Design of selective cell migration biomaterials and their applications for tissue regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
Cell migration is a widespread form of live cell activity during complex dynamic process, which plays an important role in tissue regeneration and repairing. Tissue regenerative biomaterials provide the basic supporting for the growth of cells and tissues and maintain the shape and mechanical properties of the regenerated tissues. Cell recruitment and migration with the assistance of biomaterials is important for tissue regenerative process because cell directional migration to the wound site is a crucial prerequisite in tissue regeneration. In the case of injured tissue, migration and overgrowth of unexpected cells may cause severe diseases. Hence, cell-selective biomaterials have great significance in tissue regeneration and reconstruction. The design of cell-selective biomaterials for this purpose is based on the specific interactions between materials and cells by the physical, chemical, or biological cues, because they can directly affect the migration cells and further affect the process of tissue regeneration. The chemical and biological molecules (peptides, growth factors, adhesion molecules), physical properties (hardness, topography, hydrophilicity), physiological signals (cellular chemokines or cytokines) are all effective regulatory factors in the design of cell-selective biomaterials. This review combined the latest research, summarized systematically about the influential factors of cell migration, the design of biomaterials for selective cell adhesion and directional migration, and their applications in tissue regeneration. Furthermore, the challenge and perspectives of cell-selective migration biomaterials were also discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Nourshargh S, Alon R (2014) Leukocyte migration into inflamed tissues. Immunity 41:694–70710.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.008 ↗
2. Weninger W, Biro M, Jain R (2014) Leukocyte migration in the interstitial space of nonlymphoid organs. Nat Rev Immunol 14:232–24610.1038/nri3641 ↗
3. Correa-Gallegos D, Jiang D, Christ S et al (2019) Patch repair of deep wounds by mobilized fascia. Nature 576:287–29210.1038/s41586-019-1794-y ↗
4. Rippa AL, Kalabusheva EP, Vorotelyak EA (2019) Regeneration of dermis: scarring and cells involved. Cells 8:607–63710.3390/cells8060607 ↗
5. Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP, Johnson FL, Weissman IL (2001) Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science 294:1933–193610.1126/science.1064081 ↗
6. Almubarak S, Nethercott H, Freeberg M et al (2016) Tissue engineering strategies for promoting vascularized bone regeneration. Bone 83:197–20910.1016/j.bone.2015.11.011 ↗
7. Guan X, Guan X, Dong C, Jiao Z (2020) Rho GTPases and related signaling complexes in cell migration and invasion. Exp Cell Res 388:111824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.11182410.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111824 ↗
8. Janiszewska M, Primi MC, Izard T (2020) Cell adhesion in cancer: beyond the migration of single cells. J Biol Chem 295:2495–250510.1074/jbc.REV119.007759 ↗
9. Driskell RR, Lichtenberger BM, Hoste E (2013) Distinct fibroblast lineages determine dermal architecture in skin development and repair. Nature 504:277–28110.1038/nature12783 ↗
10. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453:314–32110.1038/nature07039 ↗
11. Facklam AL, Volpatti LR, Anderson DG (2020) Biomaterials for personalized cell therapy. Adv Mater 32:1902005. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190200510.1002/adma.201902005 ↗
12. Huang J, Chi H, Qiu L, Wang Y, Qiu Z, Zhang J, Liu X, Yan J (2019) Stromal cell-derived factor 1 promotes cell migration to enhance bone regeneration after hypoxic preconditioning. Tissue Eng Part A 25:1300–130910.1089/ten.tea.2018.0187 ↗
13. Frangogiannis NG (2019) Cardiac fibrosis: cell biological mechanisms, molecular pathways and therapeutic opportunities. Mol Asp Med 65:70–9910.1016/j.mam.2018.07.001 ↗
14. Weiskirchen R, Weiskirchen S, Tacke F (2019) Organ and tissue fibrosis: molecular signals, cellular mechanisms and translational implications. Mol Asp Med 65:2–1510.1016/j.mam.2018.06.003 ↗
15. Gourdie RG, Dimmeler S, Kohl P (2016) Novel therapeutic strategies targeting fibroblasts and fibrosis in heart disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15:620–63810.1038/nrd.2016.89 ↗
16. Osborn O, Olefsky JM (2012) The cellular and signaling networks linking the immune system and metabolism in disease. Nat Med 18:363–37410.1038/nm.2627 ↗
17. Al-Soudi A, Kaaij MH, Tas SW (2017) Endothelial cells: from innocent bystanders to active participants in immune responses. Autoimmun Rev 16:951–96210.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.008 ↗
18. Hansson GK, Libby P (2006) The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immun 6:508–51910.1038/nri1882 ↗
19. Bai X, Wang X, Xu Q (2010) Endothelial damage and stem cell repair in atherosclerosis. Vasc Pharmacol 52:224–22910.1016/j.vph.2010.02.001 ↗
20. Pircher A, Treps L, Bodrug N, Carmeliet P (2016) Endothelial cell metabolism: a novel player in atherosclerosis? Basic principles and therapeutic opportunities. Atherosclerosis 253:247–25710.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.011 ↗
21. Maguire EM, Pearce SWA, Xiao Q (2019) Foam cell formation: a new target for fighting atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Vasc Pharmacol 112:54–7110.1016/j.vph.2018.08.002 ↗
22. Tabas I, Lichtman AH (2017) Monocyte-macrophages and T Cells in atherosclerosis. Immunity 17:621–63410.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.008 ↗
23. Zhang H, Zheng X, Ahmed W, Yao Y, Bai J, Chen Y, Gao C (2018) Design and applications of cell-selective surfaces and interfaces. Biomacromol 19:1746–176310.1021/acs.biomac.8b00264 ↗
24. Ramachandran P, Dobie R, Wilson-Kanamori JR et al (2019) Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level. Nature 575:512–51810.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 ↗
25. Tedgui A, Mallat Z (2006) Cytokines in atherosclerosis: pathogenic and regulatory pathways. Physiol Rev 86:515–58110.1152/physrev.00024.2005 ↗
26. Moroni L, Gunnewiek MK, Benetti EM (2014) Polymer brush coatings regulating cell behavior: passive interfaces turn into active. Acta Biomater 10:2367–237810.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.048 ↗
27. Massia SP, Hubbell JA (1991) Human endothelial cell interactions with surface-coupled adhesion peptides on a nonadhesive glass substrate and two polymeric biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 25:223–24210.1002/jbm.820250209 ↗
28. Hundt C, Peyrin JM, Haïk S et al (2001) Identification of interaction domains of the prion protein with its 37-kDa/67-kDa laminin receptor. EMBO J 20:5876–588610.1093/emboj/20.21.5876 ↗
29. Sundaram HS, Han X, Nowinski AK et al (2014) Achieving one-step surface coating of highly hydrophilic poly(carboxybetaine methacrylate) polymers on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Adv Mater Interfaces 1:1400071. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20140007110.1002/admi.201400071 ↗
30. Shamsi F, Coster H, Jolliffe KA (2011) Characterization of peptide immobilization on an acetylene terminated surface via click chemistry. Surf Sci 605:1763–177010.1016/j.susc.2011.05.027 ↗
31. Mizutani M, Arnold SC, Matsuda T (2002) Liquid, phenylazide-end-capped copolymers of ε-caprolactone and trimethylene carbonate: preparation, photocuring characteristics, and surface layering. Biomacromol 3:668–67510.1021/bm0101670 ↗
32. Coad BR, Jasieniak M, Griesser SS, Griesser HJ (2013) Controlled covalent surface immobilization of proteins and peptides using plasma methods. Surf Coat Technol 233:169–17710.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.05.019 ↗
33. Shin YM, Jo S, Park J, Gwon H, Jeong SI, Lim Y (2014) Synergistic effect of dual-functionalized fibrous scaffold with BCP and RGD containing peptide for improved osteogenic differentiation. Macromol Biosci 14:1190–119810.1002/mabi.201400023 ↗
34. Tong WF, Liu XL, Pan F, Wu ZQ, Jiang WW (2013) Protein adsorption and cell adhesion on RGD-functionalized silicon substrate surface. Chin J Polym Sci 31:495–50210.1007/s10118-013-1210-2 ↗
35. Tugulu S, Silacci P, Stergiopulos N, Klok H (2007) RGD-functionalized polymer brushes as substrates for the integrin specific adhesion of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biomaterials 28:2536–254610.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.006 ↗
36. Paripovic D, Hall-Bozic H, Klok H (2012) Osteoconductive surfaces generated from peptide functionalized poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphate) brushes. J Mater Chem 22:19570–1957810.1039/c2jm31568h ↗
37. Kurimoto R, Kanie K, Idota N, Hara M, Nagano S (2016) Combinational effect of cell adhesion biomolecules and their immobilized polymer property to enhance cell-selective adhesion. Int J Polym Sci 23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/209098510.1155/2016/2090985 ↗
38. Kurimoto R, Kanie K, Uto K, Kawai S, Hara M (2016) Combinational effects of polymer viscoelasticity and immobilized peptides on cell adhesion to cell-selective scaffolds. Anal Sci 32:1195–120210.2116/analsci.32.1195 ↗
39. Cio DS, Gautrot JE (2016) Cell sensing of physical properties at the nanoscale: mechanisms and control of cell adhesion and phenotype. Acta Biomater 30:26–4810.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.027 ↗
40. Gautrot JE, Malmström J, Sundh M, Margadant C, Sonnenberg A, Sutherland DS (2014) The nanoscale geometrical maturation of focal adhesions controls stem cell differentiation and mechanotransduction. Nano Lett 14:3945–395210.1021/nl501248y ↗
41. Thomas WE, Discher DE, Shastri VP (2010) Mechanical regulation of cells by materials and tissues. MRS Bull 35:578–58310.1557/mrs2010.525 ↗
42. Liu J, Tan Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xu P, Chen J, Poh Y, Tang K, Wang N, Huang B (2012) Soft fibrin gels promote selection and growth of tumorigenic cells. Nat Mater 11:734–74110.1038/nmat3361 ↗
43. Janmey PA, Miller RT (2011) Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. J Cell Sci 124:9–1810.1242/jcs.071001 ↗
44. Buxboim A, Ivanovska IL, Discher DE (2010) Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells ‘feel’ outside and in? J Cell Sci 123:297–30810.1242/jcs.041186 ↗
45. Kuo CR, Xian J, Brenton JD, Franze K, Sivaniah E (2012) Complex stiffness gradient substrates for studying mechanotactic cell migration. Adv Mater 24:6059–606410.1002/adma.201202520 ↗
46. Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, von der Klaus M, Schmuki P (2009) TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm-an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 5:666–67110.1002/smll.200801476 ↗
47. Richert L, Vetrone F, Yi J, Zalzal SF, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A (2008) Surface nanopatterning to control cell growth. Adv Mater 20:1488–149210.1002/adma.200701428 ↗
48. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC (2007) The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 6:997–100310.1038/nmat2013 ↗
49. Singh A (2017) Biomaterials innovation for next generation ex vivo immune tissue engineering. Biomaterials 130:104–11010.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.015 ↗
50. Julier Z, Park AJ, Briquez PS, Martino MM (2017) Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system. Acta Biomater 53:13–2810.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.056 ↗
51. Zhang K, Zheng J, Bian G et al (2015) Polarized macrophages have distinct roles in the differentiation and migration of embryonic spinal-cord-derived neural stem cells after grafting to injured sites of spinal cord. Mol Ther 23:1077–109110.1038/mt.2015.46 ↗
52. Zhang Q, Hwang JW, Oh JH et al (2017) Effects of the fibrous topography-mediated macrophage phenotype transition on the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells: an in vivo study. Biomaterials 149:77–8710.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.007 ↗
53. Németh K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PST et al (2009) Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E2-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med 15:42–4910.1038/nm.1905 ↗
54. Hughes JE, Srinivasan S, Lynch KR, Proia RL, Ferdek P, Hedrick CC (2008) Sphingosine-1-phosphate induces an anti-inflammatory phenotype in macrophages. Circ Res 102:950–95810.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.170779 ↗
55. Murakami M, Saito T, Tabata Y (2014) Controlled release of sphingosine-1-phosphate agonist with gelatin hydrogels for macrophage recruitment. Acta Biomater 10:4723–472910.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.008 ↗
56. Das A, Segar CE, Hughley BB, Bowers DT, Botchwey EA (2013) The promotion of mandibular defect healing by the targeting of S1P receptors and the recruitment of alternatively activated macrophages. Biomaterials 34:9853–986210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.015 ↗
57. Combadiere C, Potteaux S, Rodero M et al (2008) Combined inhibition of CCL2, CX3CR1, and CCR5 abrogates Ly6C(hi) and Ly6C(lo) monocytosis and almost abolishes atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Circulation 117:1649–165710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.745091 ↗
58. San Emeterio CL, Olingy CE, Chu Y, Botchwey EA (2017) Selective recruitment of non-classical monocytes promotes skeletal muscle repair. Biomaterials 117:32–4310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.021 ↗
59. Li X, Miao Y, Pala DS, Devreotesa PN (2020) Excitable networks controlling cell migration during development and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 100:133–14210.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.001 ↗
60. Redd M, Kelly G, Dunn G, Way M, Martin P (2006) Imaging macrophage chemotaxis in vivo: studies of microtubule function in zebrafish wound inflammation. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 63:415–42210.1002/cm.20133 ↗
61. Cara DC, Kaur J, Forster M, McCafferty DM, Kubes P (2001) Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in chemokine-induced emigration and chemotaxis in vivo. J Immunol 167:6552–655810.4049/jimmunol.167.11.6552 ↗
62. Keenana TM, Folch A (2008) Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems. Lab Chip 8:34–5710.1039/B711887B ↗
63. Genzer J, Bhat RR (2008) Surface-bound soft matter gradients. Langmuir 24:2294–231710.1021/la7033164 ↗
64. DeLong SA, Gobin AS, West JL (2005) Covalent immobilization of RGDS on hydrogel surfaces to direct cell alignment and migration. J Control Release 109:139–14810.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.020 ↗
65. Mimura T, Imai S, Kubo M, Isoya E, Ando K, Okumura N, Matsusue Y (2008) A novel exogenous concentration-gradient collagen scaffold augments full-thickness articular cartilage repair. Osteoarthr Cartilage 16:1083–109110.1016/j.joca.2008.02.003 ↗
66. Singh M, Berkland C, Detamore MS (2008) Strategies and applications for incorporating physical and chemical signal gradients in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng B-Rev 14:341–36610.1089/ten.teb.2008.0304 ↗
67. Bodor DL, Pönisch W, Endres RG, Ewa KP (2020) Of cell shapes and motion: the physical basis of animal cell migration. Dev Cell 52:550–56210.1016/j.devcel.2020.02.013 ↗
68. Raftopoulou M, Hall A (2004) Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev Biol 265:23–3210.1016/j.ydbio.2003.06.003 ↗
69. Mitchison TJ, Cramer LP (1996) Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84:371–37910.1016/S0092-8674(00)81281-7 ↗
70. Li X, Miao Y, Pal DS, Devreotes PN (2020) Excitable networks controlling cell migration during development and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 100:133–14210.1016/j.semcdb.2019.11.001 ↗
71. Ananthakrishnan R, Ehrlicher A (2007) The forces behind cell movement. Int J Biol Sci 3:303–31710.7150/ijbs.3.303 ↗
72. Seetharaman S, Etienne-Manneville S (2020) Cytoskeletal crosstalk in cell migration. Trends Cell Biol 30:720–73510.1016/j.tcb.2020.06.004 ↗
73. Klymov A, Bronkhorst EM, Riet J, Jansen JA, Walboomers XF (2015) Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells feature selective migration behavior on submicro- and nano-dimensional multi-patterned substrates. Acta Biomater 16:117–12510.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.016 ↗
74. Zhang Q, Dong H, Li Y, Zhu Y, Zeng L, Gao H, Yuan B, Chen X, Mao C (2015) Microgrooved polymer substrates promote collective cell migration to accelerate fracture healing in an in vitro model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:23336–2334510.1021/acsami.5b07976 ↗
75. Han LL (2012) Gradient construction of polyelectrolyte multilayer membrane and its effect on cell migration behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, Zhejiang University
76. Wu J, Mao Z, Gao C (2012) Controlling the migration behaviors of vascular smooth muscle cells by methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) brushes of different molecular weight and density. Biomaterials 33:810–820
77. Wang E, Zhao M, Forrester JV, McCaig CD (2003) Bi-directional migration of lens epithelial cells in a physiological electrical field. Exp Eye Res 76:29–3710.1016/S0014-4835(02)00257-9 ↗
78. Mosabbir AA, Truong K (2018) Genetically encoded circuit for remote regulation of cell migration by magnetic fields. ACS Synth Biol 7:718–72610.1021/acssynbio.7b00415 ↗
79. Guo A, Song B, Reid B, Gu Y, Forrester JV, Jahoda CAB, Zhao M (2010) Effects of physiological electric fields on migration of human dermal fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 130:2320–232710.1038/jid.2010.96 ↗
80. Shen Y, Leng M, Yu H, Zhang Q, Luo X, Hans Gregersen H, Wang G, Liu X (2015) Effect of amphiphilic PCL–PEG nano-micelles on HepG2 cell migration. Macromol Biosci 15:372–38410.1002/mabi.201400376 ↗
81. Zhang H, Yu S, Zhao X, Mao Z, Gao C (2018) Stromal cell-derived factor-1a-encapsulated albumin/heparin nanoparticles for induced stem cell migration and intervertebral disc regeneration in vivo. Acta Biomater 72:217–22710.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.032 ↗
82. Tay CY, Cai P, Setyawati MI, Fang W, Tan LP, Hong CHL, Chen X, Leong DT (2014) Nanoparticles strengthen intracellular tension and retard cellular migration. Nano Lett 14:83–8810.1021/nl4032549 ↗
83. Su G, Yu H, Hong J et al (2019) Integrin-induced signal event contributes to self-assembled monolayers on Au-nanoparticle-regulated cancer cell migration and invasion. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:1804–182110.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01648 ↗
84. Lee JS, Lee K, Moon S, Chung H, Lee JH, Um SH, Kim D, Cho S (2014) Mussel-inspired cell-adhesion peptide modification for enhanced endothelialization of decellularized blood vessels. Macromol Biosci 14:1181–118910.1002/mabi.201400052 ↗
85. Kouvroukoglou S, Dee KC, Bizios R, McIntire LV, Zygourakis K (2000) Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. Biomaterials 21:1725–173310.1016/S0142-9612(99)00205-7 ↗
86. Andukuri A, Minor WP, Kushwaha M, Anderson JM, Jun H (2010) Effect of endothelium mimicking self-assembled nanomatrices on cell adhesion and spreading of human endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. Nanomedicine 6:289–29710.1016/j.nano.2009.09.004 ↗
87. Yu J, Lee A, Lin W, Lin C, Wu Y, Tsai W (2014) Electrospun PLGA fibers incorporated with functionalized biomolecules for cardiac tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 20:1896–190710.1089/ten.tea.2013.0008 ↗
88. Nomizu M, Yamamura K, Kleinman HK, Yamada Y (1993) Multimeric forms of Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg (YIGSR) peptide enhance the inhibition of tumor-growth and metastasis. Cancer Res 53:3459–3461
89. Wang P, Wu T, Tsai W, Kuo W, Wang M (2013) Grooved PLGA films incorporated with RGD/YIGSR peptides for potential application on skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B 110:88–9510.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.04.016 ↗
90. Chevallier P, Janvier R, Mantovani D, Laroche G (2005) In vitro biological performances of phosphorylcholine-grafted ePTFE prostheses through RFGD plasma techniques. Macromol Biosci 5:829–83910.1002/mabi.200500088 ↗
91. Larsen CC, Kligman F, Kottke-Marchant K, Marchant RE (2006) The effect of RGD fluorosurfactant polymer modification of ePTFE on endothelial cell adhesion, growth, and function. Biomaterials 27:4846–485510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.009 ↗
92. Xiong J, Stehle T, Zhang R, Joachimiak A, Frech M, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA (2002) Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin αvβ3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science 296:151–15510.1126/science.1069040 ↗
93. Hubbell JA, Massia SP, Desai NP, Drumheller PD (1991) Endothelial cell-selective materials for tissue engineering in the vascular graft via a new receptor. Nat Biotechnol 9:568–57210.1038/nbt0691-568 ↗
94. Fu Y, Huang MN, Luo YF, Hu CB, Wang YL (2013) Studying the effective concentration of RGDS on RGDS-poly(dl-lactic acid). Asian J Chem 25:763–76610.14233/ajchem.2013.12878 ↗
95. Cui CY, Wang YN, Zhao W, Yang KK, Jiang XY, Li S, Zhao M, Song YB, Peng SQ (2015) RGDS covalently surfaced nanodiamond as a tumor targeting carrier of VEGF-siRNA: synthesis, characterization and bioassay. J Mater Chem B 3:9260–926810.1039/C5TB01602A ↗
96. Hirano Y, Inai K, Oka M (2012) Design and structure activity correlation of RGDS cell-attachment peptide containing molecules. Kobunshi Ronbunshu 69:11–1910.1295/koron.69.11 ↗
97. Aguzzi MS, Fortugno P, Giampietri C, Ragone G, Capogrossi MC, Facchiano A (2010) Intracellular targets of RGDS peptide in melanoma cells. Mol Cancer 9:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-8410.1186/1476-4598-9-84 ↗
98. Deng J, Zhao C, Spatz JP, Wei Q (2017) Nanopatterned adhesive, stretchable hydrogel to control ligand spacing and regulate cell spreading and migration. ACS Nano 11:8282–829110.1021/acsnano.7b03449 ↗
99. Liu G, Yang Z, Zhou P, Zhou C, Guan R, Sun B, Fan J, Zhou J, Yi Y, Qiu S (2020) ROR-α-1 inhibits the proliferation, invasion, and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma MHCC97H via downregulation of chemokine CXCL5. Cytokine 129:155004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2020.15500410.1016/j.cyto.2020.155004 ↗
100. Liu L, Leng S, Yue J, Lu Q, Xu W, Yi X, Huang D, Zhang L (2019) EDTA enhances stromal cell-derived factor 1a-induced migration of dental pulp cells by up-regulating chemokine receptor 4 expression. J Endodont 45:599–60510.1016/j.joen.2019.01.006 ↗