Size effect of carbon black on the structure and mechanical properties of magnetorheological elastomers
Source abstract
Abstract
Four types of carbon black (CBN330, CBN550, CBN660 and CBN990) with increased particle size were chosen as the reinforcing filler for magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) preparation. The size effect of CB on the structural and mechanical property of MREs was investigated experimentally. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was adopted to characterize the structure of CB and MREs. Mooney viscosity, vulcanization curve, thermogravimetric analysis and mechanical property test were conducted to obtain the processing and vulcanization characteristics, thermal stability and mechanical parameters of MREs. It showed that MRE-CBN660 possessed a relatively better overall performance. Furthermore, the mechanical model of MREs and adsorption property of CB on carbonyl iron were studied theoretically. The theoretical results were coincidence with the experimental results, which interpreted the size effect of CB essentially.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Jeong UC, Yoon JH, Yang IH, Jeong JE, Kim JS, Chung KH, Oh JE (2013) Magnetorheological elastomer with stiffness-variable characteristics based on induced current applied to differential mount of vehicles. Smart Mater Struct 22:1150070–115008710.1088/0964-1726/22/11/115007 ↗
2. Ginder JM, Nichols ME, Elie LD, Clark SM (2000) Controllable-stiffness components based on magnetorheological elastomers. Proc SPIE 3985:418–42510.1117/12.388844 ↗
3. Yu Y, Li Y, Li J, Gu X (2016) A hysteresis model for dynamic behaviour of magnetorheological elastomer base isolator. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–15
4. Li Y, Li J, Li W, Du H (2014) A state-of-the-art review on magnetorheological elastomer devices. Smart Mater Struct 23:1–36
5. Ubaidillah Sutrisno J, Purwanto A, Mazlan SA (2015) Recent progress on magnetorheological solids: materials, fabrication, testing, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 17:563–59710.1002/adem.201400258 ↗
6. Xuan BN, Komatsuzaki T, Iwata Y, Asanuma H (2018) Modeling and semi-active fuzzy control of magnetorheological elastomer-based isolator for seismic response reduction. Mech Syst Signal Process 101:449–46610.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.040 ↗
7. Ge L, Gong X, Wang Y, Xuan S (2016) The conductive three dimensional topological structure enhanced magnetorheological elastomer towards a strain sensor. Compos Sci Technol 135:92–9910.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.015 ↗
8. Sedlacik M, Mrlik M, Babayan V, Pavlinek V (2016) Magnetorheological elastomers with efficient electromagnetic shielding. Compos Struct 135:199–20410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.037 ↗
9. Li ZT, Lin B, Jiang LW, Lin EC, Chen J, Zhang SJ, Tang YW, He FA, Li DH (2018) Effective preparation of magnetic superhydrophobic Fe3O4/PU sponge for oil-water separation. Appl Surf Sci 427:56–6410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.183 ↗
10. Xu Z, Tong J, Wu F (2018) Magnetorheological elastomer vibration isolation of tunable three-dimensional locally resonant acoustic metamaterial. Solid State Commun 271:51–5510.1016/j.ssc.2017.12.024 ↗
11. Wang Y, Hu Y, Wang Y, Deng H, Gong X, Zhang P, Jiang W, Chen Z (2006) Magnetorheological elastomers based on isobutylene–isoprene rubber. Polym Eng Sci 46:264–26810.1002/pen.20462 ↗
12. Plachy T, Kratina O, Sedlacik M (2018) Porous magnetic materials based on EPDM rubber filled with carbonyl iron particles. Compos Struct 192:126–13010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.095 ↗
13. Huang JC (2002) Carbon black filled conducting polymers and polymer blends. Adv Polym Technol 21:299–31310.1002/adv.10025 ↗
14. Gent AN, Campion RP (2001) Engineering with rubber: how to design rubber components. Hanser Gardner Publications, Cincinnati
15. Aziz SAA, Ubaidillah Mazlan SA, Ismail NIN, Choi SB (2018) Implementation of functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes on magnetorheological elastomer. J Mater Sci 53:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2315-310.1007/s10853-018-2315-3 ↗
16. Fröhlich J, Niedermeier W, Luginsland HD (2005) The effect of filler–filler and filler–elastomer interaction on rubber reinforcement. Compos Part A Appl Sci 36:449–46010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.004 ↗
17. Chen L, Gong XL, Li WH (2008) Effect of carbon black on the mechanical performances of magnetorheological elastomers. Polym Test 27:340–34510.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.003 ↗
18. Jung HS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ, Jung JH, Kim YG (2016) Magnetic carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheology. Compos Struct 136:106–11210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.008 ↗
19. Khimi R, Pickering KL (2015) Comparison of dynamic properties of magnetorheological elastomers with existing antivibration rubbers. Compos Part B Eng 83:175–18310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.033 ↗
20. Do TT, Celina M, Fredericks PM (2002) Attenuated total reflectance infrared microspectroscopy of aged carbon-filled rubbers. Polym Degrad Stab 77:417–42210.1016/S0032-3861(02)00238-0 ↗
21. An JS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ (2016) Modified silane-coated carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheological performance. Compos Struct 160:1020–102610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.128 ↗
22. Tripathy AR, Morin JE, Williams DE, Eyles SJ, Farris RJ (2002) A novel approach to improving the mechanical properties in recycled vulcanized natural rubber and its mechanism. Macromolecules 35:4616–462710.1021/ma012110b ↗
23. Liu L, Zhang SQ, Zhang BG, Liu GY, Yang H (2012) Rubber/carbon black interface interaction investigated by infrared spectrometry. Polym Mater Sci Eng 28:117–120
24. Boonstra BBST, Dannenberg EM (1959) Swelling behavior of rubbers compounded with reinforcing pigments. Rubber Chem Technol 32:825–84310.5254/1.3542452 ↗
25. Wang PY, Qinn HL, Yu HP (2010) Kinetics of natural rubber vulcanization in the end stage of curing period. J Appl Polym Sci 101:580–58310.1002/app.23554 ↗
26. Xue X, Yin Q, Jia H, Zhang X, Wen Y, Ji Q, Xu Z (2017) Enhancing mechanical and thermal properties of styrene-butadiene rubber/carboxylated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber blend by the usage of graphene oxide with diverse oxidation degrees. Appl Surf Sci 423:584–59110.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.200 ↗
27. Cvek M, Moucka R, Sedlacik M, Pavlinek V (2017) Electromagnetic, magnetorheological and stability properties of polysiloxane elastomers based on silane-modified carbonyl iron particles with enhanced wettability. Smart Mater Struct 26:10500310.1088/1361-665X/aa85c5 ↗
28. Yu M, Qi S, Fu J, Yang PA, Zhu M (2015) Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetorheological elastomer based on polyurethane/epoxy resin IPNs matrix. Smart Mater Struct 24:045009–04501710.1088/0964-1726/24/4/045009 ↗
29. Xu ZD, Liao YX, Ge T, Xu C (2016) Experimental and theoretical study of viscoelastic dampers with different matrix rubbers. Smart Mater Struct 142:04016051
30. Eem SH, Jung HJ, Koo JH (2012) Modeling of magneto-rheological elastomers for harmonic shear deformation. IEEE Trans Magn 48:3080–308310.1109/TMAG.2012.2205140 ↗
31. Yan XR (2008) Study on mechanism of magnetorheological elastomers variable stiffness and application. PhD dissertation, Chongqing University
32. Guo F, Du CB, Li RP (2014) Viscoelastic parameter model of magnetorheological elastomers based on abel dashpot. Adv Mech Eng 2014:62938610.1155/2014/629386 ↗
33. Pritz T (1996) Analysis of four-parameter fractional derivative model of real solid materials. J Sound Vib 195:103–11510.1006/jsvi.1996.0406 ↗
34. Rogers L (1984) Operators and fractional derivatives for viscoelastic constitutive equations. J Rheol 27:351–37210.1122/1.549710 ↗
35. Torvik PJ, Bagley RL (1984) On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials. J Appl Mech 51:725–728
36. Rossikhin YA, Shitikova MV (2012) On fallacies in the decision between the Caputo and Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives for the analysis of the dynamic response of a nonlinear viscoelastic oscillator. Mech Res Commun 45:22–2710.1016/j.mechrescom.2012.07.001 ↗
37. Norouzi M, Alehashem SMS, Vatandoost H, Ni YQ, Shahmardan MM (2015) A new approach for modeling of magnetorheological elastomers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 27:1–15
38. Borcea L, Bruno O (2001) On the magneto-elastic properties of elastomer–ferromagnet composites. J Mech Phys Solids 49:2877–291910.1016/S0022-5096(01)00108-9 ↗
39. Boehm HP (1994) Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon 32:759–76910.1016/0008-6223(94)90031-0 ↗
40. Bonnet ML, Costa D, Protopopoff E, Marcus P (2017) Theoretical study of the Pb adsorption on Ni, Cr, Fe surfaces and on Ni based alloys. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.17610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.176 ↗