Electrodeposition of cuprous oxide on a porous copper framework for an improved photoelectrochemical performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting can be an efficient and economically feasible alternative for hydrogen production if easily processed photoelectrodes made of inexpensive and abundant materials are employed. Here, we present the preparation of porous Cu2O photocathodes with good PEC performance using solely inexpensive electrodeposition methods. Firstly, porous Cu structures with delicate pore networks were deposited on flat Cu substrates employing hydrogen-bubble-assisted Cu deposition. In a second electrodeposition step, the porous Cu structures were mechanically reinforced and subsequently detached from the substrates to obtain free-standing porous frameworks. In a third and final step, photoactive Cu2O films were electrodeposited. The PEC water splitting performance in 0.5 M Na2SO4 (pH ∼6) shows that these photocathodes have photocurrents of up to −2.25 mA cm−2 at 0 V versus RHE while maintaining a low dark current. In contrast, the Cu2O deposited on a flat Cu sample showed photocurrents only up to −1.25 mA cm−2. This performance increase results from the significantly higher reactive surface area while maintaining a thin and homogeneous Cu2O layer with small grain sizes and therefore higher hole concentrations as determined by Mott-Schottky analysis. The free-standing porous Cu2O samples show a direct optical transmittance of 23% (λ = 400–800 nm) and can therefore be used in tandem structures with a photoanode in full PEC cells. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Glenk G, Reichelstein S (2019) Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen. Nat Energy 4:216–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0326-110.1038/s41560-019-0326-1 ↗
2. Hisatomi T, Kubota J, Domen K (2014) Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 43:7520–7535. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60378d10.1039/c3cs60378d ↗
3. Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR et al (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
4. Grätzel M (2001) Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
5. Golden TD, Shumsky MG, Zhou Y et al (1996) Electrochemical deposition of Copper(I) Oxide films. Chem Mater 8:2499–2504. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm960209510.1021/cm9602095 ↗
6. Rakhshani AE, Varghese J (1988) Potentiostatic electrodeposition of cuprous oxide. Thin Solid Films 157:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(88)90349-510.1016/0040-6090(88)90349-5 ↗
7. Rakhshani AE, Al-Jassar AA, Varghese J (1987) Electrodeposition and characterization of cuprous oxide. Thin Solid Films 148:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(87)90157-X10.1016/0040-6090(87)90157-X ↗
8. Ma X, Zhang J, Wang B et al (2018) Hierarchical Cu2O foam/g-C3N4 photocathode for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 427:907–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.07510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.075 ↗
9. Gerischer H (1977) On the stability of semiconductor electrodes against photodecomposition. J Electroanal Chem 82:133–14310.1016/S0022-0728(77)80253-2 ↗
10. Zhang Y, Deng B, Zhang T et al (2010) Shape effects of Cu2O polyhedral microcrystals on photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 114:5073–5079. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911003710.1021/jp9110037 ↗
11. Tolstova Y, Wilson SS, Atwater HA (2015) Single phase, single orientation Cu2O (100) and (110) thin films grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. J Cryst Growth 410:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.04510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.045 ↗
12. Chen A, Long H, Li X et al (2009) Controlled growth and characteristics of single-phase Cu 2 O and CuO films by pulsed laser deposition. Vacuum 83:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.10.00310.1016/j.vacuum.2008.10.003 ↗
13. Akimoto K, Ishizuka S, Yanagita M et al (2006) Thin film deposition of Cu2O and application for solar cells. Sol Energy 80:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.10.01210.1016/j.solener.2005.10.012 ↗
14. Paracchino A, Laporte V, Sivula K et al (2011) Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nat Mater 10:456–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat301710.1038/nmat3017 ↗
15. Nitopi S, Bertheussen E, Scott SB et al (2019) Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem Rev 119:7610–7672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
16. An X, Li K, Tang J (2014) Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide composites for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2. Chemsuschem 7:1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20130119410.1002/cssc.201301194 ↗
17. Paracchino A, Mathews N, Hisatomi T et al (2012) Ultrathin films on copper(i) oxide water splitting photocathodes: a study on performance and stability. Energy Environ Sci 5:8673. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22063f10.1039/c2ee22063f ↗
18. Brittman S, Yoo Y, Dasgupta NP et al (2014) Epitaxially aligned cuprous oxide nanowires for all-oxide, single-wire solar cells. Nano Lett 14:4665–4670. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl501750h10.1021/nl501750h ↗
19. Lin CY, Lai YH, Mersch D, Reisner E (2012) Cu 2ONiO x nanocomposite as an inexpensive photocathode in photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Sci 3:3482–3487. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sc20874a10.1039/c2sc20874a ↗
20. Wu H, Zheng Z, Toe CY et al (2020) A pulse electrodeposited amorphous tunnel layer stabilises Cu2O for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible-light irradiation. J Mater Chem A 8:5638–5646. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta00629g10.1039/d0ta00629g ↗
21. Azevedo J, Steier L, Dias P et al (2014) On the stability enhancement of cuprous oxide water splitting photocathodes by low temperature steam annealing. Energy Environ Sci 7:4044–4052. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee02160f10.1039/c4ee02160f ↗
22. Luo J, Steier L, Son MK et al (2016) Cu2O nanowire photocathodes for efficient and durable solar water splitting. Nano Lett 16:1848–1857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0492910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04929 ↗
23. de Jongh PE, Vanmaekelbergh D, Kelly JJ (2000) Photoelectrochemistry of electrodeposited Cu[sub 2]O. J Electrochem Soc 147:486. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.139322110.1149/1.1393221 ↗
24. Engel CJ, Polson TA, Spado JR et al (2008) Photoelectrochemistry of porous p-Cu2 O films. J Electrochem Soc 155:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.283085010.1149/1.2830850 ↗
25. Jaeho Oh, Yongsug T, Jaeyoung L (2004) Electrodeposition of Cu2O nanowires using nanoporous alumina template. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 7:C27–C30. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.164063710.1117/1.1640637 ↗
26. Zhang W, Wen X, Yang S et al (2003) Single-crystalline scroll-type nanotube arrays of copper hydroxide synthesized at room temperature. Adv Mater 15:822–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20030484010.1002/adma.200304840 ↗
27. Wen X, Xie Y, Choi CL et al (2005) Copper-based nanowire materials: templated syntheses, characterizations, and applications. Langmuir 21:4729–4737. https://doi.org/10.1021/la050038v10.1021/la050038v ↗
28. Paracchino A, Brauer JC, Moser JE et al (2012) Synthesis and characterization of high-photoactivity electrodeposited Cu 2O solar absorber by photoelectrochemistry and ultrafast spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 116:7341–7350. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp301176y10.1021/jp301176y ↗
29. Ahn CY, Lim MS, Hwang W et al (2017) Effect of porous metal flow field in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell under pressurized condition. Fuel Cells 17:652–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.20170004210.1002/fuce.201700042 ↗
30. Varzi A, Mattarozzi L, Cattarin S et al (2018) 3D Porous Cu–Zn alloys as alternative anode materials for Li-ion batteries with superior low T performance. Adv Energy Mater 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170170610.1002/aenm.201701706 ↗
31. Hao M, Charbonneau V, Fomena NN et al (2019) Hydrogen bubble templating of fractal Ni catalysts for water oxidation in alkaline media. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:5734–5743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b0086010.1021/acsaem.9b00860 ↗
32. Chaturvedi P, Sarker S, Chen X et al (2019) Enhancing the cooperative catalytic effect in Ni/Co Hydr(oxy)oxide porous electrodes for overall water splitting and glucose sensing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:11303–11312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0082210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00822 ↗
33. Shin HC, Liu M (2004) Copper foam structures with highly porous nanostructured walls. Chem Mater 16:5460–5464. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm048887b10.1021/cm048887b ↗
34. Still ER, Wikberg P (1980) Solution studies of systems with polynuclear complex formation. 1. The copper(II) citrate system. Inorganica Chim Acta 46:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1693(00)84183-310.1016/S0020-1693(00)84183-3 ↗
35. Eskhult J, Nyholm L (2008) Pulsed galvanostatic and potentiostatic electrodeposition of Cu and Cu 2O nanolayers from alkaline Cu(II)-citrate solutions. J Electrochem Soc 155:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.280679310.1149/1.2806793 ↗
36. Yoon S, Kim M, Kim IS et al (2014) Manipulation of cuprous oxide surfaces for improving their photocatalytic activity. J Mater Chem A 2:11621–11627. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00616j10.1039/c4ta00616j ↗
37. Cao D, Nasori N, Wang Z et al (2016) Facile surface treatment on Cu2O photocathodes for enhancing the photoelectrochemical response. Appl Catal B Environ 198:398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.010 ↗
38. Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. National Association of Corrosion Engineers10.1007/978-1-4684-1806-4_4 ↗
39. Wang JP, Cho WD (2009) Oxidation behavior of pure copper in oxygen and/or water vapor at intermediate temperature. ISIJ Int 49:1926–1931. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.49.192610.2355/isijinternational.49.1926 ↗
40. Chen K, Xue D (2014) Reaction route to the crystallization of copper oxides. Appl Sci Converg Technol 23:14–26. https://doi.org/10.5757/asct.2014.23.1.1410.5757/asct.2014.23.1.14 ↗
41. Yang Y, Xu D, Wu Q, Diao P (2016) Cu2O/CuO bilayered composite as a high-efficiency photocathode for photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci Rep 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep3515810.1038/srep35158 ↗
42. Plowman BJ, Jones LA, Bhargava SK (2015) Building with bubbles: the formation of high surface area honeycomb-like films via hydrogen bubble templated electrodeposition. Chem Commun 51:4331–4346. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc06638c10.1039/c4cc06638c ↗
43. Wang M, Yu X, Wang Z et al (2017) Hierarchically 3D porous films electrochemically constructed on gas-liquid-solid three-phase interface for energy application. J Mater Chem A 5:9488–9513. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta02519j10.1039/c7ta02519j ↗
44. Niu W, Moehl T, Cui W et al (2018) Extended Light Harvesting with Dual Cu2O-Based Photocathodes for High Efficiency Water Splitting. Adv Energy Mater 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170232310.1002/aenm.201702323 ↗
45. Ma QB, Hofmann JP, Litke A, Hensen EJM (2015) Cu2O photoelectrodes for solar water splitting: tuning photoelectrochemical performance by controlled faceting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 141:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.02510.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.025 ↗
46. Bai J, Li Y, Wang R et al (2015) A novel 3D ZnO/Cu2O nanowire photocathode material with highly efficient photoelectrocatalytic performance. J Mater Chem A 3:22996–23002. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta07583a10.1039/c5ta07583a ↗
47. Huang Q, Kang F, Liu H et al (2013) Highly aligned Cu2O/CuO/TiO2 core/shell nanowire arrays as photocathodes for water photoelectrolysis. J Mater Chem A 1:2418–2425. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ta00918h10.1039/c2ta00918h ↗