journal article·2021-10

Injectable chitosan cryogel microspheres with biocompatible properties on mammalian macrophages in vitro

Furkan Ayaz, Didem Demir, Nimet Bölgen

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 30
Publisher page

Abstract

Macrophages play a vital role in rejection of the implant materials by producing pro-inflammatory TNF and IL6 cytokines. They are also important for the normal function of the immune system to fight against infections. Therefore, characterizing the immunotoxicity on this cell type will be informative for the medical use of the biocompatible materials. Chitosan-based materials have been widely considered as biocompatible and safe. They have been suggested for the bone implants. Studies suggest that depending on the setup and chitosan functionalization, the immune system may react differentially to the chitosan-based materials. In this study, we characterized the immunocompatibility of injectable chitosan cryogel microspheres on mammalian macrophages by measuring their effect on cell viability and these cells’ ability to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines in the absence and presence of LPS, as a stimulant. Different sizes of microspheres were used to examine the effect of the size on their plausible effects. Our results suggest that independent of their size, chitosan cryogel microspheres were immunocompatible. They did not influence the cell viability and pro-inflammatory cytokine production by LPS-induced macrophages. Moreover, these materials lacked immunostimulatory activity as well, which means they would not activate the macrophages in the absence of any stimulant after their direct interaction with these cells. These properties are advantageous for their possible utilization in the medical fields as minimally invasive materials due to their injectable properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Chang B, Ahuja N, Ma C, Liu X (2017) Injectable scaffolds: preparation and application in dental and craniofacial regeneration. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 111:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.04010.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040 ↗
2. Kang SW, Jeon O, Kim BS (2005) Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres as an injectable scaffold, for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 11:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.43810.1089/ten.2005.11.438 ↗
3. Eggermont LJ, Rogers ZJ, Colombani T, Memic A, Bencherif SA (2020) Injectable cryogels for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol 38:418–43110.1016/j.tibtech.2019.09.008 ↗
4. Memic A, Colombani T, Eggermont LJ, Rezaeeyazdi M, Steingold J, Rogers ZJ, Navare KJ, Mohammed HS, Bencherif SA (2019) Latest advances in cryogel technology for biomedical applications. Adv Ther 2:1800114. https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.20180011410.1002/adtp.201800114 ↗
5. Leach DG, Young S, Hartgerink JD (2019) Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials. Acta Biomater 88:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.016.Advances10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.016.Advances ↗
6. Kim I, Lee SS, Bae S, Lee H, Hwang NS (2018) Heparin functionalized ınjectable cryogel with rapid shape- recovery property for neovascularization. Biomacromol 19:2257–2269. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0033110.1021/acs.biomac.8b00331 ↗
7. Crupi A, Costa A, Tarnok A, Melzer S, Teodori L (2015) Inflammation in tissue engineering: the Janus between engraftment and rejection. Eur J Immunol 45:3222–3236. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.20154581810.1002/eji.201545818 ↗
8. Siavashani AZ, Mohammadi J, Maniura-Weber K, Senturk B, Nourmohammadi J, Sadeghi B, Huberd L, Rottmar M (2020) Silk based scaffolds with immunomodulatory capacity: anti-inflammatory effects of nicotinic acid. Biomater Sci 8:148–162. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9bm00814d10.1039/c9bm00814d ↗
9. Cheung RCF, Ng TB, Wong JH, Chan WY (2015) Chitosan: an update on potential biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Mar Drugs 13:5156–518610.3390/md13085156 ↗
10. Friedman AJ, Phan J, Schairer DO, Champer J, Qin M, Pirouz A, Blecher-Paz K, Oren A, Liu PT, Modlin RL, Kim J (2013) Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of chitosan-alginate nanoparticles: a targeted therapy for cutaneous pathogens. J Invest Dermatol 133:1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.39910.1038/jid.2012.399 ↗
11. Verschoor CP, Puchta A, Bowdish DME (2012) The macrophage. Methods Mol Biol 844:139–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-527-5_1010.1007/978-1-61779-527-5_10 ↗
12. Campos MIG, Dos Santos MCLG, Trevilatto PC, Scarel-Caminaga RM, Bezerra FJB, Line SRP (2004) Early failure of dental implants and TNF-α (G-308A) gene polymorphism. Implant Dent 13:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000116458.60585.C410.1097/01.ID.0000116458.60585.C4 ↗
13. Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W, Becker K, Erren M, Götze C (2007) Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-α: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 89:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.1748510.1302/0301-620X.89B1.17485 ↗
14. Demir D, Bölgen N (2017) Synthesis and characterization of injectable chitosan cryogel microsphere scaffolds. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 66:686–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.125561410.1080/00914037.2016.1255614 ↗
15. Sarmadi M, Behrens AM, McHugh KJ, Contreras HTM, Tochka ZL, Lu X, Langer R, Jaklenec A (2020) Modeling, design, and machine learning-based framework for optimal injectability of microparticle-based drug formulations. Sci Adv 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb659410.1126/sciadv.abb6594 ↗
16. Ayaz F, Colak SG, Ocakoglu K (2020) Investigating the immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects of cis and trans isomers of ruthenium polypyridyl complexes on the mammalian macrophage-like cells. ChemSelect 5:11648–11653. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20200278410.1002/slct.202002784 ↗
17. Yüzer A, Ayaz F, Ince M (2019) Immunomodulatory activities of zinc(II)phthalocyanine on the mammalian macrophages through p38 pathway: potential ex vivo immunomodulatory PDT reagents. Bioorg Chem 92:103249–103257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.10324910.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103249 ↗
18. Ayaz F, Ersan RH, Algul O (2019) Symmetric bis-benzoxazole-based chemicals exerted anti-inflammatory effect on danger signal LPS-stimulated macrophages. Monatshefte fur Chemie 150:1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-019-02398-310.1007/s00706-019-02398-3 ↗
19. Ayaz F, Alaş MÖ, Oğuz M, Genç R (2019) Aluminum doped carbon nanodots as potent adjuvants on the mammalian macrophages. Mol Biol Rep 46:2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04701-110.1007/s11033-019-04701-1 ↗
20. Ayaz F (2019) Heteroleptic ruthenium polypyridyl complex had differential effects on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL1β, and IL6 by the mammalian macrophages in vitro. Inflammation 42:1383–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-019-00999-y10.1007/s10753-019-00999-y ↗
21. Ayaz F (2019) Anti-inflammatory properties of the ruthenium polypyridyl complex, K314, on the in vitro activated macrophages. J Res Pharm 23(2):164–169
22. Ayaz F (2018) Ruthenium based photosensitizer exerts immunostimulatory and possible adjuvant role on the mammalian macrophages in vitro. Cumhur Sci J 39:991–99810.17776/csj.453074 ↗
23. Ayaz F, Gonul İ, Demirbag B, Ocakoglu K (2019) Differential immunomodulatory activities of Schiff base complexes depending on their metal conjugation. Inflammation 42:1878–1885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-019-01050-w10.1007/s10753-019-01050-w ↗
24. Yıldızlı G, Coral G, Ayaz F (2020) Immunostimulatory activities of coliphages on in vitro activated mammalian macrophages. Inflammation 43:595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-019-01140-910.1007/s10753-019-01140-9 ↗
25. Önal HT, Yuzer A, Ince M, Ayaz F (2020) Photo induced anti-inflammatory activities of a Thiophene substituted subphthalocyanine derivative. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 30:101701–101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.10170110.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101701 ↗
26. Denkbaş EB, Odabaşi M (2000) Chitosan microspheres and sponges: preparation and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 76:1637–1643. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000613)76:11%3c1637::AID-APP4%3e3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000613)76:11<1637::AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
27. Jagtap YM, Bhujbal RK, Ranade AN, Ranpise NS (2012) Effect of various polymers concentrations on physicochemical properties of floating microspheres. Indian J Pharm Sci 74:512–520. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.11057810.4103/0250-474X.110578 ↗
28. Demir D, Öfkeli F, Ceylan S, Bölgen N (2016) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from blue crab and synthesis of chitosan cryogel scaffolds. J Turk Chem Soc Sect A Chem 3:3:131–144. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.0063410.18596/jotcsa.00634 ↗
29. Jesus S, Marques AP, Alana Duarte ES, Costa JP, Mariana Colaço MS, Som C et al (2020) Chitosan nanoparticles: shedding light on immunotoxicity and hemocompatibility. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:100–120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.0010010.3389/fbioe.2020.00100 ↗
30. Yoon HJ, Moon ME, Park HS et al (2007) Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory effects in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358:954–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.04210.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.042 ↗