journal article·2020-12Open access

A new understanding of the effect of filler minerals on the precipitation of synthetic C–S–H

Zengqi Zhang, Qiang Wang, Mingzhong Zhang, Zongxian Huang, Shiyu Zhuang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 35

Abstract

The filler effect is the most important physical mechanism of mineral admixtures in the early hydration of cement whose chemical properties greatly affect the precipitation of C–S–H. In this study, calcite, strontianite, magnesite, dolomite, quartz, whewellite and whitlockite were selected as the fillers. The morphology and reaction kinetics of synthetic C–S–H precipitated on the surfaces of different fillers were studied via electron microscopy observations and electrical conductivity and ion concentration measurements. The precipitation rate of C–S–H has a positive correlation with the affinity of Ca2+ for adsorption on the fillers, which can be explained by the nucleation barrier of C–S–H. Extremely ordered honeycomb-like morphology of the C–S–H is found on calcite and strontianite surfaces, while less regular leaf-like or honeycomb-like C–S–H is found on whewellite and whitlockite. The ordered C–S–H pattern is related to the lattice cleavage of the ionic compound filler. In the case of quartz, C–S–H prefers growth along the tangential direction, which is quite different from the normal-direction growth on ionic compounds. The in-plane growth of C–S–H on quartz is believed to be induced by a layer of loosely physically adsorbed Ca2+.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Drilling and Well Engineering · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Kumar A, Oey T, Kim S et al (2013) Simple methods to estimate the influence of limestone fillers on reaction and property evolution in cementitious materials. Cem Concr Compos 42:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.05.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.05.002 ↗
2. Poppe AM, De Schutter G (2005) Cement hydration in the presence of high filler contents. Cem Concr Res 35:2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.008 ↗
3. Lawrence P, Cyr M, Ringot E (2005) Mineral admixtures in mortars effect of type, amount and fineness of fine constituents on compressive strength. Cem Concr Res 35:1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.004 ↗
4. Lothenbach B, Le Saout G, Gallucci E, Scrivener K (2008) Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements. Cem Concr Res 38:848–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002 ↗
5. Bentz DP (2006) Modeling the influence of limestone filler on cement hydration using CEMHYD3D. Cem Concr Compos 28:124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.10.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.10.006 ↗
6. Mohamed AR, Elsalamawy M, Ragab M (2015) Modeling the influence of limestone addition on cement hydration. Alexandria Eng J 54:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2014.11.00410.1016/j.aej.2014.11.004 ↗
7. Berodier E, Scrivener K (2014) Understanding the filler effect on the nucleation and growth of C-S-H. J Am Ceram Soc 97:3764–3773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1317710.1111/jace.13177 ↗
8. Ouyang X, Koleva DA, Ye G, van Breugel K (2017) Insights into the mechanisms of nucleation and growth of C-S–H on fillers. Mater Struct Constr. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1082-y10.1617/s11527-017-1082-y ↗
9. French CW, Mokhtarzadeh A (1993) High strength concrete: effects of materials, curing and test procedures on short-term compressive strength. PCI J 38:76–87. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011993.76.8710.15554/pcij.05011993.76.87 ↗
10. Bentz DP, Ardani A, Barrett T et al (2015) Multi-scale investigation of the performance of limestone in concrete. Constr Build Mater 75:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.042 ↗
11. Mehta P, Monteiro P (2006) Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Education, Cambridge
12. Ouyang X, Koleva DA, Ye G, van Breugel K (2017) Understanding the adhesion mechanisms between C-S-H and fillers. Cem Concr Res 100:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.07.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2017.07.006 ↗
13. Oey T, Kumar A, Bullard JW et al (2013) The filler effect: the influence of filler content and surface area on cementitious reaction rates. J Am Ceram Soc 96:1978–1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1226410.1111/jace.12264 ↗
14. Kumar A, Oey T, Falzone G et al (2017) The filler effect: the influence of filler content and type on the hydration rate of tricalcium silicate. J Am Ceram Soc 100:3316–3328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1485910.1111/jace.14859 ↗
15. Sato T, Diallo F (2010) Seeding effect of nano-CaCO3 on the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/2141-1110.3141/2141-11 ↗
16. Plank J, Schönlein M, Kanchanason V (2018) Study on the early crystallization of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) in the presence of polycarboxylate superplasticizers. J Organomet Chem 869:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.02.00510.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.02.005 ↗
17. Wang F, Kong X, Wang D, Wang Q (2019) The effects of nano-C-S-H with different polymer stabilizers on early cement hydration. J Am Ceram Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1642510.1111/jace.16425 ↗
18. Kanchanason V, Plank J (2017) Role of pH on the structure, composition and morphology of C-S-H–PCE nanocomposites and their effect on early strength development of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 102:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.09.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2017.09.002 ↗
19. Schönlein M, Plank J (2018) A TEM study on the very early crystallization of C-S-H in the presence of polycarboxylate superplasticizers: transformation from initial C-S-H globules to nanofoils. Cem Concr Res 106:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.017 ↗
20. Nicoleau L (2010) New calcium silicate hydrate network. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/2142-0710.3141/2142-07 ↗
21. Nicoleau L, Gädt T, Chitu L et al (2013) Oriented aggregation of calcium silicate hydrate platelets by the use of comb-like copolymers. Soft Matter 9:4864–4874. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm00022b10.1039/c3sm00022b ↗
22. Li Y, Li H, Wang Z, Jin CC (2020) Effect and mechanism analysis of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on C-S-H gel. Cem Concr Res 128:105955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10595510.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105955 ↗
23. Picker A, Nicoleau L, Burghard Z et al (2017) Mesocrystalline calcium silicate hydrate: a bioinspired route toward elastic concrete materials. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.170121610.1126/sciadv.1701216 ↗
24. Esteves LP (2011) Superabsorbent polymers: on their interaction with water and pore fluid. Cem Concr Compos 33:717–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.04.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.04.006 ↗
25. Sun J, Shi H, Qian B et al (2017) Effects of synthetic C-S-H/PCE nanocomposites on early cement hydration. Constr Build Mater 140:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.075 ↗
26. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (2005) Description of input and examples for PHREEQC inverse geochemical calculations batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and version 3—a computer program for speciation. Cso 6-43A. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-6554(94)90020-510.1016/0029-6554(94)90020-5 ↗
27. Burgos-Cara A, Ruiz-Agudo E, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2017) Effectiveness of oxalic acid treatments for the protection of marble surfaces. Mater Des 115:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.037 ↗
28. Popova A, Geoffroy G, Renou-Gonnord M-F et al (2004) Interactions between polymeric dispersants and calcium silicate hydrates. J Am Ceram Soc 83:2556–2560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01590.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01590.x ↗
29. Sposito G (1993) Chemistry of the solid-water interface. Wiley, New York10.1016/0304-4203(93)90021-F ↗
30. Huang YC, Fowkes FM, Lloyd TB, Sanders ND (1991) Adsorption of calcium ions from calcium chloride solutions onto calcium carbonate particles. Langmuir 7:1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00056a02810.1021/la00056a028 ↗
31. Pourchet S, Pochard I, Brunel F, Perrey D (2013) Chemistry of the calcite/water interface: influence of sulfate ions and consequences in terms of cohesion forces. Cem Concr Res 52:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.002 ↗
32. Pokrovsky OS, Mielczarski JA, Barres O, Schott J (2000) Surface speciation models of calcite and dolomite/aqueous solution interfaces and their spectroscopic evaluation. Langmuir 16:2677–2688. https://doi.org/10.1021/la980905e10.1021/la980905e ↗
33. Papirer E (2000) Adsorption on silicon surfaces. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781482269703 ↗
34. Jang HM, Fuerstenau DW (1987) The nature of simple monovalent cation-silica interaction as reflected in the spin-lattice relaxation time of 23 Na. Langmuir 3:1114–1118. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00078a04110.1021/la00078a041 ↗
35. Jönsson B, Nonat A, Labbez C et al (2005) Controlling the cohesion of cement paste. Langmuir 21:9211–9221. https://doi.org/10.1021/la051048z10.1021/la051048z ↗
36. Foxall T, Peterson GC, Rendall HM, Smith AL (1979) Charge determination at calcium salt/aqueous solution interface. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1 Phys Chem Condens Phases 75:1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1039/F1979750103410.1039/F19797501034 ↗
37. Rode S, Oyabu N, Kobayashi K et al (2009) True atomic-resolution imaging of (1014) calcite in aqueous solution by frequency modulation atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 25:2850–2853. https://doi.org/10.1021/la803448v10.1021/la803448v ↗
38. Rodriguez ET, Richardson IG, Black L et al (2015) Composition, silicate anion structure and morphology of calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H) synthesised by silica-lime reaction and by controlled hydration of tricalcium silicate (C3S). Adv Appl Ceram 114:362–371. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676115Y.000000003810.1179/1743676115Y.0000000038 ↗
39. Grudemo A (1954) Discussion following the paper by J.D. Bernal on ‘The structure of cement hydration compounds.’ In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium Chem. Cem., pp 247–253
40. Kalousek GL, Prebus AF (1958) Crystal chemistry of hydrous calcium silicates: III, morphology and other properties of tobermorite and related phases. J Am Ceram Soc 41:124–13210.1111/j.1151-2916.1958.tb13525.x ↗
41. Pourchet S, Regnaud L, Perez JP, Nonat A (2009) Early C3A hydration in the presence of different kinds of calcium sulfate. Cem Concr Res 39:989–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2009.07.01910.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2009.07.019 ↗
42. Nielsen AE, Söhnel O (1971) Interfacial tensions electrolyte crystal-aqueous solution, from nucleation data. J Cryst Growth 11:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(71)90090-X10.1016/0022-0248(71)90090-X ↗
43. Myers RJ, Bernal SA, Provis JL (2014) A thermodynamic model for C-(N-)A-S-H gel: CNASH-ss. Derivation and validation. Cem Concr Res 66:27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.005 ↗
44. Palberg T (1997) Colloidal crystallization dynamics. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2:607–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(97)80053-210.1016/S1359-0294(97)80053-2 ↗
45. Scrivener K, Ouzia A, Juilland P, Kunhi Mohamed A (2019) Advances in understanding cement hydration mechanisms. Cem Concr Res 124:105823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10582310.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105823 ↗
46. Dharmawardhana CC, Misra A, Aryal S et al (2013) Role of interatomic bonding in the mechanical anisotropy and interlayer cohesion of CSH crystals. Cem Concr Res 52:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2013.05.00910.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2013.05.009 ↗
47. Richardson IG (2008) The calcium silicate hydrates. Cem Concr Res 38:137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2007.11.00510.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2007.11.005 ↗
48. Bonaccorsi E, Merlino S, Kampf AR (2005) The crystal structure of tobermorite 14 Å (plombierite), a C-S-H phase. J Am Ceram Soc 88:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00116.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00116.x ↗
49. Taylor HFW (1993) Nanostructure of C-S-H: current status. Adv Cem Based Mater 1:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/1065-7355(93)90006-A10.1016/1065-7355(93)90006-A ↗
50. Pellenq RJM, Lequeux N, van Damme H (2008) Engineering the bonding scheme in C-S-H: the iono-covalent framework. Cem Concr Res 38:159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.02610.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.026 ↗