Carbonization temperature dependence of hydrovoltaic conversion of natural wood
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrovoltaic effect is emerging as a potential way to acquire electric energy from water. Some carbon materials, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene or porous carbon, have revealed featured water-electric process due to their typical double electric layer (DEL) behavior. In this work, the carbonized wood (CW) was demonstrated to exhibit a considerable hydrovoltaic performance as water flows in its vertical-pores. Electrochemical studies verified that the maximum open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current achieved ~ 0.27 V and ~ 0.62 μA in 0.5 M NaCl solution, respectively. Further research manifested that carbonization temperature featured prominently on the hydrovoltaic performance owing to the evolution of pyrolytic carbon. At different heat treatment temperatures from 500 to 800 °C, the organic matters of wood were gradually transformed into stacked polyaromatic hydrocarbon, organic mesophase and amorphous carbon through process of thermopolymerization and pyrolyzation. The structure and specific surface area of the amorphous carbon involved played a pivotal role on the water-induced voltage resulting from the DEL effect and electron drag process between water and carbon atoms. The lower resistance of amorphous carbon also enhances the short-circuit current of the CW device. This work is mainly dedicated to provide a potential strategy to get water-induced energy from biochar materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Law M, Greene LE, Johnson JC, Saykally R, Yang PD (2005) Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. N Mat 4(6):455–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat138710.1038/nmat1387 ↗
2. Wang ZL, Song J (2006) Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312(5771):242–246. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.112400510.1126/science.1124005 ↗
3. Poudel B, Hao Q, Ma Y et al (2008) High-thermoelectric performance of nanostructured Bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science 320(5876):634–638. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.115644610.1126/science.1156446 ↗
4. Zhang HW, Shen PK (2012) Recent development of polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. Chem Rev 112(5):2780–2832. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200035s10.1021/cr200035s ↗
5. Wagenen RAV, Andrade JD (1980) Flat plate streaming potential investigations: hydrodynamics and electrokinetic equivalency. J Colloid Interface Sci 76(2):305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(80)90374-410.1016/0021-9797(80)90374-4 ↗
6. Král P, Shapiro M (2001) Nanotube electron drag in flowing liquids. Phys Rev Lett 86(1):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.13110.1103/PhysRevLett.86.131 ↗
7. Ghosh S, Sood AK, Kumar N (2003) Carbon nanotube flow sensors. Science 299:1042–1044. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.107908010.1126/science.1079080 ↗
8. Persson BNJ, Tartaglino U, Tosatti E, Ueba H (2004) Electronic friction and liquid-flow-induced voltage in nanotubes. Phys Rev B 69(23):1681–1685. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.23541010.1103/PhysRevB.69.235410 ↗
9. Ghosh S, Sood AK, Ramaswamy S, Kumar N (2004) Flow-induced voltage and current generation in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 70(20):3352–3359. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.20542310.1103/PhysRevB.70.205423 ↗
10. Liu J, Dai L, Baur JW (2007) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes for flow-induced voltage generation. J Appl Phys 101(6):343. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.271077610.1063/1.2710776 ↗
11. Dhiman P, Yavari F, Mi X, Gullapalli H, Shi YF, Ajayan PM, Koratkar N (2011) Harvesting energy from water flow over graphene. Nano Lett 11(8):3123–3127. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201155910.1021/nl2011559 ↗
12. Yin J, Zhang ZH, Li X, Yu J, Zhou JX, Chen WQ, Guo WL (2014) Waving potential in graphene. Nat Commun 2014(5):3582. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201155910.1021/nl2011559 ↗
13. Yin J, Li XM, Yu J, Zhang ZH, Zhou JX, Guo WL (2014) Generating electricity by moving a droplet of ionic liquid along graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 9(5):378–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.5610.1038/nnano.2014.56 ↗
14. Lee SH, Jung Y, Kim S, Han CS (2013) Flow-induced voltage generation in non-ionic liquids over monolayer graphene. Appl Phys Lett 102(6):102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479270210.1063/1.4792702 ↗
15. Haber N (1982) Chemoelectronic mobilization of chemical species in low-conductivity fluids: new electrokinetic effect. P Natl Acad Sci USA 79(2):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.2.27210.1073/pnas.79.2.272 ↗
16. Sparreboom W, Berg AVD, Eijkel JC (2009) Principles and applications of nanofluidic transport. Nat Nanotechnol 4(11):713–720. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.33210.1038/nnano.2009.332 ↗
17. Bocquet L, Charlaix E (2010) Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem Soc Rev 39(3):1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1039/b909366b10.1039/b909366b ↗
18. Nguyen T, Xie YB, Vreede LJD, Berg AVD, Eijkel JCT (2013) Highly enhanced energy conversion from the streaming current by polymer addition. Lab Chip 13(16):3210–3216. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc41232f10.1039/c3lc41232f ↗
19. Hsu WL, Daiguji H, Dunstan DE, Davidson MR, Harvie DJE (2016) Electrokinetics of the silica and aqueous electrolyte solution interface: viscoelectric effects. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2016:108–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2016.05.00110.1016/j.cis.2016.05.001 ↗
20. Yuan Q, Zhao YP (2009) Hydroelectric voltage generation based on water-filled single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 131(18):6374–6376. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809337210.1021/ja8093372 ↗
21. Zhong HK, Xia J, Wang FC, Chen HS, Wu HG, Lin SS (2017) Graphene-piezoelectric material heterostructure for harvesting energy from water flow. Adv Funct Mater 27(5):1604226. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160422610.1002/adfm.201604226 ↗
22. He YJ, Lao JC, Yang TT, Li X, Zang XB, Li XM, Zhu M, Chen Q et al (2015) Galvanism of continuous ionic liquid flow over graphene grids. Appl Phys Lett 107(8):131. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.492974510.1063/1.4929745 ↗
23. Zhong HK, Wu ZQ, Li XQ, Xu WL, Xu S, Zhang SJ, Xu ZJ, Chen HS et al (2016) Graphene based two dimensional hybrid nanogenerator for concurrently harvesting energy from sunlight and water flow. Carbon 105:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.03010.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.030 ↗
24. Tang Q, Yang P (2016) The era of water-enabled electricity generation from graphene. J Mater Chem A 4(25):9730–9738. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA03107B10.1039/C6TA03107B ↗
25. Zhao F, Liang Y, Cheng HH, Jiang L, Qu LT (2016) Highly efficient moisture-enabled electricity generation from graphene oxide frameworks. Energy Environ Sci 9(3):912–916. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee03701h10.1039/c5ee03701h ↗
26. Liang Y, Zhao F, Cheng ZH, Deng YX, Xiao YK, Cheng HH, Zhang PP (2018) Huang YX et al Electric power generation via asymmetric moisturizing of graphene oxide for flexible, printable and portable electronics. Energy Environ Sci 11(7):1730–1735. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE00671G10.1039/C8EE00671G ↗
27. Xu T, Ding XT, Shao CX, Song L, Lin TY, Gao X, Xue JL, Zhang ZP et al (2018) Electric power generation through the direct interaction of Pristine Graphene-Oxide with water molecules. Small 1704473:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20170447310.1002/smll.201704473 ↗
28. Zhao F, Cheng HH, Zhang ZP, Jiang L, Qu LT (2015) Direct power generation from a graphene oxide film under moisture. Adv Mater 27(29):4351–4357. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150186710.1002/adma.201501867 ↗
29. Huang YX, Cheng HH, Shi GQ, Qu LT (2017) Highly efficient moisture-triggered nanogenerator based on graphene quantum dots. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(44):38170–38175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1254210.1021/acsami.7b12542 ↗
30. Liu K, Yang PH, Li S, Li J, Ding TP, Xue GB, Chen Q, Zhou J et al (2016) Induced potential in porous carbon films through water vapor absorption. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(28):8003–8007. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160270810.1002/anie.201602708 ↗
31. Liu K, Ding TP, Li J, Chen Q, Xue GB, Yang PH, Xu M, Wang ZL et al (2018) Thermal–electric nanogenerator based on the electrokinetic effect in porous carbon film. Adv Energy Mater 8(13):1702481. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170248110.1002/aenm.201702481 ↗
32. Xue GB, Xu Y, Ding TP, Li J, Yin J, Fei WW, Cao YZ, Yu J et al (2017) Water-evaporation-induced electricity with nanostructured carbon materials. Nat Nanotechnol 12(4):317–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.30010.1038/nnano.2016.300 ↗
33. Ding TP, Liu K, Li J, Xue GB, Chen Q, Huang L, Hu B, Zhou J (2017) All-printed porous carbon film for electricity generation from evaporation-driven water flow. Adv Funct Mater 1700551:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170055110.1002/adfm.201700551 ↗
34. Li J, Liu K, Xue GB, Ding TP, Yang PH, Chen Q, Shen Y, Li S et al (2018) Electricity generation from water droplets via capillary infiltrating. Nano Energy 48:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.06110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.061 ↗
35. Li J, Liu K, Ding T, Ding TP, Yang PH, Duan JJ, Zhou J (2019) Surface functional modification boosts the output of an evaporation-driven water flow nanogenerator. Nano Energy 58:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.011 ↗
36. Chen CJ, Kuang YD, Zhu SZ, Ingo B, Tobias K, Amy LT, Lars B et al (2020) Structure–property–function relationships of natural and engineered wood. Nat Rev Mater 2020(5):642–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0195-z10.1038/s41578-020-0195-z ↗
37. Wang Y, Lin XJ, Liu T, Chen H, Jiang ZJ, Liu J, Huang JL, Liu ML (2018) Wood-derived hierarchically porous electrodes for high-performance all-solid-state supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater 28(52):1806207. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180620710.1002/adfm.201806207 ↗
38. Xia CL, Kang CW, Mumukshu DP, Cai LP, Bharat G, Rajarshi B, Sheldon QS, Choi WB (2016) Pine wood extracted activated carbon through self-activation process for high-performance Lithium-ion battery. ChemistrySelect 1(13):4000–4007. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20160092610.1002/slct.201600926 ↗
39. Li YJ, Kun KF, Chen CJ, Luo W, Gao TT, Xu SM, Dai JQ, Glenn P, Wang YB et al (2017) Enabling high-areal-capacity lithium-sulfur batteries: designing anisotropic and low-tortuosity porous architectures. ACS Nano 11(5):4801–4807. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b0117210.1021/acsnano.7b01172 ↗
40. Zhu MW, Li YJ, Chen G, Jiang F, Yang Z, Luo XG, Wang YB, Steven DL et al (2017) Tree-inspired design for high-efficiency water extraction. Adv Mater 29(44):1704107. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170410710.1002/adma.201704107 ↗
41. Xue GB, Liu K, Chen Q, Yang PH, Li J, Ding TP, Duan JJ, Qi B et al (2017) Robust and low-cost flame-treated wood for high-performance solar steam generation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(17):15052–15057. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0199210.1021/acsami.7b01992 ↗
42. Kuang YD, Chen CJ, He SM, Emily MH, Wang Y, Gan WT, Mi RY, Hu LB (2019) A high-performance self-regenerating solar evaporator for continuous water desalination. Adv Mater 31(23):e1900498. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190049810.1002/adma.201900498 ↗
43. Ishimaru K, Hata T, Bronsveld P, Meier D, Imamura J (2007) Spectroscopic analysis of carbonization behavior of wood, cellulose and lignin. J Mater Sci 42(1):122–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1042-310.1007/s10853-006-1042-3 ↗
44. Yu J, Zhang MC, Shen Y, Fan WD, Zhou YG (2002) Thermogravimetric analysis of pyrolysis characteristics of biomass. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Chin Ed) 50(6):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1137/12088941110.1137/120889411 ↗
45. Hao YF, Wang YY, Wang L, Ni ZH, Wang ZQ, Wang R, Shen ZX, Coo CK et al (2010) Probing layer number and stacking order of few-layer graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Small 6(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20090117310.1002/smll.200901173 ↗
46. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D et al (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97(18):187401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401 ↗
47. Bokobza L, Bruneel JL, Couzi M (2015) Raman spectra of carbon-based materials (from Graphite to Carbon Black) and of some silicone composites. Carbon 1(1):77–94. https://doi.org/10.3390/c101007710.3390/c1010077 ↗
48. Labbé N, Harper D, Rials T, Elder T (2006) Chemical structure of wood charcoal by infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. J Agric Food Chem 54:3492–3497. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf053062n10.1021/jf053062n ↗
49. Lin HZ, Wang SR, Zhang L, Ru B, Zhou JS, Luo ZY (2017) Structural evolution of chars from biomass components pyrolysis in a xenon lamp radiation reactor. Chin J Chem Eng 25(2):232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.08.00210.1016/j.cjche.2016.08.002 ↗
50. Liu YY, Ma SP, Chen JW (2018) A novel pyro-hydrochar via sequential carbonization of biomass waste: preparation, characterization and adsorption capacity. J Clean Prod 176:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.09010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.090 ↗
51. Kwan YCG, Ng GM, Huan CHA (2015) Identification of functional groups and determination of carboxyl formation temperature in graphene oxide using the XPS O 1s spectrum. Thin Solid Films 590:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.05110.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.051 ↗