A high-flux polydopamine/reduced graphene oxide/MOF-5 composite membrane via a mussel-inspired method for dye wastewater purification
Source abstract
Abstract
A novel polydopamine/reduced graphene oxide/MOF-5 (PDA/RGO/MOF-5) composite membrane with high flux, outstanding dye separation performance and anti-fouling ability was prepared by synthesizing the polydopamine-modified GO/MOF-5 composite material and aggregating it on a commercial cellulose acetate (CA) membrane substrate through the vacuum filtration process. The prepared samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Besides, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy were used to explore the structural characteristics of the membrane. The results showed that the permeation performance of the hybrid membrane was greatly enhanced due to the increase in the spacing between RGO layers. The flux for methylene blue (MB, cationic dye) and Congo red (CR, anionic dye) could reach 3439 ± 208 L·m−2·h−1 and 2484 ± 52 L·m−2·h−1, respectively, which were much higher than those of other polymer membranes reported so far. Moreover, the membrane material also exhibited an ideal dye rejection rate (99 ± 0.07% for MB and 97 ± 0.3% for CR). After three fouling-washing cycle experiments, the composite membrane still maintained an excellent flux recovery rate (FRR) of more than 85 ± 2%. Overall, it can be predicted that the PDA/RGO/MOF-5 membrane prepared by us has great potential in wastewater purification.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Jabbari V, Veleta JM, Zarei-Chaleshtori M, Gardea-Torresdey J, Villagran D (2016) Green synthesis of magnetic MOF@GO and MOF@CNT hybrid nanocomposites with high adsorption capacity towards organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 304:774–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.03410.1016/j.cej.2016.06.034 ↗
2. Shamsuddin N, Das DB, Starov VM (2015) Filtration of natural organic matter using ultrafiltration membranes for drinking water purposes: Circular cross-flow compared with stirred dead end flow. Chem Eng J 276:331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.07510.1016/j.cej.2015.04.075 ↗
3. Lu J-J, Gu Y-H, Chen Y, Yan X, Guo Y-J, Lang W-Z (2019) Ultrahigh permeability of graphene-based membranes by adjusting D-spacing with poly (ethylene imine) for the separation of dye wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 210:737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.06510.1016/j.seppur.2018.08.065 ↗
4. Liu Q, Xu G-R (2016) Graphene oxide (GO) as functional material in tailoring polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Desalination 394:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.01710.1016/j.desal.2016.05.017 ↗
5. Zambianchi M, Durso M, Liscio A et al (2017) Graphene oxide doped polysulfone membrane adsorbers for the removal of organic contaminants from water. Chem Eng J 326:130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.14310.1016/j.cej.2017.05.143 ↗
6. Makhetha TA, Moutloali RM (2018) Antifouling properties of Cu(tpa)@GO/PES composite membranes and selective dye rejection. J Membr Sci 554:195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.00310.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.003 ↗
7. Ma J, Guo XY, Ying YP, Liu DH, Zhong CL (2017) Composite ultrafiltration membrane tailored by MOF@GO with highly improved water purification performance. Chem Eng J 313:890–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.12710.1016/j.cej.2016.10.127 ↗
8. Bahremand AH, Mousavi SM, Ahmadpour A, Taherian M (2017) Biodegradable blend membranes of poly (butylene succinate)/cellulose acetate/dextran: preparation, characterization and performance. Carbohyd Polym 173:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.010 ↗
9. Pandey RP, Rasheed PA, Gomez T, Azam RS, Mahmoud KA (2020) A fouling-resistant mixed-matrix nanofiltration membrane based on covalently cross-linked Ti3C2TX (MXene)/cellulose acetate. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11813910.1016/j.memsci.2020.118139 ↗
10. Han B, Zhang D, Shao Z, Kong L, Lv S (2013) Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate/carboxymethyl cellulose acetate blend ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 311:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.00210.1016/j.desal.2012.11.002 ↗
11. Zhu M, Liu Y, Chen M et al (2020) Ultrahigh flux of graphene oxide membrane modified with orientated growth of MOFs for rejection of dyes and oil-water separation. Chin Chem Lett 31:2683–2688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.01110.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.011 ↗
12. Kim HW, Yoon HW, Yoon S-M et al (2013) Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 342:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.123609810.1126/science.1236098 ↗
13. Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2013) The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341:974. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
14. Evans JD, Garai B, Reinsch H et al (2019) Metal-organic frameworks in Germany: from synthesis to function. Coord Chem Rev 380:378–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.00210.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.002 ↗
15. Wang Y, Hou C, Zhang Y, He F, Liu M, Li X (2016) Preparation of graphene nano-sheet bonded PDA/MOF microcapsules with immobilized glucose oxidase as a mimetic multi-enzyme system for electrochemical sensing of glucose. J Mater Chem B 4:3695–3702. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb00276e10.1039/c6tb00276e ↗
16. Peng Y, Li Y, Ban Y et al (2014) Metal-organic framework nanosheets as building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science 346:1356–1359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125422710.1126/science.1254227 ↗
17. Chen B, Li Y, Li M et al (2021) Rapid adsorption of tetracycline in aqueous solution by using MOF-525/graphene oxide composite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11145710.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111457 ↗
18. Wang C, An B, Lin W (2019) Metal-organic frameworks in solid-gas phase catalysis. ACS Catal 9:130–146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b0405510.1021/acscatal.8b04055 ↗
19. Shu JC, Cao WQ, Cao MS (2021) Diverse metal-organic framework architectures for electromagnetic absorbers and shielding. Adv Func Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210047010.1002/adfm.202100470 ↗
20. Shu J-C, Zhu S-Q, Cao W-Q, Cao M-S (2021) Hierarchical C/Co3O4 nanoarray on a nickel substrate integrating electromagnetic and thermal shielding. Mater Chem Front 5:6553–6558. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1qm00731a10.1039/d1qm00731a ↗
21. Yang S, Zou Q, Wang T, Zhang L (2019) Effects of GO and MOF@GO on the permeation and antifouling properties of cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 569:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.06810.1016/j.memsci.2018.09.068 ↗
22. Cai YY, Wang JJ, Cai ZH, Zhang QG, Zhu AM, Liu QL (2021) Enhanced performance of sulfonated poly(ether ether Ketone) hybrid membranes by introducing sulfated MOF-808/Graphene oxide composites. Acs Appl Energy Mater 4:9664–9672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c0178910.1021/acsaem.1c01789 ↗
23. Azizi A, Feijani EA, Ghorbani Z, Tavasoli A (2021) Fabrication and characterization of highly efficient three component CuBTC/graphene oxide/PSF membrane for gas separation application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:2244–2254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.02510.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.025 ↗
24. Wang Z, Zhu JY, Xu SN, Zhang YT, Van der Bruggen B (2021) Graphene-like MOF nanosheets stabilize graphene oxide membranes enabling selective molecular sieving. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11939710.1016/j.memsci.2021.119397 ↗
25. Chen T, Butt FS, Zhang M et al (2021) Ultra-permeable zeolitic imidazolate frameworks-intercalated graphene oxide membranes for unprecedented ultrafast molecular separation. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12950710.1016/j.cej.2021.129507 ↗
26. Tanhaei M, Mahjoub AR, Safarifard V (2018) Sonochemical synthesis of amide-functionalized metal-organic framework/graphene oxide nanocomposite for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution. Ultrason Sonochem 41:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.03010.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.030 ↗
27. Firouzjaei MD, Shamsabadi AA, Aktij SA et al (2018) Exploiting synergetic effects of graphene oxide and a silver-based metal-organic framework to enhance antifouling and anti-biofouling properties of thin-film nanocomposite membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:42967–42978. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1271410.1021/acsami.8b12714 ↗
28. Sui X, Ding H, Yuan Z et al (2019) The roles of metal-organic frameworks in modulating water permeability of graphene oxide-based carbon membranes. Carbon 148:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.04910.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.049 ↗
29. Liu Y, Ng Z, Khan EA, Jeong H-K, Ching C-b, Lai Z (2009) Synthesis of continuous MOF-5 membranes on porous alpha-alumina substrates. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 118:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.08.05410.1016/j.micromeso.2008.08.054 ↗
30. Saha D, Deng S, Yang Z (2009) Hydrogen adsorption on metal-organic framework (MOF-5) synthesized by DMF approach. J Porous Mater 16:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-007-9178-310.1007/s10934-007-9178-3 ↗
31. Gnanaselvan G, Sasikumar B, Arthanareeswaran G, Mok YS (2019) Performance of composite PES/MOF-5 membranes for the treatment of textile wastewater. Desalin Water Treat 156:220–228. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.2377710.5004/dwt.2019.23777 ↗
32. Mi B (2014) Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science 343:740–742. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125024710.1126/science.1250247 ↗
33. Li Y, Shi S, Gao H, Zhao Z, Su C, Wen H (2018) Improvement of the antifouling performance and stability of an anion exchange membrane by surface modification with graphene oxide (GO) and polydopamine (PDA). J Membr Sci 566:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.05410.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.054 ↗
34. Zhong W, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Li W (2020) Highly stable and antifouling graphene oxide membranes prepared by bio-inspired modification for water purification. Chin Chem Lett 31:2651–2652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.03310.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.033 ↗
35. Zhang Y, Chen S, An J et al (2019) Construction of an antibacterial membrane based on dopamine and polyethylenimine cross-linked graphene oxide. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:2732–2739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0006110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00061 ↗
36. Liu Z, Qu S, Weng J (2015) Application of polydopamine in surface modification of biomaterials. Prog Chem 27:212–219. https://doi.org/10.7536/pc14092110.7536/pc140921 ↗
37. Feng P, Peng S, Shuai C et al (2020) In situ generation of hydroxyapatite on biopolymer particles for fabrication of bone scaffolds owning bioactivity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:46743–46755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1376810.1021/acsami.0c13768 ↗
38. Feng P, Liu M, Peng S, Bin S, Zhao Z, Shuai C (2021) Polydopamine modified polycaprolactone powder for fabrication bone scaffold owing intrinsic bioactivity. J Mater Res Technol-Jmr&T 15:3375–3385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.13710.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.137 ↗
39. Feng X, Yu Z, Long R et al (2020) Polydopamine intimate contacted two-dimensional/two-dimensional ultrathin nylon basement membrane supported RGO/PDA/MXene composite material for oil-water separation and dye removal. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11694510.1016/j.seppur.2020.116945 ↗
40. Zhao X, Pionteck J (2021) Electrochemical performance of polydopamine modified PANI/rGO composites: dependency on preparation sequence. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5066310.1002/app.50663 ↗
41. Qiu XQ, Kundu CK, Li ZW, Li XH, Zhang ZJ (2019) Layer-by-layer-assembled flame-retardant coatings from polydopamine-induced in situ functionalized and reduced graphene oxide. J Mater Sci 54:13848–13862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03879-w10.1007/s10853-019-03879-w ↗
42. Alkhouzaam A, Qiblawey H, Khraisheh M (2021) Polydopamine functionalized graphene oxide as membrane nanofiller: spectral and structural studies. Membranes. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes1102008610.3390/membranes11020086 ↗
43. Wen B, Cao M, Lu M et al (2014) Reduced graphene oxides: light-weight and high-efficiency electromagnetic interference shielding at elevated temperatures. Adv Mater 26:3484–3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140010810.1002/adma.201400108 ↗
44. Ma J, He Y, Zeng G et al (2018) Bio-inspired method to fabricate poly-dopamine/reduced graphene oxide composite membranes for dyes and heavy metal ion removal. Polym Adv Technol 29:941–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.420510.1002/pat.4205 ↗
45. Liu YC, Zhu M, Chen MY et al (2019) A polydopamine-modified reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/MOFs nanocomposite with fast rejection capacity for organic dye. Chem Eng J 359:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.10510.1016/j.cej.2018.11.105 ↗
46. Liu Y, Gan D, Chen M et al (2020) Bioinspired dopamine modulating graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane interposed by super-hydrophilic UiO-66 with enhanced water permeability. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11755210.1016/j.seppur.2020.117552 ↗
47. Peng YX, Yu ZX, Li F, Chen Q, Yin D, Min X (2018) A novel reduced graphene oxide-based composite membrane prepared via a facile deposition method for multifunctional applications: oil/water separation and cationic dyes removal. Sep Purif Technol 200:130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.05910.1016/j.seppur.2018.01.059 ↗
48. Li J, Hu M, Pei H et al (2020) Improved water permeability and structural stability in a polysulfone-grafted graphene oxide composite membrane used for dye separation. J Membr Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11754710.1016/j.memsci.2019.117547 ↗
49. Kumar G, Masram DT (2021) Sustainable synthesis of MOF-5@GO nanocomposites for efficient removal of rhodamine b from water. ACS Omega 6:9587–9599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0014310.1021/acsomega.1c00143 ↗
50. Li Y, Su Y, Zhao X et al (2014) Antifouling, high-flux nanofiltration membranes enabled by dual functional polydopamine. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5548–5557. https://doi.org/10.1021/am405990g10.1021/am405990g ↗
51. Karimzadeh Z, Javanbakht S, Namazi H (2019) Carboxymethylcellulose/MOF-5/Graphene oxide bio-nanocomposite as antibacterial drug nanocarrier agent. Bioimpacts 9:5–13. https://doi.org/10.15171/bi.2019.0210.15171/bi.2019.02 ↗
52. Qiu X, Wang X, Li Y (2015) Controlled growth of dense and ordered metal-organic framework nanoparticles on graphene oxide. Chem Commun 51:3874–3877. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc09933h10.1039/c4cc09933h ↗
53. Wang A-Y, Sun K, Wu L et al (2020) Co-carbonization of biomass and oily sludge to prepare sulfamethoxazole super-adsorbent materials. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13423810.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134238 ↗
54. Yang L, Kong J, Yee WA et al (2012) Highly conductive graphene by low-temperature thermal reduction and in situ preparation of conductive polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale 4:4968–4971. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr31258a10.1039/c2nr31258a ↗
55. Xia S, Ni M, Zhu T, Zhao Y, Li N (2015) Ultrathin graphene oxide nanosheet membranes with various d-spacing assembled using the pressure-assisted filtration method for removing natural organic matter. Desalination 371:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.00510.1016/j.desal.2015.06.005 ↗
56. Li J, Tang Y, Jin R et al (2019) Ultrasonic-microwave assisted synthesis of GO/g-C3N4 composites for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Solid State Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.10599010.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.105990 ↗
57. Dong L, Li M, Zhang S, Si X, Bai Y, Zhang C (2020) NH2-Fe3O4-regulated graphene oxide membranes with well-defined laminar nanochannels for desalination of dye solutions. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.11422710.1016/j.desal.2019.114227 ↗
58. Li Y, Zhang B-P, Zhao J-X, Ge Z-H, Zhao X-K, Zou L (2013) ZnO/carbon quantum dots heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic properties. Appl Surf Sci 279:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.11410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.114 ↗
59. Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H (2014) Zangeneh, preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci 453:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.07010.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.070 ↗
60. Luo Z, Fang Q, Xu X, Raj DV, Zhou X, Liu Z (2019) Attapulgite nanofibers and graphene oxide composite membrane for high-performance molecular separation. J Colloid Interface Sci 545:276–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.02710.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.027 ↗
61. Zhu L, Wang H, Bai J, Liu J, Zhang Y (2017) A porous graphene composite membrane intercalated by halloysite nanotubes for efficient dye desalination. Desalination 420:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.00810.1016/j.desal.2017.07.008 ↗
62. Zhou M, Li J, Zhang M et al (2015) A polydopamine layer as the nucleation center of MOF deposition on “inert” polymer surfaces to fabricate hierarchically structured porous films. Chem Commun 51:2706–2709. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc08796h10.1039/c4cc08796h ↗
63. Lee J-Y, She Q, Huo F, Tang CY (2015) Metal-organic framework-based porous matrix membranes for improving mass transfer in forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 492:392–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.00310.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.003 ↗
64. Abdi J, Vossoughi M, Mahmoodi NM, Alemzadeh I (2017) Alemzadeh, Synthesis of metal-organic framework hybrid nanocomposites based on GO and CNT with high adsorption capacity for dye removal. Chem Eng J 326:1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.05410.1016/j.cej.2017.06.054 ↗
65. Shen LD, Li PY, Zhang TH (2019) Green and feasible fabrication of loose nanofiltration membrane with high efficiency for fractionation of dye/NaCl mixture by taking advantage of membrane fouling. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4743810.1002/app.47438 ↗
66. Puspasari T, Peinemann KV (2016) Application of thin film cellulose composite membrane for dye wastewater reuse. J Water Process Eng 13:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.00810.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.008 ↗
67. Shi WY, Zeng XH, Li HB, Zhang HX, Qin XH, Zhou R (2020) Removal of dyes by poly(p-phenylene terephthamide)/polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber in-situ blend membranes. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4856910.1002/app.48569 ↗
68. Yun JH, Wang YX, Liu ZY, Li YJ, Yang H, Xu ZL (2020) High efficient dye removal with hydrolyzed ethanolamine-Polyacrylonitrile UF membrane: Rejection of anionic dye and selective adsorption of cationic dye. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12739010.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127390 ↗
69. Ingole PG, Sawant SY, Ingole NP et al (2016) Preparation of activated carbon incorporated polysulfone membranes for dye separation. Membr Water Treat 7:477–493. https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2016.7.6.47710.12989/mwt.2016.7.6.477 ↗
70. Alventosa-deLara E, Barredo-Damas S, Alcaina-Miranda MI, Iborra-Clar MI (2012) Ultrafiltration technology with a ceramic membrane for reactive dye removal: optimization of membrane performance. J Hazard Mater 209:492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.06510.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.065 ↗
71. Lian X, Yan B (2016) A lanthanide metal-organic framework (MOF-76) for adsorbing dyes and fluorescence detecting aromatic pollutants. RSC Adv 6:11570–11576. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra23681a10.1039/c5ra23681a ↗
72. Sun Y, Chen M, Liu H, Zhu Y, Wang D, Yan M (2020) Adsorptive removal of dye and antibiotic from water with functionalized zirconium-based metal organic framework and graphene oxide composite nanomaterial Uio-66-(OH)(2)/GO. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14661410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146614 ↗
73. Senthamarai C, Kumar PS, Priyadharshini M et al (2013) Adsorption behavior of methylene blue dye onto surface modified Strychnos potatorum seeds. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 32:624–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.1167310.1002/ep.11673 ↗
74. Feng Y, Wang H, Xu J et al (2021) Fabrication of MXene/PEI functionalized sodium alginate aerogel and its excellent adsorption behavior for Cr(VI) and Congo Red from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12577710.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125777 ↗
75. Duman O, Tunc S, Polat TG (2015) Adsorptive removal of triarylmethane dye (Basic Red 9) from aqueous solution by sepiolite as effective and low-cost adsorbent. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 210:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.02.04010.1016/j.micromeso.2015.02.040 ↗
76. Jin JH, Yang ZH, Xiong WP et al (2019) Cu and Co nanoparticles co-doped MIL-101 as a novel adsorbent for efficient removal of tetracycline from aqueous solutions. Sci Total Environ 650:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.43410.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.434 ↗
77. Abdi J, Vossoughi M, Mahmoodi NM, Alemzadeh I (2017) Synthesis of metal-organic framework hybrid nanocomposites based on GO and CNT with high adsorption capacity for dye removal. Chem Eng J 326:1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.05410.1016/j.cej.2017.06.054 ↗
78. Zou D, Chen X, Qiu M, Drioli E, Fan Y (2019) Flux-enhanced alpha-alumina tight ultrafiltration membranes for effective treatment of dye/salt wastewater at high temperatures, Separation and Purification Technology. Sep Purif Technol 215:143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.06310.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.063 ↗
79. Mahmoudian M, Kochameshki MG, Hosseinzadeh M (2018) Hosseinzadeh, Modification of graphene oxide by ATRP: a pH-responsive additive in membrane for separation of salts, dyes and heavy metals. J Environ Chem Eng 6:3122–3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.05610.1016/j.jece.2018.04.056 ↗
80. Ma X, Chen P, Zhou M, Zhong Z, Zhang F, Xing W (2017) Tight ultrafiltration ceramic membrane for separation of dyes and mixed salts (both NaCl/Na2SO4) in textile wastewater treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:7070–7079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0144010.1021/acs.iecr.7b01440 ↗
81. He Y, Li G, Wang H, Zhao J, Su H, Huang Q (2008) Effect of operating conditions on separation performance of reactive dye solution with membrane process. J Membr Sci 321:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.05610.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.056 ↗
82. Ormanci-Acar T, Celebi F, Keskin B et al (2018) Fabrication and characterization of temperature and pH resistant thin film nanocomposite membranes embedded with halloysite nanotubes for dye rejection. Desalination 429:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.00510.1016/j.desal.2017.12.005 ↗
83. Han Y, Jiang Y, Gao C (2015) High-flux graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:8147–8155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0098610.1021/acsami.5b00986 ↗