Source abstract
Abstract
The feasibility of carbon nanofibers (CNF) to impart transport properties to a flexible and ductile polyethylene matrix for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) was assessed in contrast to traditional carbon fibers (CF). Raman spectroscopy and electrical resistivity measurements of the bulk of the carbon fillers showed that commercial Pyrograf-III, PR-19 grade CNF were significantly more amorphous with lower transport properties than Thornel P-55 CF. A range of CNF/polyethylene nanocomposites (concentrations 0–40 wt %) were prepared via twin-screw extrusion and their electrical, dielectric, electrostatic dissipation, electromagnetic shielding, and mechanical properties were investigated. Good dispersion was revealed by electron microscopy, demonstrating the dispersibility of CNFs. PR-19 CNF led to superior surface conductivity and electrostatic dissipation at low concentrations. Nevertheless, the microcomposites prepared with P-55 pitch-based CF led to higher electromagnetic shielding (∼11 dB), electrical conductivities (i.e., surface resistivity of 1.4 × 10 3 Ω/sq), and relative permittivity (72.2–81.5j) at larger concentrations, displaying an in-plane anisotropic behavior. The microcomposites, though, displayed a stiff (modulus ∼1.4 GPa at 40 wt %), weak (breaking strength of only ∼3 MPa at 40 wt %), and brittle behavior (<3% at 40 wt %), whereas the nanocomposites retained acceptable flexibility (modulus ∼1 GPa), strength (∼10 MPa), and ductility (∼30%) at comparable concentrations. This study points out the feasibility of pristine CNFs for flexible thin-wall materials for EMC applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, United States
Center for Graphene Research and Innovation (CGRI), Jackson Avenue Center, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, United States
Centre for Advanced Materials Processing and Manufacturing (AMPAM), School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4067, Australia
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, United States
Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-6199, United States
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, United States