journal article·2022-01

Iron oxide nanoparticles–cellulose: a comprehensive insight on nanoclusters formation

Leonardo Zanata, Aryane Tofanello, Herculano S. Martinho, José A. Souza, Derval S. Rosa

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Due to unique nanoscale properties, as superparamagnetism, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) hybridized with cellulosic matrixes are an attractive material for environmental purposes. Previous studies obtained IONPs–cellulose clusters by the coprecipitation route. Nevertheless, the forces which bind IONPs and cellulosic matrixes and allow the nanocluster formation have not been well described. This study investigated the nanoclustering formation of superparamagnetic (SPM) IONPs and cellulosic materials. IONPs nanoclusters and hybrids were coprecipitated with microcrystalline cellulose (MC) in mass proportions of 1:0.5, 1:2, and 1:8. Lignocellulosic residues (LR) were also used as an organic matrix in mass proportions of 1:2. Dynamic light scattering analyses revealed that the obtained IONPs-organic clusters present sizes between 1.46 ± 0.49 and 6.84 ± 3.15 µm. The MC and LR organic matrix size were decisive for the hybrids’ final cluster size. Scanning electron microscopy images of the materials show an irregular morphology due to particle aggregation, while hybrids showed fibril character and the presence of crystal IONPs deposition at their surfaces. Micro-Raman spectra showed assignments of hematite (α-Fe2O3), goethite (α-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe3O4), and wustite (FeO), as a result of the coprecipitation process. Magnetization assays showed that the obtained clustered hybrids present SPM behavior at room temperature, despite to the cellulosic backbone presence and size. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy brings light over the nanoclusters surface binding energies, evidencing the hydrogen bonding of the IONPs over the hydroxyl groups of MC and LR, clarifying the nanoclustering formation among heterogeneous IONPs and cellulosic matrixes.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Chaabane L et al (2020) Functionalization of developed bacterial cellulose with magnetite nanoparticles for nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine applications. Carbohydr Polym 247:116707–116719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11670710.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116707 ↗
2. Damodaran P (2020) Mesoporous magnetite nanoclusters as efficient nanocarriers for paclitaxel delivery. Chem Sel 5(29):9261–9268. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20200110210.1002/slct.202001102 ↗
3. Ganesan V, Louis C, Damodaran SP (2018) Novel nanoflu-ids based on magnetite nanoclusters and investigation on their clus-ter size-dependent thermal conductivity. T J Phys Chem C 122(12):6918–6929. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1204310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12043 ↗
4. Seabra AB, Pelegrino MT, Haddad PS (2017) Antimicro-bial applications of Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: perspectives and challenges. Nanostruct Antimicrob Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-46152-8.00024-X10.1016/B978-0-323-46152-8.00024-X ↗
5. Arantes ACC et al (2017) Renewable hybrid nanocatalyst from magnetite and cellulose for treatment of textile effluents. Car-bohydr Polym 163:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.00710.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.007 ↗
6. Zharei S, Niad M, Raanaei H (2018) The removal of mercu-ry ion pollution by using Fe3O4-nanocellulose: synthesis, charac-terizations and DFT studies. J Hazard Mater 344:258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.00910.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.009 ↗
7. Kaco H et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4/regenerated cellulose membrane. Sains Malays 46(4):623–628. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2017-4604-1510.17576/jsm-2017-4604-15 ↗
8. Ganesan V et al (2019) Size-controlled synthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoclusters for heat generation in an alternating magnetic field. J Mol Liquids 281:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.09510.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.095 ↗
9. Manh-Huong P et al (2016) Exchange bias effects in iron oxide-based nanoparticle systems. Nanomaterials 6(11):221–251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano611022110.3390/nano6110221 ↗
10. Mohamed MA et al (2017) An overview on cellulose-based material in tailoring bio-hybrid nanostructured photocatalysts for water treatment and renewable energy applications. Int J biol macromol 103:1232–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.18110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.181 ↗
11. Gharibshahi R et al (2020) Hybridization of superparamag-netic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with MWCNTs and effect of surface modification on electromagnetic heating process efficiency: a microfluidics enhanced oil recovery study. Fuel 282:118603–118617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11860310.1016/j.fuel.2020.118603 ↗
12. Benjwal P et al (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and adsorption of arsenic (iii) by reduced gra-phene oxide (rGO)–metal oxide (TiO 2/Fe 3 O 4) based nanocom-posites. Rsc Adv 5(89):73249–73260. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA13689J10.1039/C5RA13689J ↗
13. Lian Z et al (2020) EDTA-functionalized magnetic chitosan oligosaccharide and carboxymethyl cellulose nanocomposite: syn-thesis, characterization, and Pb (II) adsorption performance. Inter J Biol Macromol 165:591–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.15610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.156 ↗
14. Abouzeid RE et al (2018) Current state and new trends in the use of cellulose nanomaterials for wastewater treatment. Biom-acromol 20(2):573–597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0083910.1021/acs.biomac.8b00839 ↗
15. Dheyab MA et al (2020) Simple rapid stabilization method through citric acid modification for magnetite nanoparticles. Sci Rep 10(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67869-810.1038/s41598-020-67869-8 ↗
16. Souza AG et al (2019) A new approach for conversion of eucalyptus lignocellulosic biomass into cellulose nanostructures: a method that can be applied in industry. J Nat Fibers. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.169112510.1080/15440478.2019.1691125 ↗
17. Ferreira RR et al (2019) Use of ball mill to prepare nanocellulose from eucalyptus biomass: challenges and process optimization by combined method. Mater Today Commun 22:100755–100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10075510.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100755 ↗
18. de Souza AG et al (2019) Valorization of industrial paper waste by isolating cellulose nanostructures with different pretreat-ment methods., Resour. Conserv Recycl 143:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.03110.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.031 ↗
19. Moosavinejad SM et al (2019) Evaluation of degradation in chemical compounds of wood in historical buildings using FT-IR and FT-Raman vibrational spectroscopy. Maderas Cienc Tecnol 21(3):381–392. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X201900500031010.4067/S0718-221X2019005000310 ↗
20. Kong D, Wilson LD (2017) Synthesis and characterization of cellulose-goethite composites and their adsorption properties with roxarsone. Carbohydr Polym 169:282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.019 ↗
21. Makarem M et al (2019) Probing cellulose structures with vibrational spectroscopy. Cellul 26(1):35–7910.1007/s10570-018-2199-z ↗
22. Sergeeva AV et al (2020) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of ammoniovoltaite, (NH4)2Fe2+5Fe3+3Al(SO4)12(H2O)18. Miner 10(9):781–795. https://doi.org/10.3390/min1009078110.3390/min10090781 ↗
23. Chai MN, Isa MIN (2013) The oleic acid composition effect on the carboxymethyl cellulose based biopolymer electrolyte, J Cryst Process Tech 3(1) 1–4. http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=2726310.4236/jcpt.2013.31001 ↗
24. Testa-Anta M et al (2019) Raman spectroscopy to unravel the magnetic properties of iron oxide nanocrystals for bio-related applications. Nanoscale Adv 1(6):2086–2103. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NA00064J10.1039/C9NA00064J ↗
25. Williams GVM et al (2018) Spin-dependent tunnelling in magnetite nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 460:229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.04.01710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.04.017 ↗
26. Kumar CSSR (2012) Raman spectroscopy for nano-materials characterization. Springer Sci Bus Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20620-710.1007/978-3-642-20620-7 ↗
27. Salviano LB et al (2018) Microstructural assessment of magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) obtained by chemical precipitation under different synthesis conditions. Mater Res 21(2):764–771. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-076410.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0764 ↗
28. Wroblewski C et al (2020) High yield synthesis and application of magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4). Magnetochem 6(2):22–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry602002210.3390/magnetochemistry6020022 ↗
29. Agarwal UP, McSweeny JD, Ralph SA (2011) FT–Raman investigation of milled-wood lignins: softwood, hardwood, and chemically modified black spruce lignins. J Wood Chem Tech 31(4):324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2011.56233810.1080/02773813.2011.562338 ↗
30. Kong D, Wilson LD (2018) Structural study of cellulose-iron oxide composite materials. J Mater Sci Chem Eng 6(4):65–77. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2018.6400910.4236/msce.2018.64009 ↗
31. Furlan DM et al (2019) Sisal cellulose and magnetite nano-particles: formation and properties of magnetic hybrid films. J Mater Res Tech 8(2):2170–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.00510.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.005 ↗
32. Francisquini, E., Schoenmaker, J., Souza, J.A., (2014) Nano-partículas magnéticas e suas aplicações. Qum. Supramol, Nano-tecnol,, Atheneu 269
33. Maccarini M et al (2014) Interactions at the CMC/magnetite interface: implications for the stability of aqueous dispersions and the magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 462:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.08.02610.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.08.026 ↗
34. Guo J et al (2017) Complexes of magnetic nanoparticles with cellulose nanocrystals as regenerable, highly efficient, and selective platform for protein separation. Biomacromol 18(3):898–905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0177810.1021/acs.biomac.6b01778 ↗
35. Carvalho-Jr WM et al (2019) Annealing control of hydro-thermally grown hematite nanorods: implication of structural chang-es and Cl concentration on weak ferromagnetism. J Alloys Compd 799:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.33510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.335 ↗
36. Chauhan I et al (2019) Immobilization of α-Fe 2 O 3 nano-particles on the cellulose surface: role of cellulose in tuning the microstructure and crystallographic phase. Cellul 26(3):1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2186-410.1007/s10570-018-2186-4 ↗
37. Dzade NY, Roldan A, Leeuw NH (2014) A density functional theory study of the adsorption of benzene on hematite (α-Fe2O3) surfaces. Miner 4(1):89–115. https://doi.org/10.3390/min401008910.3390/min4010089 ↗