Hydrogen sorption capacity of crystal lattice defects and low Miller index surfaces of copper
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect of hydrogen on the physical–chemical properties of copper is directly dependent on the types of chemical bonding between H and lattice defects in Cu. In this work, we performed a systematic study of the bonding of H-atoms with crystal lattice defects of copper. This included three types of symmetric tilt grain boundaries (GBs), Σ3, Σ5 and Σ11, and the low Miller index surfaces, (111), (110) and (100). A comparison with literature data for the bonding of H-atoms with point defects such as vacancies was done. From the defects investigated and analyzed, we conclude that the bond strength with H-atoms varies in the decreasing order: surfaces [(111), (110) and (100)] > vacancy > Σ5 GB > Σ11 GB > bulk ≈ Σ3 GB. A study on the effects of the fcc lattice expansion on the binding energies of H-atoms shows that the main driving force behind the segregation of H-atoms at some GBs is the larger volume at those interstitial GB sites when compared to the interstitial bulk sites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Waugh KC (2004) The absorption and locking-in of hydrogen in copper. Solid State Ion 168:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.05.00110.1016/j.ssi.2003.05.001 ↗
2. Wampler WR, Schober T, Lengeler B (1976) Precipitation and trapping of hydrogen in copper. Philos Mag J Theor Exp Appl Phys 34:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643760822817910.1080/14786437608228179 ↗
3. McLellan RB (1973) Solid solutions of hydrogen in gold, silver and copper. J Phys Chem Solids 34:1137–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(73)80022-810.1016/S0022-3697(73)80022-8 ↗
4. Lengeler B, Mantl S, Triftshauser W (1978) Interaction of hydrogen and vacancies in copper investigated by positron annihilation. J Phys F Met Phys 8:1691–169810.1088/0305-4608/8/8/010 ↗
5. Korzhavyi PA, Soroka IL, Isaev EI, Lilja C, Johansson B (2012) Exploring monovalent copper compounds with oxygen and hydrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:686–689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111583410910.1073/pnas.1115834109 ↗
6. Magnusson H, Frisk K (2014) Thermodynamic evaluation of the copper-rich part of the CuHOSP system at low temperatures. Calphad 47:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2014.09.00410.1016/j.calphad.2014.09.004 ↗
7. Lynch SP (2011) 2-Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) phenomena and mechanisms. In: Raja VS, Shoji T (eds) Stress corrosion cracking. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 90–13010.1533/9780857093769.1.90 ↗
8. Korzhavyi PA, Sandström R (2014) Monovacancy in copper: trapping efficiency for hydrogen and oxygen impurities. Comput Mater Sci 84:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.06510.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.065 ↗
9. Ganchenkova MG, Yagodzinskyy YN, Borodin VA, Hänninen H (2014) Effects of hydrogen and impurities on void nucleation in copper: simulation point of view. Philos Mag 94:3522–3548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2014.96264210.1080/14786435.2014.962642 ↗
10. Li Y, Korzhavyi PA (2015) Interactions of point defects with stacking faults in oxygen-free phosphorus-containing copper. J Nucl Mater 462:160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.04110.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.041 ↗
11. Di Stefano D, Mrovec M, Elsässer C (2015) First-principles investigation of hydrogen trapping and diffusion at grain boundaries in nickel. Acta Mater 98:306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.03110.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.031 ↗
12. Buranova Y, Rösner H, Divinski SV, Imlau R, Wilde G (2016) Quantitative measurements of grain boundary excess volume from HAADF-STEM micrographs. Acta Mater 106:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.03310.1016/j.actamat.2016.01.033 ↗
13. Darnbrough JE, Roebuck B, Flewitt PEJ (2015) The influence of temperature and grain boundary volume on the resistivity of nanocrystalline nickel. J Appl Phys 118:184302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493529010.1063/1.4935290 ↗
14. Besenbacher F, Nielsen BB, Myers SM (1984) Defect trapping of ion-implanted deuterium in copper. J Appl Phys 56:3384–3393. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.33390310.1063/1.333903 ↗
15. Nørskov JK, Besenbacher F, Bøttiger J, Nielsen BB, Pisarev AA (1982) Interaction of hydrogen with defects in metals: interplay between theory and experiment. Phys Rev Lett 49:1420–1423. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.142010.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1420 ↗
16. Martinsson Å, Sandström R (2012) Hydrogen depth profile in phosphorus-doped, oxygen-free copper after cathodic charging. J Mater Sci 47:6768–6776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6592-y10.1007/s10853-012-6592-y ↗
17. Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
18. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–386810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
19. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)]. Phys Rev Lett 78:139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
20. Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–1797910.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
21. Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–177510.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
22. Hanh TTT, Takimoto Y, Sugino O (2014) First-principles thermodynamic description of hydrogen electroadsorption on the Pt(111) surface. Surf Sci 625:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2014.03.00610.1016/j.susc.2014.03.006 ↗
23. Zhao M, Anderson AB (2017) Theory of hydrogen deposition and evolution on Cu(111) electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 164:H691–H695. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1621709jes10.1149/2.1621709jes ↗
24. Kurth S, Perdew JP, Blaha P (1999) Molecular and solid-state tests of density functional approximations: LSD, GGAs, and meta-GGAs. Int J Quantum Chem 75:889–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1999)75:4/5%3c889:aid-qua54%3e3.0.co;2-810.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1999)75:4/5<889::aid-qua54>3.0.co;2-8 ↗
25. Haas P, Tran F, Blaha P (2009) Calculation of the lattice constant of solids with semilocal functionals. Phys Rev B 79:085104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.08510410.1103/PhysRevB.79.085104 ↗
26. Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H (2010) A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys 132:154104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
27. You Y-W, Kong X-S, Wu X-B et al (2013) Dissolving, trapping and detrapping mechanisms of hydrogen in bcc and fcc transition metals. AIP Adv 3:012118. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478954710.1063/1.4789547 ↗
28. Lousada CM, Sophonrat N, Yang W (2018) Mechanisms of formation of H, HO, and water and of water desorption in the early stages of cellulose pyrolysis. J Phys Chem C 122:12168–12176. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0217310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02173 ↗
29. Heinola K, Ahlgren T, Nordlund K, Keinonen J (2010) Hydrogen interaction with point defects in tungsten. Phys Rev B 82:094102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.09410210.1103/PhysRevB.82.094102 ↗
30. Polo V, Kraka E, Cremer D (2002) Electron correlation and the self-interaction error of density functional theory. Mol Phys 100:1771–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/0026897011011178810.1080/00268970110111788 ↗
31. Lousada CM, Johansson AJ, Korzhavyi PA (2015) Thermodynamics of H2O splitting and H2 formation at the Cu(110)–water interface. J Phys Chem C 119:14102–14113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0115410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01154 ↗
32. Greeley J, Mavrikakis M (2005) Surface and subsurface hydrogen: adsorption properties on transition metals and near-surface alloys. J Phys Chem B 109:3460–3471. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp046540q10.1021/jp046540q ↗
33. Nanba Y, Tsutsumi T, Ishimoto T, Koyama M (2017) Theoretical study of the hydrogen absorption mechanism into a palladium nanocube coated with a metal–organic framework. J Phys Chem C 121:14611–14617. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0313710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03137 ↗
34. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13:5188–519210.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
35. Randle V (2001) The coincidence site lattice and the ‘sigma enigma’. Mater Charact 47:411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00193-610.1016/S1044-5803(02)00193-6 ↗
36. Fortes MA (1972) Coincidence site lattices. Phys Status Solidi (b) 54:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.222054013110.1002/pssb.2220540131 ↗
37. Methfessel M, Paxton AT (1989) High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys Rev B 40:3616–3621. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
38. Queeney RA (1971) The twin boundary free energy of copper and the alpha brasses. Scr Metall 5:1031–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(71)90151-710.1016/0036-9748(71)90151-7 ↗
39. Fullman RL (1951) Interfacial free energy of coherent twin boundaries in copper. J Appl Phys 22:448–455. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.169998210.1063/1.1699982 ↗
40. Tschopp MA, Coleman SP, McDowell DL (2015) Symmetric and asymmetric tilt grain boundary structure and energy in Cu and Al (and transferability to other fcc metals). Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4:176–189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0040-110.1186/s40192-015-0040-1 ↗
41. Mishin OV, Gertsman VY, Gottstein G (1997) Distributions of orientations and misorientations in hot-rolled copper. Mater Charact 38:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(96)00130-110.1016/S1044-5803(96)00130-1 ↗
42. César M, Liu D, Gall D, Guo H (2014) Calculated resistances of single grain boundaries in copper. Phys Rev Appl 2:044007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.04400710.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044007 ↗
43. Li Y, Korzhavyi PA, Sandström R, Lilja C (2017) Impurity effects on the grain boundary cohesion in copper. Phys Rev Mater 1:070602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.07060210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.070602 ↗
44. McNaught AD, Wilkinson A. Compendium of chemical terminology, 2nd ed. (the “Gold Book”). Wiley Blackwell, New York
45. K-i Ikeda K, Yamada N Takata, Yoshida F, Nakashima H, Tsuji N (2008) Grain boundary structure of ultrafine grained pure copper fabricated by accumulative roll bonding. Mater Trans 49:24. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.ME20071510.2320/matertrans.ME200715 ↗
46. Bean JJ, McKenna KP (2016) Origin of differences in the excess volume of copper and nickel grain boundaries. Acta Mater 110:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.04010.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.040 ↗
47. Wang G-C, Nakamura J (2010) Structure sensitivity for forward and reverse water–gas shift reactions on copper surfaces: a DFT study. J Phys Chem Lett 1:3053–3057. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz101150w10.1021/jz101150w ↗
48. Mudiyanselage K, Yang Y, Hoffmann FM et al (2013) Adsorption of hydrogen on the surface and sub-surface of Cu(111). J Chem Phys 139:044712. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481651510.1063/1.4816515 ↗
49. Hellman A, Svensson K, Andersson S (2014) Hydrogen-induced reconstruction of Cu(100): two-dimensional and one-dimensional structures of surface hydride. J Phys Chem C 118:15773–15778. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp503514710.1021/jp5035147 ↗
50. Lousada CM, Fernandes RMF, Tarakina NV, Soroka IL (2017) Synthesis of copper hydride (CuH) from CuCO3·Cu(OH)2—a path to electrically conductive thin films of Cu. Dalton Trans 46:6533–6543. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7DT00511C10.1039/C7DT00511C ↗