Predicting primary dendrite arm spacing in Al–Si–Mg alloys: effect of Mg alloying
Source abstract
Abstract
Directional solidification experiments were performed on Al–Si–Mg alloys to examine the effect of compositional variation on dendritic growth and to develop a novel growth model for the prediction of primary dendrite arm spacing in solidification microstructures. Instead of relying on the growth restriction factor or inoculant particle efficacy, this model examines solute effects to describe the final primary dendritic arm spacing. Increased Mg concentration was shown to decrease the dendritic growth velocity by decreasing constitutional undercooling. Solute enrichment at the solid/liquid interface was shown to limit lateral coarsening of primary dendrite arms and create a region of local solute depletion. This phenomenon allowed increased nucleation due to an increase in the resulting local liquidus temperature, and ultimately produced a refined primary dendrite arm spacing. Primary and secondary dendrites were measured and quantitatively analyzed in validation of the model. The model, which shows increased accuracy compared to existing models, was developed with aid of the three-dimensional cellular automaton method and experimentally verified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Yildirim M, Özyürek D (2013) The effects of Mg amount on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Si–Mg alloys. Mater Des 51:767–77410.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.089 ↗
2. Caceres CH, Davidson CJ, Griffiths JR, Wang QG (1999) The effect of Mg on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of Al–Si–Mg casting alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 30:2611–261810.1007/s11661-999-0301-8 ↗
3. Spear RE, Gardner GR (1963) Dendrite cell size. AFS Trans 71:209–215
4. Mccartney DG, Hunt JD (1981) Measurements of cell and primary dendrite. Acta Met 29:1851–186310.1016/0001-6160(81)90111-5 ↗
5. Hunt JD, Lu SZ (1996) Numerical modeling of cellular/dendritic array growth: spacing and structure predictions. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 27:611–62310.1007/BF02648950 ↗
6. Greer AL, Bunn AM, Tronche A et al (2000) Modelling of inoculation of metallic melts: application to grain refinement of aluminium by Al–Ti–B. Acta Mater 48:2823–2835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00094-X10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00094-X ↗
7. Spittle JA, Sadli S (1995) Effect of alloy variables on grain refinement of binary aluminium alloys with Al–Ti–B. Mater Sci Technol 11:533–537. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1995.11.6.53310.1179/mst.1995.11.6.533 ↗
8. Luo AA (2015) Material design and development: from classical thermodynamics to CALPHAD and ICME approaches. CALPHAD: Comput Coupling Phase Diagr Thermochem 50:6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2015.04.00210.1016/j.calphad.2015.04.002 ↗
9. Twarog D, Apelian D, Luo AA (2016) High Integrity casting of lightweight components. In: NADCA
10. Fortini A, Merlin M, Fabbri E et al (2016) On the influence of Mn and Mg additions on tensile properties, microstructure and quality index of the A356 aluminum foundry alloy. Proc Struct Integr 2:2238–224510.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.280 ↗
11. Matache G, Stefanescu DM, Puscasu C, Alexandrescu E (2016) Dendritic segregation and arm spacing in directionally solidified CMSX-4 superalloy. Int J Cast Met Res 29:303–31610.1080/13640461.2016.1166726 ↗
12. Stjohn DH, Qian M, Easton MA, Cao P (2011) The interdependence theory: the relationship between grain formation and nucleant selection. Acta Mater 59:4907–4921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.03510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.035 ↗
13. Mitrasinovic AM, Robles Hernandez FC (2012) Determination of the growth restriction factor and grain size for aluminum alloys by a quasi-binary equivalent method. Mater Sci Eng A 540:63–6910.1016/j.msea.2012.01.072 ↗
14. Prasad A, Yuan L, Lee PD, Stjohn DH (2013) The Interdependence model of grain nucleation: a numerical analysis of the Nucleation-Free Zone. Acta Mater 61:5914–5927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.01510.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.015 ↗
15. Stjohn DH, Prasad A, Easton MA, Qian M (2015) The contribution of constitutional supercooling to nucleation and grain formation. Metall Mater Trans A 46:4868–4885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-015-2960-y10.1007/s11661-015-2960-y ↗
16. Maxwell I, Hellawell A (1975) A simple model for grain refinement during solidification. Acta Metall 23:229–23710.1016/0001-6160(75)90188-1 ↗
17. Nastac L (1999) Numerical modeling of solidification morphologies and segregation patterns in cast dendritic alloys. Acta Mater 47:4253–4262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00325-010.1016/S1359-6454(99)00325-0 ↗
18. Pan S, Zhu M (2010) A three-dimensional sharp interface model for the quantitative simulation of solutal dendritic growth. Acta Mater 58:340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.01210.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.012 ↗
19. Luo S, Zhu MY (2013) A two-dimensional model for the quantitative simulation of the dendritic growth with cellular automaton method. Comput Mater Sci 71:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.040 ↗
20. Gu C, Ridgeway CD, Luo AA (2019) Examination of dendritic growth during solidification of ternary alloys via a novel quantitative 3D cellular automaton model. Metall Mater Trans B 50:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1480-810.1007/s11663-018-1480-8 ↗
21. Gu C, Lu Y, Cinkilic E et al (2019) Predicting grain structure in high pressure die casting of aluminum alloys: a coupled cellular automaton and process model. Comput Mater Sci 161:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.02910.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.029 ↗
22. Dobravec T, Mavrič B, Šarler B (2017) A cellular automaton—finite volume method for the simulation of dendritic and eutectic growth in binary alloys using an adaptive mesh refinement. J Comput Phys 349:351–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.08.01110.1016/j.jcp.2017.08.011 ↗
23. Zhu MF, Stefanescu DM (2007) Virtual front tracking model for the quantitative modeling of dendritic growth in solidification of alloys. Acta Mater 55:1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.03710.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.037 ↗
24. Wei L, Lin X, Wang M, Huang W (2012) A cellular automaton model for a pure substance solidification with interface reconstruction method. Comput Mater Sci 54:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.01210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.012 ↗
25. Gu C, Wei Y, Zhan X, Li Y (2017) A three-dimensional cellular automaton model of dendrite growth with stochastic orientation during the solidification in the molten pool of binary alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 22:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2016.118396210.1080/13621718.2016.1183962 ↗
26. Yao X, Dahle AK, Davidson CJ, StJohn DH (2006) Effect of solute on the growth rate and the constitutional undercooling ahead of the advancing interface during solidification of an alloy and the implications for nucleation. J Mater Res 21:2470–247910.1557/jmr.2006.0302 ↗
27. Rappaz M, Boettinger WJ (1999) On dendritic solidification of multicomponent alloys with unequal liquid diffusion coefficients. Acta Mater 47:3205–3219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00188-310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00188-3 ↗
28. Chen R, Xu Q, Liu B (2015) Cellular automaton simulation of three-dimensional dendrite growth in Al-7Si-Mg ternary aluminum alloys. Comput Mater Sci 105:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.03510.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.035 ↗
29. Chen R, Xu Q, Guo H et al (2017) Correlation of solidification microstructure refining scale, Mg composition and heat treatment conditions with mechanical properties in Al-7Si-Mg cast aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 685:391–40210.1016/j.msea.2016.12.051 ↗
30. Cao X, Campbell J (2006) Morphology of β-Al5FeSi phase in Al–Si cast alloys. Mater Trans 47:1303–131210.2320/matertrans.47.1303 ↗