journal article·2011-05

Quantitative characterization of carbon nanotube turf topology by SEM analysis

H. Malik, K. J. Stephenson, D. F. Bahr, D. P. Field

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

A procedure has been developed to quantify various parameters that affect the mechanical stiffness of vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube turfs from secondary electron images. A representative measure of density, tortuosity, and path connectedness is obtained from the images as these parameters are presumed to correlate with measured properties for this class of materials. Elastic moduli were determined using nanoindentation techniques. Experimental evidence indicates that an increase in turf density does not necessarily result in an increase in elastic modulus. Six turfs analyzed in this work along with four additional structures selected from a previous publication support the conclusion that an increase in density is not necessarily responsible for an increase in mechanical stiffness of a turf. Tortuosity and path connectedness tend to show more of a correlation with stiffness, though no direct correlation with these parameters was identified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S (1991) Nature 354:5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Arnold MS, Green AA, Hulvat JF, Stupp SI, Hersam MC (2006) Nat Nanotechol 1:6010.1038/nnano.2006.52 ↗
3. Collins PG, Arnold MS, Avouris P (2001) Science 292:70610.1126/science.1058782 ↗
4. Hong S, Myung S (2007) Nat Nanotechnol 2:20710.1038/nnano.2007.89 ↗
5. Dmytrenko OP, Kulish NP, Belyi NM, Lizunova SV, Prylutskyy YI, Shlapatskaya VV, Strzhemechny YM, Ritter U, Scharff P (2009) Fullerene Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct 17:12310.1080/15363830802671700 ↗
6. Baxendale M (2003) J Mater Sci Mater El 14:65710.1023/A:1026158432563 ↗
7. McCarter CM, Richards RF, Mesarovic SD, Richard CD, Bahr DF, McClain D, Jiao J (2006) J Mater Sci 41:7872. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0870-510.1007/s10853-006-0870-5 ↗
8. Al-Khedher MA, Pezeshki C, McHale JL, Knorr FJ (2007) Nanotechnology 18:35570310.1088/0957-4484/18/35/355703 ↗
9. Zbib AA, Mesarovic SD, Lilleodden ET, McClain D, Jiao J, Bahr DF (2008) Nanotechnology 19:17570410.1088/0957-4484/19/17/175704 ↗
10. Mesarovic SD, McCarter CM, Bahr DF, Radhakrishnan H, Richards RF (2007) Scripta Mater 56:15710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.021 ↗
11. Hutchens SB, Hall LJ, Greer JR (2010) Adv Funct Mater 20:233810.1002/adfm.201000305 ↗
12. Pavese M, Musso S, Pugno NM (2010) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10:424010.1166/jnn.2010.2187 ↗
13. Somu S, Wang H, Kim Y, Jaberansari L, Hahm MG, Li B, Kim T, Xiong X, Jung YJ, Upmanyu M, Busnaina A (2010) ACS Nano 4:414210.1021/nn100714v ↗
14. Kofler H (1998) In: Proceedings of the joint IAPR international workshops on advances in pattern recognition, p 445
15. Hart WE, Goldbaum M, Cote B, Kube P, Nelson MR (1999) Int J Med Inf 53:23910.1016/S1386-5056(98)00163-4 ↗
16. Watanabe Y, Nakashima Y (2001) J Groundw Hydrol 43:1310.5917/jagh1987.43.13 ↗
17. Smedby O, Hogman N, Nilsson S, Erikson U, Olsson AG, Walldius G (1993) J Vasc Res 30:18110.1159/000158993 ↗
18. Coucke PJ, Wessels MW, Acker PV, Gardella R, Barlati S, Willems PJ, Colombi M, Paepe AD (2003) J Med Genet 40:74710.1136/jmg.40.10.747 ↗
19. Bullitt E, Gerig G, Pizer SM, Lin W, Aylward SR (2003) IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:116310.1109/TMI.2003.816964 ↗
20. Dong L, Jiao J, Pan C, Tuggle D (2004) Appl Phys A 78:910.1007/s00339-003-2295-1 ↗
21. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗