journal article·2019-03Open access

3D microstructure of magnesium potassium phosphate ceramics from X-ray tomography: new insights into the reaction mechanisms

Alberto Viani, Konstantinos Sotiriadis, Gabriele Lanzafame, Lucia Mancini

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 5

Abstract

Magnesium potassium phosphate ceramics are chemically bonded ceramics employed as biomaterials, in nuclear waste encapsulation and for concrete repair. The microstructure dictates material performance and depends on the raw mix composition. Synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography was employed to describe the 3D microstructure and its time evolution during hardening and gain insights into the reaction mechanisms. Any excess water with respect to the stoichiometry of the reaction brought about an increase in porosity, but, notably, a reduction in the average pore size. Crystals filled the water ‘pockets’ in the ceramic volume by growing larger, although less densely packed, increasing the complexity of the pore shape. Platelet over elongated crystal habit was favoured. Such a change in shape is likely related to a change in reaction mechanism, as crystallization from a gel-like amorphous precursor is hindered and progressively substituted by a through-solution mechanism. It is proposed that the time evolution of the microstructure is dictated by the balance between crystallization from amorphous precursor, prevailing in relatively ‘dense’ systems (with stoichiometric water or in low excess), and water segregation, prevailing at higher water contents. The former mechanism was shown to produce an increase in porosity with time, because of the density mismatch between the amorphous and the crystalline phase.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Ostrowski N, Roy A, Kumta PN (2016) Magnesium phosphate cement systems for hard tissue applications: a review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0005610.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00056 ↗
2. Neiman R, Sarma AC (1980) Setting and thermal reactions of phosphate investments. J Dent Res 59:1478–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034580059009040110.1177/00220345800590090401 ↗
3. Covill A, Hyatt NC, Hill J, Collier NC (2011) Development of magnesium phosphate cements for encapsulation of radioactive waste. Adv Appl Ceram 110:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676110Y.000000000810.1179/1743676110Y.0000000008 ↗
4. Seehra SS, Gupta S, Kumar S (1993) Rapid setting magnesium phosphate cement for quick repair of concrete pavements—characterisation and durability aspects. Cem Concr Res 23:254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(93)90090-V10.1016/0008-8846(93)90090-V ↗
5. Ibrahim HA, Sibak A, Abadir MF (2011) Preparation and characterization of chemically bonded phosphate ceramics (CBPC) for encapsulation of harmful waste. J Am Sci 7:543–548
6. Li Y, Sun J, Li J, Shi T (2015) Effects of fly ash, retarder and calcination of magnesia on properties of magnesia–phosphate cement. Adv Cem Res 27:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.14.0002910.1680/adcr.14.00029 ↗
7. Ma H, Xu B, Liu J et al (2014) Effects of water content, magnesia-to-phosphate molar ratio and age on pore structure, strength and permeability of magnesium potassium phosphate cement paste. Mater Des 64:497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.07310.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.073 ↗
8. Xu B, Ma H, Li Z (2015) Influence of magnesia-to-phosphate molar ratio on microstructures, mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of magnesium potassium phosphate cement paste with large water-to-solid ratio. Cem Concr Res 68:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.10.01910.1016/j.cemconres.2014.10.019 ↗
9. Hall DA, Stevens R, El Jazairi B (1998) Effect of water content on the structure and mechanical properties of magnesia-phosphate cement mortar. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1550–155610.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02515.x ↗
10. Walling SA, Provis JL (2016) Magnesia-based cements: a journey of 150 years, and cements for the future? Chem Rev 116:4170–4204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0046310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00463 ↗
11. Wilson A, Nicholson JW (1993) Acid-base cements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511524813 ↗
12. Xing F, Ding Z, Li Z-J (2011) Study of potassium-based magnesium phosphate cement. Adv Cem Res 23:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.9.0003010.1680/adcr.9.00030 ↗
13. Viani A, Radulescu A, Peréz-Estébanez M (2015) Characterisation and development of fine porosity in magnesium potassium phosphate ceramics. Mater Lett 161:628–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.05610.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.056 ↗
14. Viani A, Gualtieri AF (2014) Preparation of magnesium phosphate cement by recycling the product of thermal transformation of asbestos containing wastes. Cem Concr Res 58:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.01610.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.016 ↗
15. Pérez-Estébanez M, Mácová P, Šašek P, Viani A, Gualtieri AF (2014) Mg-phosphate ceramics produced from the product of thermal transformation of cement-asbestos. J Pol Miner Eng Soc 15:187–192
16. Xu B, Lothenbach B, Leemann A, Winnefeld F (2018) Reaction mechanism of magnesium potassium phosphate cement with high magnesium-to-phosphate ratio. Cem Concr Res 108:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.013 ↗
17. Ding Z, Dong B, Xing F et al (2012) Cementing mechanism of potassium phosphate based magnesium phosphate cement. Ceram Int 38:6281–6288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.08310.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.083 ↗
18. Viani A, Sotiriadis K, Šašek P, Appavou M-S (2016) Evolution of microstructure and performance in magnesium potassium phosphate ceramics: role of sintering temperature of MgO powder. Ceram Int 42:16310–16316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.18210.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.182 ↗
19. Qiao F, Chau CK, Li Z (2012) Calorimetric study of magnesium potassium phosphate cement. Mater Struct 45:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-011-9776-z10.1617/s11527-011-9776-z ↗
20. Lahalle H, Cau Dit Coumes C, Mercier C et al (2018) Influence of the w/c ratio on the hydration process of a magnesium phosphate cement and on its retardation by boric acid. Cem Concr Res 109:159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.010 ↗
21. Abbona F, Lundager Madsen HE, Boistelle R (1982) Crystallization of two magnesium phosphates, struvite and newberyite: effect of pH and concentration. J Cryst Growth 57:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(82)90242-110.1016/0022-0248(82)90242-1 ↗
22. Le Rouzic M, Chaussadent T, Platret G, Stefan L (2017) Mechanisms of k-struvite formation in magnesium phosphate cements. Cem Concr Res 91:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.008 ↗
23. Moseke C, Saratsis V, Gbureck U (2011) Injectability and mechanical properties of magnesium phosphate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 22:2591–2598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4442-010.1007/s10856-011-4442-0 ↗
24. Abdelrazig BEI, Sharp JH, El-Jazairi B (1989) The microstructure and mechanical properties of mortars made from magnesia-phosphate cement. Cem Concr Res 19:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(89)90089-610.1016/0008-8846(89)90089-6 ↗
25. Ding Z, Li Z (2005) Effect of aggregates and water contents on the properties of magnesium phospho-silicate cement. Cem Concr Compos 27:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.03.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.03.003 ↗
26. Viani A, Mácová P (2018) Polyamorphism and frustrated crystallization in the acid-base reaction of magnesium potassium phosphate cements. CrystEngComm 20:4600–4613. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ce00670a10.1039/C8CE00670A ↗
27. Le Rouzic M, Chaussadent T, Stefan L, Saillio M (2017) On the influence of Mg/P ratio on the properties and durability of magnesium potassium phosphate cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 96:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.03310.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.033 ↗
28. Maire E, Withers PJ (2014) Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int Mater Rev 59:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280413Y.000000002310.1179/1743280413Y.0000000023 ↗
29. Anovitz LM, Cole DR (2015) Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures. Rev Mineral Geochem 80:61–164. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.0410.2138/rmg.2015.80.04 ↗
30. Zhang J, Scherer GW (2011) Comparison of methods for arresting hydration of cement. Cem Concr Res 41:1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.003 ↗
31. Wheeler R, Frost G (1955) A comparative study of the dehydration kinetics of several hydrated salts. Can J Chem 33:546–56110.1139/v55-064 ↗
32. Wilkins SW, Gureyev TE, Gao DC et al (1996) Phase-contrast imaging using polychromatic hard X-rays. Nature 384:335–33810.1038/384335a0 ↗
33. Cloetens P, Barrett R, Baruchel J et al (1996) Phase objects in synchrotron radiation hard x-ray imaging. J Phys D Appl Phys 29:133–146. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/29/1/02310.1088/0022-3727/29/1/023 ↗
34. Brun F, Pacilè S, Accardo A et al (2015) Enhanced and flexible software tools for X-ray computed tomography at the italian synchrotron radiation facility Elettra. Fundam Inform 141:233–243. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2015-127310.3233/FI-2015-1273 ↗
35. Brun F, Massimi L, Fratini M et al (2017) SYRMEP Tomo Project: a graphical user interface for customizing CT reconstruction workflows. Adv Struct Chem Imaging 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40679-016-0036-810.1186/s40679-016-0036-8 ↗
36. Kak AC, Slaney M (2001) Tomographic imaging with diffracting sources. In: Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp 203–274
37. Paganin D, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE et al (2002) Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J Microsc 206:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x ↗
38. Brun F, Mancini L, Kasae P et al (2010) Pore3D: a software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip 615:326–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.02.06310.1016/j.nima.2010.02.063 ↗
39. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
40. Weickert J (1998) Anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Teubner-Verlag, Stuttgart
41. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9:62–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
42. Costanza-Robinson, Estabrook BD, Fouhey DF (2011) Representative elementary volume estimation for porosity, moisture saturation, and air-water interfacial areas in unsaturated porous media: data quality implications. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr00965510.1029/2010wr009655 ↗
43. Bear J (1975) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Soil Sci 120:162–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197508000-0002210.1097/00010694-197508000-00022 ↗
44. Al-Raoush R, Papadopoulos A (2010) Representative elementary volume analysis of porous media using X-ray computed tomography. Powder Technol 200:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.02.01110.1016/j.powtec.2010.02.011 ↗
45. Mostaghimi P, Blunt MJ, Bijeljic B (2013) Computations of absolute permeability on micro-CT images. Math Geosci 45:103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9431-410.1007/s11004-012-9431-4 ↗
46. Mandelbrot B (1977) Fractals: form, chance, and dimension. W.H.Freeman & Co, London
47. Lindquist WB, Venkatarangan A (1999) Investigating 3D geometry of porous media from high resolution images. Phys Chem Earth Part A Solid Earth Geod 24:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1895(99)00085-X10.1016/S1464-1895(99)00085-X ↗
48. Brun F, Dreossi D (2010) Efficient curve-skeleton computation for the analysis of biomedical 3d images—biomed 2010. Biomed Sci Instrum 46:475–480
49. Chau CK, Qiao F, Li Z (2011) Microstructure of magnesium potassium phosphate cement. Constr Build Mater 25:2911–2917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.035 ↗
50. Viani A, Peréz-Estébanez M, Pollastri S, Gualtieri AF (2016) In situ synchrotron powder diffraction study of the setting reaction kinetics of magnesium-potassium phosphate cements. Cem Concr Res 79:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.007 ↗
51. Winslow DN, Bukowski JM, Francis Young J (1994) The early evolution of the surface of hydrating cement. Cem Concr Res 24:1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90025-610.1016/0008-8846(94)90025-6 ↗
52. Ling EJY, Servio P, Kietzig A-M (2016) Fractal and lacunarity analyses: quantitative characterization of hierarchical surface topographies. Microsc Microanal 22:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192761501556110.1017/S1431927615015561 ↗
53. Navarre-Sitchler A, Brantley SL, Rother G (2015) How porosity increases during incipient weathering of crystalline silicate rocks. Rev Mineral Geochem 80:331–354. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.1010.2138/rmg.2015.80.10 ↗
54. Jelinek HF, Jones CL, Warfel MD et al (2006) Understanding fractal analysis? The case of fractal linguistics. Complexus 3:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/00009418910.1159/000094189 ↗
55. Stanley HE (1996) Fractals and multifractals: the interplay of physics and geometry. In: Bunde A, Havlin S (eds) Fractals and disordered systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–58
56. Pfeifer P, Avnir D (1983) Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces. J Chem Phys 79:3558–3565. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.44621010.1063/1.446210 ↗
57. Taris A, Grosso M, Brundu M et al (2017) Application of combined multivariate techniques for the description of time-resolved powder X-ray diffraction data. J Appl Crystallogr 50:451–461. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671700175310.1107/S1600576717001753 ↗
58. Viani A, Mali G, Mácová P (2017) Investigation of amorphous and crystalline phosphates in magnesium phosphate ceramics with solid-state 1 H and 31 P NMR spectroscopy. Ceram Int 43:6571–6579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.08710.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.087 ↗
59. Wilson AD, Nicholson JW (1993) Acid-base cements. Their biomedical and industrial applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511524813 ↗
60. Hall DA, Stevens R, El Jazairi B (1998) Effect of water content on the structure and mechanical properties of magnesia–phosphate cement mortar. J Am Ceram Soc 56:1550–155610.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02515.x ↗
61. Viani A, Zbiri M, Bordallo HN et al (2017) Investigation of the setting reaction in magnesium phosphate ceramics with quasielastic neutron scattering. J Phys Chem C 121:11355–11367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0139610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01396 ↗
62. Abbona F, Boistelle R (1979) Growth morphology and crystal habit of struvite crystals (MgNH4PO4·6H2O). J Cryst Growth 46:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(79)90082-410.1016/0022-0248(79)90082-4 ↗
63. Navrotsky A (2004) Energetic clues to pathways to biomineralization: precursors, clusters, and nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:12096–12101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040477810110.1073/pnas.0404778101 ↗
64. Li Y, Chen B (2013) Factors that affect the properties of magnesium phosphate cement. Constr Build Mater 47:977–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.103 ↗
65. Li J, Zhang W, Cao Y (2014) Laboratory evaluation of magnesium phosphate cement paste and mortar for rapid repair of cement concrete pavement. Constr Build Mater 58:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.015 ↗
66. Soudée E, Péra J (2000) Mechanism of setting reaction in magnesia-phosphate cements. Cem Concr Res 30:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00254-910.1016/S0008-8846(99)00254-9 ↗