The evolution of microstructure and microhardness in a biomedical Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
β-Ti alloys are promising candidates for biomedical applications due to their high strength, high corrosion and wear resistance, and low elastic modulus. This study focuses on phase evolution in a low modulus Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta (TNZT) alloy, systematically examined via isochronal and isothermal annealing, and its influence on microhardness. The observations indicate that the highest microhardness value was achieved at an aging temperature of 400 °C. The microstructural evolution at this temperature was investigated via systematic isothermal annealing treatments, and the results indicate a progressive transformation from β + ω + O’ (solution treated and quenched) to β + ω + α (after isothermal annealing at 400 °C/6 h), with the dissolution of the metastable orthorhombic O’ phase and the formation of the stable α phase. The maximum hardness corresponded to a highly refined mixture of co-existing ω and α phases after prolonged annealing for 48 h at 400 °C. The coexistence of both ω and α phases after such prolonged annealing indicates that at 400 °C, ω is in metastable equilibrium, despite the concurrent precipitation of the equilibrium α phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Long MJ, Rack HJ (1998) Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 19:1621–163910.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
2. Wang K (1996) The use of titanium for medical applications in the USA. Mater Sci Eng A 213:134–13710.1016/0921-5093(96)10243-4 ↗
3. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK (2009) Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants—a review. Prog Mater Sci 54:397–42510.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗
4. Rack HJ, Qazi JI (2006) Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 26:1269–127710.1016/j.msec.2005.08.032 ↗
5. Niinomi M (2008) Biologically and mechanically biocompatible titanium alloys. Mater Trans 49(10):2170–217810.2320/matertrans.L-MRA2008828 ↗
6. Bombač D, Brojan M, Fajfar P, Kosel F, Turk R (2007) Review of materials in medical applications. RMZ Mater Geoenviron 54(4):471–499
7. Rao S, Uchida T, Tateishi T, Okazaki T, Asao Y (1996) Effect of Ti, Al and V ions on the relative growth rate of fibroblasts (L929) and osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) cells. J Biomed Mater Eng 6(2):79–86
8. Walker PR, LeBlanc J, Sikorska M (1989) Effects of aluminum and other cations on the structure of brain and liver chromatin. Biochemistry 28(9):3911–391510.1021/bi00435a043 ↗
9. Borowy KH, Krammer KH (1985) On the properties of a new Titanium alloy (Ti–5Al–2.5Fe) as implant material. Titanium 84, Science and Technology, vol 2. Desche Ges Metallkunde EV, Munich. pp 1381–1386
10. Ahmed T, Long M, Silvestri J, Ruiz C, Rack HJ (1996) A new low modulus, biocompatible titanium alloy, In Titanium 95: Science and Technology. The Institute for Materials, Birmingham, UK, pp 1760–1767
11. Kuroda D, Niinomi M, Morinaga M, Kato Y, Yashiro T (1998) Mater Sci Eng A 243:244–24910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00808-3 ↗
12. Ferrandini PL, Cardoso FF, Souza SA, Afonso CR, Caram R (2007) Aging response of the Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta and Ti–35Nb–7Ta alloys. J Alloy Compd 433:207–21010.1016/j.jallcom.2006.06.094 ↗
13. Banerjee R, Nag S, Stechschulte J, Fraser HL (2004) Strengthening mechanisms in Ti–Nb–Zr–Ta and Ti–Mo–Zr–Fe orthopaedic alloys. Biomaterials 25:3413–341910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.041 ↗
14. Nag S, Banerjee R, Fraser HL (2005) Microstructural evolution and strengthening mechanisms in Ti–Nb–Zr–Ta, Ti–Mo–Zr–Fe and Ti–15Mo biocompatible alloys. Mater Sci Eng C 25:357–36210.1016/j.msec.2004.12.013 ↗
15. Nag S, Banerjee R (2012) Laser deposition and deformation behavior of Ti–Nb–Zr–Ta alloys for orthopedic implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 16:21–2810.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.014 ↗
16. Li SJ, Yang R, Niinomi M, Hao YL, Cui YY, Guo ZX (2005) Phase transformation during aging and resulting mechanical properties of two Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloys. Mater Sci Technol 21(6):678–68610.1179/174328405X43108 ↗
17. Nakai M, Niinomi M, Oneda T (2012) Improvement in fatigue strength of biomedical b-type Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloy while maintaining low Young’s modulus through optimizing ω-phase precipitation. Metall Mater Trans A 43a:29410.1007/s11661-011-0860-3 ↗
18. Lope ESN, Cremasco A, Afonso CRM, Caram R (2011) Effects of double aging heat treatment on the microstructure, Vickers hardness and elastic modulus of Ti–Nb alloys. Mater Charact 62:673–68010.1016/j.matchar.2011.04.015 ↗
19. Sakaguchi N, Niinomi M, Akahori T, Takeda J, Toda H (2005) Relationships between tensile deformation behavior and microstructure in Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr system alloys. Mater Sci Eng C 25:363–36910.1016/j.msec.2004.12.014 ↗
20. Gysler A, Lutjering G, Gerold V (1974) Deformation behavior of age hardened Ti-Mo alloys. Acta Metall 22:901–90910.1016/0001-6160(74)90057-1 ↗
21. Williams J, Hickman B, Marcus H (1971) The effect of omega phase on the mechanical properties of titanium alloys. Metall Trans 2:191310.1007/BF02913423 ↗
22. Tane M, Nakano T, Kuramoto S, Hara M, Niinomi M, Takesue N, Yano T, Nakajima H (2011) Low Young’s modulus in Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr–O alloys: cold working and oxygen effects. Acta Mater 59:6975–698810.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.050 ↗
23. Tang X, Ahmed T, Rack HJ (2000) Phase transformations in Ti–Nb–Ta and Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloys. J Mater Sci 35:1805–1811. doi: 10.1023/A:100479292215510.1023/A:1004792922155 ↗
24. Tane M, Nakano T, Kuramoto S, Niinomi M, Takesue N, Nakajima H (2013) ω Transformation in cold-worked Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr–O alloys with low body-centered cubic phase stability and its correlation with their elastic properties. Acta Mater 61:139–15010.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.041 ↗
25. Qazi JI, Marquardt TB, Allard LF, Rack HJ (2005) Phase transformations in Ti–35Nb–7Zr–5Ta (0.06–0.68)O alloys. Mater Sci Eng C 25:389–39710.1016/j.msec.2005.01.022 ↗
26. Wei Q, Wang L, Fu Y, Qin J, Lu W, Zhang D (2011) Influence of oxygen content on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–Nb–Ta–Zr alloy. Mater Des 32:2934–293910.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.049 ↗
27. Nag S, Banerjee R, Srinivasan R, Hwang JY, Harper M, Fraser HL (2009) ω-Assisted nucleation and growth of a precipitates in the Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–0.5Fe β-titanium alloy. Acta Mater 57:2136–214710.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.007 ↗
28. Zheng Y, Williams R, Sosa J, Wang Y, Banerjee R, Fraser H (2016) The role of the ω phase on the non-classical precipitation of the α phase in metastable β-titanium alloys. Scr Mater 111:81–8410.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.08.019 ↗
29. Zheng Y, Williams R, Wang D, Shi R, Nag S, Kami P, Sosa J, Banerjee R, Wang Y, Fraser H (2016) Role of ω phase in the formation of extremely refined intragranular α precipitates in metastable β-titanium alloys. Acta Mater 103:850–858, 10310.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.020 ↗
30. Li T, Kent D, Sha G, Stephenson LT, Ceguerra AV, Ringer SP, Dargusch MS, Cairney JM (2016) New insights into the phase transformations to isothermal ω and ω-assisted α in near β-Ti alloys. Acta Mater 106:353–36610.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.046 ↗
31. Ohmori Y, Ogo T, Nakai K, Kobayashi S (2001) Effects of ω-phase precipitation on β → α, α″ transformations in a metastable β-titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 312:182–18810.1016/S0921-5093(00)01891-8 ↗
32. Li T, Kent D, Sha G, Dargusch MS, Cairney JM (2015) The mechanism of x-assisted a phase formation in near β-Ti alloys. Scr Mater 104:75–7810.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.007 ↗
33. Mantri S, Choudhuri D, Behera A, Cotton J, Kumar N, Banerjee R (2015) Influence of fine-scale alpha precipitation on the mechanical properties of the beta titanium alloy beta-21S. Metall Mater Trans A 46(7):2803–280810.1007/s11661-015-2944-y ↗
34. Hammersley AP (1995) ESRF Internal Report, EXP/AH/95-01, FIT2D V5.18 Reference Manual V1.6
35. Toby B (2001) EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J Appl Crystallogr 34:210–21310.1107/S0021889801002242 ↗
36. Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 2:65–7110.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
37. Cheary RW, Coelho AA, Cline JP (2004) Fundamental parameters line profile fitting in laboratory diffractometers. J Res Nat Inst Stand Technol 109:1–2510.6028/jres.109.002 ↗
38. Chen SL, Daniel S, Zhang F, Chang YA, Yan XY, Xie FY, Schmid-Fetzer R, Oates WA (2002) The PANDAT software package and applications. CALPHAD 26:175–18810.1016/S0364-5916(02)00034-2 ↗
39. Banerjee S, Mukhopadhyay P (2010) Phase transformations: examples from titanium and zirconium alloys. Elsevier, Amsterdam
40. Zheng Y, Williams REA, Nag S, Banerjee R, Fraser HL, Banerjee D (2016) The effect of alloy composition on instabilities in the β phase of titanium alloys. Scr Mater 116:49–5210.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.024 ↗
41. Cook HE (1974) A theory of the omega transformation. Acta Metall 22:239–24710.1016/0001-6160(74)90014-5 ↗
42. Zheng Y, Banerjee D, Fraser HL (2016) A nano-scale instability in the β phase of dilute Ti–Mo alloys. Scripta Mater 116:131–13410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.044 ↗