The spectrum of atomic excess free volume in grain boundaries
Source abstract
Abstract
The grain boundary (GB) excess volume is an important structural factor that is strongly correlated with various thermodynamic and kinetic properties of GBs such as GB energy, GB mobility, GB diffusivity, and GB segregation energy, etc. However, the excess volume is usually reported as an average value of the entire GB. Such simplification does not consider the spectral nature of the excess volume in a GB, which cannot be used to describe the atomic mechanisms of some kinetic process, such as GB migration, that involves only a few atoms at a time. Here, we explore the spectrum of atomic excess volume in representative nanocrystalline Ni and Al samples as well as 388 Ni bicrystals based on the Olmsted dataset by using atomistic simulations. It is found that the nanocrystalline Ni and Al models show a skew-normal distribution in the spectrum of both the atomic excess volume and the atomic excess energy in the GBs, which show a weak inverse correlation between them. This is in stark contrast to the widely reported positive correlation between GB energy and excess volume based on the average value. We further show based on the statistical analysis that the correlation between the atomic excess volume and excess energy strongly depends on the GB type and a universal trend between them does not exist. While low ∑ Ni GBs generally shows a strong inverse linear correlation between these two properties, such correlation is weak for high ∑ Ni GBs. Moreover, we find that the spectrum of the excess volume shows characteristics distribution in some special Ni GBs. For example, twist GBs generally show a symmetrical unimodal distribution while most surveyed ∑3 Ni GBs with anti-thermal behavior show an apparent bimodal distribution. Nevertheless, a strong correlation is found between the atomic excess volume and the segregation energy based on the nanocrystalline Al model with Mg impurity, which implies a possible universal trend between the two properties. The current study thus shows that the excess volume provides useful insights in revealing the elemental structure–property correlations in GBs, which may be used as a structural variable in future thermodynamic modeling of GBs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Turnbull D, Cohen MH (1961) Free-volume model of the amorphous phase: glass transition. J Chem Phys 34(1):120–12510.1063/1.1731549 ↗
2. Van den Beukel A, Sietsma J (1990) The glass transition as a free volume-related kinetic phenomenon. Acta Metall Mater 38(3):383–38910.1016/0956-7151(90)90142-4 ↗
3. Betekhtin VI, Kadomtsev AG, Kipyatkova AY, Glezer AM (1998) Excess free volume and mechanical properties of amorphous alloys. Phys Solid State 40(1):74–7810.1134/1.1130237 ↗
4. Li L, Homer ER, Schuh CA (2013) Shear transformation zone dynamics model for metallic glasses incorporating free volume as a state variable. Acta Mater 61(9):3347–335910.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.024 ↗
5. Gleiter H (1992) Diffusion in nanostructured metals. PhysicaStatusSolidi (b) 172(1):41–51
6. Liontas R, Jafary-Zadeh M, Zeng Q, Zhang YW, Mao WL, Greer JR (2016) Substantial tensile ductility in sputtered Zr-Ni-Al nano-sized metallic glass. Acta Mater 118:270–28510.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.050 ↗
7. Shete MK, Singh I, Narasimhan R, Ramamurty U (2016) Effect of strain hardening and volume fraction of crystalline phase on strength and ductility of bulk metallic glass composites. Scripta Mater 124:51–5510.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.020 ↗
8. Ningaraju S, Prakash AG, Ravikumar HB (2018) Studies on free volume controlled electrical properties of PVA/NiO and PVA/TiO2 polymer nanocomposites. Solid State Ionics 320:132–14710.1016/j.ssi.2018.03.006 ↗
9. Tang C, Peng H, Chen Y, Ferry M (2016) Formation and dilatation of shear bands in a Cu-Zr metallic glass: a free volume perspective. J Appl Phys 120(23):23510110.1063/1.4972189 ↗
10. Tian Y, Jiao W, Liu P, Song S, Lu Z, Hirata A, Chen M (2019) Fast coalescence of metallic glass nanoparticles. Nat Commun 10(1):1–810.1038/s41467-019-13054-z ↗
11. Cohen MH, Grest GS (1979) Liquid-glass transition, a free-volume approach. Phys Rev B 20(3):107710.1103/PhysRevB.20.1077 ↗
12. Nantasetphong W, Amirkhizi AV, Nemat-Nasser S (2016) Constitutive modeling and experimental calibration of pressure effect for polyurea based on free volume concept. Polymer 99:771–78110.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.071 ↗
13. Cheng J, Ghosh S (2013) Computational modeling of plastic deformation and shear banding in bulk metallic glasses. Comput Mater Sci 69:494–50410.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.014 ↗
14. Victor JG, Torkelson JM (1987) On measuring the distribution of local free volume in glassy polymers by photochromic and fluorescence techniques. Macromolecules 20(9):2241–225010.1021/ma00175a032 ↗
15. Yavari AR, Le Moulec A, Inoue A, Nishiyama N, Lupu N, Matsubara E, Kvick Å (2005) Excess free volume in metallic glasses measured by X-ray diffraction. Acta Mater 53(6):1611–161910.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.011 ↗
16. Merkle KL, Csencsits R, Rynes KL, Withrow JP, Stadelmann PA (1998) The effect of three-fold astigmatism on measurements of grain boundary volume expansion by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. J Microsc 190(1–2):204–21310.1046/j.1365-2818.1998.2890841.x ↗
17. Würschum R, Oberdorfer B, Steyskal EM, Sprengel W, Puff W, Pikart P, Pippan R (2012) Free volumes in bulk nano-crystalline metals studied by the complementary techniques of positron annihilation and dilatometry. Phys B 407(14):2670–267510.1016/j.physb.2012.01.090 ↗
18. Barr CM, El-Atwani O, Kaoumi D, Hattar K (2019) Interplay between grain boundaries and radiation damage. JOM 71(4):1233–124410.1007/s11837-019-03386-y ↗
19. Sursaeva VG, Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS (2016) Grain growth in thin nano-crystalline silver films. Scripta Mater 116:91–9410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.021 ↗
20. Shvindlerman LS, Gottstein G, Ivanov VA, Molodov DA, Kolesnikov D, Łojkowski W (2006) Grain boundary excess free volume—direct thermodynamic measurement. J Mater Sci 41(23):7725–772910.1007/s10853-006-0563-0 ↗
21. Aaron HB, Bolling GF (1972) Free volume as a criterion for grain boundary models. Surf Sci 31:27–4910.1016/0039-6028(72)90252-X ↗
22. Aaron HB, Bolling GF (1972) Free volume as a guide to grain boundary phenomena. Scr Metall 6:553–56210.1016/0036-9748(72)90089-0 ↗
23. Cao F, Jiang Y, Hu T, Yin D (2018) Correlation of grain boundary extra free volume with vacancy and solute segregation at grain boundaries: a case study for Al. Phil Mag 98(6):464–48310.1080/14786435.2017.1408968 ↗
24. Uesugi T, Higashi K (2011) First-principles calculation of grain boundary energy and grain boundary excess free volume in aluminum: role of grain boundary elastic energy. J Mater Sci 46(12):4199–420510.1007/s10853-011-5305-2 ↗
25. Sun H, Singh CV (2020) Temperature dependence of grain boundary excess free volume. Scripta Mater 178:71–7610.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.046 ↗
26. Vetterick GA, Gruber J, Suri PK, Baldwin JK, Kirk MA, Baldo P, Taheri ML (2017) Achieving radiation tolerance through non-equilibrium grain boundary structures. Sci Rep 7(1):1–910.1038/s41598-017-12407-2 ↗
27. Wagih M, Schuh CA (2019) Spectrum of grain boundary segregation energies in a polycrystal. Acta Mater 181:228–23710.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.034 ↗
28. Wang Y, Li M, Xu J (2017) Free volume gradient effect on mechanical properties of metallic glasses. Scripta Mater 130:12–1610.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.003 ↗
29. Rajabzadeh A, Mompiou F, Legros M, Combe N (2013) Elementary mechanisms of shear-coupled grain boundary migration. Phys Rev Lett 110(26):26550710.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265507 ↗
30. Olmsted DL, Foiles SM, Holm EA (2009) Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: i. Grain boundary energy Acta Materialia 57(13):3694–370310.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
31. Olmsted DL, Holm EA, Foiles SM (2009) Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals—II: Grain boundary mobility. Acta Mater 57(13):3704–371310.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
32. Sutton, A. P., Balluffi, R. W., & Sutton, A. P. (1995). Interfaces in Crystalline Materials.
33. Plimpton S (1995) Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
34. Daw MS, Foiles SM, Baskes MI (1993) The embedded-atom method: a review of theory and applications. Mater Sci Rep 9(7–8):251–31010.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U ↗
35. Foiles SM, Hoyt JJ (2006) Computation of grain boundary stiffness and mobility from boundary fluctuations. Acta Mater 54(12):3351–335710.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.037 ↗
36. Zimmerman JA, Gao H, Abraham FF (2000) Generalized stacking fault energies for embedded atom FCC metals. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 8(2):10310.1088/0965-0393/8/2/302 ↗
37. Larsen PM, Schmidt S, Schiøtz J (2016) Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 24(5):05500710.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055007 ↗
38. Stukowski A (2009) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18(1):01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
39. Mendelev MI, Asta M, Rahman MJ, Hoyt JJ (2009) Development of interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of solid–liquid interface properties in Al–Mg alloys. Phil Mag 89(34–36):3269–328510.1080/14786430903260727 ↗
40. Huber L, Grabowski B, Militzer M, Neugebauer J, Rottler J (2017) Ab initio modelling of solute segregation energies to a general grain boundary. Acta Mater 132:138–14810.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.024 ↗
41. Gottstein G, Molodov DA, Shvindlerman LS (1998) Grain boundary migration in metals: recent developments. Interface Sci 6(1–2):7–2210.1023/A:1008641617937 ↗
42. Yu T, Yang S, Deng C (2019) Survey of grain boundary migration and thermal behavior in Ni at low homologous temperatures. Acta Mater 177:151–15910.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.034 ↗
43. Homer ER, Holm EA, Foiles SM, Olmsted DL (2014) Trends in grain boundary mobility: survey of motion mechanisms. JOM 66(1):114–12010.1007/s11837-013-0801-2 ↗
44. Bair JL, Homer ER (2019) Antithermal mobility in Σ7 and Σ9 grain boundaries caused by stick-slip stagnation of ordered atomic motions about coincidence site Lattice atoms. Acta Mater 162:10–1810.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.033 ↗
45. Kumar A, Wang J, Tomé CN (2015) First-principles study of energy and atomic solubility of twinning-associated boundaries in hexagonal metals. Acta Mater 85:144–15410.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.015 ↗
46. Rosenbrock CW, Homer ER, Csányi G, Hart GL (2017) Discovering the building blocks of atomic systems using machine learning: application to grain boundaries. NPJ Comput Mater 3(1):1–710.1038/s41524-017-0027-x ↗
47. Zhang Y, Ling C (2018) A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science. NPJ Comput Mater 4(1):1–810.1038/s41524-018-0081-z ↗
48. Wagih M, Larsen PM, Schuh CA (2020) Learning grain boundary segregation energy spectra in polycrystals. Nat Commun 11(1):1–910.1038/s41467-020-20083-6 ↗
49. Medlin DL, Hattar K, Zimmerman JA, Abdeljawad F, Foiles SM (2017) Defect character at grain boundary facet junctions: analysis of an asymmetric Σ= 5 grain boundary in Fe. Acta Mater 124:383–39610.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.017 ↗
50. Gupta A, Zhou X, Thompson GB, Tucker GJ (2020) Role of grain boundary character and its evolution on interfacial solute segregation behavior in nanocrystalline Ni-P. Acta Mater 190:113–12310.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.012 ↗