journal article·2021-11

Influence of functional groups and pore sizes in porous carbon for methanol acetone adsorptive separation based on molecular simulation

Lingyun Yu, Yang Guo, Hongyu Chen, Baogen Liu, Xiang Xu, Peng Sheng, Zheng Zeng, Liqing Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 33
Publisher page

Abstract

In order to investigate the optimal nitrogen functional group and the most suitable pore size for the efficient adsorptive separation of methanol–acetone mixed vapor, a series of theoretical calculations, including Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation and density functional theory (DFT) calculation, were carried out to determine the adsorptive separation properties of AC–Rs (AC = activated carbon, R = Pyridinic, –NH2, Pyrrolic, Quaternary) with different pore sizes (0.6–8.0 nm). The results showed AC–Pyridinic had the highest methanol–acetone adsorption capacities (14.64 mol/kg for acetone and 26.35 mol/kg for methanol at their respective saturation pressures). The high adsorption energies, the hydrogen bonding interaction between the pyridinic nitrogen and hydrogen of methanol’s hydroxyl group, and electrostatic interaction between the pyridinic nitrogen and carbon of acetone’s carbonyl group were crucial factors for that. In the case of methanol–acetone separation, the methanol molecular aggregation resulted in an increase in methanol–acetone selectivities on AC–Rs. Interestingly, AC–Pyridinic still showed the highest methanol–acetone selectivity. Furthermore, the pore with 3.5 nm and 3.0 nm were optimal for methanol and acetone adsorption respectively, in which AC–Pyridinic exhibited superior capture capacities (23.19 mmol/g for methanol at 16 kPa and 11.64 mmol/g for acetone at 30 kPa). And with a 6 nm pore size, AC–Pyridinic had the highest selectivity (~ 5.0). The mesopore of 2.5–3 nm is suitable for methanol–acetone adsorptive separation taking both adsorption and selectivity performance into consideration. This investigation predicted the functional group and pore sizes with the best modification effect on AC for methanol–acetone adsorptive separation, which sheds light on ways to design a highly efficient adsorbent for gas adsorption and separation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Idrissi A, Hantal G, Jedlovszky P (2015) Properties of the liquid–vapor interface of acetone–methanol mixtures, as seen from computer simulation and ITIM surface analysis. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(14):8913–8926. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05974c10.1039/c4cp05974c ↗
2. Idrissi A, Polok K, Barj M, Marekha B, Kiselev M, Jedlovszky P (2013) Free energy of mixing of acetone and methanol: a computer simulation investigation. J Phys Chem B 117(50):16157–16164. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405090j10.1021/jp405090j ↗
3. Zhang G, Wang H, Guo S, Wang J, Liu J (2016) Synthesis of Cu/TiO2/organo-attapulgite fiber nanocomposite and its photocatalytic activity for degradation of acetone in air. Appl Surf Sci 362:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.21810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.218 ↗
4. Liu Z, Zhang K, Wu Y, Xi H (2018) Effective enhancement on methanol adsorption in Cu-BTC by combination of lithium-doping and nitrogen-doping functionalization. J Mater Sci 53(8):6080–6093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1751-910.1007/s10853-017-1751-9 ↗
5. Li M-s, Wu SC, Peng Y-H, Shih Y-h (2016) Adsorption of volatile organic vapors by activated carbon derived from rice husk under various humidity conditions and its statistical evaluation by linear solvation energy relationships. Sep Purif Technol 170:102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.02910.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.029 ↗
6. Iván D, Gil DCB, Ortiz P, Sánchez OF (2009) Extractive distillation of acetone/methanol mixture using water as entrainer. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(10):485810.1021/ie801637h ↗
7. Gao J, Li L, Zeng Z, Ma X, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K (2019) Superior acetone uptake of hierarchically N-doped potassium citrate-based porous carbon prepared by one-step carbonization. J Mater Sci 54(8):6186–6198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03300-y10.1007/s10853-018-03300-y ↗
8. Ma X, Li L, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K, Li H (2018) Porous carbon materials based on biomass for acetone adsorption: effect of surface chemistry and porous structure. Appl Surf Sci 459:657–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.17010.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.170 ↗
9. Guo Y, Zeng Z, Li L, Su C, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K, Xu X, Li H (2019) Competitive adsorption of methanol-acetone on surface functionalization (–COOH, –OH, –NH2, and –SO3H): grand canonical monte carlo and density functional theory simulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(37):34241–34250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1080410.1021/acsami.9b10804 ↗
10. An YX, Fu Q, Zhang DH, Wang YY, Tang ZL (2019) Performance evaluation of activated carbon with different pore sizes and functional groups for VOC adsorption by molecular simulation. Chemosphere 227:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.01110.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.011 ↗
11. Fu JP, Jin CJ, Zhang JR, Wang ZQ, Wang T, Cheng XX, Ma CY, Chen HM (2020) Pore structure and VOCs adsorption characteristics of activated coke powders derived via one-step rapid pyrolysis activation method. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 15(5):12. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.250310.1002/apj.2503 ↗
12. Sasaki T, Matsumoto A, Yamashita Y (2008) The effect of the pore size and volume of activated carbon on adsorption efficiency of vapor phase compounds in cigarette smoke. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 325(3):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.05.00110.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.05.001 ↗
13. Liu Z, Horikawa T, Do DD, Nicholson D (2012) Packing effects on argon and methanol adsorption inside graphitic cylindrical and slit pores: a GCMC simulation study. J Colloid Interface Sci 368:474–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.10.04610.1016/j.jcis.2011.10.046 ↗
14. Sun XY, Xu GK, Li X, Feng XQ, Gao H (2013) Mechanical properties and scaling laws of nanoporous gold. J Appl Phys 113(2):25310.1063/1.4774246 ↗
15. Yang Z, Yuan H, Markert B (2019) Representation of micro-structural evolution and thermo-mechanical damage in thermal shocked oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composites. Int J Fatigue 126:122–12910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.030 ↗
16. Larson NM, Cuellar C, Zok FW (2019) X-ray computed tomography of microstructure evolution during matrix impregnation and curing in unidirectional fiber beds. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 117:243–25910.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.021 ↗
17. Yang Z, Yan H, Qian G, Ji Z (2020) Influence of hierarchical porosity on the mechanical properties of porous woven composites under thermomechanical loading. Int J Solids Struct 200–201:13–2210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.05.002 ↗
18. Li X, Xue Q, Chang X, Zhu L, Ling C, Zheng H (2017) Effects of sulfur doping and humidity on CO2 capture by graphite split pore: a theoretical study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(9):8336–8343. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1428110.1021/acsami.6b14281 ↗
19. Li X, Zhu L, Xue Q, Chang X, Ling C, Xing W (2017) Superior selective CO2 adsorption of C3N pores: GCMC and DFT simulations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(36):31161–31169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0964810.1021/acsami.7b09648 ↗
20. Li X, Xue Q, He D, Zhu L, Du Y, Xing W, Zhang T (2017) Sulfur–Nitrogen codoped graphite slit-pore for enhancing selective carbon dioxide adsorption: insights from molecular simulations. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(10):8815–8823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0161210.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01612 ↗
21. Chen H, Guo Y, Du Y, Xu X, Su C, Zeng Z, Li L (2021) The synergistic effects of surface functional groups and pore sizes on CO2 adsorption by GCMC and DFT simulations. Chem Eng J 415:128824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12882410.1016/j.cej.2021.128824 ↗
22. Farmahini AH, Opletal G, Bhatia SK (2013) Structural modelling of silicon carbide-derived nanoporous carbon by hybrid reverse Monte Carlo simulation. J Phys Chem C 117(27):14081–14094. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp403929r10.1021/jp403929r ↗
23. Pikunic J, Clinard C, Cohaut N, Gubbins KE, Guet JM, Pellenq RJM, Rannou I, Rouzaud JN (2003) structural modeling of porous carbons: constrained reverse Monte Carlo method. Langmuir 19(20):8565–8582. https://doi.org/10.1021/la034595y10.1021/la034595y ↗
24. Jain SK, Pikunic JP, Pellenq RJM, Gubbins KE (2005) Effects of activation on the structure and adsorption properties of a nanoporous carbon using molecular simulation. Adsorpt J Int Adsorpt Soc 11:355–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-005-5950-310.1007/s10450-005-5950-3 ↗
25. Jain SK, Pellenq RJM, Pikunic JP, Gubbins KE (2006) Molecular modeling of porous carbons using the hybrid reverse Monte Carlo method. Langmuir 22(24):9942–9948. https://doi.org/10.1021/la053402z10.1021/la053402z ↗
26. Jain SK, Gubbins KE, Pellenq RJM, Pikunic JP (2006) Molecular modeling and adsorption properties of porous carbons. Carbon 44(12):2445–2451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.03410.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.034 ↗
27. Kumar KV, Mueller EA, Rodriguez-Reinoso F (2012) Effect of pore morphology on the adsorption of methane/hydrogen mixtures on carbon micropores. J Phys Chem C 116(21):11820–11829. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp302749t10.1021/jp302749t ↗
28. Wu Y, Chen H, Xiao J, Liu D, Liu Z, Qian Y, Xi H (2015) Adsorptive separation of methanol–acetone on isostructural series of metal-organic frameworks M-BTC (M = Ti, Fe, Cu Co, Ru, Mo): a computational study of adsorption mechanisms and metal-substitution impacts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(48):26930–26940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0766510.1021/acsami.5b07665 ↗
29. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WAI, Skiff WMJ (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114(25):10024–1003510.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
30. Xue Q, Li X, Chang X, Ling C, Zhu L, Xing W (2018) S-graphite slit pore: a superior selective adsorbent for light hydrocarbons. Appl Surf Sci 444:772–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.05810.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.058 ↗
31. Frisch MTG, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson G (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Inc. Wallingford
32. Xu SC, Irle S, Musaev DG, Lin MC (2009) Quantum chemical prediction of pathways; and rate constants for reactions of CO and CO2 with vacancy defects on graphite (0001) surfaces. J Phys Chem C 113(43):18772–18777. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp905699410.1021/jp9056994 ↗
33. Radovic LR (2009) Active sites in graphene and the mechanism of CO2 formation in carbon oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 131(47):17166–1717510.1021/ja904731q ↗
34. Gu C, Liu J, Hu J, Wu D (2020) Metal-organic frameworks chelated by zinc fluorides for ultra-high affinity to acetylene during C2/C1 separations. Fuel 266:117037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11703710.1016/j.fuel.2020.117037 ↗
35. Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 94(26):889710.1021/j100389a010 ↗
36. Zhou X, Zhou W, Hao J, University SI, University Z (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation of ethanol under ultrahigh pressure based on TraPPE-UA potential energy model. China Meas Test
37. Shevade AV, Jiang S, Gubbins KE (2000) Molecular simulation study of water–methanol mixtures in activated carbon pores. J Chem Phys 113(16):6933–694210.1063/1.1309012 ↗
38. Duren T, Millange F, Ferey G, Walton KS, Snurr RQ (2016) Calculating geometric surface areas as a characterization tool for metalorganic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 111(42):15350–1535610.1021/jp074723h ↗
39. Sarkisov L, Harrison A (2011) Computational structure characterisation tools in application to ordered and disordered porous materials. Mol Simul 37(15):1248–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2011.59283210.1080/08927022.2011.592832 ↗
40. Do DD, Herrera L, Fan C, Wongkoblap A, Nicholson D (2010) The role of accessibility in the characterization of porous solids and their adsorption properties. Adsorpt-J Int Adsorpt Soc 16(1–2):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-009-9203-810.1007/s10450-009-9203-8 ↗
41. Meng J, Niu J, Meng H, Xia J, Zhong R (2020) Insight on adsorption mechanism of coal molecules at different ranks. Fuel 267:117234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11723410.1016/j.fuel.2020.117234 ↗
42. Martin MG, Siepmann JI (1999) Novel configurational-bias Monte Carlo method for branched molecules. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 2. United-atom description of branched alkanes. J Phys Chem B 103(21):4508–4517. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984742e10.1021/jp984742e ↗
43. Mo Y, Li H, Zhou K, Ma X, Guo Y, Wang S, Li L (2019) Acetone adsorption to (BeO)12, (MgO)12 and (ZnO)12 nanoparticles and their graphene composites: a density functional theory (DFT) study. Appl Surf Sci 469:962–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.07910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.079 ↗
44. Li Y, Yang Y, Lei J, Liu W, Tong M, Liang J (2021) The degradation pathways of carbamazepine in advanced oxidation process: a mini review coupled with DFT calculation. Sci Total Environ 779:146498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14649810.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146498 ↗
45. Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang YB (2014) Noncovalent ππ interaction between graphene and aromatic molecule: structure, energy, and nature. J Chem Phys 140(9):15540610.1063/1.4867071 ↗
46. Xiao J, Sitamraju S, Janik MJ (2014) CO2 adsorption thermodynamics over N-substituted/grafted graphanes: a DFT study. Langmuir 30(7):1837–1844. https://doi.org/10.1021/la404883710.1021/la4048837 ↗
47. Zhou K, Li L, Ma X, Mo Y, Chen R, Li H, Li H (2018) Activated carbons modified by magnesium oxide as highly efficient sorbents for acetone. RSC Adv 8(6):2922–2932. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra11740j10.1039/c7ra11740j ↗
48. Ma X, Liu B, Wu Q, Li D, Chen R, Zeng Z, Li L (2021) Specific Li+ sites in a nanoporous carbon for enhanced light hydrocarbons storage and separation: GCMC and DFT simulations. Fuel 288:119647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11964710.1016/j.fuel.2020.119647 ↗
49. Ma X, Li L, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K, Li H (2019) Doping of alkali metals in carbon frameworks for enhancing CO2 capture: a theoretical study. Fuel 236:942–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.16610.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.166 ↗
50. Ao ZM, Li S, Jiang Q (2010) Correlation of the applied electrical field and CO adsorption/desorption behavior on Al-doped graphene. Solid State Commun 150(13–14):680–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.01610.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.016 ↗
51. Lim D-H, Negreira AS, Wilcox J (2011) DFT studies on the interaction of defective graphene-supported Fe and Al nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 115(18):8961–8970. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp201291410.1021/jp2012914 ↗
52. Ma X, Li L, Zeng Z, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K, Su C, Li H (2019) Synthesis of nitrogen-rich nanoporous carbon materials with C3N-type from ZIF-8 for methanol adsorption. Chem Eng J 363:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.13210.1016/j.cej.2019.01.132 ↗
53. Liang X, Chi J, Yang Z (2018) The influence of the functional group on activated carbon for, acetone adsorption property by molecular simulation study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 262:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.00910.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.009 ↗
54. Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WE, Teller E (1940) On a theory of the van der Waals adsorption of gases. Jamchemsoc 62(7):1723–173210.1021/ja01864a025 ↗
55. Darmstadt H, Roy C (2003) Surface spectroscopic study of basic sites on carbon blacks. Carbon 41(13):2662–2665. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(03)00325-710.1016/s0008-6223(03)00325-7 ↗
56. Ma R, Lin G, Ju Q, Tang W, Wang J (2020) Edge-sited Fe–N4 atomic species improve oxygen reduction activity via boosting O2 dissociation. Appl Catal B Environ 265:11859310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118593 ↗
57. Ma R, Lin G, Zhou Y, Liu Q, Wang J (2019) A review of oxygen reduction mechanisms for metal-free carbon-based electrocatalysts. NPJ Comput Mater 5:78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0210-310.1038/s41524-019-0210-3 ↗
58. Nguyen VT, Do DD, Nicholson D, Jagiello J (2011) Effects of temperature on adsorption of methanol on graphitized thermal carbon black: a computer simulation and experimental study. J Phys Chem C 115(32):16142–16149. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp205498p10.1021/jp205498p ↗
59. Wu Y, Liu D, Chen H, Qian Y, Xi H, Xia Q (2015) Enhancement effect of lithium-doping functionalization on methanol adsorption in copper-based metal-organic framework. Chem Eng Sci 123:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.10.01010.1016/j.ces.2014.10.010 ↗
60. Su C, Guo Y, Yu L, Zou J, Zeng Z, Li L (2021) Insight into specific surface area, microporosity and N, P co-doping of porous carbon materials in the acetone adsorption. Mater Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12393010.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123930 ↗