Iron oxide/PAMAM nanostructured hybrids: combined computational and experimental studies
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies in the field of iron oxide–dendrimer hybrids showed an increased potential of these materials to be used in diagnosis, monitoring, targeting, and therapy of cancer. The aim of this paper is to investigate the nature of interactions between iron oxide nanoparticles and polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers using computational and experimental techniques, namely molecular dynamics (MD) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Hybrid nanostructures based on iron oxide and PAMAM dendrimers were prepared in one-step synthesis route, using hydrothermal method at high pressure (40–100 atm). The interaction between dendrimers and iron oxide nanoparticles was predicted at specific temperature, pH, and pressure conditions. The same conditions were applied for hydrothermal synthesis. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy revealed the formation of magnetite (MAG) through hydrothermal reaction at 100 atm, starting only from iron (III) chloride. A possible explanation could be the variation of the fugacity value of oxygen under high-pressure conditions, which leads to diffusion-controlled reaction and to transformation of haematite into MAG. EPR parameter, namely linewidth, was exploited to evaluate the type of interactions from iron oxide–PAMAM hybrids, due to its dependence on spin–spin relaxation time and spin–lattice interactions. As a conclusion, MD indicated the existence of electrostatic interactions between PAMAM and iron oxide. In accordance with in silico results, EPR analysis suggested that MAG is not entrapped in PAMAM structure and the interactions between organic and inorganic components take place at dendrimer’s surface. A good agreement between MD simulations and experimental results was observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Schroeder A, Heller DA, Winslow MM, Dahlman JE, Pratt GW, Langer R et al (2012) Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology. Nat Rev Cancer 12:39–5010.1038/nrc3180 ↗
2. Darroudi M, Hakimi M, Goodarzi E, Oskuee RK (2014) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs): green preparation, characterization and their cytotoxicity effects. Ceram Int 40:14641–1464510.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.051 ↗
3. Popescu LM, Piticescu RM, Stoiciu M, Vasile E, Trusca R (2012) Investigation of thermal behaviour of hybrid nanostructures based on Fe2O3 and PAMAM dendrimers. J Therm Anal Calorim 110:357–36210.1007/s10973-012-2352-0 ↗
4. Zhang DW, Chen CH, Zhang J, Ren F (2007) Fabrication of nanosized metallic copper by electrochemical milling process. J Mater Sci 43:1492–1496. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2274-610.1007/s10853-007-2274-6 ↗
5. Lu S, Jiang Y, Wei C (2009) Preparation and characterization of EP/SiO2 hybrid materials containing PEG flexible chain. J Mater Sci 44:4047–4055. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3584-710.1007/s10853-009-3584-7 ↗
6. Popescu LM, Piticescu RM, Rusti CF, Maly M, Danani A, Kintzios S, Grinan MTV (2011) Preparation and characterization of new hybrid nanostructured thin films for biosensors design. Mater Lett 65:2032–203510.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.028 ↗
7. Tajabadi M, Khosroshahi ME, Bonakdar S (2013) An efficient method of SPION synthesis coated with third generation PAMAM dendrimer. Colloids Surf A 431:18–2610.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.04.003 ↗
8. Shi X, Wang SH, Swanson SD, Ge S, Cao Z, Van Antwerp ME et al (2008) Dendrimer-functionalized shell-crosslinked iron oxide nanoparticles for in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging of tumors. Adv Mater 20:1671–167810.1002/adma.200702770 ↗
9. Jang WD, Kamruzzaman Selim KM, Lee CH, Kang IK (2009) Bioinspired application of dendrimers: from bio-mimicry to biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 34:1–2310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.08.003 ↗
10. Svenson S, Tomalia DA (2005) Dendrimers in biomedical applications-reflections on the field. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:2106–212910.1016/j.addr.2005.09.018 ↗
11. Sekowski S, Buczkowski A, Palecz B, Gabryelak T (2011) Interaction of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) succinamic acid dendrimers generation 4 with human serum albumin. Spectrochim Acta A 81:706–71010.1016/j.saa.2011.07.009 ↗
12. Strable E, Bulte JWM, Moskowitz B, Vivekanandan K, Allen M, Douglas T (2001) Synthesis and characterization of soluble iron oxide-dendrimer composites. Chem Mater 13:2201–220910.1021/cm010125i ↗
13. Pavan GM, Posocco P, Tagliabue A, Maly M, Malek A, Danani A et al (2010) PAMAM dendrimers for siRNA delivery: computational and experimental insights. Chemistry 16:7781–779510.1002/chem.200903258 ↗
14. Pavan GM, Monteagudo S, Guerra J, Carrion B, Ocana V, Rodriguez-Lopez J et al (2012) Role of generation, architecture, pH and ionic strength on successful siRNA delivery and transfection by hybrid PPV-PAMAM dendrimers. Curr Med Chem 19:4929–494110.2174/0929867311209024929 ↗
15. Jensen LB, Pavan GM, Kasimova MR, Rutherford S, Danani A, Nielsen HM et al (2011) Elucidating the molecular mechanism of PAMAM-siRNA dendriplex self-assembly: effect of dendrimer charge density. Int J Pharm 416:410–41810.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.015 ↗
16. Pavan GM, Albertazzi L, Danani A (2010) Ability to adapt: different generations of PAMAM dendrimers show different behaviors in binding siRNA. J Phys Chem B 114:2667–267510.1021/jp100271w ↗
17. Shen M, Shi X (2010) Dendrimer-based organic/inorganic hybrid nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Nanoscale 2:1596–161010.1039/c0nr00072h ↗
18. Shi X, Wang SH, Lee I, Shen M, Baker JR (2009) Comparison of the internalization of targeted dendrimers and dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles into cancer cells. Biopolymers 91:936–94210.1002/bip.21279 ↗
19. Shi X, Lee I, Chen X, Shen M, Xiao S, Zhu M et al (2010) Influence of dendrimer surface charge on the bioactivity of 2-methoxyestradiol complexed with dendrimers. Soft Matter 6:2539–254510.1039/b925274f ↗
20. Pan B, Cui D, Sheng Y, Ozkan C, Gao F, He R et al (2007) Dendrimer-modified magnetic nanoparticles enhance efficiency of gene delivery system. Cancer Res 67:8156–816310.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4762 ↗
21. Wang SH, Shi X, Van Antwerp M, Cao Z, Swanson SD, Bi X et al (2007) Dendrimer-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles for specific targeting and imaging of cancer cells. Adv Funct Mater 17:3043–305010.1002/adfm.200601139 ↗
22. Cheng Y (2012) Dendrimer-based drug delivery systems: from theory to practice, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/9781118275238 ↗
23. Krzyminiewski R, Kubiak T, Dobosz B, Schroeder G, Kurczewska J (2014) EPR spectroscopy and imaging of TEMPO-labeled magnetite nanoparticles. Curr Appl Phys 14:798–80410.1016/j.cap.2014.03.021 ↗
24. Apicella A, Soncini M, Deriu MA, Natalello A, Bonanomi M, Dellasega D et al (2013) A hydrophobic gold surface triggers misfolding and aggregation of the amyloidogenic Josephin domain in monomeric form, while leaving the oligomers unaffected. PLoS One 8:e5879410.1371/journal.pone.0058794 ↗
25. Deriu MA, Grasso G, Licandro G, Danani A, Gallo D, Tuszynski JA et al (2014) Investigation of the Josephin domain protein-protein interaction by molecular dynamics. PLoS One 9:e10867710.1371/journal.pone.0108677 ↗
26. Paciello G, Acquaviva A, Ficarra E, Deriu MA, Macii E (2011) A molecular dynamics study of a miRNA: mRNA interaction. J Mol Model 17:2895–290610.1007/s00894-011-0991-x ↗
27. Maingi V, Jain V, Bharatam PV, Maiti PK (2012) Dendrimer building toolkit: model building and characterization of various dendrimer architectures. J Comput Chem 33:1997–201110.1002/jcc.23031 ↗
28. Pavan GM, Mintzer MA, Simanek EE, Merkel OM, Kissel T, Danani A (2010) Computational insights into the interactions between DNA and siRNA with “rigid” and “flexible” triazine dendrimers. Biomacromolecules 11:721–73010.1021/bm901298t ↗
29. Mandal T, Dasgupta C, Maiti PK (2013) Engineering gold nanoparticle interaction by PAMAM dendrimer. J Phys Chem C 117:13627–1363610.1021/jp401218t ↗
30. Karatasos K, Posocco P, Laurini E, Pricl S (2012) Poly(amidoamine)-based dendrimer/siRNA complexation studied by computer simulations: effects of pH and generation on dendrimer structure and siRNA binding. Macromol Biosci 12:225–24010.1002/mabi.201100276 ↗
31. Maingi V, Kumar MVS, Maiti PK (2012) PAMAM dendrimer-drug interactions: effect of pH on the binding and release pattern. J Phys Chem B 116:4370–437610.1021/jp211515g ↗
32. Mukherjee G, Patra N, Barua P, Jayaram B (2011) A fast empirical GAFF compatible partial atomic charge assignment scheme for modeling interactions of small molecules with biomolecular targets. J Comput Chem 32:893–90710.1002/jcc.21671 ↗
33. Sousa da Silva AW, Vranken WF (2012) ACPYPE—antechamber python parser interface. BMC Res Notes 5:36710.1186/1756-0500-5-367 ↗
34. Dupradeau FY, Pigache A, Zaffran T, Savineau C, Lelong R, Grivel N et al (2010) The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:7821–783910.1039/c0cp00111b ↗
35. Cezard C, Vanquelef E, Pecher J, Sonnet P (2008) RESP charge derivation and force field topology database generation for complex bio-molecular systems and analogs. In: 236th ACS National Meeting
36. Vanquelef E, Simon S, Marquant G, Garcia E, Klimerak G, Delepine JC et al (2011) R.E.D. Server: a web service for deriving RESP and ESP charges and building force field libraries for new molecules and molecular fragments. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W511–W51710.1093/nar/gkr288 ↗
37. Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell W, Kollman PA (1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 97:10269–1028010.1021/j100142a004 ↗
38. Cygan RT, Liang JJ, Kalinichev AG (2004) Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J Phys Chem B 108:1255–126610.1021/jp0363287 ↗
39. Gale JD (1997) GULP: a computer program for the symmetry-adapted simulation of solids. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93:629–63710.1039/a606455h ↗
40. Gale JD, Rohl AL (2003) The general utility lattice program (GULP). Mol Simul 29:291–34110.1080/0892702031000104887 ↗
41. Gale J (2005) GULP: capabilities and prospects. Zeitschrift Für Krist 220:552–554
42. Rappé AK, Goddard WA III (1991) Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem 95:3358–336310.1021/j100161a070 ↗
43. Müller-Plathe F (2002) Coarse-graining in polymer simulation: from the atomistic to the mesoscopic scale and back. Chemical 3:754–769
44. Reith D, Pütz M, Müller-Plathe F (2003) Deriving effective mesoscale potentials from atomistic simulations. J Comput Chem 24:1624–163610.1002/jcc.10307 ↗
45. Cheng CP, Yang LW (2008) Coarse-grained models reveal functional dynamics–II. Molecular dynamics simulation at the coarse-grained level–theories and biological applications. Bioinform Biol Insights 2:171–185
46. Deriu MA, Shkurti A, Paciello G, Bidone TC, Morbiducci U, Ficarra E et al (2012) Multiscale modeling of cellular actin filaments: from atomistic molecular to coarse-grained dynamics. Proteins 80:1598–160910.1002/prot.24053 ↗
47. Leroch S, Wendland M (2012) Simulation of forces between humid amorphous silica surfaces: a comparison of empirical atomistic force fields. J Phys Chem C 116:26247–2626110.1021/jp302428b ↗
48. Bürger A, Magdans U, Gies H (2013) Adsorption of amino acids on the magnetite-(111)-surface: a force field study. J Mol Model 19:851–85710.1007/s00894-012-1606-x ↗
49. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
50. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–44710.1021/ct700301q ↗
51. Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91:43–5610.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
52. Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26:1701–171810.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
53. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(33–8):27–28
54. Eisenhaber F, Lijnzaad P, Argos P, Sander C, Scharf M (1995) The double cubic lattice method: efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies. J Comput Chem 16:273–28410.1002/jcc.540160303 ↗
55. Kumari R, Kumar R, Lynn A (2014) g_mmpbsa–a GROMACS tool for high-throughput MM-PBSA calculations. J Chem Inf Model 54:1951–196210.1021/ci500020m ↗
56. Chaplin M (2015) Physical anomalies of water. http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/physical_anomalies.html . Accessed 29 May 2015
57. Goeke E (2011) Mineralogy: magnetite & hematite—minerals of the week #2. https://lifeinplanelight.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/mineralogy-magnetite-hematite-minerals-of-the-week-2/ . Accessed 19 May 2015
58. Chaplin M (2015) Water ionization, the ionic product (Kw) of water and pH. http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_dissociation.html . Accessed 19 May 2015
59. Imreh I (1987) Geochimie. Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca
60. Matthews A (1976) Magnetite formation by reduction of hematite with iron under hydrothermal conditions. Am Mineral 61:927–932
61. Chaplin M (2015) Material anomalies of water. http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/material_anomalies.html . Accessed 19 May 2015
62. Castner T, Newell GS, Holton WC, Slichter CP (1960) Note on the paramagnetic resonance of iron in glass. J Chem Phys 32:66810.1063/1.1730779 ↗
63. Abragam A, Bleaney B (1970) Electron paramagnetic resonance of transition ions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
64. Barklie RC, Collins M, Silva SRP (2000) EPR linewidth variation, spin relaxation times, and exchange in amorphous hydrogenated carbon. Phys Rev B 61:3546–355410.1103/PhysRevB.61.3546 ↗
65. Maiti PK, Çagın T, Wang G, Goddard WA (2004) Structure of PAMAM dendrimers: generations 1 through 11. Macromolecules 37:6236–625410.1021/ma035629b ↗