journal article·2016-03

Biological evaluation of ultra-fine titanium with improved mechanical strength for dental implant engineering

Lucie Ostrovska, Lucie Vistejnova, Jan Dzugan, Peter Slama, Tomas Kubina, Egor Ukraintsev, Dana Kubies, Milena Kralickova, Marie Hubalek Kalbacova

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Titanium, the gold standard for dental implant materials, is distinguished by its exceptional biocompatibility; however, from a long-term perspective, titanium still lacks sufficient loading strength. Commercially pure titanium with grain size 30 μm was processed by equal channel angular pressing, and two novel mechanically improved types of titanium material with grain size 4.6 and ≤1 µm were obtained. The surfaces of these ultra-fine grained titanium samples were further mechanically treated by grinding and polishing, and their surfaces were characterized by atomic force microscopy and contact angle measurement. Osteoblast-like cells and human mesenchymal stem cells were used to evaluate the cytocompatibility of these titanium samples. The cell metabolic activity, cell number, cell area, morphology, and cell adhesion quality during the early stage (2 h) and prolonged cultivation (48 h) were determined. Both cell types displayed increased initial attachment to all tested titanium materials in comparison to reference tissue culture plastic. Importantly, results revealed that the novel titanium materials with improved strength were equivalent to the original commercially pure titanium, thus confirming their suitability for osteoblast and mesenchymal stem cell growth and proliferation. The present study proved the cytocompatibility of the novel forms of titanium with superior mechanical properties and revealed their potential for manufacturing of long-term dental implants.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Cordova LA, Stresing V, Gobin B, Rosset P, Passuti N, Gouin F et al (2014) Orthopaedic implant failure: aseptic implant loosening—the contribution and future challenges of mouse models in translational research. Clin Sci (Lond) 127:277–29310.1042/CS20130338 ↗
2. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2014) Immediate nonfunctional versus immediate functional loading and dental implant failure rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 42:1052–105910.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.010 ↗
3. Ren K, Dusad A, Zhang Y, Purdue PE, Fehringer EV, Garvin KL et al (2014) Early diagnosis of orthopedic implant failure using macromolecular imaging agents. Pharm Res 31:2086–209410.1007/s11095-014-1310-x ↗
4. Gawkrodger DJ (2003) Metal sensitivities and orthopaedic implants revisited: the potential for metal allergy with the new metal-on-metal joint prostheses. Br J Dermatol 148:1089–109310.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05404.x ↗
5. Plecko M, Sievert C, Andermatt D, Frigg R, Kronen P, Klein K et al (2012) Osseointegration and biocompatibility of different metal implants–a comparative experimental investigation in sheep. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:3210.1186/1471-2474-13-32 ↗
6. Browne M, Gregson PJ (2000) Effect of mechanical surface pretreatment on metal ion release. Biomaterials 21:385–39210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00200-8 ↗
7. Mishnaevsky L, Levashov E, Valiev RZ, Segurado J, Sabirov I, Enikeev N et al (2014) Nanostructured titanium-based materials for medical implants: modeling and development. Mater Sci Eng R 81:1–1910.1016/j.mser.2014.04.002 ↗
8. Greger M, Cerny M, Kander L, Kliber J (2009) Structure and properties of titanium for dental implants. Metalurgija 48:249–252
9. Niinomi M (2002) Recent metallic materials for biomedical applications. Metall Mater Trans A 33:477–48610.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 ↗
10. Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Caicedo M, Brasher A, Mikecz K, Jacobs JJ (2005) Effects of soluble metals on human peri-implant cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 74:124–14010.1002/jbm.a.30345 ↗
11. Greger M, Kander L, Masek V, Vlcek M (2010) Ultra fine grain titanium using for medical applications—structure and properties. In: Nanocon 2010, 2nd international conference, pp 502–507
12. Yu ZT, Zhang MH, Tian YX, Cheng J, Ma XQ, Liu HY et al (2014) Designation and development of biomedical Ti alloys with finer biomechanical compatibility in long-term surgical implants. Front Mater Sci 8:219–22910.1007/s11706-014-0254-8 ↗
13. Schram SE, Warshaw EM, Laumann A (2010) Nickel hypersensitivity: a clinical review and call to action. Int J Dermatol 49:115–12510.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04307.x ↗
14. Valiev RZ, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT (2006) Producing bulk ultrafine-grained materials by severe plastic deformation. JOM 58:33–3910.1007/s11837-006-0213-7 ↗
15. Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Principles of equal-channel angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement. Prog Mater Sci 51:881–98110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.003 ↗
16. Kubina T, Dlouhy J, Kover M, Domankova M, Hodek J (2015) Preparation and thermal stability of ultra-fine and nano-grained commercially pure titanium wires using conform equipment. Mater Tehnol 49:213–21710.17222/mit.2013.226 ↗
17. Kubina T, Dlouhy J, Kover M, Hodek J (2014) Study of thermal stability of ultra fine-grained commercially pure titanium wire prepared in conform equipment. Metallography Xv 782:415–420
18. Estrin Y, Ivanova EP, Michalska A, Truong VK, Lapovok R, Boyd R (2011) Accelerated stem cell attachment to ultrafine grained titanium. Acta Biomater 7:900–90610.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.033 ↗
19. Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, Cai Y, Berner S, Tannenbaum R et al (2011) The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 32:3395–340310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 ↗
20. Teng FY, Ko CL, Kuo HN, Hu JJ, Lin JH, Lou CW et al (2012) A comparison of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts in dental implant titanium topographies. Bioinorg Chem Appl 2012:687–792
21. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y (2007) Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 23:844–85410.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025 ↗
22. Weber HP, Cochran DL (1998) The soft tissue response to osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 79:79–8910.1016/S0022-3913(98)70198-2 ↗
23. Rezek B, Ukraintsev E, Kratka M, Taylor A, Fendrych F, Mandys V (2014) Epithelial cell morphology and adhesion on diamond films deposited and chemically modified by plasma processes. Biointerphases 9:03101210.1116/1.4890471 ↗
24. Pop-Georgievski O, Kubies D, Zemek J, Neykova N, Demianchuk R, Mazl Chanova E et al (2015) Self-assembled anchor layers/polysaccharide coatings on titanium surfaces: a study of functionalization and stability. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:617–63110.3762/bjnano.6.63 ↗
25. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–67510.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
26. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, Clarke C, Kang IH, Friman O et al (2006) Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R10010.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 ↗
27. Dyakonov GS, Gu CF, Toth LS, Valiev RZ, Semenova IP (2014) Microstructure and mechanical properties of continuous equal channel angular pressed titanium. In: 6th international conference on nanomaterials by severe plastic deformation (Nanospd6), vol. 6310.1088/1757-899X/63/1/012067 ↗
28. Polyakov AV, Semenova IP, Valiev RZ (2014) High fatigue strength and enhanced biocompatibility of UFG CP Ti for medical innovative applications. In: 6th international conference on nanomaterials by severe plastic deformation (Nanospd6), vol. 6310.1088/1757-899X/63/1/012113 ↗
29. Li HL, Oppenheimer SM, Stupp SI, Dunand DC, Brinson LC (2004) Effects of pore morphology and bone ingrowth on mechanical properties of microporous titanium as an orthopaedic implant material. Mater Trans 45:1124–113110.2320/matertrans.45.1124 ↗
30. Mall S, Cunningham SR (2007) Fatigue behavior of integrally fabricated joints between titanium matrix composite and titanium alloy. Compos Struct 80:65–7210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.032 ↗
31. Zhao XC, Fu WJ, Yang XR, Langdon TG (2008) Microstructure and properties of pure titanium processed by equal-channel angular pressing at room temperature. Scr Mater 59:542–54510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.001 ↗
32. Broz A, Baresova V, Kromka A, Rezek B, Kalbacova M (2009) Strong influence of hierarchically structured diamond nanotopography on adhesion of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal cells. Phys Status Solidi A 206:2038–204110.1002/pssa.200982203 ↗
33. Chen XY, Cai KY, Lai M, Zhao L, Tang LL (2012) Mesenchymal stem cells differentiation on hierarchically micro/nano-structured titanium substrates. Adv Eng Mater 14:B216–B22310.1002/adem.201180073 ↗
34. Naddeo P, Laino L, La Noce M, Piattelli A, De Rosa A, Iezzi G et al (2015) Surface biocompatibility of differently textured titanium implants with mesenchymal stem cells. Dent Mater 31:235–24310.1016/j.dental.2014.12.015 ↗
35. Elias CN, Fernandes DJ, Resende CRS, Roestel J (2015) Mechanical properties, surface morphology and stability of a modified commercially pure high strength titanium alloy for dental implants. Dent Mater 31:E1–E1310.1016/j.dental.2014.10.002 ↗
36. Garbassi F, Mora M, Ochiello E (1994) Polymer surfaces: from physics to technology, 1st edn. Wiley, New York
37. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N, Comte V, Lagneau C, Lissac M et al (2003) Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mater Sci Eng C 23:551–56010.1016/S0928-4931(03)00033-X ↗
38. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA (1998) Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 41:422–43010.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<422::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
39. Flahaut E, Durrieu MC, Remy-Zolghadri M, Bareille R, Baquey C (2006) Investigation of the cytotoxicity of CCVD carbon nanotubes towards human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Carbon 44:1093–109910.1016/j.carbon.2005.11.007 ↗
40. Zhao LZ, Mei SL, Chu PK, Zhang YM, Wu ZF (2010) The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 31:5072–508210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.014 ↗
41. Kubo K, Tsukimura N, Iwasa F, Ueno T, Saruwatari L, Aita H et al (2009) Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 30:5319–532910.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.021 ↗
42. Klein MO, Bijelic A, Toyoshima T, Gotz H, von Koppenfels RL, Al-Nawas B et al (2010) Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron-scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Clin Oral Implant Res 21:642–64910.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01883.x ↗
43. Guida L, Oliva A, Basile MA, Giordano M, Nastri L, Annunziata M (2013) Human gingival fibroblast functions are stimulated by oxidized nano-structured titanium surfaces. J Dent 41:900–90710.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.009 ↗
44. Maghni K, Nicolescu OM, Martin JG (1999) Suitability of cell metabolic colorimetric assays for assessment of CD4+ T cell proliferation: comparison to 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) ELISA. J Immunol Methods 223:185–19410.1016/S0022-1759(98)00220-8 ↗
45. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J et al (2004) Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials 25:2695–271110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.111 ↗