Effect of mechanical milling on the corrosion behavior of Al–Zn/Al2O3 composite in NaCl solution
Source abstract
Abstract
Ceramic particle reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites (MMCs) have resulted in potential use in aerospace and automobile industries. The composites have been processed by mechanical milling followed by traditional powder metallurgy route. The Al crystallite size is reduced to 27 nm after 60 h of milling. Results of the corrosion tests, evaluated using the potentiodynamic method in the NaCl solution, indicate that corrosion of the investigated composite materials depends on the weight fraction of the reinforcing particles. It has been found out, based on the determined anode polarization curves, that the investigated materials are susceptible to pitting corrosion. Moreover, experimental results suggest that the milled composite material Al–Zn/Al2O3p has higher corrosion resistance in the selected environment compared to unmilled composite Al–Zn/Al2O3p. Polarization curves show that the milling procedure improves the composite corrosion resistance in passive conditions. This is illustrated by the corrosion potential, which becomes nobler with milling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Datta J, Datta S, Banerjee MK, Bandyopadhyay S (2004) Composites: Part A 35:100310.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.012 ↗
2. Aikin RM Jr (1997) J Organomet 49:35
3. Koczak MJ, Premkumar MK (1993) J Min Met Mater Soc 45(1):4410.1007/BF03223365 ↗
4. Ying DY, Zhang DL (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 286:15210.1016/S0921-5093(00)00627-4 ↗
5. Dobrzánski LA, Włodarczyk A, Adamiak M (2005) J Mater Process Technol 162:2710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.006 ↗
6. Kiourtsidis GE, Skolianos SM, Pavlidou EG (1999) Corros Sci 41:118510.1016/S0010-938X(98)00179-6 ↗
7. Grosjean M-H, Zidoune M, Roue L, Huot J, Schulz R (2004) Electrochimica Acta 49:246110.1016/j.electacta.2004.02.001 ↗
8. Kirchheim R, Huang XY, Cui P, Birringer R, Gleiter H (1992) Nanostruct Mater 1:16710.1016/0965-9773(92)90071-5 ↗
9. Elkedim O, Cao HS, Guay D (2002) J Mater Process Technol 121:38310.1016/S0924-0136(01)01225-0 ↗
10. Ashassi-Sorkabi H, Ghasemi Z, Seifzadeh D (2005) Appl Surf Sci 249:40810.1016/j.apsusc.2004.12.016 ↗
11. Badawy WA, Al-KharafiL FM (1997) Corr Sci 39(4):68110.1016/S0010-938X(97)89336-5 ↗
12. Sharma SC, Somashekar DR, Satish BM (2001) J Mater Process Technol 118:6210.1016/S0924-0136(01)00864-0 ↗