Sticky rice–nanolime as a consolidation treatment for lime mortars
Source abstract
Abstract
For almost 1500 years, many ancient Chinese mortars have remained unaltered despite exposure to atmospheric agents. The main reason for this long-term durability is the addition of sticky rice water to the standard mortar ingredients (lime and sand) following traditional recipes. In recent years, these mortars have been methodically studied leading to the conclusion that amylopectin, a polysaccharide in the sticky rice, plays a crucial role in regulating calcite crystals growth, creating a denser microstructure and providing the mortar with hydrophobic properties which contributed to their survival. In recent decades, nanolime products based on Ca(OH) 2 nanoparticles suspended in alcohol or hydro-alcoholic medium have been extensively used for the consolidation of calcareous substrates mainly due to their chemical affinity and absence of side effects. Nanolime products have resulted in successful superficial consolidations. However, in-depth consolidation still needs to be achieved, and research needs to focus on ways to attain this objective. This study aimed to test a novel approach consisting of applying a pre-treatment of sticky rice and subsequently the nanolime. The resulting consolidation was evaluated by measuring changes of superficial cohesion, porosity, contact angle, drilling resistance, water absorption by capillarity, drying rate and aesthetic properties. The durability of the treatments was investigated by exposing samples to accelerated weathering. Results showed that the use of sticky rice in combination with nanolime yields a higher degree of consolidation increasing drilling resistance and delivering hydrophobic properties although prolonged exposure to high temperature and moisture can compromise treatment durability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Snow J, Torney C (2014) Lime mortars in traditional buildings. Short guide 6. Historic Scotland, Edinburgh
2. Mydin MAO (2017) Preliminary studies on the development of lime-based mortar with added egg white. Int J Technol 5:800–81010.14716/ijtech.v8i5.442 ↗
3. Zeng Y, Zhang B, Liang X (2008) A case study and mechanism investigation of typical mortars used on ancient architecture in China. Thermochim Acta 473:1–610.1016/j.tca.2008.03.019 ↗
4. Yang T, Ma X, Zhang B, Zhang H (2016) Investigations into the function of sticky rice on the microstructures of hydrated lime putties. Constr Build Mater 102(1):105–11210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.183 ↗
5. Gadhave RV, Mahanwar PA, Gadekar PT (2017) Starch-based adhesives for wood/wood composite bonding: review. Open J Polym Chem 7:19–3210.4236/ojpchem.2017.72002 ↗
6. Alcazar-Alay SC, Almeida-Meireles MA (2015) Physicochemical properties, modifications and applications of starches from different botanical sources. Food Sci Technol 35(2):215–236. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.674910.1590/1678-457X.6749 ↗
7. Wang L, Xie Y, Wu Y, Guo Z, Cai Y, Xu Y, Zhu X (2012) Failure mechanism and conservation of the ancient seawall structure along Hangzhou Bay, China. J Coast Res 28(6):1393–140310.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00036.1 ↗
8. Wei G, Zhang H, Wang H, Fang S, Zhang B, Yang F (2012) An experimental study on application of sticky rice–lime mortar in conservation. Constr Build Mater 28:624–63210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.008 ↗
9. Luo YB, Zhang YJ (2013) Investigation of sticky-rice lime mortar of the Horse Stopped Wall in Jiange. Herit Sci 1:26–3010.1186/2050-7445-1-26 ↗
10. Xiao Y, Fu X, Gu H, Gao F, Liu S (2014) Properties, characterization, and decay of sticky rice–lime mortars from the Wugang Ming Dynasty City Wall (China). Mater Charact 90:164–17210.1016/j.matchar.2014.01.024 ↗
11. Liu X, Ma X, Zhang B (2016) Analytical Investigations of traditional masonry mortars from Ancient City Walls Built during Ming and Qing Dynasties in China. Int J Archit Herit 10(5):663–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.110439910.1080/15583058.2015.1104399 ↗
12. Song Y (1958) Tian Gong Kai Wu. Commercial Press, Shanghai, p 197
13. Archaeology Crew of Henan Province (1958) A brick tomb with colorized portrait in Deng country. Henan Province, Cultural Relic Press, Beijing, p 20
14. Song Y, Wu TGK (1982) The exploitation of the works of nature first written in 1587. Times and Culture Publishing Co., Taibei
15. Yang F, Zhang B, Ma Q (2010) Study of sticky rice—lime mortar technology for the restoration of historical masonry construction. Acc Chem Res 43(6):936–94410.1021/ar9001944 ↗
16. Zhao P, Jackson MD, Zhang Y, Li G, Monteiro PJM, Yang L (2015) Material characteristics of ancient chinese lime binder and experimental reproductions with organic admixtures. Constr Build Mater 84:477–48810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.065 ↗
17. Yang R, Zhang Z, Xie M, Li K (2016) Microstructural insights into the lime mortars mixed with sticky rice sol-gel or water: a comparative study. Constr Build Mater 125:974–98010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.119 ↗
18. Yang R, Li K, Wang L, Bornert M, Zhang Z, Hu T (2016) A micro-experimental insight into the mechanical behaviour of sticky rice slurry-lime mortar subject to wetting–drying cycles. J Mater Sci 51(18):8422–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0099-x10.1007/s10853-016-0099-x ↗
19. Liu Q, Liu Y, Zeng K, Yang F, Hui ZhuH, Liu Q (2011) Advanced design of Chinese traditional materials for the conservation of historic stone buildings. J Archaeol Sci 38:1896–190010.1016/j.jas.2011.03.036 ↗
20. Lin JS, Lin ZJ, Chan JF (2005) The ancient earthquake and earthquake-resistance of ancient building in Quanzhou City. World Earthq Eng 21(2):159–166
21. Baglioni P, Chelazzi D, Giorgi R, Carretti E, Toccafondi N, Jaidar Y (2014) Commercial Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles for the consolidation of immovable works of art. Appl Phys A 114:723–73210.1007/s00339-013-7942-6 ↗
22. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Ruiz-Agudo E (2017) Nanolime: from synthesis to application. Pure Appl Chem 90(3):523–550. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2017-050610.1515/pac-2017-0506 ↗
23. Otero J, Charola AE, Grissom CA, Starinieri V (2017) An overview of nanolime as a consolidation method for calcareous substrates. Ge-conservación 11:71–7810.37558/gec.v11i0.455 ↗
24. Otero J, Starinieri V, Charola AE (2018) Nanolime for the consolidation of lime mortars: a comparison of three available products. Constr Build Mater 181:394–40710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.055 ↗
25. Daniele V, Taglieri G, Quaresima R (2008) The nanolime in cultural heritage conservation: characterization and analysis of the carbonation process. J Cult Herit 9(3):294–30110.1016/j.culher.2007.10.007 ↗
26. Lopez-Arce P, Zornoza-Indart A (2015) Carbonation acceleration of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles: induced by yeast fermentation. Appl Phys A 120(4):1475–149510.1007/s00339-015-9341-7 ↗
27. Borsoi G, Lubelli B, Van Hees RPJ, Rosario-Veiga M, Santos-Silva A (2015) Understanding the transport of nanolime consolidants within Maastricht limestone. J Cult Herit 18:242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.07.01410.1016/j.culher.2015.07.014 ↗
28. Borsoi G, Lubelli B, Van Hees R, Rosario-Veiga M, Santos-Silva A, Fedele L, Tomasin P (2016) Effect of solvent on nanolime transport within limestone: how to improve in-depth deposition. Colloids Surf A 497:171–18110.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.007 ↗
29. Borsoi G, Lubelli B, van Hees R, Rosario-Veiga M, Santos-Silva A (2016) Optimization of nanolime solvent for the consolidation of coarse porous limestone. Appl Phys A 122:846–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0382-310.1007/s00339-016-0382-3 ↗
30. BS EN (1999) 1015-2, Methods of test for mortar for masonry–Part 2: determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
31. BS EN (1999) 1015-3, Methods of test for mortar for masonry–Part 3: determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
32. Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Crystallogr 10:65–7110.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
33. Bish DL, Post JE (1989) Modern powder diffraction. Mineralogical Society of America, Crystal Research & Technology, Washington. ISBN 0-939950-24-310.1515/9781501509018 ↗
34. Taglieri G, Daniele V, Re Del, Volpe R (2015) A new and original method to produce Ca(OH)2 nanoparticles by using an anion exchange resin. Adv Nanoparticles 4:17–2410.4236/anp.2015.42003 ↗
35. Taglieri G, Otero J, Daniele V, Gioia G, Macera L, Starinieri V, Charola AE (2018) The biocalcarenite stone of Agrigento (Italy): preliminary investigations of compatible nanolime treatments. J Cult Herit 30:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.00310.1016/j.culher.2017.11.003 ↗
36. Miller BF, Root W (1991) Long-term storage of wheat starch paste. Stud Conserv 36(2):85–9210.1179/sic.1991.36.2.85 ↗
37. IRUG (Infrared & Raman Users Group) (2018) Data base, rice starch. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles
38. Rundl RE, Foster JF, Baldwin RR (1944) On the nature of the Starch–Iodine complex. J Am Chem Soc 66:2116–212010.1021/ja01240a031 ↗
39. Kornev KG, Neimark AV (2001) Spontaneous penetration of liquids into capillaries and porous membranes revisited. J Colloids Interface Sci 235:101–11310.1006/jcis.2000.7347 ↗
40. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Bettori I, Ruiz-Agudo E (2016) Kinetics and mechanism of calcium hydroxide conversion into calcium alkoxides: implications in heritage conservation using nanolimes. Langmuir 32(20):5183–519410.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01065 ↗
41. EN 13755 (2008) Natural Stone Test Methods—Determination of Water Absorption at Atmospheric Pressure. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
42. ASTM C 67-00 (2000) Standard test methods for measuring apparent porosity at atmospheric pressure. ASTM, Pennsylvania
43. EN 16322 (2013) European Standard, Conservation of Cultural Heritage – Test Methods – Determination of Drying Properties, European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
44. ASTM D3359-02 (2002) Standard test methods for measuring adhesion by tape test. ASTM International, Pennsylvania
45. Costa D, Delgado-Rodrigues J (2012) Consolidation of a porous limestone with nano-lime. In: Proceeding of 12th international congress on the deterioration and conservation of stone. Columbia University, New York, October 22–26, pp 9–20. http://iscs.icomos.org/pdf-files/NewYorkConf/costdelg.pdf
46. Delgado-Rodrigues J, Ferreira-Pinto AP, Nogueira R, Gomes A (2017) Consolidation of lime mortars with ethyl silicate, nanolime and barium hydroxide. Effectiveness assessment with microdrilling data. J Cult Herit 29:1296–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.00610.1016/j.culher.2017.07.006 ↗
47. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Suzuki A, Ruiz-Agudo E (2013) Alcohol dispersions of calcium hydroxide nanoparticles for stone conservation. Langmuir 29:11457–1147010.1021/la4017728 ↗
48. Pavlovic S, Brandao P (2003) Adsorption of starch, amylose, amylopectin and glucose monomer and their effect the flotation of hematite and quartz. Miner Eng 16:1117–112210.1016/j.mineng.2003.06.011 ↗
49. Walsh Z, Janecek ER, Jones M (2015) Natural polymers as alternative consolidants for the preservation of waterlogged archaeological wood. Stud Conserv 62(3):173–18310.1179/2047058414Y.0000000149 ↗
50. Charola AE, Vicenzi EP, Grissom CA, Little N (2017) Composition and characteristics of Kasota limestone on the exterior of the national museum of the American Indian building. In: Conservation of the exterior of the national museum of the American Indian building, vol 6, pp 17–26
51. Belitz H-D, Werner G, Schieberle P (2004) Food chemistry, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 318–323. ISBN 3-540-40818-510.1007/978-3-662-07279-0 ↗
52. Chandroth KS, Tholath EA (2008) Physicochemical rheological and thermal properties of njavara rice (oryza sativa) starch. J Agric Food Chem 56:12105–1211310.1021/jf802572r ↗