journal article·2021-06

Non-woven polyester fabric-supported cuprous oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue

My Uyen Dao, Thi Thu Trang Nguyen, Van Thuan Le, Hien Y. Hoang, Thi Thanh Nhi Le, Thi Nam Pham, Thi Thom Nguyen, R. M. Akhmadullin, Hoang Sinh Le, Hoang V. Tran, Dai Lam Tran

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced GO (rGO) have become the most exciting material in the applications for photocatalysts. However, the GO composite film-based high-activity photocatalyst is usually not durable in aqueous solution. Therefore, in this paper, the non-woven polyester fabric (NWPF)-supported cuprous oxide nanoparticles (Cu2O) decorated on rGO (Cu2O/rGO@NWPF) membrane were suggested to synthesize via chemical reduction method. The Cu2O/rGO@NWPF nanocomposite was characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis. The combination of rGO and Cu2O particles supported on NWPF exhibited enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) under solar light and achieved 96% of MB removal efficiency in 120 min. The photocatalytic mechanism and the synergistic effects between Cu2O nanoparticles and rGO sheets were comprehensively investigated. The Cu2O/rGO@NWPF catalyst showed excellent stability with retained catalytic activity in four consecutive recycles. The obtained results indicated that the Cu2O/rGO@NWPF composite has a good application potential to large-scale water treatment at lakes or rivers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Dahiya D, Nigam PS (2020) Waste management by biological approach employing natural substrates and microbial agents for the remediation of dyes’ wastewater. Appl Sci 10:2958–2971. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP1008295810.3390/APP10082958 ↗
2. Stone C, Windsor FM, Munday M, Durance I (2020) Natural or synthetic—How global trends in textile usage threaten freshwater environments. Sci Total Environ 718:134689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13468910.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134689 ↗
3. Khan A, Wang X, Gul K et al (2018) Microwave-assisted spent black tea leaves as cost-effective and powerful green adsorbent for the efficient removal of Eriochrome black T from aqueous solutions. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 5:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2018.04.00210.1016/j.ejbas.2018.04.002 ↗
4. Piaskowski K, Świderska-Dąbrowska R, Zarzycki PK (2018) Dye removal from water and wastewater using various physical, chemical, and biological processes. J AOAC Int 101:1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-005110.5740/jaoacint.18-0051 ↗
5. Obiora-Okafo IA, Onukwuli OD (2016) Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for particle removal from dye using natural polymers: response surface methodological approach. Der Pharma Chem 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v36i2.2310.4314/njt.v36i2.23 ↗
6. Dotto J, Fagundes-Klen MR, Veit MT et al (2019) Performance of different coagulants in the coagulation/flocculation process of textile wastewater. J Clean Prod 208:656–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.11210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.112 ↗
7. Song Y, Sun Y, Chen M et al (2020) Efficient removal and fouling-resistant of anionic dyes by nanofiltration membrane with phosphorylated chitosan modified graphene oxide nanosheets incorporated selective layer. J Water Process Eng 34:101086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.10108610.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101086 ↗
8. Sun B, Li X, Zhu G et al (2018) Highly flexible magnesium silicate nanofibrous membranes for effective removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 359:1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.01110.1016/j.cej.2018.11.011 ↗
9. Mouni L, Belkhiri L, Bollinger JC et al (2018) Removal of Methylene Blue from aqueous solutions by adsorption on Kaolin: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Appl Clay Sci 153:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.03410.1016/j.clay.2017.11.034 ↗
10. Le HS, Nguyen MH, Tran DL et al (2019) Preparation of magnetic graphene oxide/chitosan composite beads for effective removal of heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng Commun 0:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.155821510.1080/00986445.2018.1558215 ↗
11. Cetinkaya AY, Bilgili L (2019) Life cycle comparison of membrane capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis membrane for textile wastewater treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 230:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4203-010.1007/s11270-019-4203-0 ↗
12. Nidheesh PV, Zhou M, Oturan MA (2018) An overview on the removal of synthetic dyes from water by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 197:210–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.19510.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.195 ↗
13. Tran TTT, Doan VD, Ho TTT et al (2019) Novel of TiO2/Ag3PO4 /Bentonite composite photocatalyst: Preparation, characterization, and application for degradation of methylene blue in aqueous solution. Environ Eng Sci 36:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.017910.1089/ees.2018.0179 ↗
14. Xiao X, Li TT, Lu XR et al (2018) A simple method for assaying anaerobic biodegradation of dyes. Bioresour Technol 251:204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.05210.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.052 ↗
15. Anli Dino A, Brindha R, Jayamuthunagai J, Bharathiraja B (2019) Biodegradation of aniline from textile industry waste using salt tolerant Bacillus firmus BA01. Eng Agric Environ Food 12:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2019.04.00310.1016/j.eaef.2019.04.003 ↗
16. Ahmed SN, Haider W (2018) Heterogeneous photocatalysis and its potential applications in water and wastewater treatment: a review. Nanotechnology 29:342001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aac6ea10.1088/1361-6528/aac6ea ↗
17. Nia NA, Foroughi MM, Jahani S et al (2019) Fabrication of a new electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of codeine and diclofenac using synergic effect of feather-type La3+-ZnO nano-flower. J Electrochem Soc 166:B489–B497. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1051906jes10.1149/2.1051906jes ↗
18. Trawiński J, Skibiński R (2019) Multivariate comparison of photocatalytic properties of thirteen nanostructured metal oxides for water purification. J Environ Sci Heal Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng 54:851–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.159816910.1080/10934529.2019.1598169 ↗
19. Zhao Q, Wang K, Wang J et al (2019) Cu2O nanoparticle hyper-cross-linked polymer composites for the visible-light photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:2706–2712. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0021010.1021/acsanm.9b00210 ↗
20. Li Y, Chen X, Li L (2019) Facile thermal exfoliation of Cu sheets towards the CuO/Cu2O heterojunction: a cost-effective photocatalyst with visible-light response for promising sustainable applications. RSC Adv 9:33395–33402. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra06837f10.1039/c9ra06837f ↗
21. Yu X, Kou S, Zhang J et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of Cu2O nano-particles and their photocatalytic degradation of fluroxypyr. Environ Technol (United Kingdom) 3330:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.137002310.1080/09593330.2017.1370023 ↗
22. Phanichphant S, Nakaruk A, Chansaenpak K, Channei D (2019) Evaluating the photocatalytic efficiency of the BiVO4/rGO photocatalyst. Sci Rep 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52589-510.1038/s41598-019-52589-5 ↗
23. Liu SH, Wei YS, Lu JS (2016) Visible-light-driven photodegradation of sulfamethoxazole and methylene blue by Cu2O/rGO photocatalysts. Chemosphere 154:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.10710.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.107 ↗
24. Zhang D, Yang J, Wang J et al (2020) Construction of Cu2O-reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photoelectric and photocatalytic properties. Opt Mater (Amst) 100:109612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10961210.1016/j.optmat.2019.109612 ↗
25. Shateri-Khalilabad M, Yazdanshenas ME (2013) Preparation of superhydrophobic electroconductive graphene-coated cotton cellulose. Cellulose 20:963–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9873-y10.1007/s10570-013-9873-y ↗
26. Ji X, Xu Y, Zhang W et al (2016) Review of functionalization, structure and properties of graphene/polymer composite fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 87:29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.011 ↗
27. Achagri G, Essamlali Y, Amadine O et al (2020) Surface modification of highly hydrophobic polyester fabric coated with octadecylamine-functionalized graphene nanosheets. RSC Adv 10:24941–24950. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra02655g10.1039/d0ra02655g ↗
28. Li Y, Li Z, Tian M et al (2019) Reduction and deposition of graphene oxide nanosheets on the multifunctional hydrophobic polyester non-woven fabric via a one-step hydrothermal route. Mater Res Exp 6:085614. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1f3e10.1088/2053-1591/ab1f3e ↗
29. Thi Thanh Nhi L, Van Thuan L, My Uyen D et al (2020) Facile fabrication of highly flexible and floatable Cu2O/rGO on Vietnamese traditional paper toward high-performance solar-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin antibiotic. RSC Adv 10:16330–16338. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra01854f10.1039/d0ra01854f ↗
30. Hashim N, Muda Z, Hussein MZ et al (2016) A brief review on recent graphene oxide-based material nanocomposites: synthesis and applications. J Mater Environ Sci 7:3225–3243
31. Vivas L, Chi-Duran I, Enriquez J et al (2019) Ascorbic acid based controlled growth of various Cu and Cu2O nanostructures. Mater Res Exp 6:065033. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0dd210.1088/2053-1591/ab0dd2 ↗
32. Wu YA, McNulty I, Liu C et al (2019) Facet-dependent active sites of a single Cu2O particle photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol. Nat Energy 4:957–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0490-310.1038/s41560-019-0490-3 ↗
33. Abdolhosseinzadeh S, Asgharzadeh H, Kim HS (2015) Fast and fully-scalable synthesis of reduced graphene oxide. Sci Rep 5:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1016010.1038/srep10160 ↗
34. Hongzhen C, Keyan Y, Weiming Y (2017) Effects of calcium carbonate on preparation and mechanical properties of wood/plastic composite. Int J Agric Biol Eng 10:184–190. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20171001.270710.3965/j.ijabe.20171001.2707 ↗
35. Shao D, Wei Q (2018) Microwave-assisted rapid preparation of nano-ZnO/Ag composite functionalized polyester non-woven membrane for improving its UV shielding and antibacterial properties. Mater (Basel) 11:1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1108141210.3390/ma11081412 ↗
36. Liao K, Ye XY, Chen PC, Xu ZK (2014) Biomineralized polypropylene/CaCO3 composite non-woven meshes for oil/water separation. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3989710.1002/app.39897 ↗
37. Errokh A, Ferraria AM, Conceição DS et al (2016) Controlled growth of Cu2O nanoparticles bound to cotton fibres. Carbohydr Polym 141:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.01910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.019 ↗
38. Ho WCJ, Tay Q, Qi H et al (2017) Photocatalytic and adsorption performances of faceted cuprous oxide (Cu2O) particles for the removal of methyl orange (MO) from aqueous media. Molecules 22:677–696. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2204067710.3390/molecules22040677 ↗
39. Aboelfetoh EF, Elhelaly AA, Gemeay AH (2018) Synergistic effect of Cu(II) in the one-pot synthesis of reduced graphene oxide (rGO/CuxO) nanohybrids as adsorbents for cationic and anionic dyes. J Environ Chem Eng 6:623–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.04710.1016/j.jece.2017.12.047 ↗
40. Abulizi A, Yang GH, Zhu JJ (2014) One-step simple sonochemical fabrication and photocatalytic properties of Cu2O-rGO composites. Ultrason Sonochem 21:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.07.01310.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.07.013 ↗
41. Jakubiak S, Tomaszewska J, Jackiewicz A et al (2016) Polypropylene - Zinc oxide nanorod hybrid material for applications in separation processes. Chem Process Eng Inz Chem I Proces 37:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1515/cpe-2016-003210.1515/cpe-2016-0032 ↗
42. Simpson LJ (1998) Electrochemically generated CaCO3 deposits on iron studied with FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta 43:2543–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(97)10167-010.1016/S0013-4686(97)10167-0 ↗
43. Böke H, Akkurt S, Özdemir S et al (2004) Quantification of CaCO3–CaSO3·0.5H2O–CaSO4·2H2O mixtures by FTIR analysis and its ANN model. Mater Lett 58:723–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2003.07.00810.1016/j.matlet.2003.07.008 ↗
44. Xu AJ, Li B, Zhan BS et al (2017) Role of rGO on structural, optical, and photocatalytic properties of Cu2O/rGO. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:448–454. https://doi.org/10.20964/2017.01.0510.20964/2017.01.05 ↗
45. Levitskii VS, Shapovalov VI, Komlev AE et al (2015) Raman spectroscopy of copper oxide films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. Tech Phys Lett 41:1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378501511022X10.1134/S106378501511022X ↗
46. Terraza CA, Martin R, Saldías C et al (2018) Preparation of CuONPs@PVDF/non-woven polyester composite membrane: Structural influence of nanoparticle addition. Polym (Basel) 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1008086210.3390/polym10080862 ↗
47. Yang Y, Luan J (2012) Synthesis, property characterization and photocatalytic activity of the novel composite polymer polyaniline/Bi2SnTiO7. Molecules 17:2752–2772. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules1703275210.3390/molecules17032752 ↗
48. Zou W, Zhang L, Liu L et al (2016) Engineering the Cu2O-reduced graphene oxide interface to enhance photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under visible light. Appl Catal B Environ 181:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.01710.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.017 ↗
49. Muthukumaran M, Dhinagaran G, Narayanan V et al (2019) Enhanced photocatalytic behavior of (GO/Cu2O) composite with Cu2O being synthesized through green route. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:7215–7220. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1667110.1166/jnn.2019.16671 ↗
50. Nie J, Li CY, Jin ZY et al (2019) Fabrication of MCC/Cu2O/GO composite foam with high photocatalytic degradation ability toward methylene blue. Carbohydr Polym 223:115101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11510110.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115101 ↗
51. Almeida BM, Melo MA, Bettini J et al (2015) A novel nanocomposite based on TiO2/Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide with enhanced solar-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 324:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.10510.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.105 ↗
52. Gopalakrishnan A, Pratap Singh S, Badhulika S (2020) Reusable, free-standing mos2/rgo/cu2o ternary composite films for fast and highly efficient sunlight driven photocatalytic degradation. Chem Select 5:1997–2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20190493210.1002/slct.201904932 ↗
53. Choi J, Oh H, Han SW et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide supported Cu, Cu2O, and CuO nanocomposites and their high photocatalytic activity for organic dye molecule. Curr Appl Phys 17:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2016.11.02010.1016/j.cap.2016.11.020 ↗
54. Dong K, He J, Liu J et al (2017) Photocatalytic performance of Cu2O-loaded TiO2/rGO nanoheterojunctions obtained by UV reduction. J Mater Sci 52:6754–6766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0911-210.1007/s10853-017-0911-2 ↗
55. Chen L, Yang J, Zeng X et al (2013) Adsorption of methylene blue in water by reduced graphene oxide: Effect of functional groups. Mater Exp 3:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1166/mex.2013.113010.1166/mex.2013.1130 ↗
56. Zhang Y, Tang Z-R, Fu X, Xu Y-J (2010) TiO2–Graphene nanocomposites for gas-phase photocatalytic degradation of volatile aromatic pollutant: Is TiO2−Graphene truly different from other TiO2−carbon composite materials? ACS Nano 4:7303–7314. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102421910.1021/nn1024219 ↗
57. El-Sharkaway EA, Kamel RM, El-Sherbiny IM, Gharib SS (2020) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using polyaniline/graphene oxide or polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide composites. Environ Technol 41:2854–2862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.158548110.1080/09593330.2019.1585481 ↗
58. Liu G, He F, Li X et al (2011) Three-dimensional cuprous oxide microtube lattices with high catalytic activity templated by bacterial cellulose nanofibers. J Mater Chem 21:10637–10640. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11432h10.1039/c1jm11432h ↗
59. Dao MU, Le HS, Hoang HY et al (2020) Natural core-shell structure activated carbon beads derived from Litsea glutinosa seeds for removal of methylene blue: facile preparation, characterization, and adsorption properties. Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.11048110.1016/j.envres.2020.110481 ↗