Mechanical performance and cellulose microfibrils in wood with high S2 microfibril angles
Source abstract
Abstract
Corewood and compression wood, both with high S2 microfibril angles, are the worst parts of the tree most in need of improvement in wood quality. This study focuses on the characteristics of cellulosic reinforcement in wood with high S2 microfibril angles lying between 35° and 60°, as well as the probable influence of these characteristics on wood longitudinal mechanical properties. Stiffness and tensile strength were measured on 221 thin radiata pine wood strips. The results indicate that at high angles, the average values of wood stiffness and tensile strength are low with relatively large variations. The variations of stiffness and strength are weakly correlated with the variation of S2 microfibril angles, regardless of wood type. Further study involved examining the characteristics of cellulose microfibrils within the S2 layer using dual axis electron tomography for samples with the same microfibril angle but differing mechanical performance. From the fact that the severe compression wood possessed fewer cellulose microfibrils and had abundant dislocations, and that at many kinking points these cellulose microfibrils were broken down into shorter dislocation segments, it was concluded that the characteristics of cellulose microfibril reinforcement are responsible for the inferior stiffness and tensile strength in the severe compression wood compared with normal corewood with the same high S2 microfibril angle.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Mark RE (1967) Cell wall mechanics of tracheids. Yale University Press, New Haven
2. Cave ID (1968) Wood Sci Technol 2:26810.1007/BF00350273 ↗
3. Preston RD (1974) The physical biology of plant walls. Chapman & Hall, London
4. Bergander A, Salmén L (2002) J Mater Sci 37:151. doi: 10.1023/A:101311592567910.1023/A:1013115925679 ↗
5. Salmén L (2004) Comptes Rendus Biol 327:87310.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.010 ↗
6. Harada H, Goto T (1982) In: Brown RM (ed) Cellulose and other natural polymer systems: biogenesis structure and degradation. Plenum Press, New York, p 38310.1007/978-1-4684-1116-4_19 ↗
7. Jakob HF, Fengel D, Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1995) Macromolecules 28:878210.1021/ma00130a010 ↗
8. Xu P, Donaldson LA, Gergely ZR, Staehelin LA (2007) Wood Sci Technol 41(2):10110.1007/s00226-006-0088-3 ↗
9. Meylan BA (1967) For Prod J 17:51
10. Evans R (1999) Appita J 52:283
11. Donaldson LA (2008) IAWA J 29(4):34510.1163/22941932-90000192 ↗
12. Mark RE, Gillis PP (1973) Tappi 56(4):164
13. Cave ID, Walker JCF (1994) For Prod J 44(5):43
14. Evans R, Ilic J (2001) For Prod J 51(3):53
15. Nakada R, Fujisawa Y, Hirakawa Y (2003) Holzforshung 57:55310.1515/HF.2003.082 ↗
16. Tang RC, Hsu NN (1973) Wood Fiber 5(2):139
17. Donaldson LA (1992) NZ J For Sci 22:77
18. Walker J, Nakada R (1999) Int For Rev 1(4):251
19. Donaldson LA, Grace J, Downes GM (2004) IAWA J 25(3):25310.1163/22941932-90000364 ↗
20. Boulder Laboratory for 3-D Electron Microscopy of Cells (2009a) Tomography guide for IMOD version 3.13. http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod . Accessed 28 April 2009
21. Boulder Laboratory for 3-D Electron Microscopy of Cells (2009b) Introduction to 3dmod version 3.13. http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod . Accessed 28 April 2009
22. Köhler L, Spatz HC (2002) Planta 215:3310.1007/s00425-001-0718-9 ↗
23. Keckes J et al (2003) Nat Mater Lett 2:81010.1038/nmat1019 ↗
24. Fratzl P, Burgert I, Keckes J (2004) Z Metallkd 95:57910.3139/146.017991 ↗
25. Altaner CM, Jarvis MC (2008) J Theor Biol 253:43410.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.010 ↗
26. Fromm J, Rockel B, Lautner S, Windeisen E, Wanner G (2003) J Struct Biol 143:7710.1016/S1047-8477(03)00119-9 ↗
27. Marchessault RH, Sundararajan PR (1983) Cellulose. In: Aspinall GO (ed) The polysaccharides, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, p 1110.1016/B978-0-12-065602-8.50007-8 ↗
28. Kerr AJ, Goring DAI (1975) Cellulose Chem Technol 9(6):563
29. Hoffmann P, Parameswaran N (1976) Holzforschung 30:6210.1515/hfsg.1976.30.2.62 ↗
30. Sjöström E (1981) Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications. Academic Press, New York
31. Awano T, Takabe k, Fujita M, Daniel G (2000) Protoplasma 212:7210.1007/BF01279348 ↗
32. Hult E-L, Larsson PT, Iversen T (2001) Polymer 42(8):330910.1016/S0032-3861(00)00774-6 ↗
33. Åkerholm M, Salmén L (2002) J Pulp Paper Sci 28:245
34. Jones RM (1975) Mechanics of composite materials. Scripta Book Company, Washington, DC
35. Goto T, Harada H, Saiki H (1978) Wood Sci Technol 12:22310.1007/BF00372868 ↗
36. Nyholm K, Ander P, Bardage S, Daniel G (2001) Nordic Pulp Paper Res J 16:37610.3183/NPPRJ-2001-16-04-p376-384 ↗
37. Duchesne I, Daniel G (2000) Nordic Pulp Paper Res J 15:5410.3183/NPPRJ-2000-15-01-p054-061 ↗
38. Duchesne I, Hult E-L, Molin U, Daniel G, Iversen T, Lennholm H (2001) Cellulose 8:10310.1023/A:1016645809958 ↗
39. Xu P, Walker JCF (2004) Wood Sci Technol 38:110.1007/s00226-003-0188-2 ↗
40. Xu P, Liu H, Evans R, Donaldson LA (2009) Wood Sci Technol 43:42310.1007/s00226-008-0228-z ↗