journal article·2022-06Open access

Lath martensite substructure evolution in low-carbon microalloyed steels

Arnab Chakraborty, Richard F. Webster, Sophie Primig

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 22

Abstract

Abstract Lath martensite substructures in as-quenched plain carbon steels exhibit dislocation-like contrast in the transmission electron microscope. More recent observations reported internal twins and nanoscale auto-tempered intra-lath carbides as additional lath substructures in ultra-low-C binary Fe–C steels. Modern microalloyed steels often have similar ultra-low C contents besides microalloying elements like Ti, Nb or V and, more recently, Mo, to achieve high strength, toughness and weldability. Nonetheless, little is known about the lath substructure evolution in the as-quenched state of microalloyed steels. This study investigates the hierarchical martensite substructure evolution post-quenching of microalloyed Nb and NbMo steels with 0.1 wt% C. Hierarchical microstructure characterization was done using scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and electron backscatter diffraction methods including parent grain reconstructions with MTEX. Thermokinetic simulations using MatCalc to determine the carbide evolution during auto-tempering were corroborated with site-specific transmission electron microscopy. Mo addition led to lowering of the martensite start temperature, yet the Nb steel showed a finer hierarchical microstructure. Finer laths with in-lath dislocations, short and long twins, and lath boundary decoration of carbides were found in the Nb steel. Conversely, laths in the NbMo were wider, with frequent intra-lath auto-tempered precipitates in the vicinity of dislocations, without twins.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Sandvik BPJ, Wayman CM (1983) Crystallography and substructure of lath martensite formed in carbon steels. Metallography 16:199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0800(83)90005-810.1016/0026-0800(83)90005-8 ↗
2. Speich GR, Leslie WC (1972) Tempering of steel. Metall Trans 3:1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264243610.1007/BF02642436 ↗
3. Maki T, Tsuzaki K, Tamura I (1980) The morphology of microstructure composed of lath martensites in steels. Trans Iron Steel Insit Jpn 20:207–214. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational1966.20.20710.2355/isijinternational1966.20.207 ↗
4. Kitahara H, Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y (2006) Crystallographic features of lath martensite in low-carbon steel. Acta Mater 54:1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.00110.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.001 ↗
5. Morito S, Yoshida H, Maki T, Huang X (2006) Effect of block size on the strength of lath martensite in low carbon steels. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.04810.1016/j.msea.2005.12.048 ↗
6. Stormvinter A, Miyamoto G, Furuhara T, Hedström P, Borgenstam A (2012) Effect of carbon content on variant pairing of martensite in Fe-C alloys. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.04610.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.046 ↗
7. Miyamoto G, Iwata N, Takayama N, Furuhara T (2012) Quantitative analysis of variant selection in ausformed lath martensite. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.01810.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.018 ↗
8. Krauss G, Marder AR (1971) The morphology of martensite in iron alloys. Metall Trans 2:2343–2357. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0281487310.1007/BF02814873 ↗
9. Suikkanen PP, Cayron C, DeArdo AJ, Karjalainen LP (2011) Crystallographic analysis of martensite in 0.2C–2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr steel using EBSD. J Mater Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60165-510.1016/S1005-0302(11)60165-5 ↗
10. Kinney CC, Pytlewski KR, Khachaturyan AG, Morris JW (2014) The microstructure of lath martensite in quenched 9Ni steel. Acta Mater 69:372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.05810.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.058 ↗
11. Hidalgo J, Santofimia MJ (2016) Effect of prior austenite grain size refinement by thermal cycling on the microstructural features of as-quenched lath martensite. Metall Mater Trans A 47:5288–5301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3525-410.1007/s11661-016-3525-4 ↗
12. Morito S, Tanaka H, Konishi R, Furuhara T, Maki T (2003) The morphology and crystallography of lath martensite in Fe-C alloys. Acta Mater 51:1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00577-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00577-3 ↗
13. Kehoe M, Kelly PM (1970) The role of carbon in the strength of ferrous martensite. Scr Metall 4:473–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(70)90088-810.1016/0036-9748(70)90088-8 ↗
14. Badinier G, Sinclair CW, Sauvage X, Wang X, Bylik V, Gouné M, Danoix F (2015) Microstructural heterogeneity and its relationship to the strength of martensite. Mater Sci Eng A 638:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.08810.1016/j.msea.2015.04.088 ↗
15. Matsuda H, Mizuno R, Funakawa Y, Seto K, Matsuoka S, Tanaka Y (2013) Effects of auto-tempering behaviour of martensite on mechanical properties of ultra high strength steel sheets. J Alloys Compd 577:S661–S667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.10810.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.108 ↗
16. Ori OHM, Neycombe HO (1972) Tempering of a high carbon martensite*. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 12:112–117. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational1966.12.11210.2355/isijinternational1966.12.112 ↗
17. Stormvinter A, Miyamoto G, Furuhara T, Hedström P, Borgenstam A (2012) Effect of carbon content on variant pairing of martensite in Fe-C alloys. Acta Mater 60:7265–7274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.04610.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.046 ↗
18. Li S, Zhu G, Kang Y (2016) Effect of substructure on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of lath martensite in 0.1C–1.1Si-1.7Mn steel. J Alloys Compd 675:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.10010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.100 ↗
19. Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Modern bainitic alloys. In: Bainite in steels: transformations, microstructure, and properties, 2nd edn. IOM Communications, London
20. Tan YH, De Zeng C, Dong XC, He YH, Hu SQ (1992) New observation of martensitic morphology and substructure using transmission electron microscopy. Metall Trans A 23:1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264732410.1007/BF02647324 ↗
21. Krauss G (1999) Martensite in steel: strength and structure. Mater Sci Eng A 273–275:40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00288-910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00288-9 ↗
22. Ping D, Liu T, Ohnuma M, Ohmura T, Abe T, Onodera H (2017) Microstructural evolution and carbides in quenched ultra-low carbon (Fe–C) alloys. ISIJ Int 57:1233–124010.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-624 ↗
23. Ping DH, Guo SQ, Imura M, Liu X, Ohmura T, Ohnuma M, Lu X, Abe T, Onodera H (2018) Lath formation mechanisms and twinning as lath martensite substructures in an ultra low-carbon iron alloy. Sci Rep 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32679-610.1038/s41598-018-32679-6 ↗
24. Man TH, Liu TW, Ping DH, Ohmura T (2018) TEM investigations on lath martensite substructure in quenched Fe-0.2C alloys. Mater Charact 135:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.03910.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.039 ↗
25. Hutchinson B, Hagström J, Karlsson O, Lindell D, Tornberg M, Lindberg F, Thuvander M (2011) Microstructures and hardness of as-quenched martensites (0.1–0.5%C). Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.06110.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.061 ↗
26. Nanda T, Singh V, Singh V, Chakraborty A, Sharma S (2019) Third generation of advanced high-strength steels: processing routes and properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng L. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071666419810.1177/1464420716664198 ↗
27. Zhao J, Jiang Z (2018) Thermomechanical processing of advanced high strength steels. Prog Mater Sci 94:174–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.01.00610.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.01.006 ↗
28. Spindler H, Klein M, Rauch R, Pichler A, Stiaszny P (2005) High strength and ultra high strength hot rolled steel grades—products for advanced applications. In: 1st international conference on super-high strength steels
29. Bhole SD, Nemade JB, Collins L, Liu C (2006) Effect of nickel and molybdenum additions on weld metal toughness in a submerged arc welded HSLA line-pipe steel. J Mater Process Technol 173:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.10.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.10.028 ↗
30. Tang Z, Stumpf W (2008) The role of molybdenum additions and prior deformation on acicular ferrite formation in microalloyed Nb-Ti low-carbon line-pipe steels. Mater Charact 59:717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.00110.1016/j.matchar.2007.06.001 ↗
31. Sun Z, Bei H, Yamamoto Y (2017) Microstructural control of FeCrAl alloys using Mo and Nb additions. Mater Charact 132:126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.00810.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.008 ↗
32. Larzabal G, Isasti N, Rodriguez-Ibabe J, Uranga P (2017) Evaluating strengthening and impact toughness mechanisms for ferritic and bainitic microstructures in Nb, Nb-Mo and Ti-Mo microalloyed steels. Metals 7:65. https://doi.org/10.3390/met702006510.3390/met7020065 ↗
33. Chakraborty A, Primig S (2021) Influence of finish rolling temperature and molybdenum addition on strengthening of low carbon niobium steels—a computational and experimental study. Steel Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20210008510.1002/srin.202100085 ↗
34. Kaar S, Steineder K, Schneider R, Krizan D, Sommitsch C (2021) New Ms-formula for exact microstructural prediction of modern 3rd generation AHSS chemistries. Scr Mater 200:113923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11392310.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113923 ↗
35. Gómez M, Medina SF, Caruana G (2003) Modelling of phase transformation kinetics by correction of dilatometry results for a ferritic Nb-microalloyed steel. ISIJ Int 43(8):1228–1237. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.43.122810.2355/isijinternational.43.1228 ↗
36. van Bohemen SMC, Sietsma J (2014) Kinetics of martensite formation in plain carbon steels: critical assessment of possible influence of austenite grain boundaries and autocatalysis. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 30:1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.000000053210.1179/1743284714Y.0000000532 ↗
37. Zamberger S, Whitmore L, Krisam S, Wojcik T, Kozeschnik E (2015) Experimental and computational study of cementite precipitation in tempered martensite. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/23/5/05501210.1088/0965-0393/23/5/055012 ↗
38. Niessen F, Nyyssönen T, Gazder AA, Hielscher R (2021) Parent grain reconstruction from partially or fully transformed microstructures in MTEX. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14603
39. Tomus D, Ng HP (2013) In situ lift-out dedicated techniques using FIB-SEM system for TEM specimen preparation. Micron 44:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2012.05.00610.1016/j.micron.2012.05.006 ↗
40. Yang HS, Bhadeshia HKDH (2009) Austenite grain size and the martensite-start temperature. Scr Mater 60:493–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.043 ↗
41. Yamada H, Sakurai T, Takenouchi T (1990) Effect of alloying elements on the peritectic temperature in low-alloy steels. Tetsu-To-Hagane/Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan 76:438–445. https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.76.3_43810.2355/tetsutohagane1955.76.3_438 ↗
42. Karthikeyan T, Dash MK, Saroja S, Vijayalakshmi M (2015) Estimation of martensite feature size in a low-carbon alloy steel by microtexture analysis of boundaries. Micron 68:77–9010.1016/j.micron.2014.09.008 ↗
43. Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y, Koizumi Y (2002) Ultragrain refinement of plain low carbon steel by cold-rolling and annealing of martensite. Acta Mater 50:4177–4189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00260-410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00260-4 ↗
44. Ping DH, Ohnuma M (2018) ω-Fe particle size and distribution in high-nitrogen martensitic steels. J Mater Sci 53:5339–5355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1938-010.1007/s10853-017-1938-0 ↗
45. Prawoto Y, Jasmawati N, Sumeru K (2012) Effect of prior austenite grain size on the morphology and mechanical properties of martensite in medium carbon steel. J Mater Sci Technol 28:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60083-810.1016/S1005-0302(12)60083-8 ↗
46. Khare S, Lee K, Bhadeshia HKDH (2009) Relative effects of Mo and B on ferrite and bainite kinetics in strong steels. Int J Mater Res 100:1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.11022210.3139/146.110222 ↗
47. Ning D, Dai CR, Wu JL, Wang YD, Wang YQ, Jing Y, Sun J (2021) Carbide precipitation and coarsening kinetics in low carbon and low alloy steel during quenching and subsequently tempering. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11111110.1016/j.matchar.2021.111111 ↗
48. Daigne J, Guttmannt M, Naylor JP (1982) The influence of lath boundaries and carbide distribution on the yield strength of 0.4% C tempered martensitic steels. Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(82)90176-810.1016/0025-5416(82)90176-8 ↗
49. Villa M, Hansen MF, Pantleon K, Somers MAJ (2015) Thermally activated growth of lath martensite in FeCrNiAl stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 31:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.000000058310.1179/1743284714Y.0000000583 ↗
50. Levitas VI, Idesman A, Olson GB, Stein E (2002) Numerical modelling of martensitic growth in an elastoplastic material. Philos Mag A 82:429–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141861020823960910.1080/01418610208239609 ↗
51. Thompson SW (2015) Structural characteristics of transition-iron-carbide precipitates formed during the first stage of tempering in 4340 steel. Mater Charact 106:452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.03010.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.030 ↗
52. Raghavan M, Thomas G (1971) Structure and mechanical properties of Fe-Cr-C-Co steels. Metall Trans 2:3433–3439. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0070382010.1007/BF00703820 ↗
53. Zhang P, Chen Y, Xiao W, Ping D, Zhao X (2016) Twin structure of the lath martensite in low carbon steel. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 26:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.00410.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.004 ↗