journal article·2022-05

Biomimicking of phyto-based super-hydrophobic surfaces towards prospective applications: a review

Darsana Deo, Shivendra Pratap Singh, Sheetikanta Mohanty, Shrabani Guhathakurata, Dipankar Pal, Sandipan Mallik

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The self-cleaning mechanism attribute of organic surfaces is grabbing much attention in most of the commercially available commodities. Among organic surfaces, investigations on hydrophobic surfaces are much insightful and intriguing. The self-cleaning phenomena of hydrophobic surfaces are also known as the lotus effect. The effect uses the right combination of roughness and surface chemistry, which makes high contact angle of water droplets on a surface, making the quick roll-off of the water droplet from the surface, also picking up the dirt on its way. Thus, the plant leaves surface wetness has many ecological and physiological consequences, and its extent and duration can be affected by the leaf surface containing morphological structure, which contributes to the ecosystem interception rates. In this review, we have described the causes and behaviour of phyto-based hydrophobic surfaces. Furthermore, the applications of various phyto-based hydrophobic surfaces, either by implementing directly or by mimicking micro-/nanostructures of the surfaces, have been illustrated. Lastly, the methods for fabricating the artificial super-hydrophobic surface by mimicking the phyto-based natural hydrophobic surfaces, precisely by following the top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches, have been explained. This article could benefit scientists and researchers currently working on phyto-based super-hydrophobicity fields.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Bhushan B, Jung YC (2006) Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces. Nanotechnology 17:2758–2772. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/11/00810.1088/0957-4484/17/11/008 ↗
2. Feng L, Zhang Y, Xi J et al (2008) Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir 24:4114–411910.1021/la703821h ↗
3. Poynor A, Hong L, Robinson IK et al (2006) How water meets a hydrophobic surface. Phys Rev Lett 97:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.26610110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.266101 ↗
4. Wimalasiri VK, Weerathunga HU, Kottegoda N, Karunaratne V (2017) Silica Based Superhydrophobic Nanocoatings for Natural Rubber Surfaces. J Nanomater 2017:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/210246710.1155/2017/2102467 ↗
5. Manoharan K, Bhattacharya S (2019) Superhydrophobic surfaces review: functional application, fabrication techniques and limitations. J Micromanufacturing 2:59–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/251659841983634510.1177/2516598419836345 ↗
6. Parvate S, Dixit P, Chattopadhyay S (2020) Superhydrophobic surfaces: insights from theory and experiment. J Phys Chem B 124:1323–1360. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b0856710.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08567 ↗
7. Park S, Kim J, Park CH (2015) Superhydrophobic textiles: review of theoretical definitions, fabrication and functional evaluation. J Eng Fiber Fabr 10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589250150100040110.1177/155892501501000401 ↗
8. Jiaqiang E, Jin Y, Deng Y et al (2018) Wetting models and working mechanisms of typical surfaces existing in nature and their application on superhydrophobic surfaces: a review. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20170105210.1002/admi.201701052 ↗
9. Sedai BR, Khatiwada BK, Mortazavian H, Blum FD (2016) Development of superhydrophobicity in silane treated diatomaceous earth and coatings. Appl Surf Sci 386:178–18610.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.009 ↗
10. Yoshimitsu Z, Nakajima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K (2002) Effects of surface structure on the hydrophobicity and sliding behavior of water droplets. Langmuir 18:5818–5822. https://doi.org/10.1021/la020088p10.1021/la020088p ↗
11. Kijlstra J, Reihs K, Klamt A (2002) Roughness and topology of ultra-hydrophobic surfaces. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00089-410.1016/S0927-7757(02)00089-4 ↗
12. Latthe SS, Terashima C, Nakata K, Fujishima A (2014) Superhydrophobic surfaces developed by mimicking hierarchical surface morphology of lotus leaf. Molecules 19:4256–4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules1904425610.3390/molecules19044256 ↗
13. Blossey R (2003) Self-cleaning surfaces - virtual realities. Nat Mater 2:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat85610.1038/nmat856 ↗
14. Chen MH, Hsu TH, Chuang YJ, Tseng FG (2009) Dual hierarchical biomimic superhydrophobic surface with three energy states. Appl Phys Lett 95:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.318011410.1063/1.3180114 ↗
15. Feng L, Song Y, Zhai J et al (2003) Creation of a superhydrophobic surface from an amphiphilic polymer. Angew Chemie 115:824–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20039018110.1002/ange.200390181 ↗
16. Kim H, Kim MH, Kim J (2009) Wettability of dual-scaled surfaces fabricated by the combination of a conventional silicon wet-etching and a ZnO solution method. J Micromech Microeng 19:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/19/9/09500210.1088/0960-1317/19/9/095002 ↗
17. Kwon Y, Patankar N, Choi J, Lee J (2009) Design of surface hierarchy for extreme hydrophobicity. Langmuir 25:6129–6136. https://doi.org/10.1021/la803249t10.1021/la803249t ↗
18. Patankar NA (2003) On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19:1249–1253. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026612+10.1021/la026612+ ↗
19. Quére D, Lafuma A, Bico J (2003) Slippy and sticky microtextured solids. Nanotechnology 14:1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/10/30710.1088/0957-4484/14/10/307 ↗
20. Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2008) Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 4:224–240. https://doi.org/10.1039/b712575p10.1039/b712575p ↗
21. Basu BJ, Hariprakash V, Aruna ST et al (2010) Effect of microstructure and surface roughness on the wettability of superhydrophobic Sol-gel nanocomposite coatings. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 56:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-010-2304-810.1007/s10971-010-2304-8 ↗
22. Kumikov VK, Khokonov KB (1983) On the measurement of surface free energy and surface tension of solid metals. J Appl Phys 54:1346–1350. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.33220910.1063/1.332209 ↗
23. Orowan E (1970) Surface energy and surface tension in solids and liquids. Proc R Soc London A Math Phys Sci 316:473–491. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1970.009110.1098/rspa.1970.0091 ↗
24. Chibowski E (2011) Apparent surface free energy of superhydrophobic surfaces. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.1163/016942411X55589010.1163/016942411X555890 ↗
25. Skalna I (2013) Algorithm for min-range multiplication of affine forms. Numer Algorithms 63:601–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-012-9644-010.1007/s11075-012-9644-0 ↗
26. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Atherton S, Newton MI (2010) An introduction to superhydrophobicity. Adv Coll Interface Sci 161:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2009.11.00110.1016/j.cis.2009.11.001 ↗
27. Wang J, Chen H, Sui T et al (2009) Investigation on hydrophobicity of lotus leaf: experiment and theory. Plant Sci 176:687–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.01310.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.013 ↗
28. Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh MC et al (1999) Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395–3399. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990074s10.1021/la990074s ↗
29. Zhang K, Li Z, Maxey M et al (2019) Self-cleaning of hydrophobic rough surfaces by coalescence-induced wetting transition. Langmuir 35:2431–2442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0366410.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03664 ↗
30. Li J, Tian J, Gao Y et al (2021) All-natural superhydrophobic coating for packaging and blood-repelling materials. Chem Eng J 410:128347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12834710.1016/j.cej.2020.128347 ↗
31. Mock U, Förster R, Menz W, Rühe J (2005) Towards ultrahydrophobic surfaces: a biomimetic approach. J Phys Condens Matter 17:639–648. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/17/9/02110.1088/0953-8984/17/9/021 ↗
32. Hassan HA, Ghazali MJ, Azhari CH, Meric C (2017) Microstructural effects of banana leaf on adhesion and self cleaning behaviour. MATEC Web Conf 87:02026. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2017870202610.1051/matecconf/20178702026 ↗
33. Gobalakrishnan M, Anubama S, Aravindan S, Bharath V (2020) Superhydrophobic nature of some plant leaves. Int J Eng Appl Sci Technol 5:222–227
34. Balani K, Batista RG, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2009) The hydrophobicity of a lotus leaf: a nanomechanical and computational approach. Nanotechnology 20:1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/30/30570710.1088/0957-4484/20/30/305707 ↗
35. Gao A, Wu Q, Wang D et al (2015) A superhydrophobic surface templated by protein self-assembly and emerging application toward protein crystallization. Adv Mater 28:579–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150476910.1002/adma.201504769 ↗
36. Puliyalil H, Filipič G, Cvelbar U (2015) Recent advances in the methods for designing superhydrophobic surfaces. Surf Energy. https://doi.org/10.5772/6085210.5772/60852 ↗
37. Zhou SS, Guan ZS, Pang Y (2012) Fabrication of polypropylene super-hydrophobic surface using PTFE-coated-sieves template via templating and splitting process. Polym - Plast Technol Eng 51:845–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.67141710.1080/03602559.2012.671417 ↗
38. Razavi SMR, Oh J, Sett S et al (2017) Superhydrophobic surfaces made from naturally derived hydrophobic materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:11362–11370. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0242410.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02424 ↗
39. Shiu JY, Kuo CW, Chen P, Mou CY (2004) Fabrication of tunable superhydrophobic surfaces by nanosphere lithography. Chem Mater 16:561–564. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm034696h10.1021/cm034696h ↗
40. Yanagida T, Shimizu N, Kimura T (2003) Properties of wax extracted from banana leaves. 2003 ASAE Annu Meet 0300:1. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.1412110.13031/2013.14121 ↗
41. Ghazali MJ, Hassan HA, Azhari CH, Mamat FA (2016) The bio-adhesion behaviour of banana leaves as soil remover at elevated temperatures. Tribol Online 11:264–271. https://doi.org/10.2474/trol.11.26410.2474/trol.11.264 ↗
42. Hassan HA, Ghazali MJ, Meric C, Azhari CH (2019) Wettability effect of the surface morphologies of Musa acuminata leaves. BioResources 14:8331–834410.15376/biores.14.4.8331-8344 ↗
43. Hassan HA, Ghazali J, Zainuddin M et al (2018) Kesan Lilin ke Atas Sifat Hidrofobik Permukaan Daun Pisang (Wax Effect on Hydrophobic Properties of Banana Leaves). J Kejuruter 29:1–7
44. Burton Z, Bhushan B (2006) Surface characterization and adhesion and friction properties of hydrophobic leaf surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 106:709–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.10.00710.1016/j.ultramic.2005.10.007 ↗
45. Ma J, Sun Y, Gleichauf K et al (2011) Nanostructure on taro leaves resists fouling by colloids and bacteria under submerged conditions. Langmuir 27:10035–10040. https://doi.org/10.1021/la201002410.1021/la2010024 ↗
46. Kumar M, Bhardwaj R (2020) Wetting characteristics of Colocasia esculenta (Taro) leaf and a bioinspired surface thereof. Sci Rep 10:1–1510.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 ↗
47. Negara KMT, Wardana ING, Widhiyanuriyawan D, Hamidi N (2019) The role of the slope on taro leaf surface to produce electrical energy. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 494:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/494/1/01208410.1088/1757-899X/494/1/012084 ↗
48. Kurokawa Y, Nagai K, Huan PD et al (2018) Rice leaf hydrophobicity and gas films are conferred by a wax synthesis gene (LGF1) and contribute to flood tolerance. New Phytol 218:1558–1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.1507010.1111/nph.15070 ↗
49. Zhu Y, Gao Y, Zhang C et al (2018) Static and dynamic wetting behavior of TX-100 solution on super-hydrophobic rice (Oryza sativa.) leaf surfaces. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 547:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.00810.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.008 ↗
50. Oriol RA, Roger CA, Escobar AM, Núria LI (2018) Superhydrophobic coating bioinspired on rice leaf: a first attempt to enhance erosion resistance properties at environmental conditions with ceramic particles. Mater Sci Forum 941:1874–1879. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.187410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.941.1874 ↗
51. Yao J, Wang JN, Yu YH et al (2012) Biomimetic fabrication and characterization of an artificial rice leaf surface with anisotropic wetting. Chin Sci Bull 57:2631–2634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5220-110.1007/s11434-012-5220-1 ↗
52. Yang XH, Xiao JH, Ou JF (2013) Special wetting behaviors on canna leaf and its dependence with microstructures. Adv Mater Res 779:64–67. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.6410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.779-780.64 ↗
53. Liu C, Bu W, Wang T (2017) Numerical investigation on effects of thermophysical properties on fluid flow in hydraulic retarder. Int J Heat Mass Transf 114:1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.12410.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.06.124 ↗
54. Yang Y, Shen H, Qiu J (2020) Fabrication of biomimetic robust self-cleaning superhydrophobic wood with canna-leaf-like micro/nanostructure through morph-genetic method improved water-, UV-, and corrosion resistance properties. J Mol Struct 1219:128616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.12861610.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128616 ↗
55. Mattaparthi S, Sharma CS (2014) Biomimicked high-aspect-ratio hierarchical superhydrophobic polymer surfaces. Bioinspired Biomim Nanobiomater 3:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1680/bbn.13.0001510.1680/bbn.13.00015 ↗
56. Mohamad N, Abdul Hamid NN, Abdul Aziz NA et al (2015) Potential of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) as hydrophobicity contributor in chitosan-urea fertilizer. Appl Mech Mater 761:536–541. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.761.53610.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.761.536 ↗
57. Do Nascimento RM, Ramos SMM, Bechtold IH, Hernandes AC (2018) Wettability study on natural rubber surfaces for applications as biomembranes. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 4:2784–2793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0072310.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00723 ↗
58. Kato A, Kokubo Y, Tsushi R, Ikeda Y (2014) Hydrophobic and hydrophilic silica-filled cross-linked natural rubber (NR): structure and properties10.1533/9780857096913.1.193 ↗
59. Samyn P, Driessen F, Stanssens D (2020) Natural rubber composites for paper coating applications. Mater Proc 2:29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ciwc2020-0683210.3390/ciwc2020-06832 ↗
60. Ju J, Bai H, Zheng Y et al (2012) A multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus. Nat Commun 3:1246–1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms225310.1038/ncomms2253 ↗
61. Kim K, Kim H, Park SH, Lee SJ (2017) Hydraulic strategy of cactus trichome for absorption and storage of water under arid environment. Front Plant Sci 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.0177710.3389/fpls.2017.01777 ↗
62. Lee SJ, Ha N, Kim H (2019) Superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic water harvester inspired by wetting property of cactus stem. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:10561–10569. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0111310.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01113 ↗
63. Zhu Y, Sun F, Qian H et al (2018) A biomimetic spherical cactus superhydrophobic coating with durable and multiple anti-corrosion effects. Chem Eng J 338:670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.08210.1016/j.cej.2018.01.082 ↗
64. Pan Z, Cheng F, Zhao B (2017) Bio-Inspired polymeric structures with special wettability and their applications: an overview. Polymers (Basel) 9:32–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym912072510.3390/polym9120725 ↗
65. Ebert D, Bhushan B (2012) Wear-resistant rose petal-effect surfaces with superhydrophobicity and high droplet adhesion using hydrophobic and hydrophilic nanoparticles. J Coll Interface Sci 384:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.07010.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.070 ↗
66. Lin J, Cai Y, Wang X et al (2011) Fabrication of biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces inspired by lotus leaf and silver ragwort leaf. Nanoscale 3:1258–1262. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00812e10.1039/c0nr00812e ↗
67. Nuraje N, Khan WS, Lei Y et al (2013) Superhydrophobic electrospun nanofibers. J Mater Chem A 1:1929–1946. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ta00189f10.1039/c2ta00189f ↗
68. Wang T, Chang L, Hatton B et al (2014) Preparation and hydrophobicity of biomorphic ZnO/carbon based on a lotus-leaf template. Mater Sci Eng C 43:310–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.02210.1016/j.msec.2014.07.022 ↗
69. Hao L, Yu S, Han X, Zhang S (2015) Design of submicron structures with superhydrophobic and oleophobic properties on zinc substrate. Mater Des 85:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.05710.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.057 ↗
70. Zhao W, Wang L, Xue Q (2010) Fabrication of low and high adhesion hydrophobic au surfaces with micro/nano-biomimetic structures. J Phys Chem C 114:11509–11514. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp102052e10.1021/jp102052e ↗
71. Zhang X, Shi F, Niu J et al (2008) Superhydrophobic surfaces: From structural control to functional application. J Mater Chem 18:621–633. https://doi.org/10.1039/b711226b10.1039/b711226b ↗
72. Yun X, Xiong Z, He Y, Wang X (2020) Superhydrophobic lotus-leaf-like surface made from reduced graphene oxide through soft-lithographic duplication. RSC Adv 10:5478–5486. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra10373b10.1039/c9ra10373b ↗
73. Liang YH, Peng J, Li XJ et al (2016) From natural to biomimetic: the superhydrophobicity and the contact time. Microsc Res Tech 79:712–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.2268910.1002/jemt.22689 ↗
74. Yuan Z, Chen H, Tang J et al (2007) Facile method to fabricate stable superhydrophobic polystyrene surface by adding ethanol. Surf Coat Technol 201:7138–7142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.02110.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.021 ↗
75. Li XM, Reinhoudt D, Crego-Calama M (2007) What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces. Chem Soc Rev 36:1350–1368. https://doi.org/10.1039/b602486f10.1039/b602486f ↗
76. Yu Z, Cheng H (2018) Tunable adhesion for bio-integrated devices. Micromachines 9:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi910052910.3390/mi9100529 ↗
77. Brock L, Sheng J (2020) Robust fabrication of polymeric nanowire with anodic aluminum oxide templates. Micromachines 11:11–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1101004610.3390/mi11010046 ↗
78. Tripathy AR, Choudhury A, Dash A et al (2021) Polymer matrix composite engineering for PDMS based capacitive sensors to achieve high-performance and broad-range pressure sensing. Appl Surf Sci Adv 3:10006210.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100062 ↗
79. Manna U, Broderick AH, Lynn DM (2012) Chemical patterning and physical refinement of reactive superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv Mater 24:4291–4295. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120090310.1002/adma.201200903 ↗
80. Jafari R, Asadollahi S, Farzaneh M (2013) Applications of plasma technology in development of superhydrophobic surfaces. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 33:177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-012-9413-910.1007/s11090-012-9413-9 ↗
81. Tsougeni K, Papageorgiou D, Tserepi A, Gogolides E (2010) “Smart” polymeric microfluidics fabricated by plasma processing: controlled wetting, capillary filling and hydrophobic valving. Lab Chip 10:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1039/b916566e10.1039/b916566e ↗
82. Cerrina F (2000) X-ray imaging: applications to patterning and lithography. IOP Sci 33:103–116
83. Kim SH, Lee S, Ahn D, Park JY (2019) PDMS double casting method enabled by plasma treatment and alcohol passivation. Sens Actuators B Chem 293:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.14510.1016/j.snb.2019.04.145 ↗
84. Twardowski A, Makowski P, Małachowski A et al (2012) Plasma treatment of thermoactive membrane textiles for superhydrophobicity. Medziagotyra 18:163–166. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.18.2.192010.5755/j01.ms.18.2.1920 ↗
85. Il YY, Moon HS, Lyoo WS et al (2009) Superhydrophobicity of cellulose triacetate fibrous mats produced by electrospinning and plasma treatment. Carbohydr Polym 75:246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.015 ↗
86. Zhou Y, Song X, Munan YU et al (2006) Superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by plasma fluorination of lotus-leaf-like amorphous carbon films. Surf Rev Lett 13:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X0600789510.1142/S0218625X06007895 ↗
87. Byun D, Lee Y, Tran SBQ et al (2008) Electrospray on superhydrophobic nozzles treated with argon and oxygen plasma. Appl Phys Lett 92:093507. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.284072510.1063/1.2840725 ↗
88. Ryu J, Kim K, Park JY et al (2017) Nearly perfect durable superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated by a simple one-step plasma treatment. Sci Rep 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02108-110.1038/s41598-017-02108-1 ↗
89. Lee SJ, Paik BG, Kim GB, Jang YG (2006) Self-cleaning features of plasma-treated surfaces with self-assembled monolayer coating. Japanese J Appl Phys, Part 1 Regul Pap Short Notes Rev Pap 45:912–91810.1143/JJAP.45.912 ↗
90. Hwang SJ, Oh DJ, Jung PG et al (2009) Dry etching of polydimethylsiloxane using microwave plasma. J Micromech Microeng. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/19/9/09501010.1088/0960-1317/19/9/095010 ↗
91. Han ZJ, Tay BK, Shakerzadeh M, Ostrikov K (2009) Superhydrophobic amorphous carbon/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett 94:223106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.314866710.1063/1.3148667 ↗
92. Ji YY, Kim SS, Kwon OP, Lee SH (2009) Easy fabrication of large-size superhydrophobic surfaces by atmospheric pressure plasma polymerization with non-polar aromatic hydrocarbon in an in-line process. Appl Surf Sci 255:4575–4578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2008.12.002 ↗
93. Berendsen CWJ, Škereň M, Najdek D, Černý F (2009) Superhydrophobic surface structures in thermoplastic polymers by interference lithography and thermal imprinting. Appl Surf Sci 255:9305–9310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.00110.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.001 ↗
94. Sun Y, Ouyang B, Rawat RS, Chen Z (2020) Rapid and stable plasma transformation of polyester fabrics for highly efficient oil-water separation. Glob Challenges 4:1900095. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.20190009510.1002/gch2.201900095 ↗
95. Li Y, Zhang J, Zhu S et al (2010) Bioinspired silica surfaces with near-infrared improved transmittance and superhydrophobicity by colloidal lithography. Langmuir 26:9842–9847. https://doi.org/10.1021/la100183y10.1021/la100183y ↗
96. Zhang G, Wang D, Gu Z, Mo H (2005) Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces from binary colloidal assembly. Langmuir 21:9143–914810.1021/la0511945 ↗
97. Michels AF, Soave PA, Nardi J et al (2016) Adjustable, (super)hydrophobicity by e-beam deposition of nanostructured PTFE on textured silicon surfaces. J Mater Sci 51:1316–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9449-310.1007/s10853-015-9449-3 ↗
98. Milionis A, S. I, Fragouli D, et al (2013) Combination of lithography and coating methods for surface wetting control. Updat Adv Lithogr. https://doi.org/10.5772/5617310.5772/56173 ↗
99. Sreenivasan SV (2017) Nanoimprint lithography steppers for volume fabrication of leading-edge semiconductor integrated circuits. Microsyst Nanoeng 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2017.7510.1038/micronano.2017.75 ↗
100. Pozzato A, Zilio SD, Fois G et al (2006) Superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated by nanoimprint lithography. Microelectron Eng 83:884–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.01210.1016/j.mee.2006.01.012 ↗