Understanding the effect of bimodal microstructure on the strength–ductility synergy of Al–CNT nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
The research work presents a novel methodology to fabricate Al–CNT nanocomposites possessing excellent amalgamation of strength and ductility. A unique combination of processing techniques comprising of ball milling and spark plasma sintering was utilized for consolidating the samples. High-energy ball milling of as-received Al powder and subsequent addition of CNT into the milled Al powder led to a substantial enhancement in the mechanical properties of the resultant composites. Al compact comprising of as-received microcrystalline powder displayed a tensile strength of 105 MPa, which increased to 161 MPa for Al compact with ball-milled nanocrystalline powder. The respective values of ductility reduced from 41.9 to 6.6%. Adding 0.5 wt% CNT in the later compact led to a further upsurge in the tensile strength to 217 MPa; however, the nanocomposite exhibited a further reduction in the ductility to 4.7%. To address this problem, bimodal microstructure was introduced in Al–CNT nanocomposites by using a mixture of nanocrystalline and microcrystalline Al powders (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 wt%) as the matrix. Al–CNT nanocomposite containing 30 wt% microcrystalline Al powder exhibited a remarkably improved strength–ductility synergy showing 149% higher yield strength and 78% higher tensile strength than the Al compact with microcrystalline grained matrix and 130% higher elongation than the Al–CNT nanocomposite with nanocrystalline grained matrix. Furthermore, to assess the effectiveness of bimodality and CNT reinforcement, experimentally determined value of yield strength of Al30M70N–CNT was assessed with respect to the theoretically calculated value. It was found that the experimentally obtained yield strength of the nanocomposite was about 94% closer to the predicted value endorsing the effectiveness of the designed fabrication route.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Ma E, Zhu T (2017) Towards strength–ductility synergy through the design of heterogeneous nanostructures in metals. Mater Today 20:323–33110.1016/j.mattod.2017.02.003 ↗
2. Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit AR (2020) Carbon nanotube- and graphene-reinforced multiphase polymeric composites: review on their properties and applications. J Mater Sci 55:2682–2724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04196-y10.1007/s10853-019-04196-y ↗
3. Manrique PH, Yan S, Lin F, Hong Q, Kinloch IA, Chen X, Young RJ, Zhnag X, Dai S (2017) Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of aluminium matrix composites reinforced with graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci 52:13466–13477https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1450-610.1007/s10853-017-1450-6 ↗
4. Liu Y, Zhou J, Hui D (2012) A strain-gradient plasticity theory of bimodal nanocrystalline materials with composite structure. Compos Part B Eng 43:6594–6607
5. Banerjee A, Hossain R, Pahlevani F, Zhu Q, Sahajwalla V, Prusty BG (2019) Strain-rate-dependent deformation behaviour of high-carbon steel in compression: mechanical and structural characterisation. J Mater Sci 54:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03301-x10.1007/s10853-018-03301-x ↗
6. Zha M, Zhang HM, Yu ZY, Zhang XH, Meng XT, Wang HY, Jiang QC (2018) Bimodal microstructure: a feasible strategy for high-strength and ductile metallic materials. J Mater Sci Technol 34:257–26410.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.018 ↗
7. Estrin Y, Vinogradov A (2013) Extreme grain refinement by severe plastic deformation: a wealth of challenging science. Acta Mater 61:782–81710.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
8. Miyamoto H, Ota K, Mimaki T (2006) Viscous nature of deformation of ultra-fine grain aluminum processed by equal-channel angular pressing. Scr Mater 54:1721–172510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.016 ↗
9. Torre FD, Spätig P, Schäublin R, Victoria M (2005) Deformation behaviour and microstructure of nanocrystalline electrodeposited and high pressure torsioned nickel. Acta Mater 53:2337–234910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.041 ↗
10. Dalla Torre F, Van Swygenhoven H, Victoria M (2002) Nanocrystalline electrodeposited Ni: Microstructure and tensile properties. Acta Mater 50:3957–397010.1016/S1359-6454(02)00198-2 ↗
11. Cheng S, Zhao YH, Zhu YT, Ma E (2007) Optimizing the strength and ductility of fine structured 2024 Al alloy by nano-precipitation. Acta Mater 55:5822–583210.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.043 ↗
12. Abdollahi A, Alizadeh A, Baharvandi HR (2014) Comparative studies on the microstructure and mechanical properties of bimodal and trimodal Al2024 based composites. Mater Sci Eng A 608:139–14810.1016/j.msea.2014.04.051 ↗
13. Jin H, Lloyd DJ (2004) The tensile response of a fine-grained AA5754 alloy produced by asymmetric rolling and annealing. Metall Mater Trans A 35:997–100610.1007/s11661-004-1003-x ↗
14. Zha M, Li Y, Mathiesen RH, Bjørge R, Roven HJ (2015) Microstructure evolution and mechanical behavior of a binary Al-7Mg alloy processed by equal-channel angular pressing. Acta Mater 84:42–5410.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.025 ↗
15. Sitarama Raju K, Subramanya Sarma V, Kauffmann A, Hegedus Z, Gubicza J, Peterlechner M, Freudenberger J, Wilde G (2013) High strength and ductile ultrafine-grained Cu-Ag alloy through bimodal grain size, dislocation density and solute distribution. Acta Mater 61:228–23810.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.053 ↗
16. Li Y, Zhao YH, Ortalan V, Liu W, Zhang ZH, Vogt RG, Browning ND, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2009) Investigation of aluminum-based nanocomposites with ultra-high strength. Mater Sci Eng A 527:305–31610.1016/j.msea.2009.07.067 ↗
17. Lee Z, Witkin DB, Radmilovic V, Lavernia EJ, Nutt SR (2005) Bimodal microstructure and deformation of cryomilled bulk nanocrystalline Al-7.5Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:462–46710.1016/j.msea.2005.08.104 ↗
18. Cavaliere P, Sadeghi B, Shabani A (2017) Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by spark plasma sintering. J Mater Sci 52:8618–8629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1086-610.1007/s10853-017-1086-6 ↗
19. Long Y, Wang T, Zhang HY, Huang XL (2014) Enhanced ductility in a bimodal ultrafine-grained Ti–6Al–4V alloy fabricated by high energy ball milling and spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 608:82–8910.1016/j.msea.2014.04.057 ↗
20. Babu NK, Kallip K, Leparoux M, AlOgab KA, Maeder X, Dasilva YAR (2016) Influence of microstructure and strengthening mechanism of AlMg5-Al2O3 nanocomposites prepared via spark plasma sintering. Mater Des 95:534–54410.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.138 ↗
21. Arpón R, Molina JM, Saravanan RA, García-Cordovilla C, Louis E, Narciso J (2003) Thermal expansion behaviour of aluminium/SiC composites with bimodal particle distributions. Acta Mater 51:3145–315610.1016/S1359-6454(03)00126-5 ↗
22. Tjong SC (2013) Recent progress in the development and properties of novel metal matrix nanocomposites reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanosheets. Mater Sci Eng R Reports 74:281–35010.1016/j.mser.2013.08.001 ↗
23. Morsi K, Esawi A (2007) Effect of mechanical alloying time and carbon nanotube (CNT) content on the evolution of aluminum (Al)–CNT composite powders. J Mater Sci 42:4954–4959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0699-y10.1007/s10853-006-0699-y ↗
24. Khan M, Rehman A, Aziz T, Sahzad M, Naveed K, Subhani T (2018) Effect of inter-cavity spacing in friction stir processed Al 5083 composites containing carbon nanotubes and boron carbide particles. J Mater Process Technol 253:72–8510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.11.002 ↗
25. Ujah CO, Popoola API, Popoola OM, Aigbodion VS (2019) Enhanced tribology, thermal and electrical properties of Al–CNT composite processed via spark plasma sintering for transmission conductor. J Mater Sci Technol 54:14064–14073
26. Singh LK, Bhadauria A, Oraon A, Laha T (2019) Spark plasma sintered Al-0.5wt% MWCNT nanocomposite: effect of sintering pressure on the densification behavior and multi-scale mechanical properties. Diam Relat Mater 91:144–15510.1016/j.diamond.2018.11.021 ↗
27. Singh LK, Bhadauria A, Jana S, Laha T (2018) Effect of sintering temperature and heating rate on crystallite size, densification behaviour and mechanical properties of Al-MWCNT nanocomposite consolidated via spark plasma sintering. Acta Metall Sin (English Lett) 31:1019–103010.1007/s40195-018-0795-4 ↗
28. Bhadauria A, Singh LK, Laha T (2018) Effect of physio-chemically functionalized graphene nanoplatelet reinforcement on tensile properties of aluminum nanocomposite synthesized via spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd 748:783–79310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.186 ↗
29. Singh LK, Bhadauria A, Laha T (2019) Al-MWCNT nanocomposite synthesized via spark plasma sintering: Effect of powder milling and reinforcement addition on sintering kinetics and mechanical properties. J Mater Res Technol 8:503–51210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.03.005 ↗
30. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation. J Mater Res 7:1564–158310.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
31. Pérez-Bustamante R, Pérez-Bustamante F, Estrada-Guel I, Santillán-Rodríguez CR, Matutes-Aquino JA, Herrera-Ramírez JM, Yoshida MM, Sanchez RM (2011) Characterization of Al2024–CNTs composites produced by mechanical alloying. Powder Technol 212:390–39610.1016/j.powtec.2011.06.007 ↗
32. Yu CY, Kao PW, Chang CP (2005) Transition of tensile deformation behaviors in ultrafine-grained aluminum. Acta Mater 53:4019–402810.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.005 ↗
33. Ye J, Han BQ, Lee Z, Ahn B, Nutt SR, Schoenung JM (2005) A tri-modal aluminum based composite with super-high strength. Scr Mater 53:481–48610.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.05.004 ↗
34. Hayes RW, Witkin D, Zhou F, Lavernia EJ (2004) Deformation and activation volumes of cryomilled ultrafine-grained aluminum. Acta Mater 52:4259–427110.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.042 ↗
35. Ci L, Ryu Z, Jin-Phillipp NY, Rühle M (2006) Investigation of the interfacial reaction between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and aluminum. Acta Mater 54:5367–537510.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.031 ↗
36. Guo B, Song M, Yi J, Ni S, Shen T, Du Y (2017) Improving the mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced pure aluminum matrix composites by achieving non-equilibrium interface. Mater Des 120:56–6510.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.096 ↗
37. Stein J, Lenczowski B, Fréty N, Anglaret E (2012) Mechanical reinforcement of a high-performance aluminium alloy AA5083 with homogeneously dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 50:2264–227210.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.044 ↗
38. Chen B, Jia L, Li S, Imai H, Takahashi M, Kondoh K (2014) In situ synthesized Al4C3 nanorods with excellent strengthening effect in aluminum matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater 16:972–97510.1002/adem.201400232 ↗
39. Pérez-Bustamante R, Bolaños-Morales D, Bonilla-Martínez J, Estrada-Guel I, Martínez-Sánchez R (2015) Microstructural and hardness behavior of graphene-nanoplatelets/aluminum composites synthesized by mechanical alloying. J Alloys Compd 615:S578–S58210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.225 ↗
40. Bartolucci SF, Paras J, Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Lee S, Kapoor D, Koratkar N (2011) Graphene-aluminum nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 528:7933–793710.1016/j.msea.2011.07.043 ↗
41. Hart EW (1967) Theory Of the tensile test. Acta Metall 15:351–35510.1016/0001-6160(67)90211-8 ↗
42. Rongtao Z, Xian W, Chaoyong L, Bintao H, Yanfeng L, Xinxi Z (2018) Strain-rate dependence of mechanical behavior and deformation mechanisms in bimodal nanostructured Ni under micro-scratch testing. Mech Mater 121:21–3010.1016/j.mechmat.2018.03.005 ↗
43. He JH, Jin L, Wang FH, Dong S, Dong J (2017) Mechanical properties of Mg-8Gd-3Y-0.5Zr alloy with bimodal grain size distributions. J Magn Alloys 5:423–429
44. Yang H, Topping TD, Wehage K, Jiang L, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2014) Tensile behavior and strengthening mechanisms in a submicron B4C-reinforced Al trimodal composite. Mater Sci Eng A 616:35–4310.1016/j.msea.2014.07.079 ↗
45. Shin SE, Choi HJ, Shin JH, Bae DH (2015) Strengthening behavior of few-layered graphene/aluminum composites. Carbon N Y 82:143–15110.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.044 ↗
46. Zhong R, Cong H, Hou P (2003) Fabrication of nano-Al based composites reinforced by single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 41:848–85110.1016/S0008-6223(02)00427-X ↗
47. Singh LK, Bhadauria A, Laha T (2019) Comparing the strengthening efficiency of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets in aluminum matrix. Powder Technol 356:1059–107610.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.026 ↗
48. Akbarpour MR, Pouresmaeil A (2018) The influence of CNTs on the microstructure and strength of Al–CNT composites produced by flake powder metallurgy and hot pressing method. Diam Relat Mater 88:6–1110.1016/j.diamond.2018.06.021 ↗
49. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–12710.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
50. Harris PJ (1999) Carbon nanotubes and related structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511605819 ↗
51. Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T (2000) Load transfer and deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube-polystyrene composites. Appl Phys Lett 76:2868–287010.1063/1.126500 ↗