New wicking measurement system to mimic human sweating phenomena with continuous microfluidic flow
Source abstract
Abstract
Typical liquid moisture management property tests of textiles may not represent human sweating from sweat pores because those methods are conducted with infinite reservoirs or limited, but large amounts of liquid. For this reason, we developed a new method, ‘single-pore wicking evolution apparatus for textiles (SWEAT),’ to investigate how liquid is transported in fabrics based on within-a-yarn and yarn-to-yarn transfer wicking. This measurement system was implemented by supplying continuous liquid flow to a single yarn at a single point within the fabric substrate at a similar flow rate to a single sweat gland (approximately 50 nl/min/gland). In order to mimic the sweating phenomenon, this SWEAT test avoids the flooding liquid stage by controlling flow rate and choosing a diameter of liquid source similar to the pore size of a sweat gland. From microscopic video analysis, we found that the liquid moves along the yarns instead of making a circular wetting area, as observed in standardized tests. With the SWEAT test, we successfully measured the directional wicking rate along an individual yarn, which has not previously been reported. Furthermore, we examined not only liquid movement within-a-yarn but also yarn-to-yarn transfer of liquid because the continuously supplied liquid spills over to the adjacent yarns through the contact points.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Kissa E (1996) Wetting and wicking. Text Res J 66(10):660–66810.1177/004051759606601008 ↗
2. Mao N, Russell S (2003) Anisotropic liquid absorption in homogeneous two-dimensional nonwoven structures. J Appl Phys 94(6):4135–413810.1063/1.1598627 ↗
3. Wong A, Li Y, Yeung K (2002) Statistical simulation of psychological perception of clothing sensory comfort. J Text Inst 93(1):108–11910.1080/00405000208630556 ↗
4. Kim J, Kim H, Park CH (2015) Contribution of surface energy and roughness to the wettability of polyamide 6 and polypropylene film in the plasma-induced process. Text Res J 86(5):461–47110.1177/0040517515580511 ↗
5. Kim H-s, Park CH (2016) Effect of biaxial tensile extension on superhydrophobicity of rayon knitted fabrics. RSC Adv 6(53):48155–4816410.1039/C6RA03966A ↗
6. Berglund LG, Gonzalez RR (1977) Evaporation of sweat from sedentary man in humid environments. J Appl Physiol 42(5):767–77210.1152/jappl.1977.42.5.767 ↗
7. Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17(3):273–28310.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
8. Cummins BM, Chinthapatla R, Ligler FS, Walker GM (2017) Time-dependent model for fluid flow in porous materials with multiple pore sizes. Anal Chem 89(8):4377–438110.1021/acs.analchem.6b04717 ↗
9. Owens TL, Leisen J, Beckham HW, Breedveld V (2011) Control of microfluidic flow in amphiphilic fabrics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(10):3796–380310.1021/am201003b ↗
10. Das B, Das A, Kothari VK, Fangueiro R (2011) Mathematical model to predict vertical wicking behaviour Part II: flow through woven fabric. J Text Inst 102(11):971–98110.1080/00405000.2010.529282 ↗
11. Tang K, Chau K, Kan C, Fan J (2015) Characterizing the transplanar and in-plane water transport properties of fabrics under different sweat rate: forced flow water transport tester. Scientific Rep 5:17012. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1701210.1038/srep17012 ↗
12. Zhu C, Takatera M (2014) A new thermocouple technique for the precise measurement of in-plane capillary water flow within fabrics. Text Res J 84(5):513–52610.1177/0040517513503729 ↗
13. Rossi RM, Stämpfli R, Psikuta A, Rechsteiner I, Brühwiler PA (2011) Transplanar and in-plane wicking effects in sock materials under pressure. Text Res J 81(15):1549–155810.1177/0040517511413317 ↗
14. Zhang G, Parwani R, Stone CA, Barber AH, Botto L (2017) X-ray imaging of transplanar liquid transport mechanisms in single layer textiles. Langmuir 33(43):12072–1207910.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02982 ↗
15. Rajagopalan D, Aneja AP, Marchal J-M (2001) Modeling capillary flow in complex geometries. Text Res J 71(9):813–82110.1177/004051750107100911 ↗
16. Hsieh Y-L (1995) Liquid transport in fabric structures. Text Res J 65(5):299–30710.1177/004051759506500508 ↗
17. Li J, Li X, Michielsen S (2016) Alternative method for determining the original drop volume of bloodstains on knit fabrics. Forensic Sci Int 263:194–20310.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.018 ↗
18. AATCC (2015) TM 197 Vertical wicking of textiles American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
19. AATCC (2015) TM 195 Liquid moisture management properties of textile fabrics. American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
20. AATCC (2015) TM 198 Horizontal wicking of textiles. AMERICAN American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
21. Francis J, Stamper I, Heikenfeld J, Gomez EF (2019) Digital nanoliter to milliliter flow rate sensor with in vivo demonstration for continuous sweat rate measurement. Lab Chip 19(1):178–18510.1039/C8LC00968F ↗
22. Sato K, Dobson RL (1970) Regional and individual variations in the function of the human eccrine sweat gland. J Investig Dermatol 54(6):443–44910.1111/1523-1747.ep12259272 ↗
23. Hall HJ (1897) Notes on surgical gauzes. Boston Medical Surg J 137(21):3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM18971118137210410.1056/NEJM189711181372104 ↗
24. Bogaty H, Hollies NRS (1951) The evaluation of experimental fabrics as alternates for standard wool fabrics. Gillette Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/703143.pdf
25. Nyoni A, Brook D (2006) Wicking mechanisms in yarns-the key to fabric wicking performance. J Text Inst 97(2):119–12810.1533/joti.2005.0128 ↗
26. Wang N, Zha A, Wang J (2008) Study on the wicking property of polyester filament yarns. Fibers Polym 9(1):97–10010.1007/s12221-008-0016-2 ↗
27. Sengupta A, Kothari V, Rengasamy R (1991) Wicking behaviour of air-jet textured yarns. Indian J Fibre Text Res 16(2):123–127
28. Liu W (2017) Enhanced comfort and faster drying textile finish. Doctoral dissertation, NC State University, USA. Retrieved from https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.20/35001
29. Pandiyaraj KN, Selvarajan V (2008) Non-thermal plasma treatment for hydrophilicity improvement of grey cotton fabrics. J Mater Process Technol 199(1–3):130–13910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.046 ↗
30. Yu J, Seipel S, Nierstrasz VA (2018) Digital inkjet functionalization of water-repellent textile for smart textile application. J Mater Sci 53(18):13216–13229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2521-z10.1007/s10853-018-2521-z ↗
31. Zaman M, Liu H, Xiao H, Chibante F, Ni Y (2013) Hydrophilic modification of polyester fabric by applying nanocrystalline cellulose containing surface finish. Carbohyd Polym 91(2):560–56710.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.070 ↗
32. Taylor NA, Machado-Moreira CA (2013) Regional variations in transepidermal water loss, eccrine sweat gland density, sweat secretion rates and electrolyte composition in resting and exercising humans. Extreme Physiol Med 2(1):410.1186/2046-7648-2-4 ↗
33. Baker LB (2017) Sweating rate and sweat sodium concentration in athletes: a review of methodology and intra/interindividual variability. Sports Med 47(1):111–12810.1007/s40279-017-0691-5 ↗
34. Kuno Y (1956) Human perspiration. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
35. Simile CB, Beckham HW (2012) Permeability–saturation–capillary pressure relations in textile fabrics from an integrated upward–horizontal–downward wicking test. J Text Inst 103(9):945–95110.1080/00405000.2011.636189 ↗
36. Huang J (2006) Sweating guarded hot plate test method. Polym Test 25(5):709–71610.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.002 ↗
37. Vairo D, Bruzzese L, Marlinge M, Fuster L, Adjriou N, Kipson N, Brunet P, Cautela J, Jammes Y, Mottola G (2017) Towards addressing the body electrolyte environment via sweat analysis: pilocarpine iontophoresis supports assessment of plasma potassium concentration. Scientific Rep 7(1):11801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12211-y10.1038/s41598-017-12211-y ↗
38. Pezron I, Bourgain G, Quéré D (1995) Imbibition of a fabric. J Colloid Interface Sci 173(2):319–32710.1006/jcis.1995.1331 ↗
39. Van Der Meeren P, Cocquyt J, Flores S, Demeyere H, Declercq M (2002) Quantifying wetting and wicking phenomena in cotton terry as affected by fabric conditioner treatment. Text Res J 72(5):423–42810.1177/004051750207200509 ↗
40. Gillespie T (1958) The spreading of low vapor pressure liquids in paper. J Colloid Sci 13(1):32–5010.1016/0095-8522(58)90007-2 ↗
41. Michel T, Mock U, Roisman I, Rühe J, Tropea C (2005) The hydrodynamics of drop impact onto chemically structured surfaces. J Phys: Condens Matter 17(9):S607–S622
42. Morent R, De Geyter N, Leys C, Vansteenkiste E, De Bock J, Philips W (2006) Measuring the wicking behavior of textiles by the combination of a horizontal wicking experiment and image processing. Rev Sci Instrum 77(9):093502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.234929710.1063/1.2349297 ↗
43. Ray SC (2012) Fundamentals and advances in knitting technology. CRC Press, New York
44. Spencer DJ (2001) Knitting technology: a comprehensive handbook and practical guide. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge
45. Tuller M, Or D, Dudley LM (1999) Adsorption and capillary condensation in porous media: Liquid retention and interfacial configurations in angular pores. Water Resour Res 35(7):1949–196410.1029/1999WR900098 ↗