journal article·2015-11

Structure-reinforcement correlation and chain dynamics in graphene oxide and Laponite-filled epoxy nanocomposites

Devesh K. Chouhan, Sangram K. Rath, Arvind Kumar, P. S. Alegaonkar, Sanjay Kumar, G. Harikrishnan, T. Umasankar Patro

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

The present work attempts at a relative deduction of correlations between structure-reinforcement and chain dynamics in Laponite- and graphene oxide (GO)-dispersed epoxy nanocomposites. The fillers were reasonably well dispersed in the epoxy matrix as revealed by wide-angle X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering studies. The scattering from the nanocomposites exhibited power-law behaviour at low q region with fractal dimensions, implying presence of platelets and tactoids of varying thicknesses. A comprehensive study on the thermomechanical properties of the nanocomposites was made in terms of tensile, dynamic mechanical analysis and flexural and fracture toughness measurements. The studies revealed simultaneous reinforcement as well as toughening effects in the nanocomposites; ~42 and ~34 % increases in flexural strength and mode I fracture toughness (K IC), respectively, with 0.1 wt% GO; and ~25 and ~20 % enhancements in flexural modulus and K IC with 0.1 and 0.3 wt% Laponite, respectively. A unique phenomenon of bimodal distribution of glass transition temperatures was observed as two overlapped peaks in terms of Gaussian contributions in the tan δ versus temperature profiles of the nanocomposites (from dynamic mechanical analysis) and derivative of reversible heat capacity with respect to temperature, dC p,rev/dT versus temperature profiles (from modulated differential scanning calorimetric measurements); as against a single symmetric profile for the unfilled matrix. We attempt to understand the nanofiller-induced alteration in the primary relaxation mechanisms as well as notable reinforcement and toughening effects by invoking the filler/polymer interactions, filler dispersion and fractographic investigations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng R 28:1–6310.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 ↗
2. Ray SS, Okamoto M (2003) Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 28:1539–164110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
3. Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH (2010) Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 35:1350–137510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
4. Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43:6515–653010.1021/ma100572e ↗
5. Zhu J, Kim J, Peng H, Margrave JL, Khabashesku VN, Barrera EV (2003) Improving the dispersion and integration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in epoxy composites through functionalization. Nano Lett 3:1107–111310.1021/nl0342489 ↗
6. Yang H, Shan C, Li F, Zhang Q, Han D, Niu L (2009) Convenient preparation of tunably loaded chemically converted graphene oxide/epoxy resin nanocomposites from graphene oxide sheets through two-phase extraction. J Mater Chem 19:8856–886010.1039/b915228h ↗
7. Donato RK, Donato KZ, Schrekker HS, Matejka L (2012) Tunable reinforcement of epoxy-silica nanocomposites with ionic liquids. J Mater Chem 22:9939–994810.1039/c2jm30830d ↗
8. Bortz DR, Heras EG, Martin GI (2012) Impressive fatigue life and fracture toughness improvements in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Macromolecules 45:238–24510.1021/ma201563k ↗
9. Fang M, Zhang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Lu H, Yang Y (2010) Constructing hierarchically structured interphases for strong and tough epoxy nanocomposites by amine-rich graphene surfaces. J Mater Chem 20:9635–964310.1039/c0jm01620a ↗
10. Weiping L, Hoa VS, Pugh M (2005) Fracture toughness and water uptake of high-performance epoxy/nanoclay nanocomposites. Comp Sci Technol 65:2364–237310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.007 ↗
11. Lan T, Kaviratna DP, Pinnavaia JT (1995) Mechanism of clay tactoid exfoliation in epoxy-clay nanocomposites. Chem Mater 7:2144–215010.1021/cm00059a023 ↗
12. Park JH, Jana SC (2003) Mechanism of exfoliation of nanoclay particles in epoxy-clay nanocomposites. Macromolecules 36:2758–276810.1021/ma021509c ↗
13. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3:3884–389010.1021/nn9010472 ↗
14. Gojny HF, Wichmann HGM, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2005) Influence of different carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy matrix composites–a comparative study. Comp Sci Technol 65:2300–231310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.021 ↗
15. Yasmin A, Luo JJ, Daniel MI (2006) Processing of expanded graphite reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Comp Sci Technol 66:1182–118910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.014 ↗
16. Tie L, Pinnavaia JT (1994) Clay-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Chem Mater 6:2216–221910.1021/cm00048a006 ↗
17. Lipinska M, Hutchinson MJ (2012) Elastomeric epoxy nanocomposites: nanostructure and properties. Comp Sci Technol 72:640–64610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.012 ↗
18. Wang Z, Thomas JP (1998) Hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites: exfoliation of magadiite nanolayers in an elastomeric epoxy polymer. Chem Mater 10:1820–182610.1021/cm970784o ↗
19. Isil I, Yilmazer U, Bayram G (2003) Impact modified epoxy/montmorillonite nanocomposites: synthesis and characterisation. Polymer 44:6371–637710.1016/S0032-3861(03)00634-7 ↗
20. Zaman I, Le HQ, Kuan CH, Kawashima N, Lee L, Gerson A, Ma J (2011) Interface-tuned epoxy/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 52:497–50410.1016/j.polymer.2010.12.007 ↗
21. Yasmin A, Abot LJ, Daniel MI (2003) Processing of clay/epoxy nanocomposites by shear mixing. Scr Mater 49:81–8610.1016/S1359-6462(03)00173-8 ↗
22. Launey ME, Ritchie RO (2009) On the fracture toughness of advanced materials. Adv Mater 21:2103–211010.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
23. Liu W, Hoa VS, Pugh M (2005) Organoclay-modified high performance epoxy nanocomposites. Comp Sci Technol 65:307–31610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.012 ↗
24. Domun N, Hadavinia H, Zhang T, Sainsbury T, Liaghat GH, Vahid S (2015) Improving the fracture toughness and the strength of epoxy using nanomaterials—a review of the current status. Nanoscale 7:10294–1032910.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
25. Liao YH, Marietta TO, Liang Z, Zhang C, Wang B (2004) Investigation of the dispersion process of SWNTs/SC-15 epoxy resin nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 385:175–18110.1016/S0921-5093(04)00857-3 ↗
26. Tak GK, Sue HJ. Preparation and mechanical properties of epoxy-clay nanocomposites. ACS Spring Meeting, 2000 (San Francisco, USA)
27. McIntyre S, Kaltzakorta I, Liggat JJ, Pethrick RA, Rhoney I (2005) Influence of the epoxy structure on the physical properties of epoxy resin nanocomposites. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:8573–857910.1021/ie048835w ↗
28. Khare KS, Khare R (2013) Effect of carbon nanotube dispersion on glass transition in cross-linked epoxy-carbon nanotube nanocomposites: role of interfacial interactions. J Phys Chem B 117:7444–745410.1021/jp401614p ↗
29. Allaoui A, El Bounia NE (2009) How carbon nanotubes affect the cure kinetics and glass transition temperature of their epoxy composites?–a review. Expr Polym Lett 3:588–59410.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.73 ↗
30. Gonzalez DJ, Gonzalez M, Anson CA, Diez PMA, Gomez AM, Martinez MT (2011) Effect of various aminated single-walled carbon nanotubes on the epoxy cross-linking reactions. J Phys Chem C 115:7238–724810.1021/jp110830y ↗
31. Chakraborty AK, Plyhm T, Barbezat M, Necola A, Terras GP (2011) Carbon nanotube (CNT)–epoxy nanocomposites: a systematic investigation of CNT dispersion. J Nanopart Res 13:6493–650610.1007/s11051-011-0552-3 ↗
32. Wang S, Liang Z, Liu T, Wang B, Zhang C (2006) Effective amino-functionalization of carbon nanotubes for reinforcing epoxy polymer composites. Nanotechnology 17:155110.1088/0957-4484/17/6/003 ↗
33. Wang S, Liang Z, Gonnet P, Liao YH, Wang B, Zhang C (2007) Effect of nanotube functionalization on the coefficient of thermal expansion of nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 17:87–9210.1002/adfm.200600760 ↗
34. Putz WK, Palmeri JM, Cohn BR, Andrews R, Brinson CL (2008) Effect of cross-link density on interphase creation in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 41:6752–675610.1021/ma800830p ↗
35. Sun L, Warren GL, O’Reilly JY, Everett WN, Lee SM, Davis D, Lagoudas D, Sue HJ (2008) Mechanical properties of surface-functionalized SWNT/epoxy composites. Carbon 46:320–32810.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.051 ↗
36. Natarajan B, Li Y, Deng H, Brinson LC, Schadler LS (2013) Effect of interfacial energetics on dispersion and glass transition temperature in polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 46:2833–284110.1021/ma302281b ↗
37. Patro TU, Wagner HD (2011) Layer-by-layer assembled PVA/laponite multilayer free-standing films and their mechanical and thermal properties. Nanotechnology 22:45570610.1088/0957-4484/22/45/455706 ↗
38. Ruggerone R, Plummer JGC, Herrera NN, Lami BE, Manson EJA (2009) Highly filled polystyrene-laponite nanocomposites prepared by emulsion polymerization. Eur Polym J 45:621–62910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.032 ↗
39. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GH, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
40. Hummers JWS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of Graphene Oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80:133910.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
41. Kaya ED (2006) Development of layered silicate/epoxy nanocomposites. PhD Dissertation, Izmir Institute of Technology
42. Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of Graphene Nanocomposites: a Review. Comp Sci Technol 72:1459–147610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
43. Martin JE, Hurd AJ (1987) Scattering from fractals. J Appl Crystallogr 20:61–7810.1107/S0021889887087107 ↗
44. Hurd AJ, Schaefer DW, Smith DM, Ross SB, Le MA, Spooner S (1989) Surface areas of fractally rough particles studied by scattering. Phys Rev B 39:974210.1103/PhysRevB.39.9742 ↗
45. Karlsson C, Best AS, Swenson J, Kohlbrecher J, Borjesson L (2005) A SANS study of 3PEG-LiClO4-TiO2 nanocomposite polymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 38:6666–667110.1021/ma050417v ↗
46. Schaefer DW, Justice RS (2007) How nano are nanocomposites? Macromolecules 40:8501–851710.1021/ma070356w ↗
47. Miller SG, Bauer JL, Maryanski MJ, Heimann PJ, Barlow JP, Gosau JM, Allred RE (2010) Characterization of epoxy functionalized graphite nanoparticles and the physical properties of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Comp Sci Technol 70:1120–112510.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.023 ↗
48. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–38810.1126/science.1157996 ↗
49. Chen B, Evans JRG (2006) Elastic moduli of clay platelets. Scr Mater 54:1581–158510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.018 ↗
50. Auad ML, Nutt SR, Pettarin V, Frontini PM (2007) Synthesis and properties of epoxy-phenolic clay nanocomposites. Exp Polym Lett 1:629–63910.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.86 ↗
51. Rath SK, Aswal VK, Sharma C, Joshi K, Patri M, Harikrishnan G, Khakhar DV (2014) Mechanistic origins of multi-scale reinforcements in segmented polyurethane-clay nanocomposites. Polymer 55:5198–521010.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.035 ↗
52. Sargsyan A, Tonoyan A, Davtyan S, Schick C (2007) The amount of immobilized polymer in PMMA SiO2 nanocomposites determined from calorimetric data. Eur Polym J 43:3113–312710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.011 ↗
53. Kourkoutsaki T, Logakis E, Kroutilova I, Matejka L, Nedbal J, Pissis P (2009) Polymer dynamics in rubbery epoxy networks/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 113:2569–258210.1002/app.30225 ↗
54. Krzeminski M, Molinari M, Troyon M, Coqueret X (2010) Characterization by atomic force microscopy of the nanoheterogeneities produced by the radiation-induced cross-linking polymerization of aromatic diacrylates. Macromolecules 43:8121–812710.1021/ma101615k ↗
55. Krzeminski M, Molinari M, Troyon M, Coqueret X (2010) Calorimetric characterization of the heterogeneities produced by the radiation-induced cross-linking polymerization of aromatic diacrylates. Macromolecules 43:3757–376310.1021/ma902817g ↗
56. Kong X, Narine SS (2008) Physical Properties of Sequential Interpenetrating Polymer Networks Produced from Canola Oil-Based Polyurethane and Poly(methyl methacrylate). Biomacromolecules 9:1424–143310.1021/bm8001478 ↗
57. Rath SK, Chavan JG, Sasane S, Srivastava A, Patri M, Samui AB, Chakraborty BC, Sawant SN (2009) Coatings of PDMS-modified epoxy via urethane linkage: segmental correlation length, phase morphology, thermomechanical and surface behaviour. Prog Org Coat 65:366–37410.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.02.007 ↗
58. Patil PN, Rath SK, Sharma SK, Sudarshan K, Maheshwari P, Patri M, Praveen S, Khandelwal P, Pujari PK (2013) Free volumes and structural relaxations in diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A based epoxy–polyether amine networks. Soft Matter 9:3589–359910.1039/c3sm27525f ↗
59. Jin J, Song M, Yao KJ (2006) A MTDSC analysis of phase transition in polyurethane–organoclay nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 447:202–20810.1016/j.tca.2006.06.014 ↗
60. Rath SK, Patri M, Khakhar DV (2012) Structure–thermomechanical property correlation of moisture cured poly(urethane-urea)/clay nanocomposite coatings. Prog Org Coat 75:264–27310.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.05.011 ↗
61. Zaman I, Phan TT, Kuan HC, Meng Q, La LTB, Luong L, Youssf O, Ma J (2011) Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength. Polymer 52:1603–161110.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.003 ↗
62. Qiu J, Wang S (2010) Enhancing polymer performance through graphene sheets. J Appl Polym Sci 119:3670–367410.1002/app.33068 ↗