Advancing strategies towards the development of tissue engineering scaffolds: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
The field of tissue engineering involves various methodologies employed to improve or replace biological tissues with extracellular matrices (ECMs). Significant progress has been made, particularly in the fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds for replacing damaged tissues or organs. The current review broadly focuses on the various research works carried out involving the use of biomaterials (biopolymers, bio-ceramics and dopants) in this area. A detailed discussion on several scaffold-making modern technologies has also been provided, along with a demonstration of different characterization techniques. Though a number of review papers have been published on biomaterials and fabrication techniques, a very small number focuses on the clinical trials carried out and the commercialization of scaffolds in the biomedical field. Thus, a critical analysis and detailed discussion of some of the clinical trials, market growth, and future demands have been presented in this paper.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Gupta S, Javaid S, Dey M et al (2022) Exploration of solvent casting for designing engineered microstructures for biomedical and functional applications. J Am Ceram Soc 105:1864–1881. https://doi.org/10.1111/JACE.1810410.1111/JACE.18104 ↗
2. Zheng Z, Eglin D, Alini M et al (2021) Visible light-induced 3D bioprinting technologies and corresponding bioink materials for tissue engineering: a review. Engineering 7:966–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.02110.1016/j.eng.2020.05.021 ↗
3. Varadavenkatesan T, Vinayagam R, Pai S et al (2021) Synthesis, biological and environmental applications of hydroxyapatite and its composites with organic and inorganic coatings. Prog Org Coat 151:106056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10605610.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.106056 ↗
4. Christy PN, Basha SK, Kumari VS et al (2020) Biopolymeric nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications—a review. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2019.10145210.1016/J.JDDST.2019.101452 ↗
5. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
6. Eltom A, Zhong G, Muhammad A (2019) Scaffold techniques and designs in tissue engineering functions and purposes: a review. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/342952710.1155/2019/3429527 ↗
7. Biswal T (2021) Biopolymers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Mater Today Proc 41:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.09.62810.1016/J.MATPR.2020.09.628 ↗
8. Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M et al (2017) Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C 78:1246–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2017.05.01710.1016/J.MSEC.2017.05.017 ↗
9. Qu H, Fu H, Han Z, Sun Y (2019) Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review. RSC Adv 9:26252–26262. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA05214C10.1039/C9RA05214C ↗
10. Kantaros A, Chatzidai N, Karalekas D (2015) 3D printing-assisted design of scaffold structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:559–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-015-7386-610.1007/S00170-015-7386-6 ↗
11. Bohner M, Van Lenthe GH, Grünenfelder S et al (2005) Synthesis and characterization of porous β-tricalcium phosphate blocks. Biomaterials 26:6099–6105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2005.03.02610.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2005.03.026 ↗
12. Bohner M, Baumgart F (2004) Theoretical model to determine the effects of geometrical factors on the resorption of calcium phosphate bone substitutes. Biomaterials 25:3569–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2003.10.03210.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2003.10.032 ↗
13. Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ (2010) The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2009.09.06310.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2009.09.063 ↗
14. Rouwkema J, Rivron NC, van Blitterswijk CA (2008) Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 26:434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIBTECH.2008.04.00910.1016/J.TIBTECH.2008.04.009 ↗
15. Deb P, Deoghare AB, Borah A et al (2018) Scaffold development using biomaterials: a review. Mater Today Proc 5:12909–12919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2018.02.27610.1016/J.MATPR.2018.02.276 ↗
16. Mabrouk M, Beherei HH, Das DB (2020) Recent progress in the fabrication techniques of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 110:110716. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2020.11071610.1016/J.MSEC.2020.110716 ↗
17. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS (2011) Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/29060210.1155/2011/290602 ↗
18. Zhu J (2010) Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:4639–465610.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044 ↗
19. Kluge JA, Mauck RL (2011) Synthetic/biopolymer nanofibrous composites as dynamic tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Jayakumar R, Nair S (eds) Biomedical applications of polymeric nanofibers. Advances in polymer science, vol 246. Springer, Berlin
20. Patel DK, Dutta SD, Hexiu J et al (2020) Bioactive electrospun nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose nanocrystals for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 162:1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.24610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.246 ↗
21. Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV (2019) Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol 127:1612–1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.1429010.1111/jam.14290 ↗
22. Elmowafy EM, Tiboni M, Soliman ME (2019) Biocompatibility, biodegradation and biomedical applications of poly(lactic acid)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) micro and nanoparticles. J Pharm Investig 49:347–38010.1007/s40005-019-00439-x ↗
23. Hamad K, Kaseem M, Yang HW et al (2015) Properties and medical applications of polylactic acid: A review. Express Polym Lett 9:435–455. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.4210.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.42 ↗
24. Li G, Zhao M, Xu F et al (2020) Synthesis and biological application of polylactic acid. Molecules 25(21):5023. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2521502310.3390/molecules25215023 ↗
25. Amnael Orozco-Díaz C, Moorehead R, Reilly GC et al (2020) Characterization of a composite polylactic acid-hydroxyapatite 3D-printing filament for bone-regeneration. Biomed Phys Eng Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab73f810.1088/2057-1976/ab73f8 ↗
26. Wang W, Zhang B, Li M et al (2021) 3D printing of PLA/n-HA composite scaffolds with customized mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering. Compos B Eng 224:109192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10919210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109192 ↗
27. Backes EH, Pires LDN, Beatrice CAG et al (2020) Fabrication of biocompatible composites of poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite envisioning medical applications. Polym Eng Sci 60:636–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2532210.1002/pen.25322 ↗
28. Nazeer MA, Onder OC, Sevgili I et al (2020) 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds modified with chitosan and hydroxyapatite for bone repair applications. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10151510.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101515 ↗
29. Custodio CL, Broñola PJM, Cayabyab SR, et al (2021) Powder loading effects on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of 3d printed poly lactic acid/hydroxyapatite biocomposites. Int J Bioprint 7:112–122. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i1.32610.18063/ijb.v7i1.326 ↗
30. Bernardo MP, da Silva BCR, Mattoso LHC (2021) Development of three-dimensional printing filaments based on poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite composites with potential for tissue engineering. J Compos Mater 55:2289–2300. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832098856810.1177/0021998320988568 ↗
31. Chuenjitkuntaworn B, Inrung W, Damrongsri D, Mekaapiruk K, Supaphol P, Pavasant P (2010) Polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds: preparation, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo biological responses of human primary bone cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 94A(1):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3265710.1002/jbm.a.32657 ↗
32. Wang L, Wang D, Zhou Y et al (2019) Fabrication of open-porous PCL/PLA tissue engineering scaffolds and the relationship of foaming process, morphology, and mechanical behavior. Polym Adv Technol 30:2539–2548. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAT.470110.1002/PAT.4701 ↗
33. Jiao Z, Luo B, Xiang S et al (2019) 3D printing of HA/PCL composite tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 2:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AIEPR.2019.09.00310.1016/J.AIEPR.2019.09.003 ↗
34. Luginina M, Schuhladen K, Orrú R et al (2020) Electrospun PCL/PGS composite fibers incorporating bioactive glass particles for soft tissue engineering applications. Nanomaterials 10:978. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1005097810.3390/nano10050978 ↗
35. Jiang C, Wang K, Liu Y et al (2021) Using wet electrospun PCL/Gelatin/CNT yarns to fabricate textile-based scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 7:2627–2637. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C00097/SUPPL_FILE/AB1C00097_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.1C00097/SUPPL_FILE/AB1C00097_SI_001.PDF ↗
36. Pedram Rad Z, Mokhtari J, Abbasi M (2018) Fabrication and characterization of PCL/zein/gum arabic electrospun nanocomposite scaffold for skin tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 93:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2018.08.01010.1016/J.MSEC.2018.08.010 ↗
37. Elkhouly H, Mamdouh W, El-Korashy DI (2021) Electrospun nano-fibrous bilayer scaffold prepared from polycaprolactone/gelatin and bioactive glass for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 32:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10856-021-06588-6/FIGURES/1110.1007/S10856-021-06588-6/FIGURES/11 ↗
38. Gentile P, Chiono V, Carmagnola I, Hatton PV (2014) An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. OPEN ACCESS Int J Mol Sci 15:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms1503364010.3390/ijms15033640 ↗
39. Cui Y, Liu Y, Cui Y et al (2009) The nanocomposite scaffold of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and hydroxyapatite surface-grafted with l-lactic acid oligomer for bone repair. Acta Biomater 5:2680–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2009.03.02410.1016/J.ACTBIO.2009.03.024 ↗
40. Jiang L, Jiang L, Xiong C, Su S (2016) Improving the degradation behavior and in vitro biological property of nano-hydroxyapatite surface-grafted with the assist of citric acid. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 146:228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2016.05.06210.1016/J.COLSURFB.2016.05.062 ↗
41. Jagur-Grodzinski J (2006) Polymers for tissue engineering, medical devices, and regenerative medicine. Concise general review of recent studies. Polym Adv Technol 17:395–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAT.72910.1002/PAT.729 ↗
42. Babilotte J, Martin B, Guduric V et al (2021) Development and characterization of a PLGA-HA composite material to fabricate 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2020.11133410.1016/J.MSEC.2020.111334 ↗
43. Park JW, Hwang JU, Back JH et al (2019) High strength PLGA/Hydroxyapatite composites with tunable surface structure using PLGA direct grafting method for orthopedic implants. Compos B Eng 178:107449. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.10744910.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.107449 ↗
44. Rasoulianboroujeni M, Fahimipour F, Shah P et al (2019) Development of 3D-printed PLGA/TiO2 nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 96:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2018.10.07710.1016/J.MSEC.2018.10.077 ↗
45. Zheng S, Guan Y, Yu H et al (2019) Polyl-lysine-coated PLGA/poly(amino acid)-modified hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds as efficient tissue engineering scaffolds for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. New J Chem 43:9989–10002. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ01675A10.1039/C9NJ01675A ↗
46. Fathi-Achachelouei M, Keskin D, Bat E et al (2020) Dual growth factor delivery using PLGA nanoparticles in silk fibroin/PEGDMA hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 108:2041–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.3454410.1002/JBM.B.34544 ↗
47. Mehrasa M, Asadollahi MA, Ghaedi K et al (2015) Electrospun aligned PLGA and PLGA/gelatin nanofibers embedded with silica nanoparticles for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 79:687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2015.05.05010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2015.05.050 ↗
48. Cao H, Kuboyama N (2010) A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/β-TCP for bone tissue engineering. Bone 46:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BONE.2009.09.03110.1016/J.BONE.2009.09.031 ↗
49. Yeo T, Ko YG, Kim EJ et al (2021) Promoting bone regeneration by 3D-printed poly(glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. J Ind Eng Chem 94:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2020.11.00410.1016/J.JIEC.2020.11.004 ↗
50. Zhang J, Yang S, Yang X et al (2018) Novel fabricating process for porous polyglycolic acid scaffolds by melt-foaming using supercritical carbon dioxide. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 4:694–706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.7B0069210.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.7B00692 ↗
51. Generali M, Kehl D, Capulli AK et al (2017) Comparative analysis of poly-glycolic acid-based hybrid polymer starter matrices for in vitro tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 158:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2017.06.04610.1016/J.COLSURFB.2017.06.046 ↗
52. Ding J, Chen BO, Lv T et al (2016) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-based engineered cartilage ameliorates polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid scaffold-induced inflammation through M2 polarization of macrophages in a pig model. Stem Cells Transl Med 5:1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.5966/SCTM.2015-026310.5966/SCTM.2015-0263 ↗
53. Filippi M, Born G, Chaaban M, Scherberich A (2020) Natural polymeric scaffolds in bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.0047410.3389/fbioe.2020.00474 ↗
54. Singh MR, Patel S, Singh D (2016) Natural polymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering. In: Grumezescu AM (ed) Nanobiomaterials in soft tissue engineering: applications of nanobiomaterials. Elsevier, Amsterdam
55. Heidary Rouchi A, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M (2015) Regenerative medicine in organ and tissue transplantation: shortly and practically achievable? Int J Organ Transplant Med 6:93
56. Montalbano G, Molino G, Fiorilli S, Vitale-Brovarone C (2020) Synthesis and incorporation of rod-like nano-hydroxyapatite into type I collagen matrix: a hybrid formulation for 3D printing of bone scaffolds. J Eur Ceram Soc 40:3689–3697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2020.02.01810.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2020.02.018 ↗
57. Garcia CF, Marangon CA, Massimino LC et al (2021) Development of collagen/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds containing plant extract intended for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 123:111955. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2021.11195510.1016/J.MSEC.2021.111955 ↗
58. Sobhanian P, Khorram M, Hashemi SS, Mohammadi A (2019) Development of nanofibrous collagen-grafted poly (vinyl alcohol)/gelatin/alginate scaffolds as potential skin substitute. Int J Biol Macromol 130:977–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.03.04510.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.03.045 ↗
59. Gunes OC, Kara A, Baysan G et al (2022) Fabrication of 3D Printed poly(lactic acid) strut and wet-electrospun cellulose nano fiber reinforced chitosan-collagen hydrogel composite scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl 37:683–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328222110933910.1177/08853282221109339 ↗
60. Ahmadian S, Ghorbani M, Mahmoodzadeh F (2020) Silver sulfadiazine-loaded electrospun ethyl cellulose/polylactic acid/collagen nanofibrous mats with antibacterial properties for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 162:1555–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.05910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.059 ↗
61. Shen Y, Xu Y, Yi B et al (2021) Engineering a highly biomimetic chitosan-based cartilage scaffold by using short fibers and a cartilage-decellularized matrix. Biomacromol 22:2284–2297. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.BIOMAC.1C00366/SUPPL_FILE/BM1C00366_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACS.BIOMAC.1C00366/SUPPL_FILE/BM1C00366_SI_001.PDF ↗
62. Saeedi Garakani S, Khanmohammadi M, Atoufi Z et al (2020) Fabrication of chitosan/agarose scaffolds containing extracellular matrix for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol 143:533–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.12.04010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.12.040 ↗
63. Sharifi F, Atyabi SM, Norouzian D et al (2018) Polycaprolactone/carboxymethyl chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application. Int J Biol Macromol 115:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.04.04510.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.04.045 ↗
64. Iacob AT, Drăgan M, Ionescu OM, Profire L, Ficai A, Andronescu E, Confederat LG, Lupascu D (2020) An overview of biopolymeric electrospun nanofibers based on polysaccharides for wound healing management. Pharmaceutics 12:98310.3390/pharmaceutics12100983 ↗
65. Maharjan B, Park J, Kaliannagounder VK, Awasthi GP, Joshi MK, Park CH, Kim CS (2021) Regenerated cellulose nanofiber reinforced chitosan hydrogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 251:11702310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117023 ↗
66. Xuan H, Wu S, Fei S, Li B, Yang Y, Yuan H (2021) Injectable nanofiber-polysaccharide self-healing hydrogels for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C 128:11226410.1016/j.msec.2021.112264 ↗
67. Sadeghianmaryan A, Naghieh S, Alizadeh Sardroud H et al (2020) Extrusion-based printing of chitosan scaffolds and their in vitro characterization for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 164:3179–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.08.18010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.08.180 ↗
68. Dutta SD, Hexiu J, Patel DK et al (2021) 3D-printed bioactive and biodegradable hydrogel scaffolds of alginate/gelatin/cellulose nanocrystals for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 167:644–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.12.01110.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.12.011 ↗
69. Luo Y, Li Y, Qin X, Wa Q (2018) 3D printing of concentrated alginate/gelatin scaffolds with homogeneous nano apatite coating for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 146:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2018.03.00210.1016/J.MATDES.2018.03.002 ↗
70. Zhang J, Wehrle E, Vetsch JR et al (2019) Alginate dependent changes of physical properties in 3D bioprinted cell-laden porous scaffolds affect cell viability and cell morphology. Biomed Mater 14:065009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/AB3C7410.1088/1748-605X/AB3C74 ↗
71. Hakimi F, Jafari H, Hashemikia S, Shabani S, Ramazani A (2023) Chitosan-polyethylene oxide/clay-alginate nanofiber hydrogel scaffold for bone tissue engineering: preparation, physical characterization, and biomimetic mineralization. Int J Biol Macromol 233:12345310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123453 ↗
72. Zulkiflee I, Fauzi MB (2021) Gelatin-polyvinyl alcohol film for tissue engineering: a concise review. Biomedicines 9:979. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMEDICINES908097910.3390/BIOMEDICINES9080979 ↗
73. Gautam S, Sharma C, Purohit SD et al (2021) Gelatin-polycaprolactone-nanohydroxyapatite electrospun nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 119:111588. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2020.11158810.1016/J.MSEC.2020.111588 ↗
74. Heidari M, Bahrami SH, Ranjbar-Mohammadi M, Milan PB (2019) Smart electrospun nanofibers containing PCL/gelatin/graphene oxide for application in nerve tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 103:109768. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.10976810.1016/J.MSEC.2019.109768 ↗
75. Ashwin B, Abinaya B, Prasith TP et al (2020) 3D-poly (lactic acid) scaffolds coated with gelatin and mucic acid for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 162:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.06.15710.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.06.157 ↗
76. Ma P, Wu W, Wei Y et al (2021) Biomimetic gelatin/chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 207:109865. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.10986510.1016/J.MATDES.2021.109865 ↗
77. Moazzami Goudarzi Z, Behzad T, Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Kharaziha M (2021) An investigation into influence of acetylated cellulose nanofibers on properties of PCL/Gelatin electrospun nanofibrous scaffold for soft tissue engineering. Polymer (Guildf) 213:123313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12331310.1016/j.polymer.2020.123313 ↗
78. Samadian H, Farzamfar S, Vaez A et al (2020) A tailored polylactic acid/polycaprolactone biodegradable and bioactive 3D porous scaffold containing gelatin nanofibers and Taurine for bone regeneration. Sci Rep 10:13366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70155-210.1038/s41598-020-70155-2 ↗
79. Mohamad Yunos D, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini AR (2008) Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 43:4433–444210.1007/s10853-008-2552-y ↗
80. Kolos E, Ruys AJ (2015) Biomimetic coating on porous alumina for tissue engineering: characterisation by cell culture and confocal microscopy. Materials 8:3584–3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA806358410.3390/MA8063584 ↗
81. Rahmati M, Mozafari M (2019) Biocompatibility of alumina-based biomaterials—a review. J Cell Physiol 234:3321–3335. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCP.2729210.1002/JCP.27292 ↗
82. Toloue E, Karbasi S, Salehi H, Rafienia M (2019) Evaluation of mechanical properties and cell viability of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-chitosan/Al2O3 nanocomposite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Med Signals Sens 9:111. https://doi.org/10.4103/JMSS.JMSS_56_1810.4103/JMSS.JMSS_56_18 ↗
83. Zafar B, Mottaghitalab F, Shahosseini Z et al (2020) Silk fibroin/alumina nanoparticle scaffold using for osteogenic differentiation of rabbit adipose-derived stem cells. Materialia (Oxf) 9:100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTLA.2019.10051810.1016/J.MTLA.2019.100518 ↗
84. Barkallah R, Taktak R, Yan Z et al (2021) Fracture behavior of alumina-tricalcium phosphate-titania composites for bone tissue reconstruction. Eng Fract Mech 255:107959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2021.10795910.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2021.107959 ↗
85. Arce AE, Rosero-Alzate ÉL, Zapata-Pernett MÁ et al (2021) Influence of porosity on the biomimetic growing patterns of bonelike apatite on the surface of calcium phosphate—calcium titanate—alumina compounds. Dyna (Medellin) 88:24–33. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v88n218.9165110.15446/dyna.v88n218.91651 ↗
86. Esteves AVM, Martins MI, Soares P et al (2022) Additive manufacturing of ceramic alumina/calcium phosphate structures by DLP 3D printing. Mater Chem Phys 276:125417. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.12541710.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.125417 ↗
87. Monrreal-Rodríguez AK, Garibay-Alvarado JA, Vargas-Requena CL, Reyes-López SY (2020) In vitro evaluation of poly-ε-caprolactone-hydroxypatite-alumina electrospun fibers on the fibroblast’s proliferation. Res Mater 6:100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINMA.2020.10009110.1016/J.RINMA.2020.100091 ↗
88. Kavitha K, Sutha S, Prabhu M et al (2013) In situ synthesized novel biocompatible titania–chitosan nanocomposites with high surface area and antibacterial activity. Carbohydr Polym 93:731–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2012.12.03110.1016/J.CARBPOL.2012.12.031 ↗
89. Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA (2007) Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 28:3188–3197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2007.03.02010.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2007.03.020 ↗
90. Parvizifard M, Karbasi S, Salehi H, Soleymani Eil Bakhtiari S (2019) Evaluation of physical, mechanical and biological properties of bioglass/titania scaffold coated with poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-chitosan for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Technol 35:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.165816910.1080/10667857.2019.1658169 ↗
91. Chuang YC, Wang L, Feng KC et al (2021) The role of titania surface coating by atomic layer deposition in improving osteogenic differentiation and hard tissue formation of dental pulp stem cells. Adv Eng Mater 23:2100097. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20210009710.1002/ADEM.202100097 ↗
92. Agilan P, Saranya K, Rajendran N (2021) Bio-inspired polydopamine incorporated titania nanotube arrays for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 629:127489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2021.12748910.1016/J.COLSURFA.2021.127489 ↗
93. Fatima T, Jolly R, Wani MR et al (2021) Exploring the bone regeneration potential of bio-fabricated nano-titania reinforced polyvinyl alcohol/nano-cellulose based composite film. Res Mater 12:100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINMA.2021.10024010.1016/J.RINMA.2021.100240 ↗
94. Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Xiao L et al (2021) Surface engineering of titania nanotubes incorporated with double-layered extracellular vesicles to modulate inflammation and osteogenesis. Regen Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1093/RB/RBAB01010.1093/RB/RBAB010 ↗
95. Olam M, Tosun N (2022) 3D-printed polylactide/hydroxyapatite/titania composite filaments. Mater Chem Phys 276:125267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.12526710.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.125267 ↗
96. Ortiz GMH, Parra R, Fuchs V, Fanovich MA (2022) TiO2-HA composites obtained by combination of sol–gel synthesis and a supercritical CO2 drying process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 101:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10971-021-05659-Y10.1007/S10971-021-05659-Y ↗
97. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L (2007) An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 35:819–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2007.07.00810.1016/J.JDENT.2007.07.008 ↗
98. Hadjicharalambous C, Buyakov A, Buyakova S et al (2015) Porous alumina, zirconia and alumina/zirconia for bone repair: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological response. Biomed Mater 10:025012–025999. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/2/02501210.1088/1748-6041/10/2/025012 ↗
99. Weng W, Wu W, Hou M et al (2021) Review of zirconia-based biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 56:8309–8333. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-021-05824-210.1007/S10853-021-05824-2 ↗
100. Jasemi A, Kamyab Moghadas B, Khandan A, Saber-Samandari S (2022) A porous calcium-zirconia scaffolds composed of magnetic nanoparticles for bone cancer treatment: fabrication, characterization and FEM analysis. Ceram Int 48:1314–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2021.09.21610.1016/J.CERAMINT.2021.09.216 ↗