journal article·2021-12

Enhanced Al/Ta co-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 ceramic electrolytes with the reduced Ta doping level for solid-state lithium batteries

Mingzhe Xue, Wanzheng Lu, Song Xue, Cunman Zhang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 35
Publisher page

Abstract

Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) is a promising solid-state electrolyte (SSE) candidate for advanced solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs). In this work, Li6.25La3Zr2-yAlxTayO12 (x = 0.25, y = 0; x = 0.2, y = 0.15; x = 0.15, y = 0.3; x = 0.1, y = 0.45; x = 0.05, y = 0.6) and Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 (LLZT0.6O) ceramic electrolytes, are prepared via a simple sol–gel process. The effect of Al and Ta co-doping levels on the phase, the microstructure and the ionic conductivity of modified LLZO is discussed in detail. Those Al/Ta co-doped LLZO ceramics (LLZATO) with Ta ≥ 0.3 per formula unit, are nearly pure cubic structures with a trace of new phases. The ionic conductivities of Li6.25La3Zr1.55Al0.1Ta0.45O12 (LLZA0.1T0.45O) and Li6.25La3Zr1.4Al0.05Ta0.6O12 (LLZA0.05T0.6O), are greatly improved by co-doping Al and Ta, benefitting from the emergence of self-grown LiAlO2 phase, and the microstructure of large grains contacting small grains. Remarkably, the optimal LLZA0.1T0.45O delivers a high ionic conductivity of 6.70 × 10–4 S cm−1 and a low electronic conductivity ~ 9.83 × 10–8 S cm−1 at 25 °C. This work provides available enhanced Al/Ta co-doped LLZO ceramic electrolytes with the reduced Ta doping level for solid-state lithium batteries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Lin D, Liu Y, Cui Y (2017) Nat Nanotechnol 12:194–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
2. Zhang F, Huang Q-A, Tang Z et al (2020) Nano Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10454510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104545 ↗
3. Wan J, Xie J, Mackanic DG, Burke W, Bao Z, Cui Y (2018) Mater Today Nano 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2018.12.00310.1016/j.mtnano.2018.12.003 ↗
4. Zhang Z, Shao Y, Lotsch B et al (2018) Energy Environ Sci 11:1945–1976. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee01053f10.1039/c8ee01053f ↗
5. Wang C, Fu K, Kammampata SP et al (2020) Chem Rev 120:4257–4300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0042710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00427 ↗
6. Gao Z, Sun H, Fu L et al (2018) Adv Mater 30:e1705702. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170570210.1002/adma.201705702 ↗
7. Janek J, Zeier WG (2016) Nat Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
8. Lu W, Xue M, Zhang C (2021) Energy Storage Mater 39:108–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.01610.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.016 ↗
9. Lau J, DeBlock RH, Butts DM, Ashby DS, Choi CS, Dunn BS (2018) Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20180093310.1002/aenm.201800933 ↗
10. Long L, Wang S, Xiao M, Meng Y (2016) J Mater Chem A 4:10038–10069. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta02621d10.1039/c6ta02621d ↗
11. Thangadurai V, Narayanan S, Pinzaru D (2014) Chem Soc Rev 43:4714–4727. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
12. Ramakumar S, Deviannapoorani C, Dhivya L, Shankar LS, Murugan R (2017) Prog Mater Sci 88:325–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00710.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.007 ↗
13. Liu Q, Geng Z, Han C et al (2018) J Power Sources 389:120–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019 ↗
14. Rettenwander D, Blaha P, Laskowski R et al (2014) Chem Mat 26:2617–2623. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500099910.1021/cm5000999 ↗
15. Samson AJ, Hofstetter K, Bag S, Thangadurai V (2019) Energy Environ Sci 12:2957–2975. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee01548e10.1039/c9ee01548e ↗
16. Thompson T, Sharafi A, Johannes MD et al (2015) Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20150009610.1002/aenm.201500096 ↗
17. Xiang X, Chen F, Yang W et al (2019) J Am Ceram Soc 103:2483–2490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1692010.1111/jace.16920 ↗
18. Shin DO, Oh K, Kim KM et al (2015) Sci Rep 5:18053. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1805310.1038/srep18053 ↗
19. Hu Z, Liu H, Ruan H, Hu R, Su Y, Zhang L (2016) Ceram Int 42:12156–12160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.14910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.149 ↗
20. El-Shinawi H, Paterson GW, MacLaren DA, Cussen EJ, Corr SA (2017) J Mater Chem A 5:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta06961d10.1039/c6ta06961d ↗
21. Saccoccio M, Yu J, Lu Z et al (2017) J Power Sources 365:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.020 ↗
22. Zhang Y, Deng J, Hu D et al (2019) Electrochim Acta 296:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.13610.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.136 ↗
23. Li Y, Han J-T, Wang C-A, Xie H, Goodenough JB (2012) J Mater Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm31413d10.1039/c2jm31413d ↗
24. Chen X, Cao T, Xue M, Lv H, Li B, Zhang C (2018) Solid State Ion 314:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.11.02710.1016/j.ssi.2017.11.027 ↗
25. Huang X, Xiu T, Badding ME, Wen Z (2018) Ceram Int 44:5660–5667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.21710.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.217 ↗
26. Lu W, Wang T, Xue M, Zhang C (2021) J Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22984510.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229845 ↗
27. Xia W, Xu B, Duan H et al (2016) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:5335–5342. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1218610.1021/acsami.5b12186 ↗
28. Wagner R, Redhammer GJ, Rettenwander D et al (2016) Chem Mat 28:1861–1871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0003810.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00038 ↗
29. He M, Cui Z, Chen C, Li Y, Guo X (2018) J Mater Chem A 6:11463–11470. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta02276c10.1039/c8ta02276c ↗
30. https://www.materialsproject.org/ (accessed August 2021).
31. Yang T, Li Y, Wu W et al (2018) Ceram Int 44:1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.07210.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.072 ↗
32. Il’ina EA, Raskovalov AA, Antonov BD, Malkov VB (2015) Russ J Appl Chem 88:775–781. https://doi.org/10.1134/s107042721505009210.1134/s1070427215050092 ↗
33. Wakudkar P, Deshpande AV (2020) Solid State Ion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.11518510.1016/j.ssi.2019.115185 ↗
34. Jiang Y, Zhu X, Qin S, Ling M, Zhu J (2017) Solid State Ion 300:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2016.12.00510.1016/j.ssi.2016.12.005 ↗
35. Wang X, Liu J, Yin R et al (2018) Mater Lett 231:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.00610.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.006 ↗
36. Xue W, Yang Y, Yang Q et al (2018) RSC Adv 8:13083–13088. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra01329b10.1039/c8ra01329b ↗
37. Wachter-Welzl A, Kirowitz J, Wagner R et al (2018) Solid State Ion 319:203–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.03610.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.036 ↗
38. Huang X, Song Z, Xiu T, Badding ME, Wen Z (2019) Ceram Int 45:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.13310.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.133 ↗
39. Jin Y, McGinn PJ (2011) J Power Sources 196:8683–8687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.065 ↗
40. Takano R, Tadanaga K, Hayashi A, Tatsumisago M (2014) Solid State Ion 255:104–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.00610.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.006 ↗
41. Imagawa H, Ohta S, Kihira Y, Asaoka T (2014) Solid State Ion 262:609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.10.05910.1016/j.ssi.2013.10.059 ↗
42. Rosenkiewitz N, Schuhmacher J, Bockmeyer M, Deubener J (2015) J Power Sources 278:104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.06610.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.066 ↗
43. Yoon SA, Oh NR, Yoo AR, Lee HG, Lee HC (2017) J Korean Ceram Soc 54:278–284. https://doi.org/10.4191/kcers.2017.54.4.0210.4191/kcers.2017.54.4.02 ↗
44. Im C, Park D, Kim H, Lee J (2018) J Energy Chem 27:1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.00610.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.006 ↗
45. Li Y, Yang T, Wu W et al (2018) Ionics 24:3305–3315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2497-310.1007/s11581-018-2497-3 ↗
46. Kim DH, Kim MY, Yang SH et al (2019) J Ind Eng Chem 71:445–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.00110.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.001 ↗
47. Huang B, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Wang M, Chen L, Gu Y (2019) Solid State Ion 338:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.00510.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.005 ↗
48. Kuganathan N, Dark J, Sgourou EN, Panayiotatos Y, Chroneos A (2019). Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1215289510.3390/en12152895 ↗
49. Masoud EM, El-Bellihi AA, Bayoumy WA, Mousa MA (2013) Mater Res Bull 48:1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.12.01210.1016/j.materresbull.2012.12.012 ↗
50. Han F, Westover AS, Yue J et al (2019) Nat Energy 4:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
51. Chen Y-T, Jena A, Pang WK et al (2017) J Phys Chem C 121:15565–15573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0400410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04004 ↗
52. Inada R, Okada T, Bando A, Tojo T, Sakurai Y (2017) Prog Nat Sci 27:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2017.06.00210.1016/j.pnsc.2017.06.002 ↗
53. Rangasamy E, Wolfenstine J, Sakamoto J (2012) Solid State Ion 206:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.02210.1016/j.ssi.2011.10.022 ↗
54. Wolfenstine J, Ratchford J, Rangasamy E, Sakamoto J, Allen JL (2012) Mater Chem Phys 134:571–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.05410.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.054 ↗
55. Agrawal RC (1999) Indian J Pure Appl Phys 37:294–301