Silane-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets for silicone rubber nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Silane-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were prepared using a newly developed approach based upon a simple two-step strategy. The effect of their dispersion and interfacial bonding on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of reinforced silicone rubber (SR) was investigated. It was found by Raman mapping that the silane-functionalized GNPs could be dispersed uniformly into the SR matrix, leading to an increase of up to 25% in Young’s modulus at only 2 parts per hundred rubber (phr) loading and a considerable enhancement of up to 150% in the thermal conductivity at 5-phr loading. Both the Young’s modulus and thermal conductivity experimental results were found to be in agreement with the values predicted using theoretical models. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim ES, Kim EJ, Shim JH, Yoon JS (2008) J Appl Polym Sci 110:1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2863310.1002/app.28633 ↗
2. Lewis FM (1962) Rubber Chem Technol 35:1222. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.353999210.5254/1.3539992 ↗
3. Saleem H, Edathil A, Ncube T et al (2016) Macromol Mater Eng 301:231. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20150033510.1002/mame.201500335 ↗
4. Song P, Peng ZJ, Yue YL, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Fan YC (2013) Express Polym Lett 7:546. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.5110.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.51 ↗
5. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Science 306:666. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
6. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Prog Mater Sci 90:75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
7. Jang BZ, Zhamu A (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2755-210.1007/s10853-008-2755-2 ↗
8. Mu QH, Feng SY (2007) Thermochim Acta 462:70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2007.06.00610.1016/j.tca.2007.06.006 ↗
9. Shen CX, Wang H, Zhang TX, Zeng Y (2019) J Mater Sci Technol 35:36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.01610.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.016 ↗
10. Song YZ, Yu JH, Yu LH et al (2015) Mater Design 88:950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.06410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.064 ↗
11. Xu H, Gong LX, Wang X et al (2016) Compos Part A-Appl S 91:53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.011 ↗
12. Zhang GW, Wang FZ, Dai J, Huang ZX (2016). Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/Ma902009210.3390/Ma9020092 ↗
13. Sarath PS, Moni G, George JJ, Haponiuk JT, Thomas S, George SC (2021) J Compos Mater 55:2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832098160810.1177/0021998320981608 ↗
14. Li A, Zhang C, Zhang YF (2017). Polymers-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/Polym909043710.3390/Polym9090437 ↗
15. Ge TJ, Zhang ML, Tang KH, Tang HY (2020) Mater Chem Phys 252:10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12325010.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123250 ↗
16. Gan L, Shang SM, Jiang SX (2016) Compos Pt B-Eng 84:294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.07310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.073 ↗
17. Liang WJ, Ge X, Ge JF et al (2018). Polymers-Basel. https://doi.org/10.3390/Polym1011125410.3390/Polym10111254 ↗
18. Lin SC, Ma CCM, Liao WH et al (2016) J Taiwan Inst Chem E 68:396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.08.00910.1016/j.jtice.2016.08.009 ↗
19. M Hellqvist Kjell (2013) Trita-CHE-ReportKTH royal institute of technology, Stockholm
20. Tang JJ, Yao W, Li WL et al (2018) J Coat Technol Res 15:375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-017-9991-910.1007/s11998-017-9991-9 ↗
21. Xu Y, Gao Q, Liang HQ, Zheng KS (2016) Polym Test 54:168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.07.01310.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.07.013 ↗
22. Y Zong, D Gui, S Li, G Tan, W Xiong, J Liu (2015) 2015 16th International conference on electronic packaging technology (ICEPT),
23. Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lin G et al (2013) Polymer 54:3605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.04.05710.1016/j.polymer.2013.04.057 ↗
24. Esmizadeh E, Arjmandpour M, Vahidifar A, Naderi G, Dubois C (2019) J Compos Mater 53:3459. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831984079910.1177/0021998319840799 ↗
25. Cunha E, Ren H, Lin F et al (2018) Rsc Adv 8:33564. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04817g10.1039/c8ra04817g ↗
26. Ren H, Cunha E, Sun Q et al (2019). Nanoscale Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00280K10.1039/C8NA00280K ↗
27. Young RJ, Liu MF, Kinloch IA et al (2018) Compos Sci Technol 154:110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.007 ↗
28. Wang YW, Guo XN, Dong LL, Jin GQ, Wang YY, Guo XY (2013) Int J Hydrog Energy 38:12733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.06210.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.062 ↗
29. Boutchich M, Arezki H, Alamarguy D et al (2014) Appl Phys Lett 105:5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490386610.1063/1.4903866 ↗
30. Tang H, Zhang YJ, Xiong QQ et al (2015) Electrochim Acta 156:86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.00910.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.009 ↗
31. Wan Y-J, Gong L-X, Tang L-C, Wu L-B, Jiang J-X (2014) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 64:79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.023 ↗
32. Zhang Z-H, Zhang J-W, Cao C-F et al (2020) Chem Eng J 386:123894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12389410.1016/j.cej.2019.123894 ↗
33. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V et al (2006) Phys Rev Lett 97:4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
34. Englert JM, Dotzer C, Yang GA et al (2011) Nat Chem 3:279. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.101010.1038/nchem.1010 ↗
35. Aranguren MI (1998) Polymer 39:4897. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-3861(97)10252-x10.1016/s0032-3861(97)10252-x ↗
36. Klonos PA (2018) Polymer 159:169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.02810.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.028 ↗
37. Menes O, Cano M, Benedito A et al (2012) Compos Sci Technol 72:1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.016 ↗
38. Li Z, Young RJ, Wang RG et al (2013) Polymer 54:5821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.02610.1016/j.polymer.2013.08.026 ↗
39. Liu MF, Papageorgiou DG, Li SH, Lin KL, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2018) Compos Part A-Appl S 110:84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.014 ↗
40. Pavoski G, Maraschin T, Fim FD et al (2017) Mater Res-Ibero-Am J Mater 20:53. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2015-052810.1590/1980-5373-mr-2015-0528 ↗
41. Li ZL, Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Wilson NR, Marsden AJ, Raju APA (2015) Carbon 88:215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.07210.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.072 ↗
42. Cai KW, Zuo SX, Luo SP et al (2016) Rsc Adv 6:95965. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra19618g10.1039/c6ra19618g ↗
43. Nielsen LE (1973) J Appl Polym Sci 17:3819. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1973.07017122410.1002/app.1973.070171224 ↗
44. Nielsen LE (1974) Ind Eng Chem Fund 13:17. https://doi.org/10.1021/I160049a00410.1021/I160049a004 ↗
45. Pietrak K, Wisniewski TS (2015) J Power Technol 95:14