journal article·2019-09

A sulfonated PEEK/PCL composite nanofibrous membrane for periosteum tissue engineering application

Fan Zhao, Sihan Hu, Fujun Wang, Lu Wang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The favorable mechanical property and regenerative capacity of bone graft are extremely important for the reconstruction of the large bone defect. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has tailored elastic modulus to natural cortical bone, while its application is limited by bio-inert surface. Tissue-engineered periosteum exhibits improved osteogenesis-inducing capacity. However, the present artificial periosteum is difficult to effectively anchor to bone grafts. The use of PEEK-based nanomembrane may be a promising candidate to integrate with PEEK bone graft without anchor problem, which has not been reported until now. In this work, a series of fluorinated PEEK polymers were successfully synthesized and electrospun into nanofibers. The chemical structure, morphology, thermal stability, wettability and mechanical strength of s-PEEK membranes were investigated. Then, a novel flexible nanocomposite membrane for tissue-engineered periosteum based on fibrous sulfonated PEEK (s-PEEK) and polycaprolactone (PCL) was prepared. The functional properties were evaluated accordingly. The s-PEEK/PCL composite membranes showed superior hydrophilic and better ductility than pure s-PEEK film. The capacity of protein adsorption was also evaluated, suggesting the elevated bioactivity of s-PEEK/PCL composite membranes. Finally, the composite membranes were successfully mineralized by a homogenous and thinner calcium phosphate layer, indicating its potential to improve the osteogenic response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Diomede F et al (2018) Three-dimensional printed PLA scaffold and human gingival stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a new tool for bone defect repair. Stem Cell Res Ther 9(1):10410.1186/s13287-018-0850-0 ↗
2. Wang S et al (2018) A high-strength mineralized collagen bone scaffold for large-sized cranial bone defect repair in sheep. Regen Biomater 5(5):1–1010.1093/rb/rby020 ↗
3. Maksimkin AV et al (2017) Multilayer porous UHMWPE scaffolds for bone defects replacement. Mater Sci Eng C 73:366–37210.1016/j.msec.2016.12.104 ↗
4. O’Keefe RJ, Mao J (2011) Bone tissue engineering and regeneration: from discovery to the clinic-an overview. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 17(6):389–39210.1089/ten.teb.2011.0475 ↗
5. Cui Y et al (2018) Porous Particle Reinforced Bioactive Gelatin Scaffold for Large Segmental Bone Defect Repairing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(8):6956–696410.1021/acsami.7b19010 ↗
6. Soucacos PN et al (2006) Vascularised bone grafts for the management of non-union. Injury 37(1):41–5010.1016/j.injury.2006.02.040 ↗
7. Liu Y, Lim J, Teoh SH (2013) Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 31(5):688–70510.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.10.003 ↗
8. Fillingham Y, Jacobs J (2016) Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J 98-B:6–910.1302/0301-620X.98B.36350 ↗
9. Deng L, Deng Y, Xie K (2017) AgNPs-decorated 3D printed PEEK implant for infection control and bone repair. Colloids Surf B 160:483–49210.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.061 ↗
10. Poser L et al (2014) A standardized critical size defect model in normal and osteoporotic rats to evaluate bone tissue engineered constructs. Biomed Res Int 1:348635
11. Ouyang L et al (2017) Smart release of doxorubicin loaded on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surface with 3D porous structure. Colloid Surfaces B 163:175–18310.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.12.045 ↗
12. Boaretti C et al (2017) Mechanically stable nanofibrous sPEEK/Aquivion®; composite membranes for fuel cell applications. J Membrane Sci 545:66–7410.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.055 ↗
13. Pimental C et al (2019) Sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)/hydroxyapatite membrane as biomaterials: process evaluation. Polimeros 29(1):e201900910.1590/0104-1428.01018 ↗
14. Kang G et al (2015) Research progress of polyether ether ketone biocomposites. Ann Materials Sci Eng 2(1):1020
15. Hai L et al (2018) Effects of an electrospun fluorinated poly(ether ether ketone) separator on the enhanced safety and electrochemical properties of lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 290:150–16410.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.075 ↗
16. Liu S et al (2018) One-step fabrication of functionalized poly(etheretherketone) surfaces with enhanced biocompatibility and osteogenic activity. Mater Sci Eng, C 88:70–7810.1016/j.msec.2018.03.003 ↗
17. Xianfeng LI, Hao X, Hui NA (2007) Preparation of nanosilver particles into sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (S-PEEK) nanostructures by electrospinning. Mater Lett 61(2):421–42610.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.074 ↗
18. Pei F et al (2018) A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair. Adv Sci 5(6):170081710.1002/advs.201700817 ↗
19. Ouyang L et al (2018) Graphene-oxide-decorated microporous polyetheretherketone with superior antibacterial capability and in vitro osteogenesis for orthopedic implant. Macromol Biosci 18(6):180003610.1002/mabi.201800036 ↗
20. Ouyang L et al (2018) Osteogenesis and antibacterial activity of graphene oxide and dexamethasone coatings on porous polyetheretherketone via polydopamine-assisted chemistry. Coatings 8(6):20310.3390/coatings8060203 ↗
21. Wang S et al (2018) Enhanced antibacterial property and osteo-differentiation activity on plasma treated porous polyetheretherketone with hierarchical micro/nano-topography. J Biomat Sci-Polym E 29(5):110.1080/09205063.2018.1425181 ↗
22. Chen K et al (2015) Decellularized periosteum as a potential biologic scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 19:46–5510.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.020 ↗
23. Gong M et al (2018) Icariin-loaded electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofiber membrane as potential artificial periosteum. Colloid Surfaces B 170:201–20910.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.012 ↗
24. Baldwin JG et al (2016) Periosteum tissue engineering in an orthotopic in vivo platform. Biomaterials 121:193–20410.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.016 ↗
25. Schonmeyr B et al (2009) Synthesis of a tissue-engineered periosteum with acellular dermal matrix and cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 15(7):1833–184110.1089/ten.tea.2008.0446 ↗
26. Xuetao S et al (2014) Periosteum-mimetic structures made from freestanding microgrooved nanosheets. Adv Mater 26(20):3290–329610.1002/adma.201305804 ↗
27. Shi X et al (2014) Stretchable and micropatterned membrane for osteogenic differentation of stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(15):11915–1192310.1021/am5029236 ↗
28. Zhang W, Yu J, Chang H (2015) Two dimensional nanosheets as conductive, flexible elements in biomaterials. J Mater Chem B 3(25):4959–496410.1039/C5TB00087D ↗
29. Liu J, Holuszko M, Mastalerz M (2017) Applications of micro-FTIR technique in studying hydrophobicity of coal. Int J Coal Geol 178:74–8310.1016/j.coal.2017.04.015 ↗
30. Jung B et al (2010) Biological and biomechanical evaluations of osteochondral allografts preserved in cold storage solution containing epigallocatechin gallate. Cell Transplant 19(6):681–689
31. Xi ZD, Xie CY, Xi YB (2016) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor enhances lipopolysaccharide-induced fibroblast proliferation by inducing toll-like receptor 4. BMC Musculoskel Dis 17(1):1–510.1186/s12891-015-0856-z ↗
32. Yang JM, Tsai RZ, Hsu CC (2016) Protein adsorption on polyanion/polycation layer-by-layer assembled polyelectrolyte films. Colloid Surfaces B 142:98–10410.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.039 ↗
33. Morita Y, Sakamoto H, Suye S (2017) Characterization of protein adsorption on stretched polyurethane nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. RSC Adv 7(89):56484–5648810.1039/C7RA11942A ↗
34. Gao Y et al (2016) Fabrication of gelatin-based electrospun composite fibers for anti-bacterial properties and protein adsorption. Mar Drugs 14(10):19210.3390/md14100192 ↗
35. Hironori I et al (2014) Mineralization of hydroxyapatite upon a unique xanthan gum hydrogel by an alternate soaking process. Carbohyd Polym 102(1):846–851
36. Lopezheredia MA et al (2018) Mineralization of gellan gum hydrogels with calcium and magnesium carbonates by alternate soaking in solutions of calcium/magnesium and carbonate ion solutions. J Tissue Eng Regen M 12(8):1825–183410.1002/term.2675 ↗
37. Luickx N et al (2015) Optimization of the time efficient calcium phosphate coating on electrospun poly(d, l-lactide). J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 103(8):2720–273010.1002/jbm.a.35404 ↗
38. Varley RJ et al (2000) Toughening of a trifunctional epoxy system Part III. Kinetic and morphological study of the thermoplastic modified cure process. Polym 41(9):3425–343610.1016/S0032-3861(99)00503-0 ↗
39. Sadrjahani M, Gharehaghaji AA, Javanbakht M (2016) Aligned electrospun sulfonated polyetheretherketone nanofiber based proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Polym Eng Sci 57(8):789–79610.1002/pen.24453 ↗
40. Tamada Y, Ikada Y (1993) Effect of preadsorbed proteins on cell adhesion to polymer surfaces. J Colloid Interf Sci 155(2):334–33910.1006/jcis.1993.1044 ↗
41. Qiu L et al (2016) Responses of vascular endothelial cells to photoembossed topographies on poly(methyl methacrylate) films. J Func Biomater 7(4):3310.3390/jfb7040033 ↗
42. Li L et al (2012) The use of hyaluronan to regulate protein adsorption and cell infiltration in nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials 33(12):3428–344510.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.038 ↗