 ↗
25. Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G (2009) A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys Condens Matter 21(8):8420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
26. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V (2017) SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 7(1):4271710.1038/srep42717 ↗
27. P. W. Battaglia et al (2018) “Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks,”
28. A White, Deep Learning for Molecules and Material
29. Liang J, Xu Y, Liu R, Zhu X (2019) QM-sym, a symmetrized quantum chemistry database of 135 kilo molecules. Sci Data 6(1):21310.1038/s41597-019-0237-9 ↗
30. Kashyap J, Yang E-H, Datta D (2020) Computational study of the water-driven graphene wrinkle life-cycle towards applications in flexible electronics. Sci Rep 10(1):164810.1038/s41598-020-58149-6 ↗
31. Solanky P, Sharma V, Ghatak K, Kashyap J, Datta D (2019) The inherent behavior of graphene flakes in water: a molecular dynamics study. Comput Mater Sci 162:140–14710.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.021 ↗
32. K Ghatak, D Datta, J Kashyap, K G Team (2019) “Growth Physics of MoS2 Layer on the MoS2 surface: a monte carlo approach,” in APS March Meeting Abstracts. F13.009
33. Kashyap J, Ghatak K, Datta D (2019) Characterizing the morphology of the different grown homo/hetero tmd structures by controlling parameters – a multiscale computational approach. ECS Meet Abstr MA2019-01(12):806–806. https://doi.org/10.1149/MA2019-01/12/80610.1149/MA2019-01/12/806 ↗
34. Jumper J et al (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596(7873):583–58910.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗