Review: recent advances using severe plastic deformation to improve the properties of battery materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Severe plastic deformation (SPD) techniques are capable of achieving improved properties in materials by modifying the microstructures through the application of large plastic strains. Generally, a more uniform and refined microstructure is obtained after SPD while specific crystallographic textures may also develop depending on the material and processing route. In this study, the SPD procedures employed so far for the processing of battery materials are reviewed, where this is mainly for Zn-, Li-, Mg- and Al-based batteries. Among the various SPD techniques, high-pressure torsion, equal-channel angular pressing, accumulative roll bonding, friction stir processing and deformation-driven metallurgy are all of special interest for conveniently processing battery materials. This review demonstrates that there is an important potential for making use of SPD techniques in the production of battery materials having improved properties and especially in the application of these procedures for fabricating metallic electrodes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mokhtar M, Talib MZM, Majlan EH, Tasirin SM, Ramli WMFW, Daud WRW, Sahari J (2015) Recent developments in materials for aluminum-air batteries: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 32:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.00410.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.004 ↗
2. Palacín MR, De Guibert A (2016) Batteries: Why do batteries fail? Science 351(6273):1253292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125329210.1126/science.1253292 ↗
3. Kittner N, Lill F, Kammen DM (2017) Energy storage deployment and innovation for the clean energy transition. Nat Energy 2(9):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.12510.1038/nenergy.2017.125 ↗
4. Jiang X, Chen Y, Meng X, Cao W, Liu C, Huang Q, Naik N, Murugadoss V, Huang M, Guo Z (2022) The impact of electrode with carbon materials on safety performance of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Carbon 191:448–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.01110.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.011 ↗
5. Li M, Lu J, Chen Z, Amine K (2018) 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 30:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180056110.1002/adma.201800561 ↗
6. Wang HF, Xu Q (2019) Materials design for rechargeable metal-air batteries. Matter 1:565–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.00810.1016/j.matt.2019.05.008 ↗
7. Deng J, Bae C, Denlinger A, Miller T (2020) Electric vehicles batteries: requirements and challenges. Joule 4:511–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.01310.1016/j.joule.2020.01.013 ↗
8. Goodenough JB, Park KS (2013) The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc 135:1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
9. Pan J, Xu YY, Yang H, Dong Z, Liu H, Xia BY (2018) Advanced architectures and relatives of air electrodes in Zn–air batteries. Adv Sci 5(4):1700691. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20170069110.1002/advs.201700691 ↗
10. Yu J, Li BQ, Zhao CX, Zhang Q (2020) Seawater electrolyte-based metal-air batteries: from strategies to applications. Energy Environ Sci 13:3253–3268. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01617a10.1039/d0ee01617a ↗
11. Nitta N, Wu F, Lee JT, Yushin G (2015) Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Mater Today 18:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.04010.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
12. Shan C, Qin Z, Xie Y, Meng X, Chen J, Chang Y, Zang R, Wan L, Huang Y (2023) Cu-CNTs current collector fabricated by deformation-driven metallurgy for anode-free Li metal batteries. Carbon 204:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.07410.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.074 ↗
13. Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK (2021) Magnetic stirring assisted hydrothermal synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4 cathode material for sodium-ion battery. Ceram Int 47:26929–26934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.10410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.104 ↗
14. Daya A, Paul Sathiyan S (2022) Review on Li-ion based battery chemistry: challenges and opportunities. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1258:012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1258/1/01204110.1088/1757-899x/1258/1/012041 ↗
15. Zhang P, Liu X, Xue J, Jiang K (2020) The role of microstructural evolution in improving energy conversion of Al-based anodes for metal-air batteries. J Power Sources 451:227806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22780610.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227806 ↗
16. Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK, Chen G (2016) In-situ hydrothermal synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4/rGO hybrid as a cathode for Na-ion battery. Electrochim Acta 208:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.02810.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.028 ↗
17. Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK, Chen G (2016) Ball mill assisted synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4 nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxide for sodium ion battery cathodes. Electrochim Acta 220:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.16010.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.160 ↗
18. Liu Q, Pan Z, Wang E, An L, Sun G (2020) Aqueous metal-air batteries: fundamentals and applications. Energy Storage Mater 27:478–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.12.01110.1016/j.ensm.2019.12.011 ↗
19. Zhang J, Chang Z, Zhang Z, Du A, Dong S, Li Z, Li G, Cui G (2021) Current design strategies for rechargeable magnesium-based batteries. ACS Nano 15:15594–15624. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c0653010.1021/acsnano.1c06530 ↗
20. Xie Y, Meng X, Qin Z, Chang Y, Mao D, Wan L, Huang Y (2022) Reversible passivation in primary aluminum-air batteries via composite anodes. Energy Storage Mater 49:537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.00410.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.004 ↗
21. Chen Y, Kang Y, Zhao Y, Wang L, Liu J, Li Y, Liang Z, He X, Li X, Tavajohi N et al (2021) A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: the issues, strategies, and testing standards. J Energy Chem 59:83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.01710.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017 ↗
22. Li J, Zhang B, Wei Q, Wang N, Hou B (2017) Electrochemical behavior of Mg–Al–Zn–In alloy as anode materials in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Electrochim Acta 238:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.11910.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.119 ↗
23. Qi G, Qiu Y (2009) The effect of heat treatment on element distribution and electrochemical properties of Al–Zn–In anodes. Anti-Corrosion Methods Mater 56:306–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/0003559091100027810.1108/00035590911000278 ↗
24. Wang N, Wang R, Peng C, Feng Y, Chen B (2012) Effect of hot rolling and subsequent annealing on electrochemical discharge behavior of AP65 magnesium alloy as anode for seawater activated battery. Corros Sci 64:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.02410.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.024 ↗
25. Xie Q, Ma A, Jiang J, Li Y, Wang J, Wang L, Klu EE (2020) Effects of microstructure evolution on discharge properties of AZ31 alloy as anode for seawater battery. Mater Corros 71:1462–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20201159810.1002/maco.202011598 ↗
26. Gu Y, Jiang J, Xie Q, Ma A, Gao Z (2022) Improved discharge performance of equal-channel-angular-pressed AZ61-In alloys as anodes for seawater-activated batteries. J Alloys Compd 890:161809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16180910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161809 ↗
27. Zohrevand M, Mohammadi-Zerankeshi M, Nobakht-Farin F, Alizadeh R, Mahmudi R (2022) Degradation behavior of the as-extruded and ECAP-processed Mg-4Zn alloy by Ca addition and hydrothermal coating. J Mater Res Technol 20:1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.07210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.072 ↗
28. Valiev R (2004) Nanostructuring of metals by severe plastic deformation for advanced properties. Nat Mater 3:511–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat118010.1038/nmat1180 ↗
29. Emerla M, Bazarnik P, Huang Y, Lewandowska M, Langdon TG (2023) Using direct high-pressure torsion synthesis to produce aluminium matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes. J Alloys Compd 968:171928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17192810.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171928 ↗
30. Hashemi M, Alizadeh R, Langdon TG (2023) Recent advances using equal-channel angular pressing to improve the properties of biodegradable Mg–Zn alloys. J Magnes Alloy 11:2260–2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.07.00910.1016/j.jma.2023.07.009 ↗
31. Langdon TG (2013) Twenty-five years of ultrafine-grained materials: Achieving exceptional properties through grain refinement. Acta Mater 61:7035–7059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.01810.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.018 ↗
32. Asadollahi M, Gerashi E, Alizadeh R, Mahmudi R (2022) Effect of Zn content and processing route on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and bio-degradation of Mg–Zn alloys. J Mater Res Technol 21:4473–4489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.04110.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.041 ↗
33. Gerashi E, Alizadeh R, Mahmudi R (2022) Improved corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of biodegradable Mg-4Zn-xSr alloys: effects of heat treatment, Sr additions, and multi-directional forging. J Mater Res Technol 20:3363–3380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.07210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.072 ↗
34. Paniagua Rojas J, González-Hernández JE, Cubero-Sesin JM, Horita Z, González-Flores D (2023) Benchmarking of aluminum alloys processed by high-pressure torsion: Al-3% Mg alloy for high-energy density Al-air batteries. Energy Fuels 37:4632–4640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c0372210.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03722 ↗
35. Zohrevand M, Alizadeh R, Mahmudi R (2023) Using different strategies to improve properties of the biodegradable Mg–4Li–4Zn alloy. J Mater Res Technol 27:2066–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.05910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.059 ↗
36. Bachmaier A, Pippan R (2012) Generation of metallic nanocomposites by severe plastic deformation. Int Mater Rev 58(1):41–62. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280412Y.000000000310.1179/1743280412Y.0000000003 ↗
37. Aghamohammadi H, Hassanzadeh N, Eslami-Farsani R (2021) A review study on the recent advances in developing the heteroatom-doped graphene and porous graphene as superior anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Ceram Int 47:22269–22301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.04810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.048 ↗
38. Wang JT (2006) Historic retrospection and present status of severe plastic deformation in China. Mater Sci Forum 503–504:363–370. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.36310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.363 ↗
39. Valiev RZ, Xia K, Langdon TG (2009) Processing by severe plastic deformation:an ancient skill adapted for the modern world. Int J Mater Res 100:1623–1631. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.11023310.3139/146.110233 ↗
40. Langdon TG (2011) Processing by severe plastic deformation: historical developments and current impact. Mater Sci Forum 667–669:9–14. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.667-669.910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.667-669.9 ↗
41. Edalati K, Bachmaier A, Beloshenko VA, Beygelzimer Y, Blank VD, Botta WJ, Bryła K, Čižek J, Divinski S, Enikeev NA (2022) others, Nanomaterials by severe plastic deformation: review of historical developments and recent advances. Mater Res Lett 10:163–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2022.202977910.1080/21663831.2022.2029779 ↗
42. Bridgman PW (1964) Studies in large plastic flow and fracture: with special emphasis on the effects of hydrostatic pressure. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA and London, England. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.978067473134910.4159/harvard.9780674731349 ↗
43. Valiev RZ, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT (2006) Producing bulk ultrafine-grained materials by severe plastic deformation. JOM 58(4):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0213-710.1007/s11837-006-0213-7 ↗
44. Valiev RZ, Islamgaliev RK, Alexandrov IV (2000) Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation. Prog Mater Sci 45:103–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
45. Edalati K (2019) Metallurgical alchemy by ultra-severe plastic deformation via high-pressure torsion process. Mater Trans 60:1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MF20191410.2320/matertrans.MF201914 ↗
46. Segal V (2018) Modes and processes of severe plastic deformation (SPD). Materials (Basel) 11:1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1107117510.3390/ma11071175 ↗
47. Kwon Y-J, Shigematsu I, Saito N (2003) Production of ultra-fine grained aluminum alloy using friction stir process. Mater Trans 44:1343–1350. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.44.134310.2320/matertrans.44.1343 ↗
48. Xie Y, Meng X, Li Y, Mao D, Wan L, Huang Y (2021) Insight into ultra-refined grains of aluminum matrix composites via deformation-driven metallurgy. Compos Commun 26:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2021.10077610.1016/j.coco.2021.100776 ↗
49. Xu C, Horita Z, Langdon TG (2008) The evolution of homogeneity in an aluminum alloy processed using high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater 56:5168–5176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.036 ↗
50. Zhilyaev AP, Langdon TG (2008) Using high-pressure torsion for metal processing: fundamentals and applications. Prog Mater Sci 53:893–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
51. Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Prog Mater Sci 51:881–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
52. Iwahashi Y, Wang J, Horita Z, Nemoto M, Langdon TG (1996) Principle of equal-channel angular pressing for the processing of ultra-fine grained materials. Scr Mater 35:143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-810.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
53. Horita Z, Fujinami T, Langdon TG (2001) The potential for scaling ECAP: Effect of sample size on grain refinement and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process 318:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01339-910.1016/S0921-5093(01)01339-9 ↗
54. Srinivasan R, Cherukuri B, Chaudhury P (2006) Scaling up of Equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) for the production of forging stock. Mater Sci Forum 503:371–378. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.37110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.371 ↗
55. Frint S, Hockauf M, Frint P, Wagner M (2016) Scaling up Segal’s principle of equal-channel angular pressing. Mater Des 907:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.06710.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.067 ↗
56. Gu RC, Jiang Y, Liu YW, Liu Y, Liu F, Wang JT (2021) Exploring the size effect in scaling up ECAP using the theory of similarity. J Mater Process Technol 298:117290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11729010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117290 ↗
57. Raab GJ, Valiev RZ, Lowe TC, Zhu YT (2004) Continuous processing of ultrafine grained Al by ECAP-Conform. Mater Sci Eng A 382:30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.04.02110.1016/j.msea.2004.04.021 ↗
58. Xu C, Schroeder S, Berbon PB, Langdon TG (2010) Principles of ECAP-Conform as a continuous process for achieving grain refinement: Application to an aluminum alloy. Acta Mater 58:1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.04410.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.044 ↗
59. Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T, Hong RG (1998) Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminum produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr Mater 39:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00302-9 ↗
60. Saito Y, Utsunomiya H, Tsuji N, Sakai T (1999) Novel ultra-high straining process for bulk materials—development of the accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Acta Mater 47:579–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-610.1016/S1359-6454(98)00365-6 ↗
61. Jiang L, Pérez-Prado MT, Gruber PA, Arzt E, Ruano OA, Kassner ME (2008) Texture, microstructure and mechanical properties of equiaxed ultrafine-grained Zr fabricated by accumulative roll bonding. Acta Mater 56:1228–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.01710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.017 ↗
62. Suwas S, Mondal S (2019) Texture evolution in severe plastic deformation processes. Mater Trans 60:1457–1471. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MF20193310.2320/matertrans.MF201933 ↗
63. Sabirov I, Murashkin MY, Valiev RZ (2013) Nanostructured aluminium alloys produced by severe plastic deformation: new horizons in development. Mater Sci Eng A 560:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.02010.1016/j.msea.2012.09.020 ↗
64. Ma ZY (2008) Friction stir processing technology: a review. Metall Mater Trans A 39:642–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9459-010.1007/s11661-007-9459-0 ↗
65. Xie Y, Meng X, Chang Y, Mao D, Yang Y, Xu Y, Wan L, Huang Y (2022) Ameliorating strength-ductility efficiency of graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced aluminum composites via deformation-driven metallurgy. Compos Sci Technol 219:109225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10922510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109225 ↗
66. Xie Y, Meng X, Mao D, Chang Y, Qin Z, Ma X, Wan L, Huang Y (2022) Deformation-driven modification of Al–Li–Mg–Zn–Cu high-alloy aluminum as anodes for primary aluminum-air batteries. Scr Mater 212:114551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11455110.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114551 ↗
67. Xie Y, Meng X, Huang Y, Li J, Cao J (2019) Deformation-driven metallurgy of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced aluminum composite for the balance between strength and ductility. Compos Part B Eng 177:107413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10741310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107413 ↗
68. Huang Y, Langdon TG (2013) Advances in ultrafine-grained materials. Mater Today 16:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.00410.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.004 ↗
69. Zheng X, Zhang T, Yang H, Zheng Q, Gao Y, Liu Z, Wang W, Wang K (2020) Friction stir processing induced elctrochemical performance improvement of commercial Al for Al-air battery. Electrochim Acta 354:136635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13663510.1016/j.electacta.2020.136635 ↗
70. Wang T, Sun J, Hua Y, Krishna BNV, Xi Q, Ai W, Yu JS (2022) Planar and dendrite-free zinc deposition enabled by exposed crystal plane optimization of zinc anode. Energy Storage Mater 53:273–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.04610.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.046 ↗
71. Wu S, Hu Z, He P, Ren L, Huang J, Luo J (2023) Crystallographic engineering of Zn anodes for aqueous batteries. EScience 3:100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2023.10012010.1016/j.esci.2023.100120 ↗
72. Chen Z, Zhao J, He Q, Li M, Feng S, Wang Y, Yuan D, Chen J, Alshareef HN, Ma Y (2022) Texture control of commercial Zn foils prolongs their reversibility as aqueous battery anodes. ACS Energy Lett 7:3564–3571. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0192010.1021/acsenergylett.2c01920 ↗
73. Chu Y, Ren L, Hu Z, Huang C, Luo J (2022) An in-depth understanding of improvement strategies and corresponding characterizations towards Zn anode in aqueous Zn-ions batteries, Green. Energy Environ 8:1006–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2022.04.00810.1016/j.gee.2022.04.008 ↗
74. Zhou M, Guo S, Li J, Luo X, Liu Z, Zhang T, Cao X, Long M, Lu B, Pan A, Fang G, Zhou J, Liang S (2021) Surface-preferred crystal plane for a stable and reversible zinc anode. Adv Mater 33:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210018710.1002/adma.202100187 ↗
75. Zheng J, Deng Y, Yin J, Tang T, Garcia-Mendez R, Zhao Q, Archer LA (2022) Textured electrodes: manipulating built-in crystallographic heterogeneity of metal electrodes via severe plastic deformation. Adv Mater 34:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210686710.1002/adma.202106867 ↗
76. Zhang L, Zhu C, Yu S, Ge D, Zhou H (2022) Status and challenges facing representative anode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Energy Chem 66:260–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.00110.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.001 ↗
77. Aghamohammadi H, Hassanzadeh N, Eslami-Farsani R (2021) A review study on titanium niobium oxide-based composite anodes for Li-ion batteries: synthesis, structure, and performance. Ceram Int 47:26598–26619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.12710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.127 ↗
78. Aghamohammadi H, Hassanzadeh N, Eslami-Farsani R (2022) A comprehensive review study on pure titanium niobium oxide as the anode material for Li-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 911:165117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16511710.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165117 ↗
79. Qiao Y, Yang H, Chang Z, Deng H, Li X, Zhou H (2021) A high-energy-density and long-life initial-anode-free lithium battery enabled by a Li2O sacrificial agent. Nat Energy 6:653–662. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00839-010.1038/s41560-021-00839-0 ↗
80. Xie Z, Wu Z, An X, Yue X, Wang J, Abudula A, Guan G (2020) Anode-free rechargeable lithium metal batteries: progress and prospects. Energy Storage Mater 32:386–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.00410.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.004 ↗
81. Fan H, Chen B, Li S, Yu Y, Xu H, Jiang M, Huang Y, Li J (2020) Nanocrystalline Li–Al–Mn–Si foil as reversible li host: electronic percolation and electrochemical cycling stability. Nano Lett 20:896–904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0362610.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03626 ↗
82. Hu Y, Li H, Chen Z, Cen W, Wang Q, Chen Y, Davoodi A, Liu W (2023) Li-Alloy texture creates in-built Li(110) epitaxy in a thin Li-metal anode allowing high depth-of-discharge cycling in carbonate electrolyte. Chem Eng J 466:143084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14308410.1016/j.cej.2023.143084 ↗
83. Hu X, Gao Y, Zhang B, Shi L, Li Q (2022) Superior cycle performance of Li metal electrode with 110 surface texturing. EcoMat 4:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.1226410.1002/eom2.12264 ↗
84. Liu S, Deng L, Guo W, Zhang C, Liu X, Luo J (2019) Bulk nanostructured materials design for fracture-resistant lithium metal anodes. Adv Mater 31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180758510.1002/adma.201807585 ↗
85. Pishgahinejad S, Aghamohammadi H, Hassanzadeh N (2023) Copper-coated graphite electrodes for the facile preparation of copper oxide particles anchored on functionalized holey graphene sheets. J Electroanal Chem 931:117204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.11720410.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117204 ↗
86. Mozaffarpour F, Hassanzadeh N, Vahidi E (2023) Synthesis, characterization and life cycle assessment of electrochemically exfoliated KOH-activated holey graphene. Front Environ Sci Eng 17(12):155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1755-410.1007/s11783-023-1755-4 ↗
87. Jeong HT, Jang J, Lee DG, Lee D, Kim WJ (2023) Grain size and hardness: key parameters for enhancing the chemo-mechanical stability of lithiated aluminum foil anodes. J Alloys Compd 965:171279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17127910.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171279 ↗
88. Qian C, He Z, Liang C, Cha Y, Ji W (2020) Superior intracluster conductivity of metallic lithium-ion battery anode achieved by high-pressure torsion. Mater Lett 260:126933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12693310.1016/j.matlet.2019.126933 ↗
89. Kreder KJ, Heligman BT, Manthiram A (2017) Interdigitated eutectic alloy foil anodes for rechargeable batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2:2422–2423. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0084410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00844 ↗
90. Heligman BT, Iii JK, Heligman BT, Joseph K, Iii K, Manthiram A (2019) Zn–Sn Interdigitated eutectic alloy anodes with high volumetric capacity for lithium-ion batteries Zn–sn interdigitated eutectic alloy anodes with high volumetric capacity for lithium-ion batteries. Joule 3(4):1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00510.1016/j.joule.2019.01.005 ↗
91. Qian C, He Z, Liang C, Ji W (2018) New in situ synthesis method for Fe3O4/flake graphite nanosheet composite structure and its application in anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. J Nanomater 2018:2417949. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/241794910.1155/2018/2417949 ↗
92. Wang M, Zhang F, Chen L, Xu B, Cui Z, Edalati K (2021) Influence of Cu doping and high-pressure torsion on electrochemical performance of lithium-rich cathode material. J Phys Conf Ser 1750:012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1750/1/01207710.1088/1742-6596/1750/1/012077 ↗
93. Tian HK, Jalem R, Matsui M, Mandai T, Somekawa H, Tateyama Y (2021) Tuning the performance of a Mg negative electrode through grain boundaries and alloying toward the realization of Mg batteries. J Mater Chem A 9:15207–15216. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta02419a10.1039/d1ta02419a ↗
94. Chen X, Zou Q, Shi Z, Le Q, Zhang M, Atrens A (2022) The discharge performance of an as-extruded Mg–Zn–La–Ce anode for the primary Mg-air battery. Electrochim Acta 404:139763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13976310.1016/j.electacta.2021.139763 ↗
95. Hassanzadeh N, Langdon TG (2023) Invited viewpoint: biodegradable Mg batteries. J Mater Sci 58:13721–13743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08828-210.1007/s10853-023-08828-2 ↗
96. Jiang P, Li D, Hou R, Yang H, Yang J, Zhu S, Wang L, Guan S (2023) A micro-alloyed Mg–Zn–Ge alloy as promising anode for primary Mg-air batteries. J Magnes Alloy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.05.00410.1016/j.jma.2023.05.004 ↗
97. Deng M, Höche D, Lamaka SV, Snihirova D, Zheludkevich ML (2018) Mg-Ca binary alloys as anodes for primary Mg-air batteries. J Power Sources 396:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.090 ↗
98. Shangguan F, Cheng W, Chen Y, Yu H, Wang L, Li H, Wang H, Wang J (2023) Elucidating the dependence of electrochemical behavior and discharge performance on the grain structure of lean Mg-0.3Bi-0.3Ag-0.3In anodes in primary Mg-air battery. J Power Sources 564:232856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23285610.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232856 ↗
99. Xie Q, Ma A, Jiang J, Liu H, Saleh B (2021) Discharge properties of ECAP processed AZ31—Ca alloys as anodes for seawater-activated battery. J Mater Res Technol 11:1031–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.07610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.076 ↗
100. Wang N, Mu Y, Xiong W, Zhang J, Li Q, Shi Z (2018) Effect of crystallographic orientation on the discharge and corrosion behaviour of AP65 magnesium alloy anodes. Corros Sci 144:107–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.00310.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.003 ↗