Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 reinforced hybrid polymer composites: assessment of enhanced Li+ ion transport and potential for solid-state supercapacitor applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Composites of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) with Li+ ion containing polymer polyethylene oxide (PEO), viz. 5LiCF3SO3-95[PEO1−xLATPx], are prepared in a wide composition range (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.7). A maximum conductivity of ~ 10−4 Ω−1 cm−1 at 45 °C has been achieved for a composition x = 0.7 (70 LATP). With increase in LATP content, Li+ ion transport number systematically increases, i.e., from ~ 0.12 for 0 LATP to 0.46 for 70 LATP. Ionic mobility also exhibits a gradual rise with LATP content and attains a value ~ 2 orders of magnitude higher for 70 LATP than 0 LATP. Further, the K-edge energy of ether oxygen, obtained from X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra, does emphasize decoupling of Li+ ions from PEO matrix, particularly for large LATP content. Our investigations suggest that such hybrid films are competitive candidates for solid ionic devices. All-solid-state supercapacitors fabricated using these films demonstrate a capacity of ~ 2–4 F-g−1.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Reddy MV, Subba Rao GV, Chowdari BVR (2013) Metal oxides and oxysalts as anode materials for Li ion batteries. Chem Rev 113:5364–5457. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300188410.1021/cr3001884 ↗
2. Kim JG, Son B, Mukherjee S et al (2015) A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid state batteries. J Power Sources 282:299–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.054 ↗
3. Tarascon JM, Armand M (2001) Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
4. Rossbach A, Tietz F, Grieshammer S (2018) Structural and transport properties of lithium-conducting NASICON materials. J Power Sources 391:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.059 ↗
5. Li Y, Wang CA, Xie H et al (2011) High lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li6La3ZrTaO12. Electrochem Commun 13:1289–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2011.07.00810.1016/j.elecom.2011.07.008 ↗
6. Aziz SB, Woo TJ, Kadir MFZ, Ahmed HM (2018) A conceptual review on polymer electrolytes and ion transport models. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3:1–1710.1016/j.jsamd.2018.01.002 ↗
7. Mindemark J, Lacey MJ, Bowden T, Brandell D (2018) Beyond PEO-Alternative host materials for Li+-conducting solid polymer electrolytes. Prog Polym Sci 81:114–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.004 ↗
8. Croce F, Appetecchi GB, Persi L, Scrosati B (1998) Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Nature 394:456–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/2881810.1038/28818 ↗
9. Weston JE, Steele BCH (1982) Effects of inert fillers on the mechanical and electrochemical properties of lithium salt-poly(ethylene oxide) polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ion 7:75–7910.1016/0167-2738(82)90072-8 ↗
10. Ahn JH, Wang GX, Liu HK, Dou SX (2003) Nanoparticle-dispersed PEO polymer electrolytes for Li batteries. J Power Sources 119–121:422–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00264-710.1016/S0378-7753(03)00264-7 ↗
11. Fullerton-Shirey SK, Maranas JK (2010) Structure and mobility of PEO/LiClO 4 solid polymer electrolytes filled with Al2O3 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 114:9196–9206. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp906608p10.1021/jp906608p ↗
12. Fan L, Nan CW, Zhao S (2003) Effect of modified SiO2 on the properties of PEO-based polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ion 164:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.08.00410.1016/j.ssi.2003.08.004 ↗
13. Köster TKJ, van Wüllen L (2010) Cation-anion coordination, ion mobility and the effect of Al2O3 addition in PEO based polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ion 181:489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2010.02.00510.1016/j.ssi.2010.02.005 ↗
14. Xiong HM, Zhao KK, Zhao X et al (2003) Elucidating the conductivity enhancement effect of nano-sized SnO2 fillers in the hybrid polymer electrolyte PEO-SnO2-LiClO4. Solid State Ion 159:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00917-710.1016/S0167-2738(02)00917-7 ↗
15. Plocharski J, Wieczorek W (1988) PEO based composite solid electrolyte containing NASICON. Solid State Ion 30:979–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(88)90315-310.1016/0167-2738(88)90315-3 ↗
16. Nairn K, Forsyth M, Every H et al (1996) Polymer-ceramic ion-conducting composites. Solid State Ion 86–88:589–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(96)00212-310.1016/0167-2738(96)00212-3 ↗
17. Subramanian MA, Subramanian R, Clearfield A (1986) Lithium ion conductors in the system AB(IV)2(PO4)3 (B = Ti, Zr and Hf). Solid State Ion 18–19:562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(86)90179-710.1016/0167-2738(86)90179-7 ↗
18. Murugan R, Thangadurai V, Weppner W (2007) Fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:7778–7781. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
19. Prabu M, Reddy MV, Selvasekarapandian S, Subbarao GVS, Chowdari BVR (2013) Preparation, structural characterization and ionic conductivity studies of calcium doped LiZr2(PO4)3. In: Chowdari BVR, Kawamura J, Mizusaki J, Amezawa K (eds) Proc. 13th Asian Conf. Solid State Ion, World Scientific, pp 442–449
20. Rao RP, Reddy MV, Adams S, Chowdari BVR (2012) Preparation and mobile ion transport studies of Ta and Nb doped Li6Zr2O7 Li-fast ion conductors. Mater Sci Eng, B 177:100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.01510.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.015 ↗
21. Reddy MV, Adams S (2017) Molten salt synthesis and characterization of fast ion conductor Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12. J Solid State Electrochem 21:2921–2928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-017-3615-210.1007/s10008-017-3615-2 ↗
22. Cheng XB, Zhao CZ, Yao YX et al (2019) Recent advances in energy chemistry between solid-state electrolyte and safe lithium-metal anodes. Chem 5:74–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.00210.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.002 ↗
23. Chen F, Yang D, Zha W et al (2017) Solid polymer electrolytes incorporating cubic Li7La3Zr2O12 for all-solid-state lithium rechargeable batteries. Electrochim Acta 258:1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.16410.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.164 ↗
24. Keller M, Appetecchi GB, Kim GT et al (2017) Electrochemical performance of a solvent-free hybrid ceramic-polymer electrolyte based on Li7La3Zr2O12 in P(EO)15LiTFSI. J Power Sources 353:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.014 ↗
25. Liu W, Liu N, Sun J et al (2015) Ionic conductivity enhancement of polymer electrolytes with ceramic nanowire fillers. Nano Lett 15:2740–2745. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0060010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00600 ↗
26. Liu W, Lee SW, Lin D et al (2017) Enhancing ionic conductivity in composite polymer electrolytes with well-aligned ceramic nanowires. Nat Energy 2:17035. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.3510.1038/nenergy.2017.35 ↗
27. Cheng SHS, He KQ, Liu Y et al (2017) Electrochemical performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries using inorganic lithium garnets particulate reinforced PEO/LiClO4 electrolyte. Electrochim Acta 253:430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.16210.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.162 ↗
28. Chen L, Li Y, Li SP et al (2018) PEO/garnet composite electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries: from “ceramic-in-polymer” to “polymer-in-ceramic”. Nano Energy 46:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 ↗
29. Singh MD, Nayak B, Choudhury B et al (2017) Li+-NASICON crystallites in PEO-LiCF3SO3 matrix: characterization of a novel hybrid electrolyte. Solid State Ion 311(2017):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.09.00110.1016/j.ssi.2017.09.001 ↗
30. Singh MD, Dalvi A, Phase DM (2019) Electrical transport in PEO-NaI-NASICON nanocomposites: an assessment using impedance and X-Ray absorption spectroscopy. Mater Res Bull 118:110485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.05.01010.1016/j.materresbull.2019.05.010 ↗
31. Wang W, Yi E, Fici AJ et al (2017) Lithium ion conducting poly(ethylene oxide)-based solid electrolytes containing active or passive ceramic nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 121:2563–2573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1113610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11136 ↗
32. Liu L, Chu L, Jiang B, Li M (2019) Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 nanoparticle-reinforced solid polymer electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Solid State Ion 331:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.00710.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.007 ↗
33. Delmas C, Nadiri A, Soubeyroux JL (1988) The nasicon-type titanium phosphates ATi2(PO4)3 (A = Li, Na) as electrode materials. Solid State Ion 28–30:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(88)80075-410.1016/S0167-2738(88)80075-4 ↗
34. Takada K, Tansho M, Yanase I et al (2001) Lithium ion conduction in LiTi2(PO4)3. Solid State Ion 139:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00688-910.1016/S0167-2738(01)00688-9 ↗
35. Wang S, Ben L, Li H, Chen L (2014) Identifying Li+ ion transport properties of aluminum doped lithium titanium phosphate solid electrolyte at wide temperature range. Solid State Ion 268:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.00410.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.004 ↗
36. Evans J, Vincent CA, Bruce PG (1987) Electrochemical measurement of transference numbers in polymer electrolytes. Polymer 28:2324–232810.1016/0032-3861(87)90394-6 ↗
37. Watanabe M, Sanui K, Ogata N et al (1985) Ionic conductivity and mobility in network polymers from poly(propylene oxide) containing lithium perchlorate. J Appl Phys 57:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.33538610.1063/1.335386 ↗
38. Chandra S, Tolpadi SK, Hashmi SA (1988) Transient ionic current measurement of ionic mobilities in a few proton conductors. Solid State Ion 30:651–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(88)80119-X10.1016/S0167-2738(88)80119-X ↗
39. Ravel B, Newville M (2005) ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat 12:537–541. https://doi.org/10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
40. Pandey GP, Hashmi SA, Kumar Y (2010) Performance studies of activated charcoal based electrical double layer capacitors with ionic liquid gel polymer electrolytes. Energy Fuels 24:6644–6652. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101044710.1021/ef1010447 ↗
41. Zangina T, Hassan J, Matori KA et al (2016) Sintering behavior, ac conductivity and dielectric relaxation of Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3 NASICON compound. Results Phys 6:719–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.10.00310.1016/j.rinp.2016.10.003 ↗
42. Aono H, Sugimoto E, Sadaoka Y et al (1990) Ionic conductivity and sinterability of lithium titanium phosphate system. Solid State Ion 40–41:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(90)90282-V10.1016/0167-2738(90)90282-V ↗
43. Pandey GP, Hashmi SA, Agrawal RC (2008) Hot-press synthesized polyethylene oxide based proton conducting nanocomposite polymer electrolyte dispersed with SiO2 nanoparticles. Solid State Ion 179:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.04.00610.1016/j.ssi.2008.04.006 ↗
44. Aono H, Sugimoto E, Imanaka N, Adachi G (1990) Ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes based on lithium titanium phosphate. J Electrochem Soc 137:1023–102710.1149/1.2086597 ↗
45. Kato Y, Watanabe M, Sanui K, Naoya Ogata N (1990) Ionic transport number of network PEO electrolytes. Solid State Ion 41:632–63610.1016/0167-2738(90)90085-6 ↗
46. Golodnitsky D, Strauss E, Peled E, Greenbaum S (2015) Review—on order and disorder in polymer electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 162:A2551–A2566. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0161514jes10.1149/2.0161514jes ↗
47. Brown M, Peierls RE, Stern EA (1977) White lines in x-ray absorption. Phys Rev B 15:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.15.73810.1103/PhysRevB.15.738 ↗
48. Koningsberger DC, Mojet BL, van Dorssen GE, Ramaker DE (2000) XAFS spectroscopy; fundamental principles and data analysis. Top Catal 10:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101910531022110.1023/A:1019105310221 ↗
49. Singh R, Gupta M, Phase DM, Mukherjee SK (2019) Phase growth analysis of sputtered TiO2 thin films at low oxygen partial pressures using XANES and XRR. Mater Res Express 6:116449. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab4e3f10.1088/2053-1591/ab4e3f ↗
50. Ratner MA, Shriver DF (1988) Ion transport in solvent-free polymers. Chem Rev 88:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00083a00610.1021/cr00083a006 ↗