3D bioprinting of hydrogel/ceramic composites with hierarchical porosity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Direct 3D bioprinting of bioreactors containing microorganisms embedded inside hydrogel structures is a promising strategy for biotechnological applications. Nevertheless, microporous hydrogel networks hinder the supply of nutrients and oxygen to the cell and limit cell migration and proliferation. To overcome this drawback, we developed a feedstock for 3D bioprinting structures with hierarchical porosity. The feedstock is based on a highly particle-filled alumina/alginate nanocomposite gel with immobilized E. coli bacteria with the protein ovalbumin acting as foaming agent. The foamed nanocomposite is shaped into a porous mesh structure by 3D printing. The pore radius diameters inside the non-printed, non-foamed nanocomposite structure are below 10 µm, between 10 and 500 µm in the albumin-stabilized foam and with additional pores in the range of 0.5 and 1 mm in the printed mesh structure. The influence of albumin on the bubbles and hence pore formation was analyzed by means of interfacial shear rheology and porosity measurements with X-ray microtomography (µCT). Furthermore, averaged diffusion coefficients of water in printed and non-printed samples with different albumin concentrations were recorded using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tomography to assess the water content in the porous structure. Moreover, the effective viability and accessibility of embedded E. coli cells were analyzed for various material compositions. Here, the addition of albumin induced bacterial growth and the porosity increased the effective viability of the embedded bacteria, most likely because of enhanced accessibility of the cells. The experimental results demonstrate the potential of this approach for producing macroscopic bioactive materials with complex 3D geometries as a platform for novel applications in bioprocessing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Correia Carreira S, Begum R, Perriman AW (2020) 3D bioprinting: the emergence of programmable biodesign. Adv Healthc Mater 9(15):190055410.1002/adhm.201900554 ↗
2. Skardal A, Atala A (2015) Biomaterials for integration with 3D bioprinting. Ann Biomed Eng 43:73010.1007/s10439-014-1207-1 ↗
3. Tasoglu S, Demirci U (2013) Bioprinting for stem cell research. Trends Biotechnol 31:1010.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.005 ↗
4. Dababneh AB, Ozbolat IT (2014) Bioprinting technology: a current state-of-the-art review. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 136(6):06101610.1115/1.4028512 ↗
5. Willaert R (2007) Cell immobilization and its applications in biotechnology: current trends and future prospects. In: Fermentation microbiology and biotechnology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, pp 289–362
6. Nemati M, Webb C (2011) 2.24—Immobilized cell bioreactors. In: Moo-Young M (ed) Comprehensive biotechnology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 331–34610.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00100-8 ↗
7. Zhu Y (2007) Chapter 14—Immobilized cell fermentation for production of chemicals and fuels. In: Yang S-T (ed) Bioprocessing for value-added products from renewable resources. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 373–39610.1016/B978-044452114-9/50015-3 ↗
8. Armstrong JPK et al (2016) 3D bioprinting using a templated porous bioink. Adv Healthc Mater 5(14):1724–173010.1002/adhm.201600022 ↗
9. Kessel B et al (2020) 3D bioprinting of macroporous materials based on entangled hydrogel microstrands. Adv Sci 7:200141910.1002/advs.202001419 ↗
10. Ruiz-Cantu L et al (2020) Multi-material 3D bioprinting of porous constructs for cartilage regeneration. Mater Sci Eng: C 109:11057810.1016/j.msec.2019.110578 ↗
11. Groll J et al (2018) A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication 11(1):01300110.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
12. Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK (2020) hydrogel bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: a focused review of emerging strategies. Adv Mater 32(1):190202610.1002/adma.201902026 ↗
13. Hölzl K et al (2016) Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8(3):03200210.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 ↗
14. Gungor-Ozkerim PS et al (2018) Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: an overview. Biomater Sci 6(5):915–94610.1039/C7BM00765E ↗
15. Donderwinkel I, van Hest JCM, Cameron NR (2017) Bio-inks for 3D bioprinting: recent advances and future prospects. Polym Chem 8(31):4451–447110.1039/C7PY00826K ↗
16. Chimene D et al (2016) Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 44(6):2090–210210.1007/s10439-016-1638-y ↗
17. Pillay V et al (1998) Ionotropic gelation: encapsulation of indomethacin in calcium alginate gel discs. J Microencapsul 15(2):215–22610.3109/02652049809006851 ↗
18. Matai I et al (2020) Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 226:11953610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 ↗
19. Markstedt K et al (2015) 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose–alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromol 16:148910.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 ↗
20. Hsieh FY, Lin HH, Hsu SH (2015) 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials 71:4810.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.028 ↗
21. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:77310.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
22. Tasnim N et al (2018) 3D bioprinting stem cell derived tissues. Cell Mol Bioeng 11(4):219–24010.1007/s12195-018-0530-2 ↗
23. Skardal A, Zhang J, Prestwich GD (2010) Bioprinting vessel-like constructs using hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates. Biomaterials 31:617310.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.045 ↗
24. Cui X et al (2012) Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng 18:130410.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543 ↗
25. Lehner BAE, Schmieden DT, Meyer AS (2017) A straightforward approach for 3D bacterial printing. ACS Synth Biol 6(7):1124–113010.1021/acssynbio.6b00395 ↗
26. Trampe E et al (2018) functionalized bioink with optical sensor nanoparticles for O2 imaging in 3D-bioprinted constructs. Adv Func Mater 28(45):180441110.1002/adfm.201804411 ↗
27. Freyman MC et al (2020) 3D printing of living bacteria electrode. Nano Res 13(5):1318–132310.1007/s12274-019-2534-1 ↗
28. Wei J et al (2020) A 3D-printable TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose/alginate hydrogel with enhanced stability via nanoclay incorporation. Carbohydr Polym 238:11620710.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116207 ↗
29. Condi Mainardi J, Rezwan K, Maas M (2019) Embedding live bacteria in porous hydrogel/ceramic nanocomposites for bioprocessing applications. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 42(7):1215–122410.1007/s00449-019-02119-4 ↗
30. Bao G et al (2020) Triggered micropore-forming bioprinting of porous viscoelastic hydrogels. Mater Horiz 7(9):2336–234710.1039/D0MH00813C ↗
31. Shao L et al (2020) Sacrificial microgel-laden bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of mesoscale pore networks. Bio-Des Manuf 3(1):30–3910.1007/s42242-020-00062-y ↗
32. Ying G-L et al (2018) Aqueous two-phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous hydrogels. Adv Mater 30(50):180546010.1002/adma.201805460 ↗
33. Minas C et al (2016) 3D Printing of emulsions and foams into hierarchical porous ceramics. Adv Mater 28(45):9993–999910.1002/adma.201603390 ↗
34. Béduer A et al (2018) Additive manufacturing of hierarchical injectable scaffolds for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 76:71–7910.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.056 ↗
35. Muth JT et al (2017) Architected cellular ceramics with tailored stiffness via direct foam writing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(8):183210.1073/pnas.1616769114 ↗
36. Tariq F et al (2011) Characterization of hierarchical pore structures in ceramics using multiscale tomography. Acta Mater 59(5):2109–212010.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.012 ↗
37. Nakanishi K (2016) Porosity measurement. In: Klein L, Aparicio M, Jitianu A (eds) Handbook of sol-gel science and technology. Springer, Cham, pp 1–11
38. Robinson N, D’Agostino C (2020) NMR investigation into the influence of surface interactions on liquid diffusion in a mesoporous catalyst support. Top Catal 63(3):319–32710.1007/s11244-019-01209-7 ↗
39. Di Tullio V, Capitani D, Proietti N (2018) Unilateral NMR to study water diffusion and absorption in stone-hydrogel systems. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 269:180–18510.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.011 ↗
40. Blaeser A et al (2016) Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv Healthc Mater 5(3):326–33310.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
41. Bakrani Balani S et al (2019) Influence of printing parameters on the stability of deposited beads in fused filament fabrication of poly(lactic) acid. Addit Manuf 25:112–121
42. Ouyang L et al (2016) Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication 8(3):03502010.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
43. Katsevich A (2002) Theoretically exact filtered backprojection-type inversion algorithm for spiral CT. SIAM J Appl Math 62(6):2012–202610.1137/S0036139901387186 ↗
44. Maas M et al (2013) Towards the synthesis of hydroxyapatite/protein scaffolds with controlled porosities: bulk and interfacial shear rheology of a hydroxyapatite suspension with protein additives. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:529–53510.1016/j.jcis.2013.06.039 ↗
45. Nojima T, Iyoda T (2018) Egg white-based strong hydrogel via ordered protein condensation. NPG Asia Mater 10(1):e460–e46010.1038/am.2017.219 ↗
46. Rathna G, Li J, Gunasekaran S (2004) Functionally-modified egg white albumen hydrogels. Polym Int 53(12):1994–200010.1002/pi.1611 ↗
47. Godiya CB, Kumar S, Xiao Y (2020) Amine functionalized egg albumin hydrogel with enhanced adsorption potential for diclofenac sodium in water. J Hazard Mater 393:12241710.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122417 ↗