journal article·2021-03

Maintenance of superhydrophobic concrete for high compressive strength

Shenzhuang Ren, Yang Chen, Kun Xu, Jiyu Liu, Jing Sun, Danyang Zhao, Siying Ling, Jinlong Song, Shungang Hua

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Concrete is often used in building, bridges, dams, roads and other infrastructures. However, the porosities and natural hydrophilicity of concrete often induce the damage of the concrete architecture or other disasters. Endowing the concrete with superhydrophobicity can effectively improve the antifreeze–thaw, anti-corrosion and anti-icing properties and expand the application prospect of concrete in the modern construction industry. Despite all this, the compressive strength of superhydrophobic concrete is not high enough, limiting its application. Here, we maintained superhydrophobic concrete for 28 days and improved the compressive strength for 3.5 times from 10 MPa to 34.48 MPa. The main mechanism is that calcium silicate hydrate structures grow with the increase in maintenance time and make the inside microstructures connected more closely. In addition, XPS spectra were also collected to investigate the chemical compositions of the superhydrophobic concrete. A series of tests were carried out on superhydrophobic concrete and indicated that the superhydrophobic concrete after maintenance had high surface robustness, anti-corrosion property and high anti-icing and deicing capacity, showing the application value.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Smart Materials for Construction · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Picker A, Nicoleau L, Burghard Z, Bill J, Zlotnikov I, Labbez C, Nonat A, Colfen H (2017) Mesocrystalline calcium silicate hydrate: a bioinspired route toward elastic concrete materials. Science Advances 3(11):6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.170121610.1126/sciadv.1701216 ↗
2. Frýbort A, Všianský D, Štulířová J, Stryk J, Gregerová M (2018) Variations in the composition and relations between alkali-silica gels and calcium silicate hydrates in highway concrete. Mater Charact 137:91–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.01210.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.012 ↗
3. Li WT, Pour-Ghaz M, Castro J, Weiss J (2012) Water Absorption and critical degree of saturation relating to freeze-thaw damage in concrete pavement joints. J Mater Civ Eng 24(3):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000038310.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000383 ↗
4. Zhang J (2012) Chloride erosion on calcium silicate hydrate gel in concrete. Appl Mech Mat 174–177:421–424. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.42110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.421 ↗
5. Zhu Y-G, Kou S-C, Poon C-S, Dai J-G, Li Q-Y (2013) Influence of silane-based water repellent on the durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement Concr Compos 35(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.008 ↗
6. Saravanan K, Sathiyanarayanan S, Muralidharan S, Azim SS, Venkatachari G (2007) Performance evaluation of polyaniline pigmented epoxy coating for corrosion protection of steel in concrete environment. Prog Org Coat 59(2):160–16710.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.03.002 ↗
7. Almusallam AA, Khan FM, Dulaijan SU, Al-Amoudi OSB (2003) Effectiveness of surface coatings in improving concrete durability. Cement Concr Compos 25(4):473–48110.1016/S0958-9465(02)00087-2 ↗
8. Wang L, Quan H, Li Q (2019) Effect of solid waste-petroleum coke residue on the hydration reaction and property of concrete. Mat (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1208121610.3390/ma12081216 ↗
9. Flores-Vivian I, Hejazi V, Kozhukhova MI, Nosonovsky M, Sobolev K (2013) Self-assembling particle-siloxane coatings for superhydrophobic concrete. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(24):13284–13294. https://doi.org/10.1021/am404272v10.1021/am404272v ↗
10. Wang D, Sun Q, Hokkanen MJ, Zhang C, Lin FY, Liu Q, Zhu SP, Zhou T, Chang Q, He B, Zhou Q, Chen L, Wang Z, Ras RHA, Deng X (2020) Design of robust superhydrophobic surfaces. Nature 582(7810):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2331-810.1038/s41586-020-2331-8 ↗
11. Golovin K, Dhyani A, Thouless MD, Tuteja A (2019) Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav126610.1126/science.aav1266 ↗
12. Wang L, Gong Q, Zhan S, Jiang L, Zheng Y (2016) Robust anti-icing performance of a flexible superhydrophobic surface. Adv Mater 28(35):7729–7735. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160248010.1002/adma.201602480 ↗
13. Yang X, Song J, Liu J, Liu X, Jin Z (2017) A Twice Electrochemical-etching method to fabricate superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic patterns for biomimetic fog harvest. Sci Rep 7(1):8816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09108-110.1038/s41598-017-09108-1 ↗
14. Xiao M, Guo X, Cheng M, Ju G, Zhang Y, Shi F (2014) pH-responsive on-off motion of a superhydrophobic boat: towards the design of a minirobot. Small 10(5):859–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20130213210.1002/smll.201302132 ↗
15. Jiang CG, Xin SC, Wu CW (2011) Drag reduction of a miniature boat with superhydrophobic grille bottom. AIP Adv 1(3):032148. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.363368610.1063/1.3633686 ↗
16. Song J, Huang S, Hu K, Lu Y, Liu X, Xu W (2013) Fabrication of superoleophobic surfaces on Al substrates. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 1(46):14783. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13807k10.1039/c3ta13807k ↗
17. Song J, Xu W, Liu X, Lu Y, Wei Z, Wu L (2012) Ultrafast fabrication of rough structures required by superhydrophobic surfaces on Al substrates using an immersion method. Chem Eng J 211–212:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.09410.1016/j.cej.2012.09.094 ↗
18. Qing Y, Shi S, Lv C, Zheng Q (2020) Microskeleton-Nanofiller composite with mechanical super-robust superhydrophobicity against abrasion and impact. Adv Func Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20191066510.1002/adfm.201910665 ↗
19. Masoud Emarati S, Mozammel M (2020) Theoretical, fundamental and experimental study of liquid-repellency and corrosion resistance of fabricated superamphiphobic surface on Al alloy 2024. Chem Eng J 387:124046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12404610.1016/j.cej.2020.124046 ↗
20. Lian Z, Xu J, Yu Z, Yu P, Ren W, Wang Z, Yu H (2020) Bioinspired reversible switch between underwater superoleophobicity/superaerophobicity and oleophilicity/aerophilicity and improved antireflective property on the nanosecond laser-ablated superhydrophobic titanium surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12(5):6573–6580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1763910.1021/acsami.9b17639 ↗
21. Trdan U, Hočevar M, Gregorčič P (2017) Transition from superhydrophilic to superhydrophobic state of laser textured stainless steel surface and its effect on corrosion resistance. Corros Sci 123:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.04.00510.1016/j.corsci.2017.04.005 ↗
22. Zhang Q, Jin B, Wang B, Fu Y, Zhan X, Chen F (2017) Fabrication of a highly stable superhydrophobic surface with dual-scale structure and its antifrosting properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(10):2754–2763. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0465010.1021/acs.iecr.6b04650 ↗
23. Xiang T, Han Y, Guo Z, Wang R, Zheng S, Li S, Li C, Dai X (2018) Fabrication of inherent anticorrosion superhydrophobic surfaces on metals. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 6(4):5598–5606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0063910.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00639 ↗
24. Zhong Y, Hu J, Zhang Y, Tang S (2018) The one-step electroposition of superhydrophobic surface on AZ31 magnesium alloy and its time-dependence corrosion resistance in NaCl solution. Appl Surf Sci 427:1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.10310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.103 ↗
25. Zhang Y, Yin M-J, Ouyang X, Zhang AP, Tam H-Y (2020) 3D μ-printing of polytetrafluoroethylene microstructures: a route to superhydrophobic surfaces and devices. Appl Mat Today 19:100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10058010.1016/j.apmt.2020.100580 ↗
26. Khandavalli S, Rogers P, Rothstein JP (2018) Roll-to-roll fabrication of hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 113(4):041601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.503794610.1063/1.5037946 ↗
27. Song J, Zhao D, Han Z, Xu W, Lu Y, Liu X, Liu B, Carmalt CJ, Deng X, Parkin IP (2017) Super-robust superhydrophobic concrete. J Mat Chem A 5(28):14542–14550. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta03526h10.1039/c7ta03526h ↗
28. Song J, Li Y, Xu W, Liu H, Lu Y (2019) Inexpensive and non-fluorinated superhydrophobic concrete coating for anti-icing and anti-corrosion. J Colloid Interface Sci 541:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.01410.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.014 ↗
29. Wan H, Zhang Y (2020) Interfacial bonding between graphene oxide and calcium silicate hydrate gel of ultra-high performance concrete. Mat Struct. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01467-y10.1617/s11527-020-01467-y ↗
30. Brau M, Ma-Hock L, Hesse C, Nicoleau L, Strauss V, Treumann S, Wiench K, Landsiedel R, Wohlleben W (2012) Nanostructured calcium silicate hydrate seeds accelerate concrete hardening: a combined assessment of benefits and risks. Arch Toxicol 86(7):1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0839-x10.1007/s00204-012-0839-x ↗