journal article·2023-10Open access

Atomistic insights into the effect of temperature on capillary transport of water molecules in epoxy-modified calcium silicate hydrate nanopore: diffusion, kinetics, and mechanism

Yiping Xie, Qi Luo

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 37

Abstract

Abstract The movement of water molecules at the atomic scale within the calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) gel pores serves a dual role: it creates an environment for harmful chemical reactions within the pores and functions as a carrier for the transport of detrimental ions, thereby affects the mechanical properties and durability of cementitious materials. However, direct experimental observation poses substantial challenges. This study offers new insights into how temperature (253 K, 273 K, 293 K, and 313 K) affects the capillary transport of water molecules in epoxy-modified C–S–H. The findings demonstrate that the pore size undergoes continuous changes during immersion due to epoxy clustering or detachment, resulting in three scenarios: narrowing of epoxy/C–S–H channels (253 K, 273 K), channel blockage (293 K), and complete detachment (313 K). Moreover, the interactions between water molecules and epoxy lead to epoxy detachment or cluster formation on the C–S–H surface. As the temperature increases, the interaction between C–S–H and cross-linked epoxy resin weakens. The coordination between C–S–H and epoxy resin decreases, while the coordination with water increases. This paper provides valuable insights into the transport behavior of liquids within the epoxy-modified C–S–H pores of cement-based materials. It contributes to a better understanding of how liquids move and interact within the modified pore structure, which is beneficial for enhancing the performance and properties of cement-based materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Concrete Properties and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen J, Chouw N (2018) Effect of the interface condition on the bond between flax FRP tube and coconut fibre reinforced concrete composites. Constr Build Mater 167:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.15210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.152 ↗
2. Del Zoppo M, Di Ludovico M, Balsamo A, Prota A, Manfredi G (2017) FRP for seismic strengthening of shear controlled RC columns: experience from earthquakes and experimental analysis. Compos B Eng 129:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.028 ↗
3. Ku H, Wang H, Pattarachaiyakoop N, Trada M (2011) A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos B Eng 42(4):856–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
4. Lau D, Büyüköztürk O, Buehler MJ (2012) Characterization of the intrinsic strength between epoxy and silica using a multiscale approach. J Mater Res 27(14):1787–1796. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.9610.1557/jmr.2012.96 ↗
5. Diab H, Wu Z (2007) Nonlinear constitutive model for time-dependent behavior of FRP-concrete interface. Compos Sci Technol 67(11–12):2323–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.018 ↗
6. Zhou A, BüyüköZtürk O, Lau D (2017) Debonding of concrete-epoxy interface under the coupled effect of moisture and sustained load. Cement Concr Compos 80:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.01910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.019 ↗
7. Tatar J, Brenkus NR, Subhash G, Taylor CR, Hamilton HR (2018) Characterization of adhesive interphase between epoxy and cement paste via Raman spectroscopy and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Cem Concr Compos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.01210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.012 ↗
8. Silva M, Biscaia H (2008) Degradation of bond between FRP and RC beams. Compos Struct 85(2):164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.014 ↗
9. Lau D, Bueyuekoeztuerk O (2010) Fracture characterization of concrete/epoxy interface affected by moisture. Mech Mater 42(12):1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.001 ↗
10. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Liu Y, Nie X, Qian D, Griffith DT, Lu H (2021) The effect of resin uptake on the flexural properties of compression molded sandwich composites. Wind Energy 25(1):71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.266110.1002/we.2661 ↗
11. Cao D (2023) Strengthening the interphase of thermoplastic sandwich composites by interleaving carbon nanotube yarns. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10665510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106655 ↗
12. Cao D, Malakooti S, Kulkarni VN, Ren Y, Lu H (2020) Nanoindentation measurement of core–skin interphase viscoelastic properties in a sandwich glass composite. Mechof Time-Depend Mater 25(3):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y10.1007/s11043-020-09448-y ↗
13. Luo Q, Qin T, Chen Z, Pang B, Qu J, Gao Z (2023) The influence of moisture and epoxy bonding agents on interfacial behavior between normal concrete substrate and ultrahigh performance concrete as a repair material: experimental and molecular dynamics study. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13077910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130779 ↗
14. Pang B, Zhang Y, Liu G, She W (2018) Interface properties of nanosilica-modified waterborne epoxy cement repairing system. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0409210.1021/acsami.8b04092 ↗
15. Obaidat YT, Heyden S, Dahlblom O (2010) The effect of CFRP and CFRP/concrete interface models when modelling retrofitted RC beams with FEM. Compos Struct 92:1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.008 ↗
16. Neubauer U, Rostasy FS (1999) Design aspects of concrete structures strengthened with externally bonded CFRP-plates. ECS Publ 2:109–118
17. Ashour AF, El-Refaie SA, Garrity SW (2004) Flexural strengthening of RC continuous beams using CFRP laminates. Cement Concr Compos 26:765–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.07.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.07.002 ↗
18. Au C, Bueyuekoeztuerk O (2006) Peel and shear fracture characterization of debonding in FRP plated concrete affected by moisture. J Compos Constr 10:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:1(35)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:1(35) ↗
19. Sharma SK, Ali M, Goldar D, Sikdar PK (2006) Plate–concrete interfacial bond strength of FRP and metallic plated concrete specimens. Compos B 37:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.011 ↗
20. Wu Z, Kim RJ, Diab R, Wang R (2010) Technical papers: recent developments in long-term performance of FRP composites and FRP-concrete interface. Adv Struct Eng 13:891–903. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.13.5.89110.1260/1369-4332.13.5.891 ↗
21. Biscaia HC, Silva MAG, Chastre C (2015) Factors influencing the performance of externally bonded reinforcement systems of GFRP-to-concrete interfaces. Mater Struct 48:2961–2981. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0370-z10.1617/s11527-014-0370-z ↗
22. Santos DS, Santos PMD, Dias-da-Costa D (2012) Effect of surface preparation and bonding agent on the concrete-to-concrete interface strength. Constr Build Mater 37:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.028 ↗
23. Au C, BüyüköZtürk O (2006) Debonding of FRP plated concrete: a tri-layer fracture treatment. Eng Fract Mech 73:348–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.007 ↗
24. Woo S-K, Lee Y (2010) Experimental study on interfacial behavior of CFRP-bonded concrete. KSCE J Civ Eng 14:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0385-010.1007/s12205-010-0385-0 ↗
25. Hong Y, Lu X, Hui D, Feo L (2012) Studies on FRP-concrete interface with hardening and softening bond-slip law. Compos Struct 94:3781–3792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.009 ↗
26. Luo Q, Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Z, Geng G (2023) Interfacial degradation of calcium silicate hydrate and epoxy under a hygrothermal environment: an experimental and molecular model study. J Physical Chem C 127:1607–1621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0679710.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06797 ↗
27. Luo Q, Li Y, Zhang Z, Peng X, Geng G (2022) Influence of substrate moisture on the interfacial bonding between calcium silicate hydrate and epoxy. Constr Build Mater 320:126252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12625210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126252 ↗
28. Hou D, Yu J, Liu QF, Dong B, Wang M (2020) Nanoscale insight on the epoxy-cement interface in salt solution: a molecular dynamics study. Appl Surf Sci 509:145322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14532210.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145322 ↗
29. Yu J, Zheng Q, Hou D, Zhang J, Li S, Jin Z, Wang P, Yin B, Wang X (2019) Insights on the capillary transport mechanism in the sustainable cement hydrate impregnated with graphene oxide and epoxy composite. Compos Part B: Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10690710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106907 ↗
30. Wang P, Yang Q, Wang M, Hou D, Zhang J (2020) Theoretical investigation of epoxy detachment from C–S–H interface under aggressive environment. Constr Build Mater 264:120232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12023210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120232 ↗
31. Wang P, Yang Q, Jin Z, Hou D, Wang M (2021) Effects of water and ions on bonding behavior between epoxy and hydrated calcium silicate: a molecular dynamics simulation study. J Mater Sci 56:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06374-310.1007/s10853-021-06374-3 ↗
32. Hamid S (1981) The crystal structure of the 11Å natural tobermorite Ca2. 25 [Si3O7. 5 (OH) 1.5]·1H2O. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystal Mater 154:189–198
33. Yousefi N, Lin X, Zheng Q, Shen X, Pothnis JR, Jia J, Zussman E, Kim JK (2013) Simultaneous in situ reduction, self-alignment and covalent bonding in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Carbon 59:406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.03410.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.034 ↗
34. Pellenq RJ-M, Kushima A, Shahsavari R, Van Vliet KJ, Buehler MJ, Yip S, Ulm F-J (2009) A realistic molecular model of cement hydrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16102–16107. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.090218010610.1073/pnas.0902180106 ↗
35. Ma H, Li Z (2013) Realistic pore structure of Portland cement paste: experimental study and numerical simulation. Comput Concr 11:317–336. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2013.11.4.31710.12989/cac.2013.11.4.317 ↗
36. Du J, Bu Y, Shen Z (2018) Interfacial properties and nanostructural characteristics of epoxy resin in cement matrix. Constr Build Mater 164:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.20010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.200 ↗
37. Sun M, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Wang P, Zhang J (2020) Structure, dynamics and transport behavior of migrating corrosion inhibitor in the surface of calcium silicate hydrate: a molecular dynamics study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 23:3267–3280. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp05211f10.1039/d0cp05211f ↗
38. Kirkpatrick RJ, Kalinichev AG, Wang J (2005) Molecular dynamics modelling of hydrated mineral interlayers and surfaces: structure and dynamics. Mineral Mag 69:289–308. https://doi.org/10.1180/002646105693025110.1180/0026461056930251 ↗
39. Ylya B, Zy A, Rhwl B, Dh C, Dla D (2017) Molecular dynamics simulations on adhesion of epoxy-silica interface in salt environment-ScienceDirect. Compos B Eng 131:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.038 ↗
40. Cygan RT, Liang J-J, Kalinichev AG (2004) Molecular models of hydroxide, oxyhydroxide, and clay phases and the development of a general force field. J Phys Chem B 108:1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp036328710.1021/jp0363287 ↗
41. Asensio JL, Martin-Pastor M, Jimenez-Barbero J (1995) The use of CVFF and CFF91 force fields in conformational analysis of carbohydrate molecules. Comparison with AMBER molecular mechanics and dynamics calculations for methyl α-lactoside. Int J Biol Macromol 17:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(95)92680-O10.1016/0141-8130(95)92680-O ↗
42. Hou D, Yu J, Wang P (2019) Molecular dynamics modeling of the structure, dynamics, energetics and mechanical properties of cement-polymer nanocomposite. Compos B Eng 162:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.14210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.142 ↗
43. Plimpton S, Thompson A, Crozier P, Kohlmeyer A (2001) LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulator. J Comput Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
44. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
45. Kerisit S, Liu C (2009) Molecular simulations of water and ion diffusion in nanosized mineral fractures. Environ Sci Technol 43:777–782. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801604510.1021/es8016045 ↗