journal article·2021-12

Mechanical performance of in vitro degraded polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composites

E. Pérez

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

Polylactic acid (PLA)-based products can be found in a wide range of industrial applications due to their favorable performances. Unfortunately, neat PLA also exhibits some limitations which could be overcome by blending, composites or self-reinforced compounding. On the other hand, the mechanical characterization of PLA during in vitro degradation process has been generally limited to some basic mechanical tests which can be improved by the application of fracture mechanics analysis. The PLA matrix was reinforced (2.5 to 20 wt.%) with hydroxyapatite (HA) and processed as film or fiber in order to be experimentally evaluated. The evolution of mechanical performance during in vitro degradation was characterized by stress-based analysis and fracture mechanics. The composites displayed similar particle size distributions and more frequent agglomeration at large filler content. The film with 2.5% HA showed an enhanced crack resistance followed by a drastic drop at shorter immersion times linked to a premature matrix degradation. Fibers displayed higher tensile performance, compared to films, and faster degradation in accordance with thinner cross section. The performed characterizations indicated hydrolysis of PLA controlled by autocatalytic random scission and marginal end scission. Experimental behavior also showed an energy–stress transition, with the filler volume fraction, to define the most sensitive mechanical parameter. The whole performance during in vitro degradation can be described by three stages: (i) running-in, (ii) steady and (iii) severe. Particularly, the combination of composition, compounding method and evaluated mechanical parameter defines the presence or not of these three different stages along the in vitro degradation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. Auras R, Harte B, Selke S (2004) An overview of polylactides as packaging materials. Macromol Biosci 4:835–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20040004310.1002/mabi.200400043 ↗
2. Yin H-M, Xu H, Zhang J, Chen J-B, Lei J, Xu J-Z, Li Z-M (2015) Effects of extrusion draw ratio on the morphology, structure and mechanical properties of poly(l-lactic acid) fabricated using solid state ram extrusion. RSC Adv 5:69016–69023. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA10579J10.1039/C5RA10579J ↗
3. Farah S, Langer ADG, R, (2016) Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications: a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Del Rev 107:367–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.01210.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
4. Chow WS, Teoh EL, Karger-Kocsis J (2018) Flame retarded poly(lactic acid): a review. eXPRESS Polym Lett 12(5):396–417. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.3410.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.34 ↗
5. Loiola LMD, Fasce LA, da Silva LCE, Goncalves MC, Frontini PM, Felisberti MI (2016) Thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites based on a PLLA-b-PEO-b-PLLA triblock copolymer and nanohydroxyapatite. J Appl Polym Sci 133:44187. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4418710.1002/app.44187 ↗
6. Rasal RM, Janorkar AV, Hirt DE (2010) Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci 35:338–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003 ↗
7. Mai F, Tu W, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2015) Preparation and properties of self-reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites based on oriented tapes. Comput A 76:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.030 ↗
8. Murariu M, Dubois P (2016) PLA composites: from production to properties. Adv Drug Del Rev 107:17–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.00310.1016/j.addr.2016.04.003 ↗
9. Jem KJ, Tan B (2020) The development and challenges of poly (lactic acid) and poly (glycolic acid). Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 3:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002 ↗
10. Hamad K, Kaseem M, Ko YG, Deri F (2014) Biodegradable polymer blends and composites: an overview. Polym Sci A 56(6):812–829. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X1406005410.1134/S0965545X14060054 ↗
11. Raquez J-M, Habibi Y, Murariu M, Dubois P (2013) Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38:1504–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 ↗
12. Mano JF, Sousa RA, Boesel LF, Neves NM, Reis RL (2004) Bioinert, biodegradable and inject able polymeric matrix composites for hard tissue replacement: state of the art and recent developments. Comput Sci Tech 64:789–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.001 ↗
13. Charles LF, Kramer ER, Shaw MT, Olson JR, Wei M (2013) Self-reinforced composites of hydroxyapatite-coated PLLA fibers: fabrication and mechanical chapersson racterization. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 17:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.09.00710.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.09.007 ↗
14. Zhou H, Lawrence JG, Bhaduri SB (2012) Fabrication aspects of PLA-CaP/PLGA-CaP composites for orthopedic applications: a review. Acta Biomat 8:1999–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.03110.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.031 ↗
15. Zhang SM, Liu J, Zhou W, Cheng L, Guo XD (2005) Interfacial fabrication and property of hydroxyapatite/polylactide resorbable bone fixation composites. Curr App Phys 5:516–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.02310.1016/j.cap.2005.01.023 ↗
16. Kothapalli CR, Shaw MT, Wei M (2005) Biodegradable HA-PLA 3-D porous scaffolds: effect of nano-sized filler content on scaffold properties. Acta Biomat 1:653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.00510.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.005 ↗
17. Shikinami Y, Okuno M (1999) Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA): part I. Basic characteristics. Biomaterial 20:859–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00241-510.1016/S0142-9612(98)00241-5 ↗
18. Wan Y, Wu C, Xiong G, Zuo G, Jin J, Ren K, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Luo H (2015) Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of nanoplate-like hydroxyapatite/polylactide nanocomposites prepared by intercalation technique. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 47:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.00910.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.009 ↗
19. Li J, Lu XL, Zheng YF (2008) Effect of surface modified hydroxyapatite on the tensile property improvement of HA/PLA composite. App Surf Sci 255:494–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.06710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.067 ↗
20. Hong Z, Qiu X, Sun J, Deng M, Chen X, Jing X (2004) Grafting polymerization of l-lactide on the surface of hydroxyapatite nano-crystals. Polymer 45:6699–6706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.03610.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.036 ↗
21. Hong Z, Zhang P, He C, Qiu X, Liu A, Chen L, Chen X, Jing X (2005) Nano-composite of poly(l-lactide) and surface grafted hydroxyapatite: mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Biomaterial 26:6296–6304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.018 ↗
22. Supova M (2009) Problem of hydroxyapatite dispersion in polymer matrices: a review. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20:1201–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3696-210.1007/s10856-009-3696-2 ↗
23. Akindoyo JO, Beg MDH, Ghazali S, Heim HP, Feldmann M (2018) Impact modified PLA-hydroxyapatite composites: thermo-mechanical properties. Comput A 107:326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.017 ↗
24. Gupta B, Revagade N, Hilborn J (2007) Poly(lactic acid) fiber: an overview. Prog Polym Sci 32:455–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.005 ↗
25. Wright-Charlesworth DD, Miller DM, Miskioglu I, King JA (2005) Nanoindentation of injection molded PLA and self-reinforced composite PLA after in vitro conditioning for three months. J Biomed Mater Res 74A(3):388–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3035310.1002/jbm.a.30353 ↗
26. Walker J, Melaj M, Giménez R, Pérez E, Bernal C (2019) Solid-state drawing of commercial Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) based filaments. Front Mater 6:280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.0028010.3389/fmats.2019.00280 ↗
27. Wright-Charlesworth DD, King JA, Miller DM, Lim CH (2006) In vitro flexural properties of hydroxyapatite and self-reinforced poly(L-lactic acid). J Biomed Mater Res 78A(3):541–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3076710.1002/jbm.a.30767 ↗
28. Sonseca A, Peponi L, Sahuquillo O, Kenny JM, Giménez E (2012) Electrospinning of biodegradable polylactide/hydroxyapatite nanofibers: study on the morphology, crystallinity structure and thermal stability. Polym Deg Stab 97:2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.009 ↗
29. Persson M, Lorite GS, Cho S-W, Tuukkanen J, Skrifvars M (2013) Melt spinning of poly(lactic acid) and hydroxyapatite composite fibers: influence of the filler content on the fiber properties. Appl Mater Interfaces 5:6864–6872. https://doi.org/10.1021/am401895f10.1021/am401895f ↗
30. Lopresti F, Carfì Pavia F, Vitrano I, Kersaudy-Kerhoas M, Brucato V, La Carrubba V (2020) Effect of hydroxyapatite concentration and size on morpho-mechanical properties of PLA-based randomly oriented and aligned electrospun nanofibrous mats. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 101:103449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10344910.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103449 ↗
31. Russias J, Saiz E, Nalla RK, Gryn K, Ritchie RO, Tomsia AP (2006) Fabrication and mechanical properties of PLA/HA composites: a study of in vitro degradation. Mat Sci Eng C 26:1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.00410.1016/j.msec.2005.08.004 ↗
32. Shikinami Y, Okuno M (2001) Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly l-lactide (PLLA). Part II: practical properties of miniscrews and miniplates. Biomaterial 22:3197–3211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00072-210.1016/S0142-9612(01)00072-2 ↗
33. Martínez C, Fernández C, Prado M, Ozols A, Olmedo DG (2017) Synthesis and characterization of a novel scaffold for bone tissue engineering based on Wharton’s jelly. J Biomed Mater Res A 105A:1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3597610.1002/jbm.a.35976 ↗
34. Pérez E, Bernal C, Piacquadio M (2012) Multifractal analysis of tensile toughness and filler dispersion for polypropylene–CaCO3 composites. App Surf Sci 258:8940–8945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.12410.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.124 ↗
35. Pérez E, Bernal C, Pérez CJ (2016) Internal structure analysis of polypropylene/quartz composites related to their toughness. Polym Comput 37(5):1488–1496. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2331810.1002/pc.23318 ↗
36. Oliveira M, Santos E, Araújo A, Fechine GJM, Machado AV, Botelho G (2016) The role of shear and stabilizer on PLA degradation. Polym Test 51:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.005 ↗
37. Meaurio E, López-Rodríguez N, Sarasua JR (2006) Infrared spectrum of poly(l-lactide): application to crystallinity studies. Macromology 39:9291–9301. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma061890r10.1021/ma061890r ↗
38. Puchalski M, Kwolek S, Szparaga G, Chrzanowski M, Krucinska I (2017) Investigation of the influence of PLA molecular structure on the crystalline forms (α’ and α) and mechanical properties of wet spinning fibres. Polymer 9:18. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym901001810.3390/polym9010018 ↗
39. Zhu X-K, Joyce JA (2012) Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng Fract Mech 85:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001 ↗
40. Pérez N (2017) Linear-elastic fracture mechanics. In: Pérez N (ed) Fracture mechanics. Springer, Switzerland, pp 79–13010.1007/978-3-319-24999-5_3 ↗
41. Lauke B (2017) Fracture toughness modelling of polymers filled with inhomogeneously distributed rigid spherical particles. Exp Polym 11(7):545–554. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.5210.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.52 ↗
42. Lauke B (2015) Plastic yielding contribution to fracture toughness of polymers modified with rubber and inorganic fillers. J Mater Sci 50:2178–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8781-310.1007/s10853-014-8781-3 ↗
43. Quaresimin M, Salviato M, Zappalorto M (2014) A multi-scale and multi-mechanism approach for the fracture toughness assessment of polymer nanocomposites. Comput Sci Tech 91:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.015 ↗
44. Pérez E (2017) Lauke B (2017) Calculation of debonding strength at the interface of particles with different shapes and matrix. Comput Struct 167:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.020 ↗
45. Pérez E, Lauke B (2019) Evaluation of the particle geometry and interphase influence on the filler-matrix debonding process. Mater Res Exp 6:085341. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab274610.1088/2053-1591/ab2746 ↗
46. Yousefzade O, Jeddi J, Vazirinasab E, Garmabi H (2018) Poly(lactic acid) phase transitions in the presence of nano calcium carbonate: Opposing effect of nanofiller on static and dynamic measurements. J TP Comput Mat 32(3):312–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571875938610.1177/0892705718759386 ↗
47. Torres J, Cotelo J, Karl J, Gordon AP (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objective. JOM 67(5):1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y ↗
48. http://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=e1654c43ab994d7fab5e0f9 aabe4dddc&ckck=1. Accessed 10 April 2021
49. Buzarovska A, Grozdanov A (2012) Biodegradable poly(L-lactic acid)/TiO2 nanocomposites: thermal properties and degradation. J App Polym Sci 123:2187–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3472910.1002/app.34729 ↗
50. Rakmae S, Ruksakulpiwat Y, Sutapun W, Suppakarn N (2012) Effect of silane coupling agent treated bovine bone based carbonated hydroxyapatite on in vitro degradation behavior and bioactivity of PLA composites. Mat Sci Eng C 32:1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.02210.1016/j.msec.2012.04.022 ↗
51. Kiss A, Fekete E, Pukanszky B (2007) Aggregation of CaCO3 particles in PP composites: effect of surface coating. Comput Sci Tech 67:1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.010 ↗
52. Abranyi A, Szazdi L, Pukanszky B, Vancso GJ, Pukanszky B (2006) Formation and detection of clay network structure in poly(propylene)/layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromol Rapid Commun 27(2):132–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20050068710.1002/marc.200500687 ↗
53. Ahmed J, Auras R, Kijchavengkul T, Varshney SK (2012) Rheological, thermal and structural behavior of poly(ε-caprolactone) and nanoclay blended films. J Food Eng 111(4):580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.03.01410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.03.014 ↗
54. Bouakaz BS, Habi A, Grohens Y, Pillin I (2018) Effect of combinations of nanofillers on rheology-structure relations in biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 161:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.00610.1016/j.clay.2018.04.006 ↗
55. Tesfaye M, Patwa R, Gupta A, Kashyap MJ, Katiyar V (2017) Recycling of poly (lactic acid)/silk based bionanocomposites films and its influence on thermal stability, crystallization kinetics, solution and melt rheology. Int J Bio Macromol 101:580–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.08510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.085 ↗
56. Bouakaz BS, Habi A, Grohens Y, Pillin I (2017) Organomontmorillonite/graphene-PLA/PCL nanofilled blends: new strategy to enhance the functional properties of PLA/PCL blend. Appl Clay Sci 139:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.01.01410.1016/j.clay.2017.01.014 ↗
57. Mirzadeh A, Ghasemi H, Mahrous F, Kamal MR (2015) Reactive extrusion effects on rheological and mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate]/epoxy chain extender blends and clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 132:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4266410.1002/app.42664 ↗
58. Li Y, Han C, Bian J, Han L, Dong L, Gao G (2012) Rheology and biodegradation of polylactide/silica nanocomposites. Pol Comput 33(10):1719–1727. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2230610.1002/pc.22306 ↗
59. Meincke O, Kaempfer D, Weickmann H, Friedrich C, Vathauer M, Warth H (2004) Mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of carbon-nanotube filled polyamide-6 and its blends with acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene. Polymer 45(3):739–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.01310.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.013 ↗
60. Valentino O, Sarno M, Rainone NG, Nobile MR, Ciambelli P, Neitzert HC, Simon GP (2008) Influence of the polymer structure and nanotube concentration on the conductivity and rheological properties of polyethylene/CNT composites. Phys E 40(7):2440–2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2008.02.00110.1016/j.physe.2008.02.001 ↗
61. Kashi S, Gupta RK, Baum T, Kao N, Bhattacharya SN (2018) Phase transition and anomalous rheological behaviour of polylactide/graphene nanocomposites. Comput B 135:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.002 ↗
62. Leroy A, Ribeiro S, Grossiord C, Alves A, Vestberg RH, Salles V, Brunon C, Gritsch K, Grosgogeat B, Bayon Y (2017) FTIR microscopy contribution for comprehension of degradation mechanisms in PLA-based implantable medical devices. J Mater Sci Mater Med 28:87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5894-710.1007/s10856-017-5894-7 ↗
63. Gay S, Arostegui S, Leaitre J (2009) Preparation and characterization of dense nanohydroxyapatite/PLLA composites. Mat Sci Eng C 29:172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.06.00510.1016/j.msec.2008.06.005 ↗
64. Sonseca A, Peponi L, Sahuquillo O, Kenny J, Gimenez E (2012) Electrospinning of biodegradable polylactide/hydroxyapatite nanofibers: study on the morphology, crystallinity structure and thermal stability. Poylm Deg Estab 97:2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.009 ↗
65. Backes EH, Pires LDN, Beatrice CAG, Costa LC, Passador FR, Pessan LA (2020) Fabrication of biocompatible composites of poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite envisioning medical applications. Polym Eng Sci 60(3):636–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2532210.1002/pen.25322 ↗
66. Kareem MM, Tanner KE (2020) Optimising micro-hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(lactide acid) electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mat Sci Mat Med 31:38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06376-810.1007/s10856-020-06376-8 ↗
67. Gleadall A, Pan J, Kruft M-A, Kellomäki M (2014) Degradation mechanisms of bioresorbable polyesters. Part 1. Effects of random scission, end scission and autocatalysis. Acta Biomat 10:2223–2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.03910.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.039 ↗
68. Gleadall A, Pan J, Kruft M-A, Kellomäki M (2014) Degradation mechanisms of bioresorbable polyesters. Part 2. Effects of initial molecular weight and residual monomer. Acta Biomat 10:2233–2240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.01710.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.017 ↗
69. Todo M, Takayama T (2011) Fracture mechanisms of biodegradable PLA and PLA/PCL blends. In: Pignatello R (ed) Biomaterials: physics and chemistry. InTech, Croatia, pp 375–394
70. Wang Z, Wang Y, Ito Y, Zhang P, Chen X (2016) A comparative study on the in vivo degradation of poly(L-lactide) based composite implants for bone fracture fixation. Sci Rep 6:20770. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2077010.1038/srep20770 ↗
71. Rothen-Weinhold A, Besseghir K, Vuaridel E, Sublet E, Oudry N, Kubel F, Gurny R (1999) Injection-molding versus extrusion as manufacturing technique for the preparation of biodegradable implants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 48:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00034-x10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00034-x ↗
72. Mai F, Tu W, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2015) The influence of solid-state drawing on mechanical properties and hydrolytic degradation of melt-spun poly(lactic acid) (PLA) tapes. Fibers 3:523–538. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib304052310.3390/fib3040523 ↗
73. Vieira AC, Vieira JC, Ferra JM, Magalhaes FD, Guedes RM, Marques AT (2011) Mechanical study of PLA–PCL fibers during in vitro degradation. J Mech B Biomed Mat 4(3):451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.006 ↗
74. Lauke B (2013) Contribution of matrix yielding energy to the crack resistance of particle reinforced composites. Comput Sci Tech 86:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.07.004 ↗
75. Williams JG (2010) Particle toughening of polymers by plastic void growth. Comput Sci Tech 70(6):885–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.024 ↗
76. Deblieck RAC, van Beek DJM, Remerie K, Ward IM (2011) Failure mechanisms in polyolefines: the role of crazing, shear yielding and the entanglement network. Polymer 52:2979–2990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.05510.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.055 ↗
77. Dasari A, Misra RDK (2004) The role of micrometric wollastonite particles on stress whitening behavior of polypropylene composites. Acta Mat 52(6):1683–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.01310.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.013 ↗
78. Todo M, Park S-D, Takayama T, Arakawa K (2007) Fracture micromechanisms of bioabsorbable PLLA/PCL polymer blends. Eng Fract Mech 74(12):1872–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.021 ↗
79. Chen J-K, Huang Z-P, Zhu J (2007) Size effect of particles on the damage dissipation in nanocomposites. Comput Sci Tech 67(14):2990–2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2007.05.020 ↗
80. Zappalorto M, Salviato M, Quaresimin M (2011) Influence of the interphase zone on the nanoparticle debonding stress. Comput Sci Tech 72(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.09.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2011.09.016 ↗
81. Salviato M, Zappalorto M, Quaresimin M (2013) Plastic shear bands and fracture toughness improvements of nanoparticle filled polymers: a multiscale analytical model. Comput A 48:144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.006 ↗
82. Chauveau J, Rousseau D, Richard P, Chapeau-Blondeau F (2010) Multifractal analysis of three-dimensional histogram from color images. Chaos Solitons Fractals 43:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2010.08.00310.1016/j.chaos.2010.08.003 ↗
83. Feng J, Wang E, Huang Q, Ding H, Ma Y (2020) Study on the coal fractography under dynamic impact loading based on multifractal method. Fractals 28(1):2050006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X2050006110.1142/S0218348X20500061 ↗