Biaxial fatigue property enhancement of gradient ultra-fine-grained Zircaloy-4 prepared by surface mechanical rolling treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface mechanical rolling treatment (SMRT) was applied to modify the microstructure and biaxial fatigue properties of Zircaloy-4 tubes. Gradient ultra-fine microstructural layers of ~ 500 μm in-depth from the outside surface were fabricated on rods. Residual compressive stresses with gradient distribution were simultaneously produced. Biaxial tension–torsion fatigue test was conducted to assess the effect of modified microstructures and residual stress on the fatigue lifetime and deformed substructure of Zircaloy-4. The results show that the SMRT Zircaloy-4 alloy possesses more than double biaxial fatigue lifetime than that of the as-received Zircaloy-4 without SMRT at a tension–torsion stress ratio of 1.0. Microstructural examination reveals that the SMRT Zircaloy-4 alloy shows sequential deformation characteristics at different layers across the tubular wall during biaxial fatigue. The fatigued dislocation configuration changes from dislocation cells within the depth of 200 μm, to bent lamellar structures at the depth of ~ 300 μm, and embryonic dislocation cells at the depth of ~ 500 μm. The enhancement of biaxial fatigue life in the SMRT Zircaloy-4 can be attributed to the combined effects of the gradient ultra-fine structure and the gradient residual compressive stress in the vicinity of surface suppress the fatigue crack initiation and propagation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Zinkle SJ, Was GS (2013) Materials challenges in nuclear energy. Acta Mater 61:735–75810.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
2. Cox B (2005) Some thoughts on the mechanisms of in-reactor corrosion of zirconium alloys. J Nucl Mater 336(2–3):331–36810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.029 ↗
3. Jin N, Yang YQ, Luo X, Xia ZH (2013) Development of CVD Ti-containing films. Prog Mater Sci 58:1490–153310.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.07.001 ↗
4. Shi XY, Liu Y, Li DJ, Chen B, Zeng XQ, Lu J, Ding WJ (2015) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of an Mg–Gd alloy subjected to surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 630:146–15410.1016/j.msea.2015.02.009 ↗
5. Zhang T, Wang DP, Wang Y, Deng CY, Gong BM (2013) Surface alloying method of ultrasonic shot peening on iron surface. Appl Surf Sci 265:671–67610.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.079 ↗
6. Lee WH, Kim SJ, Lee WJ et al (2001) Mechanism of surface modification of a porous-coated Ti–6Al–4V implant fabricated by electrical resistance sintering. J Mater Sci 36:3573–3577. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101790530573710.1023/A:1017905305737 ↗
7. Li W, Liu P, Ma FC, Rong YH (2009) Microstructural characterization of nanocrystalline nickel produced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. J Mater Sci 44:2925–2930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3386-y10.1007/s10853-009-3386-y ↗
8. Huang HW, Wang ZB, Lu J, Lu K (2015) Fatigue behaviors of AISI 316L stainless steel with a gradient nanostructured surface layer. Acta Mater 87:150–16010.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.057 ↗
9. Lu K, Lu J (1999) Surface nanocrystallization (SNC) of metallic materials presentation of the concept behind a new approach. J Mater Sci Technol 15:193–19710.1179/026708399101505707 ↗
10. Chen K, Yang HM, Gao JS, Yang Y (2018) Microstructure detection of Mg–Zi–Ti–Si amorphous composite coating prepared by SMAT. Mater Charact 135:265–26910.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.051 ↗
11. Tao NR, Wang ZB, Tong WP (2002) An investigation of surface nanocrystallization mechanism in Fe induced by surface mechanical attrition treatment. Acta Mater 50:4603–461610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00310-5 ↗
12. Wang K, Tao NR, Liu G, Lu J, Lu K (2006) Plastic strain-induced grain refinement at the nanometer scale in copper. Acta Mater 54:5281–529110.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.013 ↗
13. Zhu KY, Vassel A, Brisset F, Lu K, Lu J (2004) Nanostructure formation mechanism of α-titanium using SMAT. Acta Mater 52:4101–411010.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.023 ↗
14. Wang Q, Yin YF, Sun QY, Xiao L, Sun J (2014) Gradient nano microstructure and its formation mechanism in pure titanium produced by surface rolling treatment. J Mater Res 29:569–57710.1557/jmr.2014.19 ↗
15. Legrand PB (1984) Relations entre la structure électronique et la facilité de glissement dans les métaux hexagonaux compacts. Philos Mag B 49:171–18410.1080/13642818408227636 ↗
16. Fang TH, Li WL, Tao NR, Lu K (2011) Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 133:1587–159010.1126/science.1200177 ↗
17. Wu XL, Jiang P, Chen L, Yuan F, Zhu YT (2014) Extraordinary strain hardening by gradient structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):719710.1073/pnas.1324069111 ↗
18. Unal O, Varol R (2015) Surface severe plastic deformation of AISI 304 via conventional shot peening, severe shot peening and repeening. Appl Surf Sci 351:289–29510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.093 ↗
19. Jelliti S, Richard C, Retraint D, Roland T, Chemkhi M, Demangel C (2013) Effect of surface nanocrystallization on the corrosion behavior of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. Surf Coat Technol 224:82–8710.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.052 ↗
20. Amanova A, Cho IS, Pyun YS (2016) Microstructural evolution and surface properties of nanostructured Cu-based alloy by ultrasonic nanocrystalline surface modification Technique. Appl Surf Sci 388:185–19510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.237 ↗
21. Li D, Chen HN, Xu H (2009) The effect of nanostructured surface layer on the fatigue behaviors of a carbon steel. Appl Surf Sci 255:3811–381610.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.037 ↗
22. Zhuang W, Liu Q, Djugum R, Sharp PK, Paradowska A (2014) Deep surface rolling for fatigue life enhancement of laser clad aircraft aluminium alloy. Appl Surf Sci 320:558–56210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.139 ↗
23. Dai K, Shaw L (2008) Analysis of fatigue resistance improvements via surface severe plastic deformation. Int J Fatigue 3:1398–140810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.010 ↗
24. Bagherifard S, Fernandez-Parient I, Ghelichi R, Guagliano M (2014) Effect of severe shot peening on microstructure and fatigue strength of cast iron. Int J Fatigue 65:64–7010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.022 ↗
25. Cubillos JM, Coronado JJ, Rodríguez SA (2017) Deep rolling effect on fatigue behavior of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Fatigue 95:120–13110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.008 ↗
26. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Kidlington
27. Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
28. Li RH, Zhang ZJ, Zhang P, Zhang ZF (2013) Improved fatigue properties of ultrafine-grained copper under cyclic torsion loading. Acta Mater 61:585710.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.032 ↗
29. Schijve J (2008) Fatigue of structures and materials, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht
30. Zhuang WZ, Halford GR (2001) Investigation of residual stress relaxation under cyclic load. Int J Fatigue 23:31–3710.1016/S0142-1123(01)00132-3 ↗
31. Dalaei K, Karlsson B, Svensson LE (2011) Stability of shot peening induced residual stresses and their influence on fatigue lifetime. Mater Sci Eng A 28:1008–101510.1016/j.msea.2010.09.050 ↗
32. Kumar S, Li XY, Haque A, Gao HJ (2011) Is stress concentration relevant for nanocrystalline metals? Nano Lett 11:2510–251610.1021/nl201083t ↗
33. Zhang P, Li SX, Zhang ZF (2011) General relationship between strength and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 529:62–7310.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061 ↗
34. Callister WD Jr (2007) Materials science and engineering—an introduction. Wiley, New York
35. Tiryakioğlu M, Robinson JS, Salazar Guapuriche MA, Zhao YY, Eason PD (2015) Hardness–strength relationships in the aluminum alloy 7010. Mater Sci Eng A 631:196–20010.1016/j.msea.2015.02.049 ↗