Quantitative prediction of moisture content distribution in acetylated wood using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The uptake of moisture severely affects the properties of wood in service applications. Even local moisture content variations may be critical, but such variations are typically not detected by traditional methods to quantify the moisture content of the wood. In this study, we used near-infrared hyperspectral imaging to predict the moisture distribution on wood surfaces at the macroscale. A broad range of wood moisture contents were generated by controlling the acetylation degree of wood and the relative humidity during sample conditioning. Near-infrared image spectra were then measured from the surfaces of the conditioned wood samples, and a principal component analysis was applied to separate the useful chemical information from the spectral data. Moreover, a partial least squares regression model was developed to predict moisture content on the wood surfaces. The results show that hyperspectral near-infrared image regression can accurately predict the variations in moisture content across wood surfaces. In addition to sample-to-sample variation in moisture content, our results also revealed differences in the moisture content between earlywood and latewood in acetylated wood. This was in line with our recent studies where we found that thin-walled earlywood cells are acetylated faster than the thicker latewood cells, which decreases the moisture uptake during the conditioning. Dynamic vapor sorption isotherms validated the differences in moisture content within earlywood and latewood cells. Overall, our results demonstrate the capabilities of hyperspectral imaging for process analytics in the modern wood industry. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Wood Treatment and Properties · Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Altgen M, Rautkari L (2021) Humidity-dependence of the hydroxyl accessibility in Norway spruce wood. Cellulose 28:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03535-610.1007/s10570-020-03535-6 ↗
2. Thybring EE, Piqueras S, Tarmian A, Burgert I (2020) Water accessibility to hydroxyls confined in solid wood cell walls. Cellulose 27:5617–5627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03182-x10.1007/s10570-020-03182-x ↗
3. Wang C, Piao C, Lucas C (2011) Synthesis and characterization of superhydrophobic wood surfaces. J Appl Polym Sci 119:1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3284410.1002/app.32844 ↗
4. Rowell RM, Ibach RE, McSweeny J, Nilsson T (2009) Understanding decay resistance, dimensional stability and strength changes in heat-treated and acetylated wood. Wood Mater Sci Eng 4:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1748027090326133910.1080/17480270903261339 ↗
5. Rowell RM (2006) Chemical modification of wood: a short review. Wood Mater Sci Eng 1:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1748027060067092310.1080/17480270600670923 ↗
6. Altgen M, Awais M, Altgen D et al (2020) Distribution and curing reactions of melamine formaldehyde resin in cells of impregnation-modified wood. Sci Rep 10:3366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60418-310.1038/s41598-020-60418-3 ↗
7. Kocaefe D, Huang X, Kocaefe Y (2015) Dimensional stabilization of wood. Curr For Reports 1:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0017-510.1007/s40725-015-0017-5 ↗
8. Hill C (2006) Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley, New York10.1002/0470021748 ↗
9. Thybring EE, Kymäläinen M, Rautkari L (2018) Experimental techniques for characterising water in wood covering the range from dry to fully water-saturated. Wood Sci Technol 52:297–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-017-0977-710.1007/s00226-017-0977-7 ↗
10. Defoirdt N, Sen A, Dhaene J et al (2017) A generic platform for hyperspectral mapping of wood. Wood Sci Technol 51:887–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-017-0903-z10.1007/s00226-017-0903-z ↗
11. Fujimoto T, Numa T, Kobori H, Tsuchikawa S (2015) Visualisation of spatial distribution of moisture content and basic density using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging method in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Int Wood Prod J 6:46–48. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042645314Y.000000008410.1179/2042645314Y.0000000084 ↗
12. Awais M, Altgen M, Mäkelä M et al (2020) Hyperspectral near-infrared image assessment of surface-acetylated solid wood. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:5223–5232. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c0062610.1021/acsabm.0c00626 ↗
13. Amigo JM (2020) Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging: setting the scene. In: Data handling in science and technology. Elsevier, pp 3–1610.1016/B978-0-444-63977-6.00001-8 ↗
14. Mäkelä M, Geladi P (2018) Hyperspectral near infrared imaging quantifies the heterogeneity of carbon materials. Sci Rep 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28889-710.1038/s41598-018-28889-7 ↗
15. Marcus WA, Legleiter CJ, Aspinall RJ et al (2003) High spatial resolution hyperspectral mapping of in-stream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams. Geomorphology 55:363–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00150-810.1016/S0169-555X(03)00150-8 ↗
16. Dale LM, Thewis A, Boudry C et al (2013) Hyperspectral imaging applications in agriculture and agro-food product quality and safety control: a review. Appl Spectrosc Rev 48:142–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2012.70580010.1080/05704928.2012.705800 ↗
17. Bellon-Maurel V, Dubois J Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging in Food and Agricultural Science. In: Infrared and raman spectroscopic imaging. Wiley, Weinheim, Germany, pp 259–29410.1002/9783527628230.ch8 ↗
18. Sacré P-Y, De Bleye C, Chavez P-F et al (2014) Data processing of vibrational chemical imaging for pharmaceutical applications. J Pharm Biomed Anal 101:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.04.01210.1016/j.jpba.2014.04.012 ↗
19. Boldrini B, Kessler W, Rebner K, Kessler RW (2012) Hyperspectral imaging: a review of best practice, performance and pitfalls for in-line and on-line applications. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 20:483–508. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.100310.1255/jnirs.1003 ↗
20. Kobori H, Gorretta N, Rabatel G et al (2013) Applicability of Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging for monitoring wood moisture content (MC). Holzforschung 67:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2012-005410.1515/hf-2012-0054 ↗
21. Stefansson P, Thiis T, Gobakken LR, Burud I (2021) Hyperspectral NIR time series imaging used as a new method for estimating the moisture content dynamics of thermally modified Scots pine. Wood Mater Sci Eng 16:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.177236610.1080/17480272.2020.1772366 ↗
22. dos Santos LM, Amaral EA, Nieri EM et al (2020) Estimating wood moisture by near infrared spectroscopy: testing acquisition methods and wood surfaces qualities. Wood Mater Sci Eng 16:336–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.176814310.1080/17480272.2020.1768143 ↗
23. Mäkelä M, Altgen M, Belt T, Rautkari L (2021) Hyperspectral imaging and chemometrics reveal wood acetylation on different spatial scales. J Mater Sci 56:5053–5066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05597-010.1007/s10853-020-05597-0 ↗
24. Haddadi A, Burger J, Leblon B et al (2015) Using near-infrared hyperspectral images on subalpine fir board. Part 1: moisture content estimation. Wood Mater Sci Eng 10:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2014.96574310.1080/17480272.2014.965743 ↗
25. Greenspan L (1977) Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand Sect A Phys Chem 81A:89. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.081A.01110.6028/jres.081A.011 ↗
26. Mäkelä M, Geladi P, Rissanen M et al (2020) Hyperspectral near infrared image calibration and regression. Anal Chim Acta 1105:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.01.01910.1016/j.aca.2020.01.019 ↗
27. Mäkelä M, Rissanen M, Sixta H (2020) Machine vision estimates the polyester content in recyclable waste textiles. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:105007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10500710.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105007 ↗
28. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P (1987) Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2:37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-910.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 ↗
29. Eigenvector Research I (2019) Box filter. In: Eig. Res. Doc. Wiki. http://wiki.eigenvector.com/index.php?title=Box_filter. Accessed 3 May 2020
30. Eigenvector Research I (2008) Standard Normal Variate. In: Eig. Res. Doc. Wiki. http://wiki.eigenvector.com/index.php?title=Snv. Accessed 3 May 2020
31. Wall ME, Rechtsteiner A, Rocha LM (2002) Singular value decomposition and principal component analysis. Pract Approach Microarray Data Anal. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47815-3_510.1007/0-306-47815-3_5 ↗
32. Geladi P, Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-910.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9 ↗
33. Geladi P, Grahn H, Manley M (2011) Data analysis and chemometrics for hyperspectral imaging. In: Raman, infrared, and near-infrared chemical imaging. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 93–10710.1002/9780470768150.ch5 ↗
34. de Jong S (1993) SIMPLS: an alternative approach to partial least squares regression. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 18:251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(93)85002-X10.1016/0169-7439(93)85002-X ↗
35. Andersson M (2009) A comparison of nine PLS1 algorithms. J Chemom 23:518–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.124810.1002/cem.1248 ↗
36. Gowen A, Burger J, Esquerre C et al (2014) Near infrared hyperspectral image regression: on the use of prediction maps as a tool for detecting model overfitting. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 22:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.111410.1255/jnirs.1114 ↗
37. Schwanninger M, Rodrigues JC, Fackler K (2011) A review of band assignments in near infrared spectra of wood and wood components. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 19:287–308. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.95510.1255/jnirs.955 ↗
38. Ali M, Emsley AM, Herman H, Heywood RJ (2001) Spectroscopic studies of the ageing of cellulosic paper. Polymer (Guildf) 42:2893–2900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00691-110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00691-1 ↗
39. Tsuchikawa S, Tsutsumi S (1998) Adsorptive and capillary condensed water in biological material. J Mater Sci Lett 17:661–663. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100667232416310.1023/A:1006672324163 ↗
40. Inagaki T, Yonenobu H, Tsuchikawa S (2008) Near-infrared spectroscopic monitoring of the water adsorption/desorption process in modern and archaeological wood. Appl Spectrosc 62:860–865. https://doi.org/10.1366/00037020878528431210.1366/000370208785284312 ↗
41. Alves A, Santos A, Rozenberg P et al (2012) A common near infrared—based partial least squares regression model for the prediction of wood density of Pinus pinaster and Larix × eurolepis. Wood Sci Technol 46:157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0383-x10.1007/s00226-010-0383-x ↗
42. Bassett KH, Liang CY, Marchessault RH (1963) The infrared spectrum of crystalline polysaccharides. IX. The near infrared spectrum of cellulose. J Polym Sci Part A Gen Pap 1:1687–1692. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1963.10001052010.1002/pol.1963.100010520 ↗
43. Workman J Jr, Weyer L (2007) Practical guide to interpretive near-infrared spectroscopy. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420018318 ↗
44. Yonenobu H, Tsuchikawa S (2003) Near-infrared spectroscopic comparison of antique and modern wood. Appl Spectrosc 57:1451–1453. https://doi.org/10.1366/00037020332255463510.1366/000370203322554635 ↗
45. Fornés V, Chaussidon J (1978) An interpretation of the evolution with temperature of the ν 2 +ν 3 combination band in water. J Chem Phys 68:4667–4671. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.43557610.1063/1.435576 ↗
46. Bächle H, Zimmer B, Windeisen E, Wegener G (2010) Evaluation of thermally modified beech and spruce wood and their properties by FT-NIR spectroscopy. Wood Sci Technol 44:421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-010-0361-310.1007/s00226-010-0361-3 ↗
47. Digaitis R, Thybring EE, Thygesen LG, Fredriksson M (2021) Targeted acetylation of wood: a tool for tuning wood-water interactions. Cellulose 28:8009–8025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04033-z10.1007/s10570-021-04033-z ↗