journal article·2022-06

ICME framework to simulate microstructure evolution during laser powder bed fusion of Haynes 282 nickel-based superalloy

V. S. Hariharan, S. Pramod, D. Kesavan, B. S. Murty, Gandham Phanikumar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Haynes 282 is a creep-resistant, ?? strengthened nickel-based superalloy with excellent weldability. Additive manufacturing, especially laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), of Haynes 282 is being researched for its potential applications in aerospace and power generation sectors. LPBF enables us to achieve desired properties via microstructure control through process parameter optimization. Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) approach can be used to tune the process parameters to obtain desired microstructure, instead of trial-and-error methods. In this report, ICME framework has been established to simulate microstructural evolution during LPBF and post-processing of Haynes 282. A dimensionless number was used to optimize the process parameters with minimal porosity. Thermal modelling was performed using a semi-analytical model and the obtained thermal data was used to simulate solidification during LPBF. The corresponding cell spacing obtained matched closely with the experimental data. The .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Debroy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS et al (2018) Progress in materials science additive manufacturing of metallic components—process structure and properties. Progr Mater Sci 92:112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
2. DebRoy T, Mukherjee T, Milewski JO et al (2019) Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions. Nat Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0408-210.1038/s41563-019-0408-2 ↗
3. Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S et al (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61:315–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.111664910.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
4. Gokcekaya O, Ishimoto T, Hibino S et al (2021) Unique crystallographic texture formation in Inconel 718 by laser powder bed fusion and its effect on mechanical anisotropy. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11687610.1016/j.actamat.2021.116876 ↗
5. Godec M, Zaefferer S, Podgornik B et al (2020) Quantitative multiscale correlative microstructure analysis of additive manufacturing of stainless steel 316L processed by selective laser melting. Mater Charact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.11007410.1016/j.matchar.2019.110074 ↗
6. Zhu ZG, Nguyen QB, Ng FL et al (2018) Hierarchical microstructure and strengthening mechanisms of a CoCrFeNiMn high entropy alloy additively manufactured by selective laser melting. Scripta Mater 154:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.015 ↗
7. Lu LX, Sridhar N, Zhang YW (2018) Phase field simulation of powder bed-based additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 144:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.03310.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.033 ↗
8. Wang YM, Voisin T, McKeown JT et al (2018) Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat Mater 17:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT502110.1038/NMAT5021 ↗
9. Khayat ZR, Palmer TA (2018) Impact of iron composition on the properties of an additively manufactured solid solution strengthened nickel base alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 718:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.11210.1016/j.msea.2018.01.112 ↗
10. Meredith SD, Zuback JS, Keist JS, Palmer TA (2018) Impact of composition on the heat treatment response of additively manufactured 17–4 PH grade stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 738:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.06610.1016/j.msea.2018.09.066 ↗
11. Giovagnoli M, Silvi G, Merlin M, Di GMT (2020) Optimisation of process parameters for an additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy: limitations of the energy density-based approach on porosity and mechanical properties estimation. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14061310.1016/j.msea.2020.140613 ↗
12. Leicht A, Yu CH, Luzin V et al (2020) Effect of scan rotation on the microstructure development and mechanical properties of 316L parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Charact 163:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11030910.1016/j.matchar.2020.110309 ↗
13. Nadammal N, Cabeza S, Mishurova T et al (2017) Effect of hatch length on the development of microstructure, texture and residual stresses in selective laser melted superalloy Inconel 718. Mater Des 134:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.04910.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.049 ↗
14. Kirka MM, Nandwana P, Lee Y, Dehoff RR (2017) Solidification and solid-state transformation sciences in metals additive manufacturing. Scr Mater 135:130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.00510.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.005 ↗
15. Council NR (2008) Integrated computational materials engineering: A transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. National Academies Press, Washington DC
16. Deepu MJ, Phanikumar G (2020) ICME framework for simulation of microstructure and property evolution during gas metal arc welding in DP980 steel. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-020-00182-410.1007/s40192-020-00182-4 ↗
17. Motaman SAH, Kies F, Köhnen P et al (2020) Optimal design for metal additive manufacturing: an integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) approach. Jom 72:1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04028-410.1007/s11837-020-04028-4 ↗
18. Johnson NS, Vulimiri PS, To AC et al (2020) Invited review: machine learning for materials developments in metals additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10164110.1016/j.addma.2020.101641 ↗
19. Tan C, Weng F, Sui S et al (2021) Progress and perspectives in laser additive manufacturing of key aeroengine materials. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 170:103804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.10380410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103804 ↗
20. Sanchez S, Smith P, Xu Z et al (2021) Powder bed fusion of nickel-based superalloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.10372910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103729 ↗
21. Lu N, Lei Z, Hu K et al (2020) Hot cracking behavior and mechanism of a third-generation Ni-based single-crystal superalloy during directed energy deposition. Addit Manuf 34:101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10122810.1016/j.addma.2020.101228 ↗
22. Lindwall G, Campbell CE, Lass EA et al (2019) Simulation of TTT curves for additively manufactured inconel 625. Metall Mater Trans A 50:457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4959-710.1007/s11661-018-4959-7 ↗
23. Pike LM (2006) Haynes 282 alloy- A new wrought superalloy designed for improved Creep Strength and Fabricability. ASME Turbo Expo 2006 Power Land, Sea Air 1–910.1115/GT2006-91204 ↗
24. Holcomb GR, Jablonski PD, Wang P (2010) Cast alloys for advanced ultra supercritical steam turbines. 7th Int Symp Superalloy 718 Deriv 2010 2:947–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118495223.ch7210.1002/9781118495223.ch72 ↗
25. Unocic KA, Kirka MM, Cakmak E et al (2020) Materials science and engineering a evaluation of additive electron beam melting of haynes 282 alloy ☆. Mater Sci Eng A 772:138607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13860710.1016/j.msea.2019.138607 ↗
26. Ramakrishnan A, Dinda GP (2019) Microstructure and mechanical properties of direct laser metal deposited Haynes 282 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 748:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.01.10110.1016/j.msea.2019.01.101 ↗
27. Otto R, Brøtan V, Azar AS, Åsebø O (2019) Processing of Haynes® 282® Alloy by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Technology. In: TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting and Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. Springer, pp 503–51010.1007/978-3-030-05861-6_47 ↗
28. Otto R, Brøtan V, Carvalho PA et al (2021) Roadmap for additive manufacturing of HAYNES® 282® superalloy by laser beam powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) technology. Mater Des 204:109656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10965610.1016/j.matdes.2021.109656 ↗
29. Shaafi A, Schulz F, Minet-lallemand K, Hryha E (2021) Microstructure and mechanical properties of Haynes 282 superalloy produced by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Today Commun 26:102038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10203810.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102038 ↗
30. Boswell J, Jones J, Barnard N et al (2021) Materials & Design The effects of energy density and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of laser additive manufactured Haynes 282. Mater Des 205:109725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10972510.1016/j.matdes.2021.109725 ↗
31. Deshpande A, Nath SD, Atre S, Hsu K (2020) E ff ect of Post Processing Heat Treatment Routes on Microstructure and Mechanical Property Evolution of Haynes 282 Ni-Based Superalloy Fabricated with. 1–1310.3390/met10050629 ↗
32. Christofidou KA, Pang HT, Li W et al (2020) Microstructural Control and Optimization of Haynes 282 Manufactured Through Laser Powder Bed Fusion. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Superalloys. pp 1014–102310.1007/978-3-030-51834-9_99 ↗
33. Rankouhi B, Kumar A, Pfefferkorn FE, Thoma DJ (2021) A dimensionless number for predicting universal processing parameter boundaries in metal powder bed additive manufacturing. Manuf Lett 27:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.12.00210.1016/j.mfglet.2020.12.002 ↗
34. Thermo-Calc. https://www.thermocalc.com/. Accessed 16 March 2022.
35. Wolfer AJ, Aires J, Wheeler K et al (2019) Fast solution strategy for transient heat conduction for arbitrary scan paths in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 30:100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089810.1016/j.addma.2019.100898 ↗
36. Zhang B, Seede R, Xue L et al (2021) An efficient framework for printability assessment in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 46:102018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10201810.1016/j.addma.2021.102018 ↗
37. ThermalControlLPBF-DRL. https://github.com/BaratiLab/ThermalControlLPBF-DRL. Accessed 30 Jan 2022
38. Ogoke F, Farimani AB (2021) Thermal control of laser powder bed fusion using deep reinforcement learning. Addit Manuf 46:102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10203310.1016/j.addma.2021.102033 ↗
39. Mohan D, Phanikumar G (2019) Experimental and modelling studies for solidification of undercooled Ni-Fe-Si alloys. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.020810.1098/rsta.2018.0208 ↗
40. Nicholas Grundy A, Münch S, Feldhaus S, Bratberg J (2019) Continuous casting of high carbon steel: How does hard cooling influence solidification, micro - and macro segregation? IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/529/1/01206910.1088/1757-899X/529/1/012069 ↗
41. Micress. https://micress.rwth-aache.de/. Accessed 30 Jauary 2022
42. Eiken J, Steinbach I (2006) Multiphase-field approach for multicomponent alloys with extrapolation scheme for numerical application. Phys Rev E. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.06612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
43. Böttger B, Eiken J, Apel M (2015) Multi-ternary extrapolation scheme for efficient coupling of thermodynamic data to a multi-phase-field model. Comput Mater Sci 108:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.03.003 ↗
44. Eiken J (2009) A phase-field model for technical alloy solidification a phase-field model for technical alloy solidification. RWTH Aachen University
45. Keller T, Lindwall G, Ghosh S et al (2017) Application of finite element, phase-field, and CALPHAD-based methods to additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys. Acta Mater 139:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.00310.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.003 ↗
46. Sridar S, Zhao Y, Xiong W (2021) Phase transformations during homogenization of inconel 718 alloy fabricated by suction casting and laser powder bed fusion: a CALPHAD case study evaluating different homogenization models. J Phase Equilibria Diffus 42:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-021-00871-310.1007/s11669-021-00871-3 ↗
47. Langer J, Schwartz AJ (1980) Kinetics of nucleation in near-critical fluids. Phys Rev A 21:948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(80)90152-410.1016/0021-8502(80)90152-4 ↗
48. Lindwall G, Campbell CE, Lass EA et al (2019) Simulation of TTT curves for additively manufactured inconel 625. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 50:457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-4959-710.1007/s11661-018-4959-7 ↗
49. Fahrmann MG, Metzler D (2016) Simulation of \gamma’ precipitation kinetics in a commercial Ni-base superalloy. J Met 68:2786–2792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2097-510.1007/s11837-016-2097-5 ↗
50. Matysiak H, Zagorska M, Andersson J et al (2013) Microstructure of haynes® 282® superalloy after vacuum induction melting and investment casting of thin-walled components. Materials (Basel) 6:5016–5037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma611501610.3390/ma6115016 ↗
51. Joseph C, Persson C, Hörnqvist Colliander M (2020) Precipitation kinetics and morphology of grain boundary carbides in Ni-base superalloy Haynes 282. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-06019-110.1007/s11661-020-06019-1 ↗
52. Haynes 282 alloy brochure. https://hayesintl.com. Accessed 10 Aug 2021
53. Kruger KL (2017) 15-HAYNES 282 alloy. In: Di Gianfrancesco A (ed) Materials for ultra-supercritical and advanced ultra-supercritical power plants. Woodhead Publishing, pp 511–5455310.1016/B978-0-08-100552-1.00015-4 ↗
54. Osoba LO, Ding RG, Ojo OA (2012) Microstructural analysis of laser weld fusion zone in Haynes 282 superalloy. Mater Charact 65:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2011.12.00910.1016/j.matchar.2011.12.009 ↗
55. Osoba LO, Ding RG, Ojo OA (2012) Improved resistance to laser weld heat-affected zone microfissuring in a newly developed superalloy HAYNES. Metall Mater Trans A 282(43):4281–4295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-012-1212-710.1007/s11661-012-1212-7 ↗
56. Fahrmann MG, Pike LM (2018) Experimental TTT diagram of HAYNES 282 Alloy. Springer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-89480-5_37 ↗
57. Promoppatum P, Yao SC, Pistorius PC, Rollett AD (2017) A comprehensive comparison of the analytical and numerical prediction of the thermal history and solidification microstructure of inconel 718 products made by laser powder-bed fusion. Engineering 3:685–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.02310.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.023 ↗
58. Prashanth KG, Scudino S, Maity T et al (2017) Is the energy density a reliable parameter for materials synthesis by selective laser melting? Mater Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2017.129980810.1080/21663831.2017.1299808 ↗
59. Sridar S, Zhao Y, Li K et al (2020) Materials science and engineering A Post-heat treatment design for high-strength low-alloy steels processed by laser powder bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A 788:139531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13953110.1016/j.msea.2020.139531 ↗
60. Lee YS, Zhang W (2016) Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf 12:178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.00310.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003 ↗
61. Islam Z, Agrawal AK, Rankouhi B et al (2022) A high-throughput method to define additive manufacturing process parameters: application to Haynes 282. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 53:250–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-021-06517-w10.1007/s11661-021-06517-w ↗
62. Gan Z, Kafka OL, Parab N et al (2021) Universal scaling laws of keyhole stability and porosity in 3D printing of metals. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22704-010.1038/s41467-021-22704-0 ↗
63. Caron JL (2014) Weldability and welding metallurgy of Haynes 282 Alloy10.7449/2014/Superalloys_2014_273_286 ↗
64. Osoba LO, Ojo OA (2012) Influence of laser welding heat input on HAZ cracking in newly developed Haynes 282 superalloy. Mater Sci Technol 28:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284711Y.000000007810.1179/1743284711Y.0000000078 ↗
65. White H, Santella M, Specht ED (2009) Weldability of haynes 282 alloy for new fabrications and after service exposure. Energy Mater Mater Sci Eng Energy Syst 4:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1179/174892310X1281103210011410.1179/174892310X12811032100114 ↗
66. Pike LM (2008) Development of a fabricable gamma-prime (γ′) strengthened superalloy. Proc Int Symp Superalloys. 191–20010.7449/2008/Superalloys_2008_191_200 ↗
67. Lee Y, Nordin M, Babu SS, Farson DF (2014) Effect of fluid convection on dendrite arm spacing in laser deposition. Metall Mater Trans B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-014-0054-710.1007/s11663-014-0054-7 ↗
68. Dehoff RR, Kirka M, Sames WJ et al (2015) Site specific control of crystallographic grain orientation through electron beam additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 31:931–938. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284714Y.000000073410.1179/1743284714Y.0000000734 ↗
69. Fernandez-zelaia P, Kirka MM, Márquez A et al (2021) Acta Materialia Nickel-based superalloy single crystals fabricate d via electron b eam melting. Acta Mater 216:117133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11713310.1016/j.actamat.2021.117133 ↗
70. Boussinot G, Apel M, Zielinski J et al (2019) Strongly out-of-equilibrium columnar solidification during laser powder-bed fusion in additive manufacturing. Phys Rev Appl 10:1. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.01402510.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014025 ↗
71. Kurz W, Rappaz M, Trivedi R (2020) Progress in modelling solidification microstructures in metals and alloys. Part II: dendrites from 2001 to 2018. Int Mater Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.175789410.1080/09506608.2020.1757894 ↗
72. Trivedi R (1984) Interdendritic spacing part ii. A comparison of theory and experiment. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0264468910.1007/bf02644689 ↗
73. Aziz MJ, Kaplan T (1988) Continuous growth model for interface motion during alloy solidification. Acta Metall 36:2335–2347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(88)90333-110.1016/0001-6160(88)90333-1 ↗
74. Joseph C, Persson C, Hörnqvist Colliander M (2017) Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and tensile properties of Ni-base superalloy Haynes 282. Mater Sci Eng A 679:520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.04810.1016/j.msea.2016.10.048 ↗
75. Mikula J, Ahluwalia R, Laskowski R, Wang K (2021) Modelling the influence of process parameters on precipitate formation in powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of IN718. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10985110.1016/j.matdes.2021.109851 ↗