Effects of heating rate and DC electric field during sintering on the grain size distribution in fully sintered tetragonal zirconia polycrystals stabilized with 3% molar yttria (3Y-TZP)
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of sintering temperature rate \( (\dot{T}\) = 1.5–50 °C/min) without and with an initial applied dc electric field (Eo = 14 V/cm) on the grain size distribution (GSD) of fully sintered 3 mol%, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (3Y-TZP) was determined from SEM micrographs of fractured and polished-and-etched surfaces. No clear difference between the measurements on the two surfaces was detected. The grain size parameters characterizing the GSD tended to decrease with \( \dot{T} \) and with Eo. All of the GSD’s however fit a single curve based on the Bitti–Di Nunzio grain coarsening model. This fit along with other considerations also give that the heating rate and electric field applied during sintering did not have a significant effect on the grain shape or the grain boundary energy in the fully sintered specimens. It is proposed that the decrease in grain size in the fully sintered condition by the application of an electric field during prior sintering results primarily from its effect on the driving force for grain growth, while the effect of the heating rate is on the grain mobility.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR (1976) Introduction to ceramics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
2. Kang S-JL (2005) Sintering. Elsevier, Burlington
3. Wang J, Raj R (1991) J Am Ceram Soc 74:1952
4. Jimenez J, Dominiquez-Rodriguez A (2000) Acta Mater 48:320110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00113-0 ↗
5. Gomez Garcia D, Lorenzo-Martin C, Munez-Bernabe A, Dominquez-Rodriquez A (2003) Phys Rev 67:144101-110.1103/PhysRevB.67.144101 ↗
6. Yang D, Conrad H (2011) Mater Sci Eng A 528:122110.1016/j.msea.2010.10.041 ↗
7. Chu M-Y, Rehamen MN, De Jonghe LC (1991) J Am Ceram Soc 74:121710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04090.x ↗
8. Liu ZY, Loh NH, Khor KA, Tor SB (2001) Scr Mater 44:113110.1016/S1359-6462(01)00664-9 ↗
9. Mazcheri M, Simachi A, Dourandish M, Golestrani-Fard F (2005) Ceram Int 35:54710.1016/j.ceramint.2008.01.008 ↗
10. Yang D, Raj R, Conrad H (2010) J Am Ceram Soc 93:293510.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03905.x ↗
11. Conrad H, Yang D (2011) Mater Sci Eng A 528:852310.1016/j.msea.2011.08.022 ↗
12. Conrad H (2011) J Am Ceram Soc 94:852310.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04823.x ↗
13. Bitti RR, Di Nunzio PE (1998) Scr Mater 39:33510.1016/S1359-6462(98)00174-2 ↗
14. Lifshitz IM, Slyolov VV (1961) J Phys Chem Solids 19:3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
15. Wagner C (1961) Z Electrochem 6:581
16. Starnes S, Conrad H (2008) Scr Mater 39:111510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.025 ↗
17. Schucker F (1968) In: DeHoff R, Rhines F (eds) Quantitative microscopy. McGraw Hill, New York, p 201
18. Smith CS, Guttman L (1953) Trans AIME 197:81