3D printing of biphasic osteochondral scaffold with sintered hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone
Source abstract
Abstract
Biphasic scaffolds with biomimetic structure are essential to osteochondral tissue engineering. However, insufficient mechanical properties limit their applications. Here, a novel biphasic scaffold was designed and fabricated using a multi-nozzle three-dimensional (3D) printer with hydroxyapatite (HAp) and polycaprolactone (PCL). HAp was first printed as the subchondral layer and strengthened by sintering, followed by printing PCL as the cartilage layer on top of the HAp layer. High interface bonding strength between the two layers was obtained by controlling the temperature of the printing platform. Compression tests showed that the biphasic scaffold had properties between those of pure HAp and PCL scaffolds, and its compressive modulus was about 18 MPa at the strain of 0–5% and 143 MPa at the strain of 5–10%, which was separately at the range of native cartilage and subchondral bone. Finite element simulation was adopted to investigate the variation of inner structure of the biphasic scaffold under compression, demonstrating a biomimetic strengthened structure with a deformable cartilage layer. Therefore, the biphasic HAp/PCL scaffold takes advantage of both the rigidity of HAp and the elasticity of PCL, thus has biomimetic mechanical properties for its further applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Dhinsa BS, Adesida AB (2012) Current clinical therapies for cartilage repair, their limitation and the role of stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 7(2):143–14810.2174/157488812799219009 ↗
2. Di Luca A, Van Blitterswijk C, Moroni L (2015) The Osteochondral interface as a gradient tissue: from development to the fabrication of gradient scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Birth Defects Res Part C Embryo Today Rev 105(1):34–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.2109210.1002/bdrc.21092 ↗
3. Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA (2009) The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 1(6):461–46810.1177/1941738109350438 ↗
4. Ji W-C, Zhang X-W, Qiu Y-S (2016) Selected suitable seed cell, scaffold and growth factor could maximize the repair effect using tissue engineering method in spinal cord injury. World J Exp Med 6(3):58–62. https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v6.i3.5810.5493/wjem.v6.i3.58 ↗
5. Cai H, Yao Y, Xu Y, Wang Q, Zou W, Liang J, Sun Y, Zhou C, Fan Y, Zhang X (2019) A Col I and BCP ceramic bi-layer scaffold implant promotes regeneration in osteochondral defects. RSC Adv 9(7):3740–3748. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09171d10.1039/c8ra09171d ↗
6. Du Y, Liu H, Yang Q, Wang S, Wang J, Ma J, Noh I, Mikos AG, Zhang S (2017) Selective laser sintering scaffold with hierarchical architecture and gradient composition for osteochondral repair in rabbits. Biomaterials 137:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.021 ↗
7. Liu J, Li L, Suo H, Yan M, Yin J, Fu J (2019) 3D printing of biomimetic multi-layered GelMA/nHA scaffold for osteochondral defect repair. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10770810.1016/j.matdes.2019.107708 ↗
8. Zhang B, Huang J, Narayan RJ (2020) Gradient scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering and regeneration. J Mater Chem B 8(36):8149–8170. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00688b10.1039/d0tb00688b ↗
9. Wang Y, Guo Y, Wei Q, Li X, Ji K, Zhang K (2021) Current researches on design and manufacture of biopolymer-based osteochondral biomimetic scaffolds. Bio Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00119-y10.1007/s42242-020-00119-y ↗
10. Wu Y, Chen X, Zhao G, Chen R, Liu Y, Ren H, Qu X, Liu Y (2019) β-Tricalcium phosphate/ε-polycaprolactone composite scaffolds with a controllable gradient: fabrication and characterization. Ceram Int 45(13):16188–16194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.140 ↗
11. Zhou X, Esworthy T, Lee SJ, Miao S, Cui H, Plesiniak M, Fenniri H, Webster T, Rao RD, Zhang LG (2019) 3D Printed scaffolds with hierarchical biomimetic structure for osteochondral regeneration. Nanomedicine 19:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2019.04.00210.1016/j.nano.2019.04.002 ↗
12. Diao J, OuYang J, Deng T, Liu X, Feng Y, Zhao N, Mao C, Wang Y (2018) 3D-plotted beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds with smaller pore sizes improve in vivo bone regeneration and biomechanical properties in a critical-sized calvarial defect rat model. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180044110.1002/adhm.201800441 ↗
13. Wang C, Huang W, Zhou Y, He L, He Z, Chen Z, He X, Tian S, Liao J, Lu B, Wei Y, Wang M (2020) 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact Mater 5(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004 ↗
14. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin CT (2020) Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11953610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 ↗
15. Gao, F., Xu, Z., Liang, Q., Liu, B., Li, H., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Lin, Z., Wu, M., Ruan, C., Liu, W. (2018) Direct 3D printing of high strength biohybrid gradient hydrogel scaffolds for efficient repair of osteochondral defect. Adv Funct Mater https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170664410.1002/adfm.201706644 ↗
16. Holmes B, Zhu W, Li J, Lee JD, Zhang LG (2015) Development of novel three-dimensional printed scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 21(1–2):403–415. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.013810.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0138 ↗
17. Jia S, Wang J, Zhang T, Pan W, Li Z, He X, Yang C, Wu Q, Sun W, Xiong Z, Hao D (2018) Multilayered scaffold with a compact interfacial layer enhances osteochondral defect repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(24):20296–20305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0344510.1021/acsami.8b03445 ↗
18. Kosik-Kozioł A, Heljak M, Święszkowski W (2020) Mechanical properties of hybrid triphasic scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. Mater Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12689310.1016/j.matlet.2019.126893 ↗
19. Chen L, Deng C, Li J, Yao Q, Chang J, Wang L, Wu C (2019) 3D printing of a lithium-calcium-silicate crystal bioscaffold with dual bioactivities for osteochondral interface reconstruction. Biomaterials 196:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.005 ↗
20. Shimomura K, Moriguchi Y, Murawski CD, Yoshikawa H, Nakamura N (2014) Osteochondral tissue engineering with biphasic scaffold: current strategies and techniques. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20(5):468–476. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.054310.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0543 ↗
21. Sayyidmousavi A, Bougherara H (2012) Investigation of stress shielding around the Stryker Omnifit and Exeter periprosthetic hip implants using an irreversible thermodynamic-based model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100(5):1416–1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3250010.1002/jbm.b.32500 ↗
22. Bittner SM, Guo JL, Melchiorri A, Mikos AG (2018) Three-dimensional printing of multilayered tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Today (Kidlington) 21(8):861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00610.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.006 ↗
23. Bittner SM, Guo JL, Mikos AG (2018) Spatiotemporal control of growth factors in three-dimensional printed scaffolds. Bioprinting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e0003210.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00032 ↗
24. Bracaglia LG, Smith BT, Watson E, Arumugasaamy N, Mikos AG, Fisher JP (2017) 3D printing for the design and fabrication of polymer-based gradient scaffolds. Acta Biomater 56:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.03010.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.030 ↗
25. Degirmenbasi N, Kalyon DM, Birinci E (2006) Biocomposites of nanohydroxyapatite with collagen and poly(vinyl alcohol). Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 48(1):42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.01.00210.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.01.002 ↗
26. Shahbazarab Z, Teimouri A, Chermahini AN, Azadi M (2018) Fabrication and characterization of nanobiocomposite scaffold of zein/chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite prepared by freeze-drying method for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 108:1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.01710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.017 ↗
27. O’Leary C, Cavanagh B, Unger RE, Kirkpatrick CJ, O’Dea S, O’Brien FJ, Cryan S-A (2016) The development of a tissue-engineered tracheobronchial epithelial model using a bilayered collagen-hyaluronate scaffold. Biomaterials 85:111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.06510.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.065 ↗
28. Li C, Ouyang L, Armstrong JPK, Stevens MM (2021) Advances in the fabrication of biomaterials for gradient tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 39(2):150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.06.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2020.06.005 ↗
29. Erickson AE, Sun J, Levengood SKL, Swanson S, Chang FC, Tsao CT, Zhang MQ (2019) Chitosan-based composite bilayer scaffold as an in vitro osteochondral defect regeneration model. Biomed Microdevices. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-019-0373-110.1007/s10544-019-0373-1 ↗
30. Loy BN, Zimel M, Gowda AL, Tooley TR, Maerz T, Bicos J, Guettler J (2018) A biomechanical and structural comparison of articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the glenoid and humeral head. Orthop J Sports Med 6(7):7. https://doi.org/10.1177/232596711878585410.1177/2325967118785854 ↗