DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2022-02

Enhanced sulfur redox kinetics by hollow structured NiCo2O4 entangled with acidified MWCNTs for lithium sulfur batteries

Qi Wang, Yirui Deng, Jingru Ma, Xiaohe Jin, Minjie Li, Mengwei Wu, Qiang Wang, Ben Ge, Lei Zhang, Ruiping Liu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 7
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Energy storage

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Wu X, Liang X, Zhang X et al (2021) Structural evolution of plasma sprayed amorphous Li4Ti5O12 electrode and ceramic/polymer composite electrolyte during electrochemical cycle of quasi-solid-state lithium battery. J Adv Ceram 10:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0447-910.1007/s40145-020-0447-9 ↗
2. Wu P, Shi B, Tu H et al (2021) Pomegranate-type Si/C anode with SiC taped, well-dispersed tiny Si particles for lithium-ion batteries. J Adv Ceram 10:1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-021-0498-610.1007/s40145-021-0498-6 ↗
3. Gonzalez Puente PM, Song S, Cao S et al (2021) Garnet-type solid electrolyte: advances of ionic transport performance and its application in all-solid-state batteries. J Adv Ceram 10:933–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-021-0489-710.1007/s40145-021-0489-7 ↗
4. Li Y, Guo X-T, Zhang S-T, Pang H (2021) Promoting performance of lithium–sulfur battery via in situ sulfur reduced graphite oxide coating. Rare Met 40:417–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01498-y10.1007/s12598-020-01498-y ↗
5. Yan M, Wang W-P, Yin Y-X et al (2019) Interfacial design for lithium–sulfur batteries: from liquid to solid. EnergyChem 1:100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2019.10000210.1016/j.enchem.2019.100002 ↗
6. Yin Y-X, Xin S, Guo Y-G, Wan L-J (2013) Lithium–sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:13186–13200. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20130476210.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
7. Seh ZW, Sun Y, Zhang Q, Cui Y (2016) Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Soc Rev 45:565–5634. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00410a10.1039/c5cs00410a ↗
8. Xu K, Liang X, Wang L-L et al (2021) Tri-functionalized polypropylene separator by rGO/MoO2 composite for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Rare Met 40:2810–2818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01686-w10.1007/s12598-020-01686-w ↗
9. Liu Z, Wang L, Yang W (2021) Hierarchically porous nitrogen-doped carbon foams decorated with zinc nanodots as high-performance sulfur hosts for lithium–sulfur battery. Chin Chem Lett 32(9):2919–2922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.02710.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.027 ↗
10. Lim WG, Kim S, Jo C, Lee J (2019) A comprehensive review of materials with catalytic effects in Li–S batteries: enhanced Redox kinetics. Angew Chem 131:18920–18931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20190241310.1002/ange.201902413 ↗
11. Hong X, Wang R, Liu Y et al (2020) Recent advances in chemical adsorption and catalytic conversion materials for Li–S batteries. J Energy Chem 42:144–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.07.00110.1016/j.jechem.2019.07.001 ↗
12. Wang Q, Zhao H, Li B et al (2021) MOF-derived Co9S8 nano-flower cluster array modified separator towards superior lithium sulfur battery. Chin Chem Lett 32:1157–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.02210.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.022 ↗
13. Du Z, Chen X, Hu W et al (2019) Cobalt in nitrogen-doped graphene as single-atom catalyst for high-sulfur content lithium-sulfur batteries. J Am Chem Soc 141:3977–3985. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b1297310.1021/jacs.8b12973 ↗
14. Peng HJ, Huang JQ, Cheng XB, Zhang Q (2017) Review on high-loading and high-energy lithium–sulfur Batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1700260-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170026010.1002/aenm.201700260 ↗
15. Zheng M, Chi Y, Hu Q et al (2019) Carbon nanotube-based materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 7:1724–17241. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta05347f10.1039/c9ta05347f ↗
16. Salhabi EHM, Zhao J, Wang J et al (2019) Hollow multi-shelled structural TiO2-x with multiple spatial confinement for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 58:9078–9082. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20190329510.1002/anie.201903295 ↗
17. Waqas M, Han Y, Chen D et al (2020) Molecular “capturing” and “seizing” MoS2/TiN interlayers suppress polysulfide shuttling and self-discharge of Li–S batteries. Energy Storage Mater 27:333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.02.01510.1016/j.ensm.2020.02.015 ↗
18. Han X-R, Guo X-T, Xu M-J et al (2020) Clean utilization of palm kernel shell: sustainable and naturally heteroatom-doped porous activated carbon for lithium–sulfur batteries. Rare Met 39:1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01439-910.1007/s12598-020-01439-9 ↗
19. Liu X, Huang J-Q, Zhang Q, Mai L (2017) Nanostructured metal oxides and sulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29:1601759. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160175910.1002/adma.201601759 ↗
20. Tian D, Song X, Qiu Y et al (2021) Heterogeneous mediator enabling three-dimensional growth of lithium sulfide for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Mater n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.1223610.1002/eem2.12236 ↗
21. Zhang J, You C, Lin H, Wang J (2021) Electrochemical kinetics modulators in lithium sulfur batteries: from defect-rich catalysts to single atomic catalysts. Energy Environ Mater n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.1225010.1002/eem2.12250 ↗
22. Huang J-Q, Wang Z, Xu Z-L et al (2016) Three-dimensional porous graphene aerogel cathode with high sulfur loading and embedded TiO2 nanoparticles for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:28663–28670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1003210.1021/acsami.6b10032 ↗
23. Chen Y, Tang W, Ma J et al (2020) Nickel-decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays as a self-supporting cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Front Mater Sci 14:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-020-0509-510.1007/s11706-020-0509-5 ↗
24. Liu H, Chen Z, Zhou L et al (2019) Rooting bismuth oxide nanosheets into porous carbon nanoboxes as a sulfur immobilizer for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 7:7074–7081. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA12403E10.1039/C8TA12403E ↗
25. Li Y, Wang Q, Zheng D et al (2019) The effect of cerium oxide addition on the electrochemical properties of lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloy Compd 787:982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.18110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.181 ↗
26. Kim M, Lee J, Jeon Y, Piao Y (2019) Phosphorus-doped graphene nanosheets anchored with cerium oxide nanocrystals as effective sulfur hosts for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 11:13758–13766. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR03278A10.1039/C9NR03278A ↗
27. Cheng H, Cai N, Wang M (2019) Facile and scalable synthesis of micro-mesoporous carbon/magnesium oxide/sulfur composite for lithium–sulfur batteries. Solid State Ionics 337:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.04.00410.1016/j.ssi.2019.04.004 ↗
28. Li Z, Zhang J, Lou XW, David (2015) Hollow carbon nanofibers filled with MnO2 nanosheets as efficient sulfur hosts for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:12886–12890. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20150697210.1002/anie.201506972 ↗
29. Liu S, Hu L, Xu X et al (2015) Nickel cobaltite nanostructures for photoelectric and catalytic applications. Small 11:4267–4283. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20150031510.1002/smll.201500315 ↗
30. Tong X, Chen S, Guo C et al (2016) Mesoporous NiCo2O4 nanoplates on three-dimensional graphene foam as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:28274–28282. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1004410.1021/acsami.5b10044 ↗
31. Lin J-X, Qu X-M, Wu X-H et al (2021) NiCo2O4/CNF separator modifiers for trapping and catalyzing polysulfides for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries with high sulfur loadings and lean electrolytes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:1804–1813. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0804910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08049 ↗
32. Cui B, Lin H, Liu Y et al (2009) Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of core-ring structured NiCo2O4 nanoplatelets. J Phys Chem C 113:14083–14087. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp900028t10.1021/jp900028t ↗
33. Fang R, Zhao S, Sun Z et al (2017) More reliable lithium–sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects. Adv Mater 29:1606823. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
34. Wang M, Yin D, Cao Y et al (2021) Surface modification of hollow capsule by Dawson-type polyoxometalate as sulfur hosts for ultralong-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Chin Chem Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.04310.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.043 ↗
35. Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-510.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 ↗
36. Yuan C, Li J, Hou L et al (2013) Template-engaged synthesis of uniform mesoporous hollow NiCo 2O4 sub-microspheres towards high-performance electrochemical capacitors. RSC Adv 3:18573–18578. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra42828a10.1039/c3ra42828a ↗
37. Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
38. Ruzsinszky A, Csonka GI, Vydrov OA et al (2008) Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 100:136406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
39. Karmakar S, Varma S, Behera D (2018) Investigation of structural and electrical transport properties of nano-flower shaped NiCo2O4 supercapacitor electrode materials. J Alloys Compd 757:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.05610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.056 ↗
40. Zhang X, Fan Y, Khan MA et al (2020) Co−Ni binary-metal oxide coated with porous carbon derived from metal-organic framework as host of nano-sulfur for lithium–sulfur batteries. Batteries Supercaps 3:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.20190012110.1002/batt.201900121 ↗
41. Zhang G, Zhang Z-W, Peng H-J et al (2017) A toolbox for lithium–sulfur battery research: methods and protocols. Small Methods 1:1700134. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.20170013410.1002/smtd.201700134 ↗
42. Liu Y-T, Han D-D, Wang L et al (2019) NiCo2O4 nanofibers as carbon-free sulfur immobilizer to fabricate sulfur-based composite with high volumetric capacity for lithium–sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater 9:1803477. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180347710.1002/aenm.201803477 ↗
43. Liang X, Kwok CY, Lodi-Marzano F et al (2016) Tuning transition metal oxide–sulfur interactions for long life lithium sulfur batteries: the “Goldilocks” principle. Adv Energy Mater 6:1501636. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20150163610.1002/aenm.201501636 ↗
44. Tian LY, Zhang Z, Liu S et al (2021) High-entropy spinel oxide nanofibers as catalytic sulfur hosts promise the high gravimetric and volumetric capacities for lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Mater n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.1221510.1002/eem2.12215 ↗
45. Zhou G, Tian H, Jin Y et al (2017) Catalytic oxidation of Li2S on the surface of metal sulfides for Li–S batteries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:840–845. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.161583711410.1073/pnas.1615837114 ↗