The effect of textured surface on graphene wettability and droplet evaporation
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of a grain orientation and textured surfaces on the droplet evaporation and the graphene coating wettability is investigated. The study of the behavior of water droplets on graphene-coated substrates is important for the development of highly sensitive sensor technologies. The coating of the graphene layer with water leads to changes in charge concentration and electrical conductivity. To date, there are very few studies on the effect of substrate textures and wall heating on water droplets evaporation on a heated graphene coating. The contact angle depends on the ratio of several factors: textures, grain orientation and grain size. In the final stage of evaporation of a water droplet on a hot textured substrate with graphene, a jump in the contact line of the water droplet is observed. The contact angle abruptly increases almost two times. Molecular-dynamic modeling has shown that the wettability depends on the grains orientation and the annealing duration. The measured experimental value of the copper contact angle of 74–76° after annealing corresponds to the simulation results considering the direct proportionality between the contact angle and the amplitude of the first maximum of the density distributions of water molecules in the vicinity of a smooth copper surface.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Castro NA, Guinea F, Peres N, Novoselov K, Geim A (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81:109–16210.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
2. Ferrari AC et al (2014) Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7:4598–481010.1039/C4NR01600A ↗
3. Novikov S, Lebedeva N, Satrapinski A (2015) Ultrasensitive NO2 gas sensor based on epitaxial graphene. J Sens 5:1–710.1155/2015/108581 ↗
4. Lerner MB et al (2017) Large scale commercial fabrication of high quality graphene-based assays for biomolecule detection. Sens Actuators B 239:1261–126710.1016/j.snb.2016.09.137 ↗
5. Schedin F, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Hill EW, Blake P, Katsnelson MI, Novoselov KS (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6:652–65510.1038/nmat1967 ↗
6. Akbari A, Sheath P, Martin ST, Shinde DB, Shaibani M, Banerjee PC, Tkacz R, Bhattacharyya D, Majumder M (2016) Large-area graphene-based nanofiltration membranes by shear alignment of discotic nematic liquid crystals of graphene oxide. Nat Commun 7:108910.1038/ncomms10891 ↗
7. Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK (2012) Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335:442–44410.1126/science.1211694 ↗
8. Surwade SP, Smirnov SN, Vlassiouk IV, Unocic RR, Veith GM, Dai S, Mahurin SM (2015) Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 10:459–46410.1038/nnano.2015.37 ↗
9. Sun P, Wang K, Zhu H (2016) Recent developments in graphene-based membranes: structure, mass-transport mechanism and potential applications. Adv Mater 28:2287–2231010.1002/adma.201502595 ↗
10. An D, Yang L, Wang TJ, Liu B (2016) Separation performance of graphene oxide membrane in aqueous solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:4803–481010.1021/acs.iecr.6b00620 ↗
11. Ribeiro RM, Peres NMR, Coutinho J, Briddon PR (2008) Inducing energy gaps in monolayer and bilayer graphene: local density approximation calculations. Phys Rev B 78:1–710.1103/PhysRevB.78.075442 ↗
12. Lafkioti M, Krauss B, Lohmann T, Zschieschang U, Klauk H, Klitzing KV, Smet JH (2010) Graphene on a hydrophobic substrate: doping reduction and hysteresis suppression under ambient conditions. Nano Lett 10:1149–115310.1021/nl903162a ↗
13. Li Z, Wang Y, Kozbial A, Shenoy G, Zhou F, McGinley R et al (2013) Effect of airborne contaminants on the wettability of supported graphene and graphite. Nat Mater 12:92510.1038/nmat3709 ↗
14. Aria AI, Kidambi PR, Weatherup RS, Xiao L, Williams JA, Hofmann S (2016) Time evolution of the wettability of supported graphene under ambient air exposure. J Phys Chem C 120:2215–222410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10492 ↗
15. Liu L, Ryu S, Tomasik MR, Stolyarova E, Jung N, Hybertsen MS, Steigerwald ML, Brus LE, Flynn GW (2008) Graphene oxidation: thickness-dependent etching and strong chemical doping. Nano Lett 8:1965–197010.1021/nl0808684 ↗
16. Melios C, Giusca CE, Panchal V, Kazakova O (2018) Water on graphene: review of recent progress. 2D Mater 5:02200110.1088/2053-1583/aa9ea9 ↗
17. ShihC J, Wang QH, Lin S, Park KC, Jin Z, Strano MS, Blankschtein D (2012) Breakdown in the wetting transparency of graphene. Phys Rev Lett 109:1–5
18. Ashraf A, Wu Y, Wang MC, Aluru NR, Dastgheib SA, Nam SW (2014) Spectroscopic investigation of the wettability of multilayer graphene using highly ordered pyrolytic graphite as a model material. Langmuir 30:12827–1283610.1021/la503089k ↗
19. Munz M, Giusca CE, Myers-Ward RL, Gaskill DK, Kazakova O (2015) Thickness-dependent hydrophobicity of epitaxial graphene. ACS Nano 9:8401–841110.1021/acsnano.5b03220 ↗
20. Shin YJ, Wang Y, Huang H, Kalon G, Wee ATS, Shen Z, Bhatia CS, Yang H (2010) Surface-energy engineering of graphene. Langmuir 26(6):3798–380210.1021/la100231u ↗
21. Misyura SY (2020) Dependence of wettability of microtextured wall on the heat and mass transfer: simple estimates for convection and heat transfer. Int J Mech Sci 170:10535310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105353 ↗
22. Misyura SY (2019) The influence of convection on heat transfer in a water layer on a heated structured wall. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 102(102):14–2110.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.01.010 ↗
23. Shih C-J, Strano MS, Blankschtein D (2013) Wetting translucency of graphene. Nat Mater 12:866–86910.1038/nmat3760 ↗
24. Huang Y, Jun LJ, Meng S (2018) Transparency in graphene mediated evaporation. 2D Mater 5:04100110.1088/2053-1583/aac9ff ↗
25. Parobek D, Liu H (2015) Wettability of graphene. 2D Mater 2:03200110.1088/2053-1583/2/3/032001 ↗
26. Hu H, Larson RG (2005) Analysis of the effects of Marangoni stresses on the microflow in an evaporating sessile droplet. Langmuir 21:3972–398010.1021/la0475270 ↗
27. Misyura SY, Kuznetsov GV, Feoktistov DV, Volkov RS, Morozov VS, Orlova EG (2019) The influence of the surface microtexture on wettability properties and drop evaporation. Surf Coat Technol 375:458–46710.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.058 ↗
28. Ristenpart WD, Kim PG, Domingues C, Wan J, Stone HA (2007) Influence of substrate conductivity on circulation reversal in evaporating drops. Phys Rev Lett 98:14830110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.148301 ↗
29. Misyura SY (2018) The influence of characteristic scales of convection on non-isothermal evaporation of a thin liquid layer. Sci Rep 8:1152110.1038/s41598-018-29015-3 ↗
30. Kuznetsov GV, Misyura SY, Volkov RS, Morozov VS (2019) Marangoni flow and free convection during crystallization of a salt solution droplet. Colloids Surf A 572:37–4610.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.051 ↗
31. Misyura SY, Volkov RS, Filatova AS (2018) Interaction of two drops at different temperatures: the role of thermocapillary convection and surfactant. Colloids Surf A 559:275–28310.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.063 ↗
32. Misyura SY, Egorov RI, Morozov VS, Zaitsev AS (2021) Emergence and breakup of a cluster of ordered microparticles during the interaction of thermocapillary and thermogravitational convection. Powder Technol 379:165–17310.1016/j.powtec.2020.10.048 ↗
33. Picknett RG, Bexon R (1977) The evaporation of sessile or pendant drops in still air. J Colloid Interf Sci 61:336–35010.1016/0021-9797(77)90396-4 ↗
34. Girard F, Antoni M, Sefiane K (2008) On the effect of Marangoni flow on evaporation rates of heated water drops. Langmuir 24:9207–921010.1021/la801294x ↗
35. Misyura SY (2015) High temperature nonisothermal desorption in a water-salt droplet. Int J Therm Sci 92:34–4310.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.01.017 ↗
36. Misyura SY (2018) The anomalously high rate of crystallization, controlled by crystal forms under the conditions of a limited liquid volume. Cryst Growth Des 18:1327–133810.1021/acs.cgd.7b00980 ↗
37. Egorov RI, Misyura SY, Morozov VS, Zaitsev AS (2021) Self-organization of TiO2 microparticles on the surface of a thin liquid layer due to local heating and the formation of convective cells. J Mol Liq 324:11468510.1016/j.molliq.2020.114685 ↗
38. Hou X, Wang L, Zhou F, Li L (2011) Fabrication of ZnO submicrorod films with water repellency by surface etching and hydrophobic modification. Thin Solid Films 519:7813–781610.1016/j.tsf.2011.05.043 ↗
39. Emelyanenko AM, Shagieva FM, Domantovsky AG, Boinovich LB (2015) Nanosecond laser micro- and nanotexturing for the design of a superhydrophobic coating robust against long-term contact with water, cavitation, and abrasion. Appl Surf Sci 332:513–51710.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.202 ↗
40. Boinovich LB, Emelyanenko AM, Modestov AD, Domantovsky AG, Emelyanenko KA (2017) Not simply repel water: the diversified nature of corrosion protection by superhydrophobic coating. Mendeleev Commun 27:254–25610.1016/j.mencom.2017.05.012 ↗
41. Boinovich LB, Emelyanenko AM, Emelyanenko KA, Modin EB (2019) Modus operandi of protective and anti-icing mechanisms underlying the design of longstanding outdoor icephobic coatings. ACS Nano 13:4335–434610.1021/acsnano.8b09549 ↗
42. Banik M, Chakrabarty P, Das A, Ray SK, Mukherjee R (2019) Colloidal transfer printing–mediated fabrication of zinc oxide nanorods for self-cleaning applications. Adv Mater Interfaces 6:190006310.1002/admi.201900063 ↗
43. Varughese SM, Bhandaru N (2020) Durability of submerged hydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter 16:1692–170110.1039/C9SM01942A ↗
44. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Gr 14:33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
45. Brooks B et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30:1545–161410.1002/jcc.21287 ↗
46. Pettersen EF et al (2004) UCSF Chimera visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–161210.1002/jcc.20084 ↗
47. Belyaeva LA, Tang C, Juurlink L, Schneider GF (2020) Macroscopic and microscopic wettability of graphene. Langmuir 37:4049–405510.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02817 ↗
48. Boyko EV, Kostogrud IA, Bezrukov IA, Krivenko AS, Smovzh DV (2019) The influence of the crystallographic orientation of the copper catalytic substrate crystallites on the mechanical transfer of graphene. Mater Res Express 6:12562810.1088/2053-1591/ab6537 ↗
49. Hu J, Xu J, Zhao Y, Shi L, Li Q, Liu F, Ullah Z, Li W, Guo Y, Liu L (2017) Roles of oxygen and hydrogen in crystal orientation transition of copper foils for high-quality graphene growth. Sci Rep 7:4535810.1038/srep45358 ↗
50. Frank O, Vejpravova J, Holy V, Kavan L, Kalbac M (2014) Interaction between graphene and copper substrate: the role of lattice orientation. Carbon 68:44010.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.020 ↗
51. Shah S, Chiou YC, Lai CY, Apostoleris H, Rahman MM, Younes H, Almansouri I, Ghaferi AA, Chiesa M (2017) Impact of short duration, high-flow H2 annealing on graphene synthesis and surface morphology with high spatial resolution assessment of coverage. Carbon 125:318–32610.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.048 ↗
52. Akhtar S, Laoui T, Ibrahim A, Kumar AM, Ahmed J, Toor I-ul-H (2019) Few-layer graphene film and copper surface morphology for improved corrosion protection of copper. JMEPEG 28:5541–555010.1007/s11665-019-04268-9 ↗
53. Wang B, Zhang H-R, Zhang Y-H, Chen Z-Y, Jin Z, Liu X-Y, Hu L-Z, Yu G-H (2014) Effect of Cu substrate roughness on growth of graphene domains at atmospheric pressure. Mater Lett 131:138–14010.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.155 ↗
54. Wang H, Wang G, Bao P, Yang P, Zhu W, Xie X, Zhang W-J (2012) Controllable synthesis of submillimeter single-crystal monolayer graphene domains on copper foil by suppressing nucleation. J Am Chem Soc 134:3627–363010.1021/ja2105976 ↗
55. Ibrahim A, Akhtar S, Atieh M, Karnik R, Laoui T (2015) Effects of annealing on copper substrate surface morphology and graphene growth by chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 94:369–37710.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.067 ↗