TiO2–Cu photocatalysts: a study on the long- and short-range chemical environment of the dopant
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the short- and long-range chemical environments of Cu dopant in TiO2 photocatalyst have been investigated. The Cu-doped and undoped TiO2 specimens were prepared by the sol–gel approach employing CuSO4·5H2O and Ti(O-iPr)4 precursors and subjecting the dried gels to thermal treatment at 400 and 500 °C. The photocatalytic activity, investigated by methylene blue degradation under sunlight irradiation, showed a significantly higher efficiency of Cu-doped samples than that of pure TiO2. The X-ray diffraction results showed the presence of anatase phase for samples prepared at 400 and 500 °C. No crystalline CuSO4 phase was detected below 500 °C. It was also found that doping decreases the crystallite size in the (004) and (101) directions. Infrared spectroscopy results indicated that the chemical environment of sulfate changes as a function of thermal treatment, and UV–vis spectra showed that the band gap decreases with thermal treatment and Cu doping, showing the lowest value for the 400 °C sample. X-ray absorption fine structure measurements and analysis refinements revealed that even after thermal treatment and photocatalytic assays, the Cu2+ local order is similar to that of CuSO4, containing, however, oxygen vacancies. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data, limited to the near surface region of the catalyst, evidenced, besides CuSO4, the presence of Cu1+ and CuO phases, indicating the active role of Cu in the TiO2 lattice.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Kdasi A, Iris A, Saed K, Guan CT (2004) Glob Nest Int J 6:222
2. Di Paola A, Garcia-Lopez E, Ikeda S, Marci G, Ohtani B, Palmisano L (2002) Catal Today 75:8710.1016/S0920-5861(02)00048-2 ↗
3. Srinivas B, Shubhamangala B, Lalitha K, Reddy PAK, Kumari VD, Subrahmanyam M et al (2011) Photochem Photobiol 87:99510.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00946.x ↗
4. Tseng IH, Wu JCS, Chou HY (2004) J Catal 221:43210.1016/j.jcat.2003.09.002 ↗
5. Gurman JS (1982) J Mater Sci 17:1541. doi: 10.1007/BF0054077910.1007/BF00540779 ↗
6. Xiong L, Yang F, Yan L, Yan N, Yang X, Qiu M et al (2011) J Phys Chem Solids 72:110410.1016/j.jpcs.2011.06.016 ↗
7. Carvalho HWP, Batista APL, Hammer P, Ramalho TC (2010) J Hazard Mater 184:27310.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.033 ↗
8. Ravel B, Newville M (2005) J Synchrotron Radiat 12:53710.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
9. Madarasz J, Braileanu A, Pokol G (2008) J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 82:29210.1016/j.jaap.2008.05.003 ↗
10. Collins LW, Gibson EK, Wendlandt WW (1974) Thermochim Acta 9:1510.1016/0040-6031(74)85090-2 ↗
11. Rao BR (1961) Acta Crystallogr 14:321
12. López-Ayala S, Rincón ME, Pfeiffer H (2009) J Mater Sci 44:4162. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3617-210.1007/s10853-009-3617-2 ↗
13. Colon G, Maicu M, Hidalgo MC, Navio JA (2006) Appl Catal B 67:4110.1016/j.apcatb.2006.03.019 ↗
14. Moon J, Takagi H, Fujishiro Y, Awano M (2001) J Mater Sci 36:949. doi: 10.1023/A:100481970629210.1023/A:1004819706292 ↗
15. Nakamoto K (1986) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, p 232
16. Liao LF, Lien CF, Lin JL (2001) Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:383110.1039/b103419g ↗
17. Joyner RW (1980) Chem Phys Lett 72:16210.1016/0009-2614(80)80264-8 ↗
18. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1992) Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Chastain J, editor. Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Minnesota
19. Bueno PR, Tararan R, Parra R, Joanni E, Ramirez MA, Ribeiro WC et al (2009) J Phys D 42:05040410.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055404 ↗
20. Xin B, Wang P, Ding D, Liu J, Ren Z, Fu H (2008) Appl Surf Sci 254:256910.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.002 ↗