journal article·2015-11Open access

Dog-bone copper specimens prepared by one-step spark plasma sintering

Claire Arnaud, Charles Manière, Geoffroy Chevallier, Claude Estournès, Ronan Mainguy, Florence Lecouturier, David Mesguich, Alicia Weibel, Lise Durand, Christophe Laurent

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Copper dog-bone specimens are prepared by one-step spark plasma sintering (SPS). For the same SPS cycle, the influence of the nature of the die (graphite or WC–Co) on the microstructure, microhardness, and tensile strength is investigated. All samples exhibit a high Vickers microhardness and high ultimate tensile strength. A numerical electro-thermal model is developed, based on experimental data inputs such as simultaneous temperature and electrical measurements at several key locations in the SPS stack, to evaluate the temperature and current distributions for both dies. Microstructural characterizations show that samples prepared using the WC–Co die exhibit a larger grain size, pointing out that it reached a higher temperature during the SPS cycle. This is confirmed by numerical simulations demonstrating that with the WC–Co die, the experimental sample temperature at the beginning of the dwell is higher than the experimental control temperature measured at the outer surface of the die. This difference is mostly ascribed to a high vertical thermal contact resistance and a higher current density flowing through the WC–Co punch/die interface. Indeed, simulations show that current density is maximal just outside the copper sample when using the WC–Co die, whereas by contrast, with the graphite die, current density tends to flow through the copper sample. These results are guidelines for the direct, one-step, preparation of complex-shaped samples by SPS which avoids waste and minimizes machining.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Orrù R, Licheri R, Locci AM, Cincotti A, Cao G (2009) Consolidation/synthesis of materials by electric current activated/assisted sintering. Mater Sci Eng R 63:127–28710.1016/j.mser.2008.09.003 ↗
2. Munir ZA, Quach DV, Ohyanagi M (2011) Electric current activation of sintering: a review of the pulsed electric current sintering process. J Am Ceram Soc 94:1–1910.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04210.x ↗
3. Vasiliev PO, Shen Z, Hodgkins RP, Bergström L (2006) Meso/macroporous, mechanically stable silica monoliths of complex shape by controlled fusion of mesoporous spherical particles. Chem Mater 18:4933–493810.1021/cm061205v ↗
4. Jiang D, Hulbert DM, Kuntz JD, Anselmi-Tamburini U, Mukherjee AK (2007) Spark plasma sintering: a high strain rate low temperature forming tool for ceramics. Mater Sci Eng A 463:89–9310.1016/j.msea.2006.07.163 ↗
5. Cai K, Romàn-Manso B, Smay JE, Zhou J, Osendi MI, Belmonte M, Miranzo P (2012) Geometrically complex silicon carbide structures fabricated by robocasting. J Am Ceram Soc 95:2660–266610.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05276.x ↗
6. Monceau D, Oquab D, Estournes C, Boidot M, Selezneff S, Ratel-Ramond N (2010) Thermal barrier systems and multi-layered coatings fabricated by spark plasma sintering for the protection of Ni-base superalloys. Mater Sci Forum 654–656:1826–183110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.1826 ↗
7. Voisin T, Durand L, Karnatak N, Le Gallet S, Thomas M, Le Berre Y, Castagné JF, Couret A (2013) Temperature control during spark plasma sintering and application to up-scaling and complex shaping. J Mater Proc Technol 213:269–27810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.09.023 ↗
8. Olevsky E, Khaleghi E, Garcia C, Bradbury W (2010) Fundamentals of spark plasma sintering: applications to net-shaping of high strength temperature resistant components. Mater Sci Forum 654–656:412–41510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.412 ↗
9. Chanthapan S, Rape A, Gephart S, Kulkarni AK, Singh J (2011) Industrial scale field assisted sintering: an emerging disruptive manufacturing technology: applications. Adv Mater Proc 169:25–28
10. McWilliams B, Yu J, Zavaliangos A (2015) Fully coupled thermal-electric-sintering simulation of electric field assisted sintering of net-shape compacts. J Mater Sci 50:519–530. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8463-110.1007/s10853-014-8463-1 ↗
11. Pavia A, Durand L, Ajustron F, Bley V, Chevallier G, Peigney A, Estournès C (2013) Electro-thermal measurements and finite element method simulations of a spark plasma sintering device. J Mater Process Technol 213:1327–133610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.02.003 ↗
12. Zavaliangos A, Zhang J, Krammer M, Groza JR (2004) Temperature evolution during field activated sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 379:218–22810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.052 ↗
13. Maizza G, Grasso S, Sakka Y, Noda T, Ohashi O (2007) Relation between microstructure, properties and spark plasma sintering (SPS) parameters of pure ultrafine WC powder. Sci Technol Adv Mater 8:644–65410.1016/j.stam.2007.09.002 ↗
14. Maizza G, Grasso S, Sakka Y (2009) Moving finite-element mesh model for aiding spark plasma sintering in current control mode of pure ultrafine WC powder. J Mater Sci 44:1219–1236. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3179-810.1007/s10853-008-3179-8 ↗
15. Cincotti A, Locci AM, Orrù R, Cao G (2007) Modeling of SPS apparatus: temperature, current and strain distribution with no powders. AIChE J 53:703–71910.1002/aic.11102 ↗
16. Anselmi-Tamburini U, Gennari S, Garay JE, Munir ZA (2005) Fundamental investigations on the spark plasma sintering/synthesis process: II. Modeling of current and temperature distributions. Mater Sci Eng A 394:139–14810.1016/j.msea.2004.11.019 ↗
17. Vanmeensel K, Laptev A, Hennicke J, Vleugels J, Van der Biest O (2005) Modelling of the temperature distribution during field assisted sintering. Acta Mater 53:4379–438810.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.042 ↗
18. Ritasalo R, Cura ME, Liu XW, Söderberg O, Ritvonen T, Hannula SP (2010) Spark plasma sintering of submicron-sized Cu-powder—influence of processing parameters and powder oxidization on microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 527:2733–273710.1016/j.msea.2010.01.008 ↗
19. Sule R, Olubambi PA, Sigalas I, Asante JKO, Garrett JC (2014) Effect of SPS consolidation parameters on submicron Cu and Cu-CNT composites for thermal management. Powder Technol 258:198–20510.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.034 ↗
20. Robinson P (1990) Properties and selection nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials, ASM handbook vol. 2. ASM International, Novelty, p 267
21. Brindley BJ, Worthington PJ (1970) Yield-point phenomena in substitutional alloys. Met Rev 15:101–11410.1179/imr.1970.15.1.101 ↗
22. Zhang ZH, Wang FC, Wang L, Li SK (2008) Ultrafine-grained copper prepared by spark plasma sintering process. Mater Sci Eng A 476:201–20510.1016/j.msea.2007.04.107 ↗
23. Grasso S, Sakka Y, Maizza G (2009) Pressure effects on temperature distribution during spark plasma sintering with graphite sample. Mater Trans 50:2111–211410.2320/matertrans.M2009148 ↗
24. Li W, Olevsky EA, McKittrick J, Maximenko AL, German RM (2012) Densification mechanisms of spark plasma sintering: multi-step pressure dilatometry. J Mater Sci 47:7036–7046. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6515-y10.1007/s10853-012-6515-y ↗